Pinkbike Poll

Jan 17, 2014 at 15:25
by Richard Cunningham  
RC4 2014 multi image

Most Pinkbike members ride dual-suspension bikes, so it stands to reason that the majority of us are capable of tuning our own suspension. Talking to top suspension technicians, however, about the people who they encounter at major events that are in need of advice or a quick tune, would lead one to assume that the majority of riders are ill informed about the steps required to properly set up their shock and fork. While those may seem like fightin' words, a day spent watching riders pass by a chunky section of turns and a couple of jumps at Whistler would lend credibility to their statements.

To this end, suspension makers constantly wrestle with the concept of how many adjustments and what the range of those adjustments should be included when they design a production fork or shock. Bike makers work closely with suspension companies to perfect the suspension tunes for each model, but that won't guarantee that the bikes will perform well if the end user, armed with a shock pump and a can-do attitude can twist all the knobs and create rolling barf.

Suspension makers and bike designers know that a lot of riders exist who know how to tune a suspension, and who can utilize all of the pro tuning features that bristle from their upper-level forks and shocks, but in secret meetings, they dream about the day when suspension components will require minimal tuning by customers and yet deliver the outstanding performance that they can only promise in potential now. Should suspension makers cater to the illuminated minority and stuff their shocks and forks with adjustable features, or should they embrace the common man and sell a best-case-for-this-application component with minimal tuning options? It really depends upon the customer's ability and willingness to learn.

So, how well can you tune your own suspension? A good assessment of your skills may be the number of your riding friends who ask your assistance in setting up their bikes. You be your own judge, though. Rate your abilities in this outstanding Pinkbike Poll.




Do you know how to set up your suspension?






Author Info:
RichardCunningham avatar

Member since Mar 23, 2011
974 articles
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

182 Comments
  • 101 9
 Mostly everyone runs their fork too soft. There I said it. Now go up the spring rate/psi in your fork and thank me later.
  • 11 0
 Everybody tells me I run my suspension to stiff. Guess it's because there's a +40 lbs difference in weight tho (205lbs)... Smile )
  • 103 14
 If you're running a fox air fork, it's probably too soft because you want full travel. But you find yourself running at 30% sag and still cant get the last 15-20% of the travel. Ditch that fork and get something that gets full travel. There I said it. Go buy a Pike and thank me later
  • 7 4
 Finally someone who agrees! If you set a fork or shock too soft it often feels harder because you aren't getting the progressiveness out of it. I see the attraction in soft suspension but I also heard it's bad for your back when it is set too soft.
  • 25 0
 I wouldn't say everyone, but I think it is a common mistake, one I'm guilty of in the past when I started riding and I think it a lot to do with parking lot testing. When people make adjustments to their fork its often not on the side of the trail, so what so we do immediately after? We get on the bike and pedal around the parking lot/driveway and start engaging the suspension, bouncing around on the bike etc to see how it feels. Only problem is that the bike reacts nothing like that when it's actually out in the trail. No matter how hard you bounce up and down going 5 mph in the parking lot, you like aren't going to be able to exert the same forces the fork sees at speed on the trail. I've realized, that for me anyway, the proper spring rate on the trail feels like total shit during a parking lot test. It's always going to feel to harsh.
  • 23 1
 Set your sag properly and then use compression to keep your fork from diving under braking.
  • 12 34
flag thekayo (Jan 17, 2014 at 16:53) (Below Threshold)
 imo on a downhill bike you should be using just about 7 - 7.5 inches of travel each bike park lap !! if you got an 8 inch fork
  • 5 3
 Hm, Dr. Sanchez. Running a soft fork with the minimum amount of damping for the given track. Wonderful. Dial in a supersoft rearsuspension with minimum of damping and adjust riding position to help them work together. Perfect no pop setting and grip is amazing. Back off from this setting and pop is back. I get more and faster riding with a supercomfortable setup. I think hard setups might be fine for a quick competition run and top athletes. For the rest of us its soft, superlongtravel big bikes for a long day of fun. As such oildamper lsc, bottomout and easy to change spring in the rear are fine. Upfront airvalve, helper spring and lsc for tuning are fine.
  • 2 1
 Agreed. 30% sag? In my opinion not up front, maybe at the back. My old 888 used to feel best running maybe 10% sag when sat on my seat on flat ground and with plenty of LSC. Just got myself a set of boxxer r2c2s. Not tried them out yet, but looking forward fiddling about with the settings and finding out how they like to run compared to the 888s. Not expecting to be running 30% sag by the time im done setting them up tho...
  • 2 5
 I run 20% sag , which in my 100mm fork is a about 90%psi (yeah, I'm skinny), then I feel up the compression to 10% less than the sag, for softer ride. For fast track with less roots and rock gardens, I run the same psi amount on compression and sag. Seems to work for me. I obviously got dual air, rock shod SID xx by the way, and I'm all XC and trail. My trail bike runs on a #rockshox recon solo air, and I also run it with about 20% sag. On the rear shock of my trail bike I run 20% sag, and play with rebound depending the trail..
  • 1 0
 30% sag sounds fine. Depends on how the suspension hardware layout supports ramp up or not. There seems to be a sweetspot on many frames.
  • 10 6
 I think the best thing anyone can learn about their suspension is how the compression settings work. they don't work like most people assume, they add resistance to the initial force not entire force. This is why you can up HSC heaps and end up with a harsh fork that still blows through travel.

The HSC is making it resistant to the initial part (so having too much is making it harsh) however once you take this hit the shim stack is opened and then the suspension blows through its travel because the shim stack is no stiffer.
Compression dials ultimately change the thresholds of the fork, the real stiffening and support adjustments are all in the shim stack.

Ideally the best thing you can learn is how to tune a shim stack.
  • 3 1
 So true what "bookem 13" said about setting your sag and THEN adjusting with valving. Riders shouldn't be running overly stiff springs to compensate for stock valving. It might feel good cuz you're not bottoming, but you jeopardize your geometry and lose that vital negative travel. 2/3(66%) of a trophy truck's 24-36 inches of suspension is compressed when it's sitting still cuz it needs all that negative travel.

It's not as if being a more "hardcore" rider means that you can magically only run a "hardcore" small amount of sag. If riders are fast, then that negative travel is that much more important. Find the correct spring/sag, and get the damn shock/fork's stock "everyman's" valving tuned if it feels too soft.

Riding Rampage and guys who only huck is a different story...
  • 11 0
 Well let's just put it this way: MX and off road racers stiffen up their suspension the faster they go. That's true across the board. It doesn't boil down to personal preference or 'feel' but instead out of necessity. A stiffer fork means you have to go faster to make it work properly. Steep track = stiff fork. If you are running mid stroke you are allowing the front wheel to get swallowed up into every little hole. If you run it stiffer it will be more likely to ride higher in the travel and over the top of the ruts. It also allows you to ride in the attack position on steep terrain with a less chance of fork dive. This all equals speed.

I'm not saying its comfortable. In fact it can feel gross at slower speeds. But if you want to get to point A to point B the fastest, you have to stiffen up your fork.

...and always go stiffer on your spring rate first, compression damping second. This allows your fork to ramp up faster and feel supple off the start, which is what you want. If you ride into your travel too deep, it will feel over damped. This old news in the MX world, the same applies to DH mtb.
  • 4 35
flag SithBike (Jan 17, 2014 at 18:54) (Below Threshold)
 There was no option for me on the poll. I know how to set up a suspension. But I always max out my suspension air pressure to have minimum sag. It drives the LBS mechanics crazy. Does anybody else hate sag and have this personal preference?
  • 21 0
 You need sag. if you have no sag you have no negative travel for the suspension to fall into holes and track the terrain, you would be drastically reducing your traction potential.
  • 6 0
 Sag is all apart of a well set up bike. You can still run stiff suspension with proper sag. Sag is probably the most important part of your bike's suspension.
  • 4 20
flag SithBike (Jan 17, 2014 at 19:06) (Below Threshold)
 I have used standard proper sag setup many times. Even tried to force myself to like it. It's great for tricky climbs and yes I get more traction going down. But it feels like I have more suspension for the larger drops with my air pressure maxed out. That is why I do it.
  • 2 0
 Sounds like your issue is compression. if that doesn't help you might need a more progressive tune.
  • 3 2
 Please elaborate @DrSanchez? How can you run stiff suspension with proper sag? I guess I don't know much about suspension. All I know is air pressure, damping and rebound on the open setting.
  • 1 1
 Ill let sanchez go into details. but in short. compression and internal shim stack adjustments for the dampening. Sag is about getting you sprung right and having the right spring to support your weight, the dampening is for stiffening or softening the fork.
  • 4 0
 Faster riders run stiffer suspension to maintain geometry and to keep the bike neutral. You don't want the fork diving, changing your body position over the front. Also, you don't want to have the rear getting hung up on rocks from being too soft. HSC is for the bigger hits, while LSC is for the small bump compliance and pedalling. This is why I'm not a huge fan of ctd or others that give a similar end result. More novice riders use softer suspension for traction, where pro level riders don't depend on soft suspension for traction.
  • 13 3
 The "If you're not using full travel you're carrying around useless weight" people need to crawl into a hole and stop bothering riders who just want to enjoy their bikes. If an off-the-shelf suspension is sprung correctly, sags correctly, maintains good geo and good traction, resists dive, is supple over small bumps, ramps appropiately, saves your ass on bigger hits, and all around lets you rip, and then you see that your o-ring is 10-20% from the dust wiper--you still have a fine suspension!!!! That last cm or two is for the unexpected drop to flat, or for when you hit something enormous. WTF makes you think that despite pros and other worthies going twice as fast, twice as big, and weighing about as much, that you should be bottoming out? Do you think they run 0% sag and ultra stiff springs? No. Super fast riders still set reasonable sag (though it may be less than you set). Small changes in custom damping aside, you have the same fork/shock, because you wanted to have the biggest/greatest. They get to occasionally bottom out. Maybe you don't. No big deal. People hear this full-travel nonsense and make spring rate and damping changes that affect every minute of their ride, so that they can get the effect they want on one single trail feature. Madness.
  • 4 0
 Madness also is expecting a stock, mass-market suspension item w/ only spring rate adjustment to meet your needs for your individual 1) weight 2) speed/style 3) biggest impact on your local loop. Sag point and bottom out happen at two very different places on the curve, and yet your single spring rate helps determine both. Thank goodness for the growing availabilty/ease of air volume adjusters.
  • 2 0
 dbaser/DSdave

In general HSC and LSC refer to speeds of the shaft so beginning or ending stroke shouldn't matter as that link pointed out.
So you go outside and push down on the fork and it compresses half way or more, this is still a low speed compression but clearly a big one if your using more than half travel.

However some dampers are position sensitive in where one circuit is only open once travel reaches a certain point or oil forces reach a certain point. And others are speed sensitive, So there is some variance between those that use position or speed sensitive dampers.

I wouldn't suggest you view tuning as HSC=big hits and LSC=small hits its not exactly accurate.
  • 2 1
 this is just me,but i sets my bike up R.C. style,your wheels are made to roll,and every rider is not the same,so some guy like it stiff witch means more of your body has to be the travel,and you got guys that set it right R.C. car style and the bike does the work.so it comes down to you the rider all the travel company's given the bells and nobs,read the manual.I Start back in the day 2in's in front 0 in the back,so i reck a men you go ridge learn what the bike does then put travel on and learn to ride a bike.o and learn how to use your brakes you makeing to many holes on my course,i'm sorry did mean to write that but brakeing go's hand in hand with travel.
  • 4 0
 Struggled to get Forks to work as I wanted them to. Bought Pikes and they're supple at the top, don't ride mid-travel on the trails and use all the travel but still feel bottomless. Boom!
  • 2 0
 I run a lot of sag, but much of my weight over the rear. As a result my wrists have never been sore after a ride, and my bike feels plush, yet responsive.
  • 2 0
 Slidways- My explanation is exactly what a suspension manufacture will tell you. This is the easiest way of dumbing it down for the masses. I could care less what people say. Every time I have gotten into suspension tuning conversations on forums, inexperienced engineer types want to argue. We're talking to a large group of people that aren't all engineering geeks. You are correct when you are talking shaft speed, however the bigger the impact, the faster shaft speed you have from simple physics. Most people will need low speed compression for pedalling. When one is traveling at speed, going over small bumps, the low speed compression is handling the first part of the travel because the shaft speed is increased as the compression builds, again simple physics. What we haven't gone into is rebound. Now none of this tends to help without proper spring rate. This is another reason faster riders do not like ctd. It's impossible to keep the fork from diving without both LSC, and HSC. Not enough compression valving is built in to these. We end up putting in volume reducers to combat this. I don't know it all, but I do have years of experience setting up suspension for pro racers. Any good suspension tech for a race team will tell you the same. Each to their own. Keep it pinned. Try setting up a fork with proper s
  • 3 0
 Sorry about the rant, but I have to add something else. I think what people are referring to is what some people tend to think when they here the first simple explanation to suspension tuning. Some people think, "well if that's the case, I want all the small bump compliance I can get, yet not bottom out easily, so I'll run almost no LSC and crank the HSC all the way up." The suspension dives too much when running no LSC and tends to hurt them rather than help them. I am not suggesting that at all. Sorry if I come off as harsh, I certainly don't mean to.
  • 2 0
 I think that one thing that sorely needs mentioning, and so far has not been, is that almost all suspension "knowledge" bandied about on forums is based on the general combined wisdom of many years of experience in motorsport. Unfortunately MTB's are very very different from any motorized vehicle, in that on an MTB at least 70/80% of the weight is contained within the rider, who generally moves around a lot, and has their own built in suspension in the form of arms and legs. An MX bike is about the closest likeness to an MTB as the rider can shift their weight around and use their arms and legs, but even so, the bike probably weighs close to the weight of the rider. In cars/trucks, the driver makes up about 1% of the total weight, and can not shift their weight around. This means the suspension is doing a very very different job. not got time to go into what effect this has, just putting it out there....
  • 2 0
 ^ the exact same thing you are describing about MX bikes applies to mountain bikes, just on a smaller scale. Suspension is suspension is suspension. Its all got the same basic principles in how they are supposed to work. You go bigger and faster, you need stiffer suspension. This is not rocket surgery! Wink
  • 4 1
 In conclusion, just like in Photoshop, everybody's got their own way to achieve the same goal..
  • 1 0
 DS dave thats the problem and why i was sort of leaning away from the whole big vs small thing. Because people will then tune the suspension wrong, people hear small bumps and say oh well ill run no LSC.
I actually originally mentioned the link between big bumps and the speed but opted to delete it for the fear of getting to detailed lol. In general yes there is obviously a link between the bigger the bump the more force but I think its inaccurate to explain it like that, more accurate would be big force and little force.
You can have a big force initiated over a slow velocity.

I think with big bump/little bump its easier for people to get the set up and understand it incorrectly.

if you want to keep discussion im happy to, maybe PM would be easier though.
  • 1 0
 So i usually run just a few clicks of hsc, a soft fork, and enough lsc to prevent diving.
I am actually still trying to get a feel for hsc. It is hard since you have to test it out on the trail to get a feel for it.
I learned to set rebound from Zinn: go off a bump and if you bounce up and down slow it down a little at a time til you don't then o might adjust a click or two depending on the trail: slower for smooth with big jumps, faster for chunder or extra roots.
Anyone have any recommendations, or am i doing it right?
  • 1 0
 finally some people on pinkbike that know what they are talking about with suspension..... I usually break out the pop corn and troll the desk engineers.
  • 1 0
 Btw anyone know where i can get the cold weather elastimer air spring kit for the boxxer world cup? my fork feels too stiff when its cold....
  • 2 0
 Not totally familiar with the wc but doesn't the elastimer just effect the bottom out resistance? it should only really be felt during the last 20% of travel. unless it has a different function than it does in the team....
  • 2 1
 immacaroni

Again not fully familiar with the wc but think changing to a softer elastomer isn't going to help you. If you are riding in super cold conditions, then you need to drop the weight of the oil in the damper, as it is most likely running thick due to the cold. However the oil warms up pretty quickly when pushed hard, so you will have to ask yourself "is my fork still feeling too hard at the end of a run, or only in the car park at the beginning of the day?" If its only in the car park, i suggest you just bounce around like a loon on your bike for a good 5 minutes before starting any real riding. If it stays slow all day "(for example, if you live somewhere like alaska), then swap to lighter oil.
  • 2 1
 Its not so much lighter oil but the oil viscosity you need to look at, some oils can be listed at different weights but have the same viscosity. Also keep in mind oil viscosity only effects LSC once the shim stack is opened in a HSC the oil thickness has little effect on the dampening.

I can provide a link is someone doesnt beleive that last point Smile
  • 2 0
 Oil can be listed at different weights but have the same viscosity. Yes, if they are mislabeled....in general they are supposed to mean the same thing. It is however sadly true that two different bottles from different brands both labeled 7.5w can have very different viscosities at the same temp. Although mislabeling is a big issue, generally if you run 7.5w of a certain brand, switching to 5w of the same brand will mean your suspension runs faster when at the same settings/temp.

I would like to see the link about oil visc. having little effect on hsc circuits. Yes heavier oil will force the shim stack to open further, meaning the damping will be less affected than a lsc circuit with fixed sized ports, but i doubt the effect would be so linear as to mean changing the oil visc. has no effect whatsoever on damping. Sounds like an interesting read tho, and I am more than ready to be wrong...
  • 1 0
 www.shimrestackor.com/Code/Sample_Applications/Damping_Profile/Oil_Viscosity/oil-viscosity.htm

As you can see on the graph on the right oil weights only effect low speed velocity (LSC) you can read the desription below the graphs to understand why.

Smile
  • 1 0
 That is a very interesting read thankyou!
However I still don't think it is as clear cut as "oil viscosity only affects lsc circuits". In the link you posted they are ONLY talking about high speed circuits, so when they say "low speed" they mean "at tthe bottom end of the range of the high speed valving".
It seems that what they are trying to explain is that as the speeds increase, the effect of viscosity diminishes, so during super mega high speed impacts, the damping will be very similar for two different oil weights, but as the speeds decrease, the affect of viscosity becomes more and more prominant. It is undoubtably true that if you want to make drastic changes to your HSC the only way to do so is to change the shim stack. No amount of knob twiddling or oil weight fiddling is going to fix a shim stack that isn't right for your weight. This doesn't mean you can't use dials and oil weight to fine tune the feel, after getting the correct shim stack fitted.

Also...that link is going in my bookmarks. Thank you again!
  • 1 0
 Im curious why do you think it is only talking about HSC circuits? cant see anything that would indicate that.
It refers to both Low speed and high speed velocities and the effect of the shim stack, LSC forces only slightly opens the shim stack which the link also mimics that statement, when you have a highspeed hit the shim stack opens much more and therefore oil viscosity is much less and issue. Essentially the more the shim stack is opened the less the oil has an effect. Its quite apparent though in that graph that at a certain point each oil starts to level off which would indicate a wide open shim stack. Once the shim stack is open the oil will have only minor effects as you can see from the graph at about 40inchs/sec the graph drastically tappers off.

For downhill forks this point would be where the HSC stack is essentially activated and opened.

You will notice a minimal effect yes but using oil to change the HSC is not very effective mostly because any change you make to the oil will dramatically effect LSC and only minimal effect HSC.Oil is really a LSC adjustment

Now that said im not too sure when you would adjust LSC with oil or the base shim.....
  • 1 0
 Oh and yeah its a good site the information is accurate too. They have a good page on shim stacks too and configuration its really good, that site alone with some very very good suspension tech heads completely changed how I look at suspension, not only is it much easier than it appears but those external adjusters don't really do what most people think. Im now able to completely tune my suspension to how i want it without compromise Smile
  • 1 0
 trolololololololol
  • 1 0
 @slidways youre a fool
  • 3 0
 @immacaroni you're a troll.
  • 1 0
 do i live under a bridge?
  • 3 0
 I see what you mean, the article in the link you posted is a bit vague as to what exactly it is discussing. However it appears to me that they are focussing purely on the effect of oil viscosity on a shim stack (HSC), suggesting they are ignoring all other variables at this point, (eg low speed valving).

The question of whether the shim stack is ever FULLY closed, depends heavily on the individual design of the damper (especially if there is any form of preload on the shim stack, but also due to many other variables.) There is also the question of how much oil the LSC circuit flows during a high speed compression, and the effect of oil viscosity on this flow. Things get extremely complicated from here on in....I think the best thing to take from the link is that oil viscosity has a LARGE effect on LSC and LESS of an effect on HSC.

As far as oil weight being adjusted to solve a prob, this is very relevant to immacaronis original question, as he stated "my forks are stiff when cold" suggesting that the cold is the culprit, and therefore lighter oil will solve his particular problem.

As far as the little fight going on between immacaroni and slidways. I don't think either of you are trolling. Nor have either of you said anything foolish. In fact slidways has made some bloody good points and immacaroni asked a perfectly reasonable question. Calm down lads...
  • 1 0
 Great points there.
It does depends massively on damper design, however most forks still use the shim stack for low speed compressing too most down to the base shim and orifice port size.. But whether there are other methods in the damper will depend on the effect of the oil 100%agree.
For instance I have a boxxer team so it primarily uses a 2stage shim stack so for that fork the article is pretty spot on. The article is right but you need to leave room for other varribles the damper has built in I think we both agree on that one. Yep ill agree oil has a larger effect on LSC and a minor effect in HSC. I wouldn't say it has none.

As for the OP About stiff forks get a good quality oil too something like redline or silkolene.
You want something with a high quality it will help keep the fork more consistent. Fox oils are good too for the lowers but its pricey for such a small amount.
  • 2 0
 Good quality oil? I usually just use non salted butter. Margarine (w/olive oil) in the winter.
  • 4 0
 Lol! A mate of mine once filled his forks with shower gel. The gel reacted with the magnesium lowers, built up some gas inside (hydrogen?) and literally exploded. Blew the back of his lower leg open like a firework in a coke can! I kid you not. Unfortunately his bike was in a shop at the time. Some sort of oily-shower gel-corroded magnesiumy paste went everywhere. damaged about 2k worth of stock. Ooops. Silly boy.
  • 3 0
 Now that is a cool story!
  • 52 0
 I think my problem is I'm not exactly sure what I want from a fork/shock.
  • 5 2
 Ask yourself why you are riding a full suspended bike and you will have half of the answer. And the less your bar move vertically the better the suspensions work.
  • 1 0
 Too many online guides explain what rebound and compression ARE but not necessarily the effects of changing them in different circumstances. Said-guides say 'turn your compression knob 'x' number of turns in and your rebound 'y' number of turns in and (just) go from there!' Like it was that easy.
  • 2 0
 @eatridegrow
I'ts easier to describe what knobs are than how to tune them. Each situation is different so it's verry difficult to explain things.
I'm currently wrinting a "guide" (in french) about suspensions, and the "tunning part" is the most difficult part I write.
I think it's why there is so few comprehensive guides.
  • 1 0
 You want similar things maybe a little faster rebound from you fork than shock. Trying to get the front and rear to do similar things isn't always easy and depends on your riding position as well. I can't get my shitty fork to be as compliant as my rear with out too much brake dive. Need more fork.
  • 2 1
 I am not even going to take the time to read all the comment, I have read enough to see that there are a lot of people that do not under stand how suspension on your bike works. First off your bike and it's suspension components are designed to work when set within a specified sag range, going outside that you start to sacrifice the performance of your suspension. Next all the spring, be it coil or air, does is set your ride height, sag, and returns the suspension to its proper ride height. That is it nothing more. The part that does all the work is the damping system. Compression resists bottoming, rebound controls the speed that the suspension returns. If you can't get within the specified sag range with more than a few turns of preload on your spring, or you have to slacken it off to the point that you have no preload, your spring rate is not right for your weight. With the sag set right and you are bottoming out all the time, you need more compression, if you don't have compression adjustment thicker oil will also stiffen up your suspension and prevent that. Rebound, if adjustable is even easier. When running higher compression you need more rebound, slower, because the higher compression setting with cause things to return faster. With less compression run less rebound, faster, because your suspension wont be returning as fast. I worked for 10 years as a bike mechanic, and rode every day till injuries took me out of the game, but I helped 1000s of riders fine tune their rides both in the shop and on the trail.
  • 2 0
 pimpedaline - "When running higher compression you need more rebound, slower, because the higher compression setting with cause things to return faster. With less compression run less rebound, faster, because your suspension wont be returning as fast"

I assume, where you have put "compression" you actually mean "preload/spring rate?"
  • 1 1
 No I mean compression damping, changing you preload on a coil does not change the spring rate, it only changes when the spring starts to move. I did forget to mention that on an air spring the more air pressure equals more compression, but it is a poor way to compensate for bad damping settings and a nice way to blow out seals. Coil and air springs have only two jobs, set you ride height and return the suspension to that hieght
  • 1 0
 how will having higher compression damping settings cause things to return faster and require more rebound damping? adding preload or upping the spring rate will cause things to rebound faster...I also never said anything about preload affecting the spring rate.
  • 1 1
 Unless you are using a progressive spring, a springs rate is constant therefore the force/speed it returns stays the same with a constant load. Preload does not change the spring rate only its starting point. The higher compression setting will cause back pressure in the system and act sort of like a helper spring, it is basic physics.

And yes you did mention preload and spring rate.
  • 2 0
 right....

1) I understand the differences between preload and spring rate. I have said nothing to suggest otherwise....

2) A higher compression setting will cause higher back pressure in the system (during the compression stroke). This is true. However seeing as the damping fluid can be viewed as essentially un-compressible, and last time i checked the lowers on my forks didn't blow up like a balloon every time i compressed my forks, this back pressure disappears as soon as the fork stops compressing, as nothing has been elastically stretched/compressed in order to store any energy. It in no way helps the fork to return to its static position. This is simple physics. The only thing that causes the fork to re-extend to its static position is the spring (and any air trapped in the system, but this is beside the point and may as well be ignored during this discussion).

3)I did mention preload and spring rate yes. They were both applicable to the situation. Increasing the spring rate or preload will require an increase in the rebound damping in order to achieve the same rebound speed for a given position in the dampers travel.

I never said that they were the same thing, or in some way interchangeable...
  • 48 5
 I can tell you right now a vast majority of riders only think they can tune their suspension. Only a small number actually know what they're doing.
  • 32 0
 I think I heard somewhere that you have to learn by trying, and sometimes making mistakes. Most people I know understand the basics. it's not rocket science.
  • 2 0
 I agree with you.
  • 4 0
 Going along with what your saying ..not trying to be mean but honestly haha it's amazing how lazy people are in trying to learn/find out how to tune their suspension and set ups.. Like seriously if you wanna learn how to set sag and a company's setting recomendations look it up, I know fox has a whole bunch of stuff on their site that guide you along step by step to set sag and so on.. Once from there a lot of it is simple trail side adjustments to perfect it . People should try and learn . No offense to anyone just saying
  • 1 0
 +1 unless you understand what the settings are doing how can you actually be changing the right one.
  • 6 0
 You're right makeripper, it's not rocket science. It's fluid mechanics Wink
  • 4 1
 Not only do the vast majority not know tuning, theyll argue on and on about suspension setups on here.
  • 40 3
 I know that gold shit in the picture is kashima!
  • 6 1
 Kash money yo
  • 1 0
 haaha that's great,
  • 8 6
 Kashima rules everything around me, K.R.E.A.M!
  • 3 0
 Well it definitely takes your dollar dollar bills yo
  • 1 0
 C.R.E.A.M.
  • 3 2
 i still cant believe no one has complained about all the pics being fox's stuff Wink
  • 3 1
 because fox is boss!!!!!! hehe
  • 15 1
 @cambria1, after you crack open your first fork or piggyback shock, it gives you a lot of confidence about doing it yourself. Don't be afraid to ask questions and watch a lot of vids on how to do it first Smile

I love being able to pull my forks and shocks apart and rebuild them. Cheaper and much more rewarding when you are riding on something you know you can fix because you know how it works.
  • 4 1
 I agree. I learned how to tear down my fork and shock and it is nice to be able to do and it DID give me lot of confidence. Gosh, i spent months reading and rereading how to take apart the Fit damper and Monarch+ figuring out what does and doesn't need to be done. The first attempts didnt always work but never giving up proved that persistence pays off! That, and its money i didnt have, also it would be weeks to get it back and pride/ego that would be lost knowing i had to hand it over to Fox because l couldn't do something that should be common suspension knowledge. I take issue with Fox as they dont want at home mechanics. Want to change a different weight suspension fluids? If you read the Fit manuals, the first timer would think you would need to take apart literally everything to change the fluid, and they still dont really tell you the basic steps to do that! Only after thinking and following Hack Racers method, which btw doesn't work, i had no choice but try and figure out what Fox isnt telling me. Long story short, Fox doesn't believe in the rider who takes his/her suspension seriously and who wants to work or tune his/her stuff. Like they have very few if any replacement parts for dampers or air piston assemblies you can buy off the shelf other then some seals or maybe a knob. To me thats really sh*tty and pretentious.
  • 3 1
 Rock Shox, Marz and Manitou and X Fusion all have the parts ready to buy because they dont think your stupid like Fox does. Karma is kicking fox as these other companies are blowing Fox away in performance. The Charge damper is like the Fit but totally more user friendly and sram put out a video on how to bleed it right away. Is Fox helping out the brothas- no! Look, l cant wait for the day l can buy an Avalanche ssd cartridge for my F36 then i can officially call it an Avalanche 36 instead of Fox Float 36 RLC. It going to be awesome to have an absolutely perfect, user friendly damper thats high end with sweet customer service. Fox charges enough if not the most (Dvo does but they rock!) they should have the best, which they dont.
  • 3 0
 Fox does have a step by step tutorial on their service website. Check it out- and I'm
almost certain the Fox dampers can be re-Shimmed ... although I've read that they only utilize a few 3 shims. I haven't opened up my 40 that deep yet, But am glad info is there

service.foxracingshox.com/consumers/FOXDisclaimerUserChoice.htm

But you're right. They are pricey.
  • 14 0
 I've never felt 100%. Many times I've thought is this right, could I dial this in better? My local trails vary so much and I don't like dicking around trying to adjust for each one. Changes in trail conditions, psi, tires, and my mood all seem to effect the feel. Just when I think I got it, something comes up that makes me doubt. I'm torn between science and devil magic.

How do you know what you think you know, you know?
  • 11 0
 most shocks are easy to work on once you know whats inside.the trouble is finding accurate manuals and technical info. two things that are very important is to keep everything super clean and always use fresh oil,and know you are dealing with parts that have very tight tolerances so if you are using replacement or modified parts make sure everything fits nice and tight and without forcing anything in place.also make sure that the parts you use dont have any scratches,burs or tool marks
  • 1 0
 "Props already given" Well shit, +100 via comment then.
  • 8 1
 I feel the suspension makers should make things rather advanced but with proper tech documents to help set up suspension. Ctd blow and everyone knows it. I want sh*t that works. Give me easily accessable dampers and shims. I want to be able to test suspension oils with out tearing down the whole freakn thing and i dont want to be kept in the dark. Im talking to you FOX!!
  • 10 1
 Its been something I have been meaning to learn, but its not something I trust myself to mess with
  • 2 0
 Spelled it perfectly, I hate not knowing the in's and out's of my setup. I need to hang around the shop more and learn from guys who work suspensions every day.
  • 4 0
 Id say less than %1 have even the slightest clue, there is WAY too much mis-information out there, and that includes pretty much everything you read on the internet, hell half the manufactures arnt much better off either, the thing they got going for them is they know if it looks cool, it will sell, and if you talk a big enough game people will beleive anything.
  • 4 1
 I used to tweak damping adjustments endlessly and eventually after much trial and error came up with the solution - set Lsc to near-maximum, maybe 3 clicks off and sag at %20-25, then adjust your rebound damping in relation to each other starting from the fastest setting, first by hitting some high speed rough/bumpy berms repeatedly until you pop out the corner with good control and your front isn't tucking under, then hit up some nice jumps and tweak accordingly to balance the bikes flight path, maybe adding more damping at the rear to aid pedalling if you're into that kind of thing... works well for me lol.

that said, with this method I often end up near the recommended factory setting anyway, so it must be nearly right.
  • 2 0
 High LSC, yes. this has got to be one of the most common mistakes, people run almost no LSC because it make the fork feel crazy soft and grippy. Here's a secret, higher LSC gives you plenty of grip the tires are good for that, it keeps the bike stable and its a tonne faster. I find the rear end is better with a little bit less LSC and Higher HSC where the forks are a bit the opposite with a little more LSC and a Little less HSC. This is also follows the settings of what a few pros have told me. Too many people running super soft suspension.
  • 1 1
 Different companies have different ideas of how much damping a fork needs. They set their damper adjustments with different maximum and minimum amounts of damping and varying numbers of "clicks" for you to use when you set it. For example if a fork has only 10 clicks of damping adjustment (as compared to 20) then 3 clicks can be quite a lot.
  • 4 1
 As someone who builds rally car dampers for a living and rides downhill I would say 99% of people haven't a clue what they are doing and this is mountain bikers and rally drivers. The understanding of low and high speed compression and rebound, spring rates and sag is ridiculous. Just listen to some of the clattering and banging that bikes make at your local track .And everyone seems to have a mate who's an expert.
  • 2 0
 as someone who builds rally car dampers for a living and also rides downhill bikes, would you care to give some insight into what you think the main differences in set up are between the two disciplins?
  • 1 0
 dammit. i was hoping for some serious insight there. i can only assume that a car.....oh god. i havent a clue to be honest. Seriously high low speed to keep the chassis stable? crap loads of sag (70%?) to drop the wheels into holes? i dunno. please educate me Smile
  • 3 0
 I can service my shock but I still cant set it up perfectly. Im always adjusting it a bit different each ride. Some days it feels great and other days it feels ok and I adjust it again.
  • 2 0
 Different riding styles. Different bike geometry. Different skill levels. Different personal preferences. Different local terrain. In my experience you need to keep adjusting your setup as your skills progress. Yes this will often mean a harder setting. It took me 3 months to get my bike balanced and working well in most conditions. I'm still fine tuning my cockpit. I think bar width, stem length and bar roll are much harder to dial than suspension settings. I've also found that with a longer stem, more psi or volume spacers needs to be added to the fork.
  • 2 0
 There was a similar post above. Tonnes of riders who think they have a full grasp, really dont don't know what they're on about, the worst kind of ignorance. I know enough, no doubt more than most, to know its a rediculously hard subject, I don't know what I'm doing. Plus just about everyone seem to forget about the full system, the big picture, the tyres, the wheels, the frame, the suspension, the infinitely adjustable spring dampers, the riders arms and legs. The full picture is layer upon layer of sprung masses, for more complicated than a car, I know enough to know that one click of low speed compression makes as much difference in the bigger picture as a gnats fart. I can dericve system responses from first principles for cars, bicycles is on as who other level, taking into account the riders arms and legs is Einstein level genious. Some tuners are really talented, I don't believe for one second that they fully understand the big picture. Experience counts for a lot though.
  • 2 0
 I have a Fox float 32 RLC and from the box it's not a good fork. Too soft in the middle so in technical and teepsection the fork is too low and too firm at the end. Plus it lacks a lot of grip. I sent my fork for a custum tuning to a french guy who is one of the suspension sorcer (he worked for BOS suspension in the past) and my fork is not same anymore. He changed the air spring, custom to my weight and my bike. He modified to hydraulic settings to me to suit me and the fork is not the same anymore. Huge difference, from apiece of crap I have now a pretty good fork for my program. The fork stay high, doesn't plunge for anything, I have a lot more grip (like a lot more) and the fork absorb a lot better and doesn"t get stuck on the obstacles. The fork is not more comfortable and you don't seeabig difference when you test it on the parling lot. But when you ride it, it makes a huge difference.
Next week, I will send to him my RP23 for the same customization.
When you tasted custom suspensions, you can't come back on stocks suspensions from the box.
  • 1 0
 It makes me wonder how useless Fox thinks we all are!
  • 1 0
 Luckily I didn't pay full price for this fork because it was on sale (2011 model bought in 2012). So instead paying 1200€ for it, I paid "only" 600€. But 1200€ for that, it's a rip off. For me so now on, it will be buy a fork which is know to be reliable and customizable at a cheao price and send it to the professionnal to have something good a the end.

Same thing for my DH fork. I have a Boxxer with a custum made cartridge from the other suspension guru in France. You replace the stock cartridge by the other one which is a 4 way cartridge tune up for you and you have a damn good fork. The cartridge cost 220€. So buy a cheap boxxer rc at less than 500€, add the CR conception cartridge and for around 700€ you have a fork which is a lot better than 1600€ stock DH fork.
  • 2 0
 I hope pinkbike charge for all this customer consultation they do on behalf of brands. I can just imagine the day at Fox, "Hey guys we'd love to simplify our forks and shocks to help improve profit margin. Can anyone think of a way of selling the people the idea that what they want is less choice not more?". " Let's ask the Pinkbike guys they can pose a question masquerading as something else...."

There's such a huge variation in riders, riding style and gear that I don't believe a reduced option set or even a 'stock tune' can cover all riders. Hell I've never bought a bike where I thought the stock tune came close to offering the ride I want. (lots of low speed compression, minimal hi-speed and just enough damping to keep my wrists on the bar and my feet on the pedals).

Some people want never to touch their suspension and others want to fiddle with almost all of it. I'm in the latter group, but then I'm practical enough to work through settings one option at a time until I reach my optimum set up.
  • 2 0
 I ride full rigid, does this apply to me? But really, I love the pro level features included in upper level suspension, I think that someone that wants to spend that much money on anything should learn all the ins and outs of how to work it. I also understand that alot of people do not embrace that.
  • 4 0
 I think suspension makers should provide more information. Manual is to simple. They must have some more useful guides.
  • 1 0
 My first full sup ride was a proflex 856. I replaced the Girvin fork with a rock shox DH. I used to take and brake it down relube it and put speed springs in. instead of the MCU. I have lost touch with doing this because i stopped riding for a while. now that Im back in the saddle i almost afraid to brake it down and try to tune my fork. I know I need a stiffer spring. But I dont want to kill my X-fusin. I feel like I know how to do my setup exturnally. As far as the rear end goes I know very little. I know that if I run too soft the bike feels slow and boggy so I just stiffen it up and rebound couple of clicks slow rebound.
  • 1 0
 I know how you feel. Lol
  • 1 0
 I don't think suspension setting make much difference for 90% of riders. But having the external adjustments and internal stuff means that there's plenty of business opportunities for suspension tuners.

I've ridden my fox fork all season with the rebound set like a pogo stick because the adjust broke while I was turning the knob. It was a problem only twice.
  • 1 0
 My killswitch runs the stock X FUSION 02RCX... And I have a 2012 FOX 831 fork.... But even the local bike shop tells me "20% Sag" .... But what does this mean in reality? Most people have no clue, nor how to even begin to drain air etc and aim for the golden 20% sag, or if they do, they have no idea how to adjust settings for intended use on different applications of riding. When the hell is someone going to create the "Bicyclist Bible"?!?!?!
  • 2 1
 I love how no one has voted: "No. I leave the job to someone who knows their stuff" yet! Theres nothing we shop mechanics like more than having someone bring in their bike into the shop because they completely messed it up.. Smile
  • 7 1
 ...but still complains about he price when they pick it up.
  • 5 1
 most mechanics do not touch the internals of suspension, they send it to service center, at least here
  • 1 0
 Isn't there a large fox suspension centre in Switzerland?
  • 4 3
 and hence the death of the bike shop for anything but buying bikes.
  • 3 0
 there is, shox service cost 210 USD in Switzerland, that's why I do it myself
  • 1 0
 210 USD for servicing (cleaning, changing oil) the shock?! I do it just for 35 USD in my home workshop. I took 70 USD for repairing the rebound adjuster in the manitou swinger SPV (complete disassembling the shock, shaft, removing the needle, removing the knob, repairing the thread on the knob, new O-ring for the needle, reassembling with fresh oil)

At least, if they install all new gliders, O-rings, seals and bushes in the shock, I am agree to pay 210 USD once in 4 years. (Than is only because I don't know where to buy rebuild kit for RC4)
  • 1 0
 and the best part is spare parts are not included
  • 1 0
 210 just for oil change and cleaning?! It is a robbery!
  • 5 1
 Until I am racing or riding rampage I can settle with getting used to how my stuff is set up and just ride my damn bike.
  • 1 0
 Seriously. I can tell if something is REALLY wrong and that is enough.
  • 3 1
 Can someone explain how its possible for third person to tune my suspension? Is he going with us for a ride on our back or something... ? O_o
:P

I tune and service my suspension on my own BTW Wink
  • 1 0
 I spent a long time on my first dual suspension bike playing with all the settings, seeing how they reacted with more or less air pressure on different terrain. I never knew how a properly set up suspension was supposed to feel, but I spent a lot of time trying just about everything until I figured out what worked best in different situations. Once I started riding more properly set up bikes, I was pleasantly surprised that most were pretty close in feel to what I had done with mine.
  • 1 0
 when I bought my aurum I talked to my LBS, and bought the upgraded springs, dampers, etc,for the riding I wanted to do.
then I talked to a Norco Mech..and question him on my build.at the end of the day, all I need to do is a click here of compression/rebound, or a turn of the rear coil. done!
bike rides awesome!!
  • 1 0
 I was trying to make my Van feel smooth yet not wallow, spent countless runs playing with the 2 controls I had yet wasn't happy..then I got a double barrel - started with recommended settings and I'm damn close to perfection after 2 runs only playing with air pressure (had no idea how much difference could 5 psi make! Smile
  • 1 0
 Kind of hard to believe that my suspension is dialed for my weight and ability. What is the target rider for suspension mfg? Can a 6" travel fork really work for a160 lbs novice and a 200 lb expert?

It's nice when a brand provides hsc, lsc, rebound, spring rate, volume adj, basically all the tools to personalize a 1000$ fork to the rider.
  • 1 0
 i run Avalanche cartridge and the sag is not more than 15% and my shock RC4 i prefer stiff but all my internals are set to support
stiff run, so stiff suspension has a few advantages:
1st you have to be confident to ride high speed
2d the stiff suspension allows to run high speed otherwise the frame is moving to its travel and converts the speed to a friction and
you loose speed.
3d as u r running stiffer suspension you ve more control most of the force is absorbed by the spring and the damper and feel more stable.
4th stiff suspension do not heat up the oil that much couse you not running all the travel
to only downside is you can compromise the frame running too stiff but nowadays frames are WC ready so they r designed to run stiiff
  • 1 0
 Most people dont get it. They just up the spring rate rather than setting the compression and rebound correctly. Firm is not fast, tuned is fast. Different tracks need different settings to go the fastest, not what feels the fastest, but what is the fastest against the clock. Often what feels slower is faster as you have more time with a settled and balanced bike. I showed someone my geeky log book yesterday of freelap times vs settings and they were amazed at the timing differences. So I changed their boxxer r2c2 from 9 clicks of low speed and 1 of high, to 5 high, 4low and sped up the end stroke to hold the fork up in its travel, but leave it more supple through the start stroke, the rear vivid start stroke was sped up also to skip over rocks and roots andallow the bike to accelerate over the rocks where it was hitting the front of every rock and loosing speed. They were able to hit a road gap that they have never hit before within a couple of runs and were amazed how much faster they could go with just the turn of a dial or 2. I love an air shock out back, but air has never been quicker than coil, amazing how you can love something because you are going slower. Waiting to do the boxxer wc vs r2c2 test..... always ridden air up front, love that you can adjust the curve so much, having a bottom out control that makes such a difference to the stroke is ace. But dh racing is all about the fastest from top to bottom!
  • 3 0
 Should be an option for "I know enough to get buy, can tune, rebuild etc, but know enough to know it's a really hard subject to grasp 100%"
  • 2 1
 WOW... so seems that everybody can perfectly tune and open a fork or a shock.. sorry but seems to me a pretty bold statement...I mean they can open it for sure... but tune it perfectly???
I wonder how they home-made vacuum their rear shocks.. seeing that a single air bubble can compromise the entire suspension... plus do we wanna talk about the quality of OIL they use in it or outside temperature, type of terrain and so on.. the variables are so many that it's hard to believe that the most of the riders here can do it...
suspension engineering it's a branch of 'engineering' that means that you have to study or make a lot of experience as a (suspensions) mechanic before beeing able to actually improve the performance..
is like pretending to be a doctor..

in general I think there is a lack of culture of suspensions in MTB... in MX people has more culture for it and there are more professionals around.. and they make the real difference!
In MTB only the uCI DH teams have their suspension professional on board... and probably there's a reason.
  • 2 0
 Dude its not that hard, suspension brands like fox want you to think its hard so you don't take their shocks apart and see the made in china logos inside, stripping and rebuilding an MX shock isn't too complex or hard to learn
  • 1 0
 What vacuum? On shock's rebuilding phase I tend to bleed damper through IFP - good design means that there is a bleed port. Of course the gas chamber should be in vacuum before pressurized with nitrogen to get the optimum performance, but sadly many mtb-shocks use just air in there...

And yeah, quality (coil)shocks are pretty much just downsized moto-shocks. Because of that it'd be nice if those established and professional moto-shops could provide dyno-charts and suspension tuning for bikes too. Maybe someday.
Small things make big difference but it's not rocket science, considering setup changes. Smile
  • 2 1
 ALL ANYBODY REALLY NEEDS IS THE SUSPENSION COMPANIES TO DO A BETTER JOB WITH THERE OWNER/USER MANUAL. NOT A SINGLE ONE I HAVE EVER READ GIVES ACCEPTABLE UNDERSTANDING, FOR A "LEY" PERSON TO TRANSLATE RIDE QUALITY TO ADJUSTABILITY. MAYBE GIVE AN EXPLINATION OF WHAT YOU ARE DOING TO THE PRODUCT WHEN YOU ADJUST A CERTAIN PARAMATER. "LIKE WHE YOU ADJ YOUR LOW SPEED COMPRESSION, AND GIVE A DEFFINITION OF WHAT IT IS DOING/ INSIDE- WHAT IT IS PROVIDING WHEN ADJUSTED AND POSSIBLY HOW IT WILL ADVERSALLY EFFECT YOUR RIDE.
  • 4 0
 The instructions on my CaneCreek manual were the best I have ever read , unless you went to school on the special bus , you will understand it.
It's just valves or holes opening or closing anyway , more oil flow = fast , less = harder/slower.
  • 3 0
 ^^^Props on that. Use the Cane Creek quick guide to understand the functions if you want a good "suspension 101" course.
  • 1 0
 The best tuning manual by far even compared to the Cane Creek is the Elka Stage 5 imo. Hope that MRP continue to use it. The Elka/MRP shock is quite unique as it is custom shimmed by the factory to your frame, meaning that all you have to worry about is setting up the dials for the track you are on. The best of both worlds - Truly high end performance with the simplicity of a basic shock design.
  • 1 0
 I was trying to read through all the comments but I came up with a question. First, here's how I tune my own setup. Set sag I'm the garage. Tinker with compression/rebound on the trails I ride most often. Try to find the smoothest most controlled setup. Adjust that if I go to trails that are vastly different from my normal trails (I.e. More rocky and rooty since the trails I ride are pretty smooth). I'll sometimes make adjustments late summer as the corners get more brakebumps. This has worked for me for the most part. Only sucks when I make an adjustment but don't remember/track what my previous settings were so I have to test/tune again.

so my question is, do you focus on the fork or the shock first? Do both at the same time? Or are they fairly independent of each other?
  • 2 0
 Focus on the one who have less adjustments. It will be easier to fit the most complex.

Suspensions aren't independant. For exemple a too firm rear schock makes the fork feel too "plush".
  • 2 1
 Since my riding and mechanic carrier I went through all main suspension brands like Fox, Rock Shox, Marzocchi, Elka. They work excellent for what they are designed for. When I wanted to find the right tune for my riding style and the trail. It was hard to find the compromise. When my fork was soft for comfort riding it went bottom out at bigger impacts,thou. Similar in most cases with air shocks. But since I came across BOS suspension (Deville + Kirk ) and took it for the ride to my local trails. There was something different about them I have to tell you. Straight out from the box-factory settings where just right after I adjusted pressure to my weight-following the factory chart.I became much faster and better rider somehow. The fork's been plush at initial stroke and I found tune-able platform in the middle of the stroke. I was curious how it stands against big drops or jumps and surprise - magic just happened. That was moment when I realized this is what we are looking for. So if you are serious about mountain biking it is worth save up extra "a hundred" or so and invest once and have "the one" suspension. After all these great riding days and joy from set-it-once-and-ride suspension it hard for me to go back to any other branded suspension components.
"Yes I enjoy servicing and tuning the suspension."
  • 4 0
 It'd be nice to have an article teaching us something instead of a poll to see and discuss how stupid we all are.
  • 1 0
 Lots of good info/comments here. Keeping it simple, I'll just say to keep your eye's on what I call the "big three" in shock/fork adjustments and that is sag, compression and rebound settings. Weather the suspension is stock or custom, you'll always have to dial in those three adjustments according to your weight and riding style to get it performing just right.
  • 1 0
 most of people, who buy a brand new fork, don't change factory poured oil (that has crap quality) after first 5-10 hours of riding. the ride it all the season. and then they are being very surprised: "why do my seals leak?", "why my fork is so stoked?", "why internals/leg coating of my fork has signs of wear and/or damages?".
guys, changing the oil (and cleaning) in your fork and shock are the things that you "must have". that will increase your suspension life and save your money.
  • 1 0
 I read a lot of 'I run 30% sag, but I run 10% sag'. But on a Trail/Enduro/DH bike, how do you correctly measure sag? If you just sit on the bike you're probably not going to measure it correctly and get a lot less sag at the proper pressure because of the headangle and weight distribution on those types of bikes (rearward bias when just sitting on it).
  • 1 0
 before i read this i thought i knew what i was doing now i not so sure that i have set them up correctly.. BUT i am happy with the way my bikes respond on the trails. not to say i may try some things i have read here.
  • 3 0
 I pretty much run base settings for my weight and leave it there for ever Razz Rarely change settings for tracks
  • 2 1
 Yeah but if you're like most mountain bikers, your weight varies depending on how many beers you have after a ride...
  • 1 0
 I don't drink , but the tar in my lungs probably adds to some thing !
  • 2 0
 I'm a total dumbass in this department after 6 years of racing. I got nothing…….useless. I can make anything work- clapped out or destroyed- I can earn a podium.
  • 3 0
 Bike shops need like a ground version of a rock climbing wall for parking lot testing.
  • 3 0
 Perfect sus is like perfect titts. not too soft just right.perfect rebound and not too much sag
  • 1 0
 I've learned and tweaked as I've gone along, and it really depends a lot on the bike too. Where is the option for "I just rebuilt my shock this morning, but I don't have a clue what sag is"?
  • 1 0
 I highly doubt that more than a third of people(like in the poll) know how to tune their suspension. Most of people run unserviced sticky forks with not enough sag. To finish it off, they have 4bars in their minions 2 ply.
  • 2 0
 I always look up how to do suspension tuning first so I don't f*ck it up and have to pay £100 for a full service
  • 3 0
 Ronco rotisserie "set it and forget it"
  • 1 0
 I still can't believe how soft I used to run my old fork! These days i have the pre-load at its hardest setting but 120mm isn't enough... SOMEONE GET ME A 160MM!!
  • 3 0
 I have no idea what's going on right now
  • 3 1
 I'm fackin hopeless with suspension. I just stick it in the middle and drive on! Pike rules!!
  • 1 2
 I run mine by what I seen on pinkbike/youtube guides by sag and the rubberband sometimes I think its still to stiff I need my fork serviced though and my back because I ride it on the street from time to time...

But I still don't know how to check the psi and use a shock pump but really need to learn because last year blew my shock at Silverstar riding like a cheetah chasing a gazill because I know my shock wasn't in the right psi.
  • 1 0
 A minority of people use default settings and recommended spring pressures. That should tell you something...................
  • 1 1
 There is no rite or wrong. Its whatever works for you. I've used custom tuned suspension all set to my weight bike etc and it felt awful. Was probably how it should be run but it didn't work for me . Everyone is different.
  • 1 0
 22.57794353% sag and no coils or air, just helium balloons tied to the frame to allow you to float across the rough stuff. Smile
  • 1 0
 When you weigh 320+ you don't check your suspension settings...you just make sure you haven't blown it up yet.
  • 3 0
 I ride rigid.... lol....
  • 2 0
 I know enough that it don't cost me a arm and leg
  • 2 0
 My rigid 29" fork is tuned to perfection. ..
  • 1 0
 I better being a full UBI grad and career shop mechanic, I play with everything new in and out because I love it!!
  • 1 0
 fully rigid all the way...go get on a bmx bike lol totally just kidding by the way, I'm a lover of all bikes
  • 3 2
 Chris Kovarik dialled in my suspension
  • 2 0
 And?
  • 1 0
 So its good for him but not for you? just kidding.
Did you get some training at kovarik racing?
  • 1 0
 yeah done some training with him
  • 2 0
 My what?
  • 2 1
 THIS POST WAS BROUGHT TO YOU BY FOX AND SHIMANO !
  • 1 0
 where's the "not enough" answer ?
  • 1 0
 I love how PB used a FOX rear shock for this exact poll Big Grin
  • 1 1
 I love the SAG in my suspension........in the women my age.....not so much!
  • 2 1
 stay off the brakes.
  • 1 1
 I loved the decals on the old saints
  • 1 0
 Set it and forget it.
  • 1 2
 And thank you DVO for making this so much easier Smile







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.058155
Mobile Version of Website