Not many professional athletes have the opportunity to grow with their sport the way that Hans Rey has. Having spent over 25 as a professional mountain biker, Hans has been around for nearly every major technological advancement our sport has seen. We thought that it would be fun to compare Hans' bike from 1995 to his current setup. Enjoy!
99 Comments
Man, we really have come a long way! Not only are bikes so much better these days, but you can actually pick what you want depending on your personal preference.
20 years ago you were happy if the bike didn´t break
10 years ago you were happy if it (more or less) did what it was supposed to do
today I can have a snappy, fun, trail bike that pedals well but also is fun on the downs - or a burly downhill machine that is still pedal-able
and still people complain
www.pinkbike.com/news/hans-rey-has-at-least-8-bikes-stolen-from-his-garage-and-camper-van-in-east-midlands-england.html
Most of negative nellies have never tried one.
Maybe it's the principal or your just an old roadie / dirt roadie that can't get your head around it.
good memory just doesn't last long.
(and Ti Xizang was the wet dream)
Still have mine.-
Haha! You took a look in my profile.. Thanks!!
Ride on!
For the tech stuff the old bikes are often more fun. With the new bike you can easily ride bigger features but sometimes is kind of boring because you can just roll on everything if you have to. If I have to go on a long ride, 4-8hrs, I would def take a modern bike.
Versatility victory goes to the 1995 zaskar (most peoples dream from that era), it just wasn't as fast down the hill but it made it down.
Bikes have come so far since 1995.
So is that sweet Navy Blue, hanging out back there with a piece of paper over the Porsche logo. 1962-ish 356? Probably an S?
Damn Hans!
I saw the newer frame last year and bought it new from a bike meet for $50. $500 later....
www.pinkbike.com/photo/17256523
www.pinkbike.com/photo/17256521
Primarily for my daughter's middle school MTB team.
Personally I find it annoying that it took 25 for bikes to get to where we are.
Most of that time was spent not concentrating on what actually makes real difference (geometry) and instead on marketing and faff.
If companies had done real R&D, it would have taken 5-10 years
Marketing and management set budgets and goals for R&D.
R&D are slaves to marketing...
R&D always want to, but are told not to!!!
Post a Comment
Join Pinkbike Login