I spent a half day swinging a Pulaski and stacking rocks, making a step-down at a popular riding zone. I rarely do any trail work these days, but I did my time. I put eight years behind the shovel working with volunteer groups at a California State park, where one of the tasks I did was organize crews to keep the trails in shape and, occasionally, build new ones. Some of those routes are now off limits to mountain bikes, but that’s OK with me.
Our sport was founded on borrowed trails. Our pioneers rode singletracks and abandoned mining routes built and maintained by other people – some paid crews, but mostly volunteers – and I’m sure that none of those men and women had any idea that their efforts would help launch a new mechanized sport called mountain biking. They were building for future generations of hikers and horseback riders, not bicycles. Few of them (at least the ones I met) liked the idea of bicycles plying their handiwork, but they managed to find a way to make room for us. It was the birth of the multi-use trail.
I first learned to wield the Pulaski and McLeod under the watchful eye of a veteran forest ranger who was one of those guys. I clearly remember his wry smile as he watched me struggle to pry up a small root, then told me that his ten-man crew could clear and cut a mile of trail per day.
Later, I would become the one who staked the route, lectured about safety, and who walked the line, guiding new volunteers as they learned to swing those same tools. I can tell with one look if a trail is going to drain well. I can tell by sound if a tool is being used correctly – and I can also tell you that we never managed to cut 660 feet of trail per hour for an eight-hour work day. His crew must have been ass-kickers.
Digging at the state park, we dreamed about building features, often pausing at an ideal spot to trace with our arms, how we would shape an imaginary double, or how we would sculpt a berm around this or that corner, but that’s as far as we dared to take it. We were building the infrastructure that all park visitors would be sharing, not a playground for bikes.
As mountain bikers, our work there was a peace offering to reach out to established hiking and equestrian groups in an effort to gain access to the park. In the end, we were successful. The meandering trail network we helped to construct is far from challenging, but it offers people from all walks of life the chance to escape the crush of the city. Mountain bikes are welcome, although, if you want to ride flat-out, foot out, you’ll have to go elsewhere.
| At some point, trails ceased being a means to a destination - for mountain bike riders, they became the destination. |
“Elsewhere” used to mean, “less-traveled multi-use trails where the potential to scare non-cyclists was slim,” but now when riders have an urge to shred, most of us have the option to express it on mountain-bike-specific trails - much like the one I was working on today. Legal or otherwise, mountain bikers have been building them for two decades and they have taken a lot of pressure off of traditional trail systems. I never dreamed that I’d see the day when I’d find official, “Bikes Only” signs posted at a trail heads. They seem like a rite of passage.
The trails here were built by and are almost exclusively used by cyclists, and that got me thinking on the walk back to my car about how far the sport has progressed, and how profoundly different the average mountain biker’s perception and use of trails has become.
Originally, the purpose of trails was to connected users to destinations like prominent peaks, secret swimming holes, waterfalls, scenic overlooks, or to reach out to other systems. At some point, trails ceased being a means to a destination – for mountain bike riders, they became the destination. That is a fundamental shift in consciousness which is echoed in the way we describe our cycling experiences and how we rate the places where we ride. We most often speak about features, flow and fun factor. We describe trail conditions in great detail. We talk Strava times. The surrounding landscape, however, rarely gets a mention.
Commonality of purpose, is the key ingredient for successfully blending diverse groups into a shared environment. At one time, it could be argued that mountain bikers, trail runners, backpackers, dog-walkers, day-hikers and horseback riders were all on the same page, once they left the parking lot and set out into the wild. But, that is no longer the case. A perfect day for most mountain bikers could be described as a physically demanding roller coaster ride, beautifully crafted through natural terrain. That’s not a sentence I’d expect to hear from anyone walking through the woods.
| Mountain bikers have built hundreds of miles of new trails, but for the most part, you need wheels to enjoy them. |
Looking back, the west faces of the hills were brilliantly lit by the afternoon sun and I could just make out the boulder where I had been working. Two riders were perched on the lip, scoping out the drop. At the trailhead, people were pulling bikes out of vehicles and padding up for a quick lap before nightfall. A middle-aged couple entered the park walking three German Shepherds. They seemed out of context, and I wondered if our sport had reached a tipping point.
Mountain bikers have built hundreds of miles of new trails, but for the most part, you need wheels to enjoy them. Two and four-legged creatures have no need for berms, drops or doubles, which puts us in an awkward situation: for thirty years, we have been asking (sometimes demanding) people to share their trails with us, yet now that our sport has grown up, we have no useful currency with which to return that favor. That said, there are other, perhaps more effective ways we can express our gratitude. We can start by turning down our shred-o-meters to match the vibes of non-cyclists while we are sharing multi-use trail systems. And maybe, just maybe, it’s time to consider returning a trail to milder folk in places where mountain bikers never did find a way to play well with others.
Rock work might be the solution wherever you live, but here, the guys putting on the XC races in the rain are the ones destroying the trails. And sometimes they're ones placing bids to fix them.
What's your solution? Where do you meet in the middle on this one?
^^^ This, more than anything else I can think of would do the most benefit. If every anti-MTB hiker/equestrian had say, a couple of dozen pleasant and low-stress interactions with mountain bikers in a row I think it would pretty much spell the end of trail conflicts. The thing is in order to do this it typically means slowing down and being far more cautious and respectful than we *know* we need to be (because to most hikers a perfectly in control MTB on a descent looks terrifying). It would require so many of us to just suck it up and accept that some percentage of your fun is going to be sacrificed for the greater good. I just dunno if we're gonna do that, because to so many people it feels like "backing down" from the argument.
2 of my favor short local rides are 3-5 mile loops (normally do 3-4 loops) that are MTB only in parks where the other 8-10 are 'no mtb allowed' and there are a couple overlaps that are multi-use for a short distance (100ft). I don't know how many times I've come around a corner in a fast flow section to have some jogger with headphones in or a dog not on a leash that's running all over. The one is a one-way only, mtb only trail with a bridge a couple feet off the ground that is quite long (~1/4 mile) over a swamp section and came up on a lady walking her dog, not on a leash, with headphones, coming towards me on this bridge while I'm trying to get her attention and she doesn't notice until I'm less than 10 feet away. then we had to awkwardly try and pass each other once I'm off my bike while shes telling me how I startled her because she had to walk her dog the wrong way on the one trail of the 40+ miles at the park that she isn't suppose to be on.
Both of my locals are small systems with small ridership numbers, but pretty good hiker/runner/dog walker traffic. If the biker maintenance wanes for a spell, deadfall and overgrowth renders the trails nearly unusable. We get the trails cleaned up and all is well again, but the absolute lack of ownership and investment by other user groups is pretty frustrating and disheartening.
That's pretty screwed up.
Where I live trails began to emerge quite early into the sport. All DH. New neighborhoods would spring up near these trails and hikers began borrowing the bike trails and claiming ownership. I just smile and ignore the BS.
We now have signs explaining that bikes are to be expected to be coming down these trails. That's all you can do.
This battle will always go on.
If we did not build the trail then no one would see that part of the forest.
I am amazed at the level of participation of bikers to enhance the sport with new trails as well as repairing trails.
There are hiking groups that work on trails but its a far cry from how much passion riders put back into the sport.
Every person that does any trail work: YOUR AWESOME! Keep up the good work!
IMO its selfish to try to exclude others from trails. Even if I/we built them its not our land and, once found, it's everyone's to use. I don't like the trend in North Van where; just because mtbers built many of the trails and did the majority of the trailwork; that we now think we have some sort of god given right to exclude others.
What changes is who should yield. Bike specific flow trail? Hikers should yield, horses don't belong. On a multi use trail, hikers and horses get the right of way, hop off your bike and say hi. It's not so hard.
On the other hand, designated bike trails only help to keep us off hiking trails. This is bad from a legality and access standpoint. However, the majority of people (hikers, centaurs, bikers) are not willing to put in the effort to reach the backcountry anyways, so designating bike trails reduces bike traffic for the ones of us who do. If you want privacy on a trail, go hike or bike or build trail somewhere that is really hard to get to. Otherwise, accept the fact that we must share.
Their land, their rules. Fair enough...
I really like your point to lower the shred o metre . If you want to ride at warp speed, when you have no room for error or misjudgment, then go somewhere that you will be certain not to run over someone.
Our behavior as riders matters above all else. Building tracks, taking time to talk to other users. If, as a sport, we act like dickheads then we will get treated accordingly, by both other users and by land managers. If however, we act like people who love getting out in the bush, and respect others who are of the same fundamental mindset, we will get treated well.
Behaving well can earn us the chance to grow, by making the pie bigger (ie a better and more extensive trail network) rather than fighting for a piece of the same pie.
Again, good article.
It's taken two years and lots of (political) work to stop the rogue building and regain our level of trust back. While we have to follow processes (pre-approval, plan submissions, etc), we've still been able to build and regrow the local rider community (and my focus kids). Every dollar for equipment and every hour of work is 100% paid by volunteers, but I'm really proud to say we saved something that could have so easily been lost.
now that there are made for mtb tracks everywhere its just not the same.
I currently ride in Taiwan and surrounding countries and have to say that it feels like stepping back in time in these regards-and I like it,so I just can't support the idea of accepting making tracks not made for mtb off limits. there is always some that need to be left alone,most trails with should be able to be used with respect to other users. letting walkers etc on most made for mtb tracks is the swing side of this-they just also have to respect the primary users. Wellington NZ shows this can work well.
When I started riding there was maybe 20-25 miles of trail total in my area, which is the same total there was in 1940. Today we're north of 200 miles of trail. Not a single inch of the new inventory was build by equestrians, hikers or the forest service or any park, all was built by mountain bikers and 99% of it is multi-use. We're also the only ones that do any maintenance, which is why the dedicated horse trails are basically impassible, 3 foot deep pits of mud and horse shit now.
In short, it's time for them to start paying us back, not the other way around. I'm also officially done caring one iota about equestrian or hikers needs on new trails. If they ever show up to build or maintain anything at all, then they can have input. I'm not holding my breath.
I typed out a huge rant, but it serves no purpose. The people that built the trails I started riding on in the 80s are long since dead. The trails everyone at least on the east coast is riding or hiking on today were built by mountain bikers. The notion that we don't do enough is f*cking absurd.
thats all