Sacki

@gcrider: How come you think that?

@Glenngineer: Those are the comments why we love doing our job and that encourage us to keeping make things better! Thank you, Glengineer!

@Glenngineer: Our REVIVES are now shimmable, too. Same way as the DIVINE. The spacers are different from the original DIVINE spacers though. DIVINE spacers are bigger in diameter and won't work for DIVINE. REVIVE, on the other hand spacer will work for DIVINE. That's why DIVINE spacers will soon phase out and be replaced by the universal REVIVE spacers. All generation REVIVE 30.9/31.6/34.9 can be shimmed. We do still need to properly communicate REVIVE's travel-adjustability but since we are in the middle of completely re-launchingour website, we'll do that later.

This is such a good business idea for us over at BikeYoke. Thanks WTB!

Haha, well... The beads are no beads anymore once they have turned into foam. Without knowing your friend's preferences, you can still let him know that these beads for sure would be too small anyway.

@Rig: Well, they might look similar on the first glimpse. But they are quite differently sized. Here is a 142 SAGMA and a 15cm SQ Lab https://www.mtb-news.de/forum/t/bikeyoke-sagma-lite-barkeeper-vorbau-updates-carbon-raw-und-ohne-elastomere.967488/post-18453735

@jovesaxa: Could not be happier to hear this! Thank you so much for supporting our little brand! This means a lot to me and the team!

You mean comparison between our suspension design and SQ Lab's "Active" feature? Would be cool to see a comparison of these two technologies, but I can (purely objectively and without saying one or the other is better) tell you that much: Not commenting on wheter that's good or bad, but a SAGMA with soft shock absorbers will tilt much more and much more easily than an SQ Lab Active Sport, even if no elastomer was installed in it. Not just by a bit, but noticeably more. That being said: I think it is hard to compare saddles in general (objectively) and it is even harder to compare them when they are so greatly different in both, length and curvature. So unless you want to compare the "tilting" technologies, comparing a SAGMA to an SQ Lab saddle will not make more or less sense than comparing it to any other saddles. Saddles are a very personal thing.

@northboy: We did have 7x9 in the beginning and when we had to decided for the sizefor both carbon models, we went 7x10 for these because we have seen some major manufacturers are offering 7x10. I believe the trend might be because 7x10 rails allow for an ultimately stronger, yet more fley desgin in carbon rails. Just about every (there may be very few that are not) other dropper post can take any size oval rail design and we did not want to miss out on a new trend just to remain compatible with the AXS. We are still offering 7x9 alloy rails as spare parts, should you want to isntall the SAGMA on an AXS.

@FuzzyL: Actually, "sagma" transslates to "saddle" from Latin.