Leatt DBX Core 2.0 Hydration Pack - Review

Dec 14, 2017 at 18:33
by Richard Cunningham  
Leatt DBX 2.0 Hydration pack


Leatt's DBX Core 2.0 hydration hip-pack offers an alternative to riders who don't want to wear a traditional backpack and have run out of places to stash necessary items on their bike frames. The Core 2.0 is larger than the hip-packs I have tried in the past. It can hold seven liters of cargo, including two liters of fluid. The pack is separated into two main compartments. The bladder occupies the inner one. The outer compartment has one large mesh pocket and one smaller one for easy-to-lose items, and the waistband has a pair of quick access pockets. The DBX Core pack's padded waist and wide cinch straps are designed to stabilize the load on the rider''s hips. Leatt offers the pack in basic black and it sells for $79.99 USD.


Core 2.0 Details:

• Total storage: 7 liters (2 hydration, 5 in compartments)
• Quick-access side pockets in waist belt.
• Padded and ventilated waist conforms to hips
• Bright green pockets highlight contents
• Internal see-through mesh pockets
• Elastic loops in main pocket organize small items
• Bottom exit for hydration hose.
• 2-liter bladder with quick-release hose
• MSRP: $79.99 USD
• Contact: Leatt Bike
Leatt DBX 2.0 Hydration pack
Protective cap shelters the mouthpiece from animal spew.

Leatt DBX 2.0 Hydration pack
The main cargo compartment folds out. Mesh pockets expose everything inside.

Features and Performance

Unless you've worn a hip-pack before, the DBX Core 2.0 will take some getting used to. Wide, comfortable webbing and a generous waistband ensure that you can snug the pack tight enough to stabilize it on your hips without constricting your breathing or feeling unnecessarily confined. I had a little trouble keeping the waistband adjusted. The buckles did not grip the webbing securely. I fixed that by rolling up the excess webbing and securing it with the supplied Velcro band against the buckle. Get it right and the pack will exhibit some vertical movement when the bike is bouncing, but will not wiggle laterally.

Inside, the pack is well organized and user-friendly. Unzip the cargo hold and it opens flat, like a suitcase. Inside pockets are mesh, so all of the contents are easily viewed in one glance against the compartment's Day-Glo green liner. The central panel has a number of elastic loops sew in to hold tire-tools, air-pumps and CO2 cartridges. Should you run out of room inside, a pair of compression straps double as a handy way to stash a windbreaker on the outside.

Leatt DBX 2.0 Hydration pack
Pads in the waistband support the weight comfortably on the hips.
Leatt DBX 2.0 Hydration pack
Side pockets and zipper-pulls for easy access to essentials.

Leatt's bladder has a central, quick-release hose that exits out the bottom of the pack. Because the pack has no shoulder straps, the user is left with how and where to secure the hose retaining clip, I tried clipping the hose to my jersey, but the fabric was too flimsy. Eventually, I chose to clip the hose to the waistband, where it was less accessible while riding, but tucked away in a less bothersome location. Drinking from the bite valve is less intuitive than Camelbak's superior mouthpiece. Grip the edge of the bite valve with your teeth and push back the plastic seal to get the most flow. That worked best for me.

Leatt DBX 2.0 Hydration pack
Leatt's two-liter bladder has a quick-release hose fitting.
Leatt DBX 2.0 Hydration pack
The bite-valve takes some getting used to.

In action, I appreciated the Core 2.0 most when it was lightly loaded - with the bladder about 75% full, one tube, a pump, some food, and a folding wrench. Leatt's hip-pack barely moved, and I liked the way the bike handled with the extra mass strapped lower to my body, especially on the downs.

Loaded up as depicted in this review, the Core 2.0 was about as heavy and bulky as I would ever want a hip pack to be. It never was a deal breaker, but the vertical movement was a reminder that I had ten pounds strapped above my butt when I slammed a G-out or bounced through the rocks. I never suffered a sweaty back during this review, so a little bouncing may be a small price to pay for such comfort.

Unfortunately, I experienced a zipper failure. One side of the main cargo compartment blew open while I was riding. Luckily, nothing was lost. The zipper self-healed later (with some fiddling) and continues to function. Leatt says the faulty zipper issue came as a surprise, and assured us that they would warrant the item immediately, as is their policy on all of their products.
Leatt DBX 2.0 Hydration pack
One of the main compartment's two zippers failed, then self healed shortly after.


Pinkbike's Take:
bigquotesHip packs like Leatt's DBX Core 2.0 are a logical step for riders who don't want a backpack, yet need to carry more water and gear than they can stuff in their cargo bibs or stash on a bike. The Core 2.0 is large enough for an all-day epic, and it packs down to a manageable weight and bulk to make it viable for gravity riding. One improvement I'd like to see is a magnetic clip, so I could more easily access the drinking hose while in motion. The offending zipper? Well, it's still working fine, so I'm inclined give Leatt the benefit of the doubt on that one. RC


Author Info:
RichardCunningham avatar

Member since Mar 23, 2011
974 articles

124 Comments
  • 222 2
 If they get any bigger you’ll need 1, maybe 2, straps draped over your shoulders to stabilize it.
  • 26 0
 They also come handy for attaching the hose.
  • 33 1
 Would that pack be... For your back???
  • 43 1
 @IluvRIDING: yeah and scummy marketing team won't call it a backpack but something like an EHPD (elevated hip partitioning device) or a SMHS (shoulder mounted hip-system)
  • 5 0
 @Junk2016: I'm sure you could come up with a better acronym than that for this audience.
  • 10 0
 Then you would have the source hipster hydration belt !

sourceoutdoor.com/en/hydration-packs/161-hipster-hydration-belt
  • 148 0
 @VTwintips: The Shoulder-Harnessed Internally Tailored Bladder And Gear System (SHITBAGS)?
  • 9 0
 @DrPete: you must be in marketing
  • 12 2
 @onemind123: If you work in marketing, kill yourself

-Bill Hicks
  • 11 5
 I just couldn’t imagine wearing a fanny pack, even if it was more practical. And I’m fairly open minded. They’re just too....you know.
  • 10 1
 I would not bother simply because it has little or no protective value. My sweaty back pack protects my spine.
  • 2 0
 @Junk2016: I've not managed to land a job in marketing, but I'd call it Shoulder-Hip Integrated Technology.
  • 1 1
 @DrPete: excellent
  • 3 1
 @RollinFoSho: the difference between enduro and endurbro
  • 3 0
 @RollinFoSho: "I'm fairly open minded". Ha!
  • 2 0
 @sspiff:

I'd upvote more if I could but Pinkbike doesn't have the "+10 votes Bill Hicks Reference" button yet. Wink
  • 1 0
 @DrPete: great acro
  • 1 0
 holding out for the FUPAck
  • 1 0
 @Junk2016: just like they no longer call these "fanny packs", because those weren't very cool...weird, they still aren't. Even with the new "hip pack" moniker.
  • 2 0
 @nohit45: It's because "fanny pack" doesn't mean what you think it does in other parts of the world.
  • 1 0
 @onemind123: False advertising! The product you linked to has neither a can holder for PBR's, nor any denim to be seen.
  • 1 0
 @DrPete: coffee all over my kitchen flor
  • 3 0
 @Junk2019
Check out this product.......

henty.cc/enduro-backpack-launches

These guys are from my home town, normally I hate running hydration packs but i’ve had one for almost 6 months. It’s a very easy bag to wear on longer rides. Forget that I’m wearing it most of the time.
  • 1 0
 @Junk2016: haha that’s funny
  • 1 0
 Ha. So true.

The Camel Skyline is about the best compromise between a lumbar pack and traditional Camel. I don't like wearing packs due to bad sweaty back and the Skyline eliminates that, and is super stable.

For smaller loads and shorter rides, I just use a small, 20 year old Columbia lumbar pack for the very few essentials. Rides of 2 hours or less I don't need water. 3 hour rides and I'm good with 1 liter that goes into a small 1 L Platypus bladder with a screw top lid. I'm not that "hard core" that I can't take a five minute break, 2 hours into a ride, to unscrew a top and slug down a liter of water.
  • 3 1
 Typical PB reaction, focusing on image rather than functionality. I bet if Ratboy would start wearing one they'd immediately be considered cool.
  • 1 0
 @bonkywonky: You don’t need Ratboy, if you like it, use it. I bet Ratboy’s not a fan tho.
  • 1 0
 @Murph86: Be very careful you don't fall hard on your back or you won't walk again. I'd rather have a full back pack. I don't mind the heat as long as I know my spine is protected(at least better than nothing).
  • 3 0
 @Murph86: thanks for sharing this. I am probably going to buy one tonight.
  • 1 0
 @DrPete: hahaha
  • 1 0
 @DrPete: the fanny pack AKA "nature's pocket"
  • 48 6
 How many times in this long life am I going to have to live through the horror of the fannypack/bumbag/'hip pack' crawling back out of its grave?
  • 5 2
 I was thinking the same.
  • 20 18
 Sorry bro, but hippers actually work! That sweaty thing on your back is a shitty back pack, sure there is no perfect fix, but hip wins by a long shot, unless you need 3+ liters water.
  • 3 1
 THE HORROR!
  • 2 0
 Preach!
  • 3 3
 @dirtdoctor: Truth.

Don't knock it, 'till you try it.
  • 4 0
 Tried it. Knocked it.
  • 2 0
 @MikerJ: I don't want anyone to see me with something like this.
  • 33 2
 That is a pretty big pack to not have any weed in it!
  • 1 0
 Well, he cant really say that fell out without self incrimination
  • 8 1
 You ever seen the back of a $20 bill... on weed?
  • 2 0
 @onemind123: Depends on where you live Smile .
  • 3 0
 @AirBud:

I didn't know $20 bills smoked weed..
  • 18 5
 Never go full enduro broWink
  • 8 1
 Funny the picture of the zipper. I picked up a full sized hydration pack from leatt. It lasted 2 off road moto rides then the zippers started to fail. Stick to what you know, I would not recommend this product.
  • 3 0
 Same thing happened to my Leatt!
  • 3 0
 Get the USWE pack, who originally built the Leatt packs. The new Leatt packs suck.
  • 1 0
 @chainslapAZ: USWE pack here too.....F6 I think it's called. Love it, though "no dancing monkey" is pretty corny
  • 6 0
 I like the DaKine Hot Laps fanny pack for riding park or shorter 1 or 2 hour trail rides. Anything more adventurous, I prefer a hydration backpack to carry the extra weight of water, food and gear.
  • 1 0
 picked one up even though its labelled as "womens", dark green/black/brown, fits a crankbros multitool, cliffbar or two and a tube if you stuff it. perfect for most of my rides
  • 1 0
 oh and the extra water bottle pocket is a nice addition to the waterbottle cage on my bike
  • 6 0
 Have Schwalbe finally started shipping those ultralight spare tires now? I see you have one there...
  • 2 0
 tubes... 1st thing I noticed too!
  • 2 0
 @railin: oops, yes. Tubes.
  • 1 0
 Yep, got one a while back. Takes up no room but until I actually use it.. Who knows if it's any good.
  • 2 0
 @beater32: Good to know, been waiting two years for these to be available in the US. Brilliant idea for a small tubeless back up.
  • 5 2
 I do understand the freedom of having nothing on your back. But I feel my hydration backpacks have literally saved my back so often that it feels a bit insecure riding without. Just like kneepads. Yes you feel them when you put them on but once riding I don't really notice them anymore.

I currently use an Ergon BE1 and love it. The 1.5L water bladder goes low just like in these backpacks, there is some space in the upper section for some essentials and the back protector obviously covers the full length. My pump (something from Park Tool) doesn't fit so I strapped it to the outside but there are probably pumps that would fit inside. So yeah if you want something to protect your back you obviously have to accept that it is going to cover your back. But at least this Ergon pack keeps the bulk of the weight (the water) nice and low.
  • 1 7
flag bonkywonky (Dec 17, 2017 at 8:17) (Below Threshold)
 How many backpacks did you see at the DH races this year?
  • 1 0
 @bonkywonky: How many back protector did you see at XC races or back country riding this year?
  • 2 0
 Received mine about a week ago. All the brah-tato-chips are sporting "hip packs" here in CO. Feels great getting the pack off the back.

This magnet kit from Osprey makes the pack perfect.

www.osprey.com/us/en/product/hydraulics-hose-magnet-kit-HYDRMAGKT.html
  • 6 1
 I knew my fanny pack would come back into style.
  • 7 0
 You must tell the whole world how much you love your fanny pack! Start in the UK.
  • 5 0
 See that folks...you really don't need 3 bottle mounts...
  • 1 1
 Impossible to ride with that..
  • 4 0
 I tape a water bottle to each of my legs, tool to left are, tube to my right arm
  • 4 1
 jeezus enough with the hip packs. i'm going to have to pull my camelbak bandido out of the time machine just to fit in again.
  • 1 0
 Still using mine 20 odd years and still going strong,bladders on it's last legs so if anyone has a bandido bladder they dont want I will buy it,keep the old pack going for a few more years. I dont know what zips leatt is using but my old camelbak is as good as new despite using it 2-5 times a week for 20 years!
  • 4 0
 @MickT13: camelbaks seem to be one of those 'buy it for life' type things. I only replaced mine cause my son wanted one. Zips still work good even after being chewed on by my dog - he could smell an energy gel I'd left in there so he pulled the zip open and was trying to get into the gel when I busted him.
  • 4 0
 If it comes in Hawaiian print with a matching camera strap and hat I'm sold
  • 1 0
 Started using the Dakine fanny hydration pack last season, I now only use my traditional back pack style one for carrying my saw and clippers on maintenance days. Nice having the weight down low, and nothing around your shoulders and chest to restrict movement.
  • 4 0
 All you haters are whack. My mom's been rocking a fanny pack since the early 80's.
  • 1 0
 Read this with an open mind. If the Zipper fails on my back pack. I would have to crash to loose items. That fanny pack would spill out the goods. All that weight concentrated around the waist. I prefer the weight spread out over my back. Then there is the added value of spine protection. I can easily carry a spare winter jacket . Perhaps for hot dry places allowing the back to breath would be an advantage. In the North west ill use a back pack.
  • 6 3
 BS, for the amount of money the industry is charging, practice ZERO tolerance! Product failures are not an option!
  • 2 0
 The name needs more acronyms...DBX Core 2.0 Hydration Pack isn't enough. I don't know, I guess Leatt DBX Waist Pack was too straightforward?
  • 13 0
 How about: Leatt Naild DBX Core 2 R3act HP
  • 1 1
 To me, water belongs on the frame or in a backpack. Adding two kilos plus other stuff will require a tight waist belt which will likely not stay tight. One of the benefits of a fanny pack is that you can loosen the belt and swing it to the front to access the contents. So if you have to “lock” the waist strap then you're loosing a key feature. I’m using a High Above ass pack and for longer rides I carry an MSR filter to refill the one small bottle I carry on the frame. Works well.
  • 2 0
 I think it should be worn in front all the time. Not just to get things out of. Hahaha
  • 1 1
 I was a firm 'no fanny' until a mate put me into theb innov8 ones that are actually for trail running and don't have a bladder. They have a bottle in the middle and 2 percent big pockets that wrap around your waist. I was sold on shorter rides. I like the idea of a back pack for protection but if my 2 last serious crashed neither damaged my back. It was shoulders and hips.

I then thought I'd go for a pack with a bladder for longer rides in African summer. Got the camelbak one and to be honest it was kinda how I thought fanny packs would be when I was anti them. You could only have the bladder half full else it was too bulbous and pushed out from your body. Then add your tools on top of that and it gets a bit awkward. At 1.5l full and if you only use 50% of that you're not really better off than than my innov8 one with a 750 camelbak bottle. The palos was R1400 and the innov8 one was R250 with the bottle and the strap is superior.

Sometimes be needs to make a fanny pack where the bladder comes around your sides and doesn't just bulk up fatter and out from your body making it more unstable.
  • 1 0
 Leatt Zippers suck. I've had the same thing happen on two different Leatt Backpacks. I loved the criss cross buckle design and the pack sat nicely, but the zippers would break or the seam to the sipper would tear.
  • 4 1
 I'D BUY THAT FOR A DOLLAR!!
  • 2 1
 would like to try this. Have been a full bag guy forever but when you get out for a good ride that will outlast a bottle, this seems interesting.
  • 1 0
 I just started using a waist pack this autumn. I got a Macpac Module which is about 5 litres. So far so good. I can get 1.5 litres of water plus light battery and its still comfortable. The best bit is you almost forget its there.
  • 1 0
 Race Face rip-strip and a Backcountry Research strap for shorter rides. Especially if you have an unusable water bottle mount like my sb6c.
  • 2 0
 Where does the water go if you don't use the bottle mount? I have an underside cage, which sucks but is better than nothing, and I picked up a Bontrager Rapid Pack. Very similar to the Rip Strip, but it has a spot for a bottle too. Kinda pricey for what it is ($60) but I've been totally happy with it so far. For longer rides I mount a bottle under the frame and transfer it to my main bottle when that one is empty.

I also use a BR strap for a tube.

I tried the Source Hipster but it was just too bulky with the bladder anything more than half full.
  • 1 0
 @Endurahbrah: I can fit a podium chill in one of the pockets of the Rip Strip. Stretches the pocket a little, but works. The underside cage is not practical for me... The mouth piece gets contaminated in less then a mile, especially this time of year. I try to avoid eating dirt/mud at all cost. I also like the RS 'cause you can wear it under your jersey.
  • 1 0
 @Mtb4joe: Yeah the Bontrager is not fitting under a jersey, not with a water bottle in it anyway. I agree with the mouth piece getting mucked up. That's why I only use it for water storage when I need 2 bottles. And then, I don't use the mouth piece, just transfer to my clean bottle in the pack. Even handling the dirty bottle once gets me annoyed, first world problems!
  • 2 0
 I just can't wear a bumbag, sorry, I'm not too cool for school or anything but I just can't.
  • 1 0
 Have a gander at this henty.cc/shop/enduro-backpack
Leaves the 'Source' Hipster for dead wrt to water capacity and stowage space
  • 1 0
 Not a fan of the quick connect hose. Had a couple hydration packs with these and they both leaked
  • 3 0
 ....AND ENDURO !
  • 2 2
 Hip packs are an interesting proposition, as I used to ride to school with a backpack, and it really messes you up in terms of weight bias, and your positioning.
  • 2 0
 You carry a ton of books to your trails?
  • 2 1
 Been running a Nalgene like this for a couple years now and I paid $25 new.
  • 1 0
 nice scrot sac... needs suspenders.. then you'll really look like a barney.
  • 2 0
 Its not a fanny pack its a tactical belt dude!
  • 1 0
 what's old is new again. in the US we used to call 'em "fanny packs". This means something entirely different in the UK.
  • 1 0
 $80 fanny pack and the water bladder is not even included? I'll pass....
  • 1 0
 anyone know what multitool that is?
  • 8 8
 Friends don't let friends wear backpacks!! Once you go hip pack you never go back....or something like that.
  • 17 1
 Friends let friends wear fanny packs so they can laugh at them
  • 9 20
flag RLEnglish (Dec 15, 2017 at 14:53) (Below Threshold)
 two words, f*g bag
  • 15 0
 @RLEnglish: Did the bag hurt you? Show me where it touched you on this doll.
  • 6 5
 You buy this you’ll get YOUR fanny packed.
  • 1 1
 @RLEnglish: well, if you buy it, that's one thing you could do with it. Whatever floats your boat.
  • 2 0
 @RLEnglish: you are right, it could hold your cigarettes, or weed or beer.
  • 1 1
 Three co2's, a pump and some hand wipes. I guarantee this dude is doing something perverted.
  • 1 0
 Leatt DBX shagbag-secret compartment for the condom(s).
  • 5 0
 Good luck getting laid wearing that thing.
  • 3 0
 @lightsgetdimmer: getting laid? i just like wearing condoms. is that weird?
  • 1 0
 @upchuckyeager: yes
  • 1 0
 Looks like something a camel would wear on their back.
  • 2 0
 Nice crack-sack
  • 1 0
 These glamour shots of the products are just to much!
  • 1 0
 What’s a pack of fannies?!
  • 1 0
 I have never encountered "animal spew".
  • 1 0
 How much did it end up weighing fully packed during the test?
  • 3 3
 Do you have to live in Squamish to feel comfortable wearing one of these?







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.046209
Mobile Version of Website