Kenda developed the Helldiver in consort with the Polygon UR downhill team as a faster-rolling hard-pack option for pedal-heavy racetracks and enduro. There is no hiding that the tread pattern was inspired by Schwalbe's Rock Razor, but that is a good thing. Small, sharp, center tread, flanked by rows of large, reinforced edging blocks is a proven formula for speed on any type of hard-surface track and every respected tire maker has one in its arsenal.
Being a racing tire, the Helldiver Pro features every trick that Kenda has developed to keep the air inside and the rider upright. The sidewall is layered with a Kevlar fabric to prevent slashes. A second belt of fabric wards off punctures beneath the tread, and the bead area is beefed up to guard against pinch flats at low pressures. The dual-compound tread is slightly harder, and the casing stiffness is on par with Schwalbe Rock Razor in the Super Gravity casing, and even with all of its armor plating, the 2.4-inch Helldiver weighs a respectable, 980 grams. MSRP is $79.95 USD and at present, there is only one model: a 2.4" x 27.5'' tire.
Helldiver Details:• Purpose: downhill, enduro
• Conditions: dry, hard-pack
• Construction: 60 TPI casing, reinforced bead area, KVS Kevlar sidewall layer, Iron Cloak anti-puncture strip under tread, RSR dual-compound tread
• Tubeless ready
• Fast-rolling, low-profile center tread, siped, reinforced cornering tread
• Size: 2.4" x 27.5" (claimed width)
• Weight: 980 grams (actual)
• MSRP: $79.95 USD
• Contact:
Kenda Tire Helldiver Pro in Action I used the Helldiver as a rear tire, paired with a Maxxis High Roller II. Mounted up to a 26-millimeter inside-width ENVE rim, Kenda's Helldiver Pro measures 2.3 inches at its widest point - a far cry from its advertised 2.4-inch width. The tread profile is quite rounded, which is typical of Kenda tires, and breaks tradition from the flat-top profile of the Schwalbe Rock Razor and its cousins. Helldivers are tubeless ready, and mounting one up required removing the valve core to encourage a higher volume of air to flow into the tire. That said, you probably won't need the assistance of a boost-type hand-pump or a compressor to get the job done. Optimum pressure for turning and braking grip was near 28psi (2 bar).
Construction: I experienced no flats nor a hint of slashing - it's a tough tire. Most folding bead tires are flexible, but the Helldiver Pro stands rigidly upright like a dual-ply wire-bead downhill tire does. Helldiver casings are not dual-ply, but don't assume that they are wimpy. To begin with, the bead area has extra rubber filler and a stiffener, which provides some cushion for the tire when it is smashed to the rim by a maximum impact event. The sidewall has a Kevlar strip inserted between the casing fabric to ward off slashes, which is far more effective than an extra layer of polyester fabric. Under the tread, Kenda places a thorn breaker strip (presumably closely woven nylon fabric) to prevent punctures.
Ride Quality: History teaches us that adding more rubber and a bunch stiff fabric to an already heavy tire may produce a long lasting product, but the downside is a rigid, harshly riding monstrosity that only a handful of British spendthrifts would want. Kenda, however, designed flex zones between each of the tire's three reinforced layers. Their clever design allows the Helldiver's casing to conform to terrain, and the resulting feel is much more supple than I had expected. Compared to the Helldiver, a Maxxis Minion DHR rides roughly and feels like the rear brake is dragging down a hard-pack descent.
Traction: I prefer a flatter tread profile, so I can quickly access the edging tread as I lean into a corner. Kenda's rounded tread places the edging blocks at a more exaggerated lean angle. I imagined I would struggle with that and anticipated I'd switch to a wider rim to flatten its profile, but I did not notice much (if any) difference. I attribute the predictable cornering grip to the plethora of tiny tread blocks in the transition zone, but that's purely an opinion. Trails ranged from deep sand, loose-over-hard, shifty gravel and rock, and decomposed granite that could pass for a concrete product, and in all cases, except for one, the Helldiver turned, braked and climbed with remarkable authority. The exception was descending dusty rock faces, where the center tread's tiny grippers could only gain a foothold at reduced speeds.
Braking: I am not heavy handed on the rear brake, but I did do some harsh straight-line testing. The Helldiver traveled roughly ten percent farther to get the bike stopped than Maxxis High Roller it replaced on hard-pack surfaces, and was on par if the dirt was softer. Logic says that those tiny crown blocks should not be able to dig into soft, dry dirt, but they do, and surprisingly well. While we are on the subject, anytime you are skidding, you are also shearing off rubber from the tread blocks, and the embedded granite common to my home trails takes its toll on tires. So far, however, my Helldiver has held up well and looks as if it will outlast the Schwalbe Rock Razor (which I consider the baseline for semi-slick gravity tires) by a small, but significant measure.
Pinkbike's Take: | Kenda's Helldiver Pro may be listed as a downhill racing tire, but it barely measures 2.3 inches, which is off the mark in light of the full-width rubber that most gravity riders are using at present. That said, the Helldiver's performance is reason enough for hard-charging all-mountain trail riders and enduro competitors who are searching for a tough, fast-rolling dry-condition option to choose Kenda. As is, the Helldiver Pro is impressive. I can only imagine how much better it would be as a true 2.4 or 2.5-inch tire.—RC |
For reference a Maxxis 2.3" is 58mm and 2.4" is 61mm and a Schwalbe 2.35" is 60mm. and from personal experience with maxxis and schwalbe id say that measures up as 2.35 schwalbe pretty much match up with 2.4 maxxis.
Agreed though that old Maxxis 2.5 and 2.7 tyres never used to be that big but they have mostly sorted the sizing out these days and if in doubt just use the ISO dimensions.
www.maxxis.com/catalog/tire-468-121-minion-dhf
Look here at the old 26" tyre sizes, you can tell which on are old models with the small ISO sizes.
Me the same...
having them and measuring exactly, 2,63" on 1,7 bar... Extra big blocks in comparison to my 2,5" Minions make them perfect rough DH tyre with the best braking ability ever. Rear DHR II I have mounted on my Derby DH carbon rim with 40mm inner width and frontDHF tyre on my Derby carbon AM 35mm inner width rim. Perfect combination if you have enough clearance...
This set of tyres cost me to get them from US to SLovenia almost 250 USD but would spent even 100 more just to have it.
Fail.
I had some old minions that were 2.35" but the ISO was 52.
What are you going to believe? The ISO or the sticker?
What you actually mean is Internal Width. Unless I've got it all wrong and the new trend is 35mm diameter rims?
If you consider 2.54mm to be a far cry. Which I personally don't.
£20 a pair tho and that pro-bike look (although you can be sure the pro's didn't use the el cheapo version!). The good old days...
www.pinkbike.com/photo/5840235
My first DH bike, 17 years ago - Tioga sofa seat too!
but honestly I wouldn't mind blacked out tires. Wouldn't really miss the logos
Jaylysramnx -> but how bout those e13 rims that line up with their tire logo? So dope.
Also I’m sure you’re speaking of interwebs. If you’re on the trail and even noticing the tire logos of others then you’re failing at biking.
I hear ya. Nothing wrong with being particular about your bike. What else am I gonna obsess about? My car which is worth less than my bike?
Speaking of which. Check out Slik Graphics outa Sweden to get your decals sorted or customized.
As a designer, this problem can be particularly frustrating. I decided our bike will have clearance for 2.6" tires with plenty of mud space, but I can't just take 66 mm (2.6") and add an offset to get the clearance. Companies measure on 29 mm, 30 mm, or 35 mm rims at 30 - 40 psi and many exaggerate the numbers a few millimeters beyond those factors, so I always end up requiring CAD files and doing my own product measurements. Height variability is even worse: comparing a 2.6" tire to a 2.65" tire, I found as much as a 13 mm difference (allowing for maximum tolerances) in height.
So yes, the width variability found in this review isn't huge - and may be more attributable to RC than Kenda - but the problem is real!
Have a look here for an excellent tire group test, with measurements, by Seb Stott: www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqrbqRYrnB0
Wider rims don't make that much difference to the width of the widest part of the tyre...the main increase is in the narrow part of the tyre near the rim which helps boost air volume. Its flattening off the side walls with wide rims that causes the flat tread problem...although clearly some tyre designs are fare worse than others...looking at you 2.3" High rollers and all those semi-slicks.
What are the pros and cons of a rounded profile versus a square one?
anyone I know who rides well will nuke rear wheels if they run anything lower
So....for riding on the Front Range, Moab, Sedona or other dry rocky places the SS is my favorite rear tire. If I lived in New England (or England) or the PNW, no way.
36 outer, 29 inner
36 outer width, Mavic EX729 etc. ~29 inner
How exactly? That inferno has a 25.4 inner width. With a 29 inner width the tire would sit wider, flatter and would be subject to less lateral bead rolling force.