The European Bike Project is one of our favorite Instagram accounts. Alex from TEBP constantly updates his feed with everything from interesting curios from tiny manufacturers to inside looks at European manufacturing to analyses of the environmental impact of our sport. He's currently travelling in New Zealand, where he started The Oceanian Bike Project.The team at Brazn Bikes has been working on an impressive range of bikes.
The Company Milton Bloomfield founded Dynamic Composites in 1997 to make his own carbon products, shortly after graduating with a degree in mechanical engineering. The shops next door were a kayak and a bike shop, so it’s no big surprise that he soon built a kayak and a bike frame.
Not long after that, he got interested in multisports, such as the Coast to Coast race. While Milton took part in such races, he also built carbon parts for others to use in the race, such as special drink systems or parts for kayaks. After this success, Milton soon made a frame for Sarah Ulmer who won the individual pursuit race at the 2004 Athens Olympics.
Over the years, Milton was involved in more than 20 NZ Olympics and Paralympics medals as well as some iconic sailing achievements.
Now Dynamic Composites is working on its own mountain bike range, which will be sold under the “Brazn” brand. The track bikes used to be labelled “ZEN”, but Milton decided to move away from this name.
Currently, the team is working on three different bikes: a trail bike, a park bike, and an e-bike. They all have a single pivot suspension design with a medium to high idler pulley. The frames will be made in-house in Christchurch, NZ, including the CAD, tooling, making the actual frame, painting and assembly.
Milton Bloomfield working on the latest iteration of the e-bike.
After eight iterations Milton is satisfied that the e-bike frame is now good enough to go out to keen riders.
A new roll of carbon fiber just arrived at the factory.
Some of the work that Dynamic Composites does is confidential, so we couldn't take a lot of photos in the factory.
Milton acknowledges that it’s challenging to build frames in New Zealand because of the costs, but he’s passionate about bringing some carbon frame manufacturing back to New Zealand. Since 2015 the company has been ISO 9001 certified because of their work for the aerospace and medical industry and that’s the level of precision they also want to bring to Brazn.
The carbon itself comes from Gurit, a world leader in carbon fiber. All products have serial numbers, so Milton can track which carbon he used for which product, which paint was used and other details.
All frames are painted in-house.
The team has also been working on new handlebars, but releasing the bikes is their first priority. As you can see, the handlebars have gone through some testing.
A handlebar and rear ends in the factory.
The Suspension Design “Keeping things simple is difficult, making something complex is easy,” says Milton. When he went with his family on a three-week trip to Whistler back in 2018 he crashed and broke his scapula after the first week. While the rest of the family was in the bike park, he had two weeks off the bike to design a new bike for his next visit. He found that the waiting time at bike shops in Whistler was long and he was working on the bikes of his family every day, so the question of how he could build a frame with a simple suspension design came up.
He liked the high pivot bikes that started to appear in the downhill World Cup back then, so he decided to take this route too.
 | Keeping things simple is difficult, making something complex is easy.—Milton Bloomfield, Brazn Bikes |
“With the right design and spring rate, you can have the progressivity to prevent bottom out harshness and maintain sensitivity at the same time,” Milton explained – and I could definitely feel that he was right when I had the chance to ride the park bike in Christchurch Adventure Park.
The biggest challenge was to get the lateral stiffness of the bottom bracket right. While some riders think that single pivot frames are not stiff enough, Milton points out that many motorbikes are single pivots too – so it’s all a matter of the right concept. One key feature to get the right stiffness is the use of bottom bracket size bearings for the frame pivot, but the braces between the seat- and chainstays surely help too.
The design also allows Milton to create pretty light frames – not having a lot of bearings and a rocker link simply saves weight. For example, the trail bike frame is around 2.8 kg (including shock).
The E-Bike Milton says: “I’m a perfectionist. When you understand all the aspects of bike design, it’s difficult to say 'It’s good enough.' I went through seven iterations of the e-bike frame before I actually built one frame. There is only so much you can do in CAD, at some point you have to go to the physical product. I could go on with the design forever, but version eight really is good enough.”
For 2023 and 2024, the e-bike will be available with Shimano Motors and Brazn got all the parts in stock for 2023. Suspension duties will be managed by DVO products and other parts will come from E*Thirteen and PRO.
When Milton designed the e-bike, he didn’t look at other options that are on the market. “Ignorance is bliss," he says. He didn’t want to take inspiration from other bikes, he wanted the bike to be his interpretation of an e-bike.
I had the chance to ride this bike around the Port Hills and in Victoria Park. While this is by no means a review, my first impression was positive. There are not many high pivot e-bikes with idler pulleys out there, even though the design makes a lot of sense: The slightly increased friction does not really matter and the lack of pedal kickback and more active suspension makes the ride even more enjoyable.
Details
- Head Angle: 65°
- Effective Seat Angle: 76° / 75.4° / 75.1°
- Reach: 450 / 480 / 510 mm
- Stack: 633 / 642 / 647 mm
- Chainstays: 460 mm
- As ridden 22.3 kg (according to Brazn)
- 160 mm front, 150 mm rear travel
- 29” wheels
- Rear shock: 205 x 60 mm Trunnion
The Park Bike I was lucky enough to ride the park bike at the chairlift-assisted Christchurch Adventure Park, which proved to be the perfect test lab for this bike. Riding this bike was a lot of fun and I was amazed how well the rear suspension worked. There was a lot of plushness, but at the same time there was enough progression to prevent any bottom-out harshness. Of course, the pedal kickback-reducing idler pulley design was very welcome too.
Due to some issues with my hands I usually ride with a Fasst Flexx handlebar, so using the almost perfectly straight carbon bar felt a bit harsh in the beginning, but I got used to it after some laps. Overall I loved the characteristics of this rig and if you mainly ride park, I’d definitely recommend staying tuned for the official release of this frame.
Details
- Head Angle: 63°
- Effective Seat Angle: 73°
- Reach: 450 mm
- Stack: 609 mm
- Chainstays: 430 mm
- As ridden less than 15 kg (according to Brazn)
- 27.5” wheels
- 180 mm front, 180 mm rear travel
- BB92 bottom bracket
- Rear shock: 205 x 65 mm Trunnion
The Trail Bike Milton went the extra mile and gave me the trail bike to try out as well. I rode it up the rather cruel Huntsbury Avenue and down the pretty mellow Huntsbury downhill track. I was amazed how well the bike pedalled uphill, even though Milton had put some decent rubber on the light carbon wheels. There was no suspension bob and the bike felt very efficient. Naturally, the downhill performance was not even close to the park bike, but I had a good time nevertheless. The rear suspension seemed to work better for me than the Fox 34, which I found a bit unresponsive, even with the compression open and the correct sag. What really counts for me though is the XC-like uphill performance of the frame, combined with an impressively low weight.
Details
- Head Angle: 65°
- Effective Seat Angle: 75°
- Reach: 480 mm
- Stack: 613 mm
- Chainstays: 435 mm
- As ridden less than 14 kg (according to Brazn)
- Frameset with shock as ridden: 2780g
- 29” wheels
- 140 mm front, 130 mm rear travel
- PF30 bottom bracket
- Rear shock 185 x 50 mm
160 Comments
@nickfranko agreed
imgur.com/aHceD9W
- would look way better
- make room for a water bottle
- bonus - less complicated construction = cheaper to make.
Nothing has to be a weak point if the design and manufacturing compensates for it. A sharp kink could be the strongest point on the bike if there's enough material! A better way to look at it is "structural efficiency".
You're correct it's a point of structural inefficiency. No cause for concern if Brazn has used sufficient material and applied it correctly, just slightly heavier than a different shape might have been. That said, the reason we perceive such design elements as "weak points" is because many products fail to properly compensate for structural inefficiencies.
However, I still thing the discussion about seattube length. If the seatpost engineers actually trust that the minimum insertion length is sufficient for them to perform and survive then it is wasted to not take advantage of that. The current consensus seems to be that the ideal length is the dropper that when extended reaches the saddle up to XC height yet still has the outer tube nearly entirely slid into the seattube. Whereas I'd say that when the saddle is at that height with that very same dropper seatpost (so with the same amount of travel), you only have little more than the minimum insertion dept inside the seattube. As I mentioned, that gives you most flexibility to play with the saddle height. You can still do what you could do with the conventional/current seattube dimensioning, you just also get the option to play with a lower saddle height when you do what that. Of course many here say they won't use and need that so that's all fine. It is just a big brands that designs bikes for the masses could actually benefit from more versatility. Especially as many of these big brands also have athletes on their roster who compete in 4X, DS and pumptrack racing. If they're on hardtails, they already have good options. But if they're on full suspension bikes, they typically get the small size XC or trail bikes. And I feel that they choose them for their low height, but the short reach is a compromise. The shorter seattubes could solve that without anyone losing any functionality. Again, provided the droppers live up to their claims and the minimum insertion is indeed sufficient.
www.mtbr.com/threads/parallelogram-dropper-post.1066201/#lg=thread-1066201&slide=0
The review heaped praise on the "climb" position, yet bike design clung to the 73° seat-tube angle due to a prevalent belief that a short wheelbase was superior. A short wheelbase does have some advantages in some situations, yet it seemed so obvious that the disadvantages outweighed the advantages. We had to either fold ourselves in half or sit on the very tip of the saddle's nose to keep the front wheel down on any climb that required the small chainring.
Similarly, we either had to get off and adjust our saddle height every few minutes or our default descending position was full Superman, resting our solar plexus on the rear edge of the saddle, yet the article states "To date, we have yet to find a use for [the Stowaway position]".
Was every bike designer in California and Colorado riding nothing by gently rolling terrain? Were they all so convinced of the short wheelbase dogma that they ignored the obvious problems and rejected the obvious solutions? My friends and I were flex-honing our seat-tubes, greasing our quick-releases for faster adjustment, and choosing saddles that didn't bruise our ribs quite as badly, waiting for bike designers to do the obvious. Little did we realize we would have to wait decades.
Anyway, the Power Post may have been imperfect, but it was visionary.
...I'll see myself out
I totally get why one wouldn't like a backpack, but I'm the opposite. The bike can't carry enough water for me so I'm resigned to carrying the back bag. Even though all my bikes have at least one bottle mount.
@hamncheez: undead and unalive
backpacks can get real hot though so i use one of these
www.osprey.com/us/en/product/seral-4-SERAL4S21.html
thank god for bike packing gear for those multi day excursions.
just had a look at the camelbak that's not bad from the looks, have to see who distributes them here.
ta for that.
@TheRamma Bottle mounts are certainly not the main criteria for me choosing a frame, but like I mentioned above if I am looking at two bikes with similar performance attributes the one with bottle mounts will get the nod. This is not a dis to any company that doesn't have them, but if I was a designer/product mgr for a bike manufacturer it would be something that would be in the discussions. It is feasible on nearly every bike out these days. Lastly, I'll mention a US brand that makes killer bikes that would greatly benefit from bottle mount inclusion that being Canfield. I would be surprised if they do not go for this in their next design updates. Revel proved it is do-able with their CBF suspension and I would love to them do it as I prefer Canfield's vibe.
I can ask Lance if he's going to redesign for ya, but he's a pretty good engineer, so I imagine if the solution was simple and didn't require a big trade-off, he would have done it. IDK, not speaking for the dude, I'm an engineering moron.
If you're ever in Western CO, let me know, you can probably go ride with him and ask him yourself. The bikes are ridiculously good, as is the company. Can't say they're the best, but the suspension outperforms anything I've tried, including Revel. I gave up a Process 153 with a water bottle mount in the front triangle for that Lithium, and haven't looked back.
I was a Evil creep for nearly six years. I had a great time on both of the Wreckonings I had, but more recently moved on to riding a Stumpjumper EVO. There is plenty of love and hate out there for the big S, but I can't really find much of anything I don't like about it. It has a bottle mount and frame storage and is just silly fun. Despite having less travel than the Evils, there is not really anything I would be concerned about riding with it.
i've taken to bringing a banana and an apple on rides longer than a few hours these days but you can feel the difference in energy levels. i tried using a very dilute saline solution for electrolytes but yuck, nope not doing that again. then i put a little bit of ginger and lemon juice with it and that's not too bad. the issue is i'm so used to sweet sugary stuff it's taking a while to acclimatise.
No hate for the Big S. I do know, and accept, that I pay extra for a small company where I can talk to the owner/designer/engineer if I call the website's number. Not everybody cares about that, though.
I can honestly say that the suspension ride on the thing is astounding with far more supple a ride feel than my 21'/gen5 Fuel EX, and yet with WAY less suspension bob than the Fuel too. The traction when climbing on some of the small hills near where I live is unreal, and when just riding through some of the single track on those trails local trails that I normally ride trying to get fit, the addition of the motor means that in areas where I'd be peddling around at up to 16kph / 10mph, I was doing twice that speed and turning the mundane into fun and exciting.
I've been fortunate enough to ride a well sorted Rail a few years back, a fantastic bike, there is no denying that. In my opinion the 'way' the BRAZN ride's made it much more enjoyable of a bike to me!
I was skeptical and curious as to how well that rear end could work before riding it properly (if i am honest), all I can say is that everyone should have a go so see for themselves, it's that well sorted!. To be expected from an engineer who designed and built Olympic gold and silver medal winning track bikes, who then started on a MTB path as a way past others issues.
A lot of my initial riding was done in the open setting on the shock (still with little to no noticeable pedal bob), the switch to the trail setting was hugely noticeable, and made a great bike even better on flatter sections and general trail riding!
As for water, I'm one of those that can't suffice on a tiny little bottle's, so I have wore a 3lt pack for longer than I care to mention.
Now that the chain is elevated on this particular bike, all these pros and cons compared to a traditional bike are out of the way. It is pretty much the same again.
Currently, I feel a direct multi-link may be best for most riders in most situations, but that could change when we get bypass shocks, as they'll be able to offer more sophisticated curves for both spring and damping.
In any case, it's great that companies are exploring these options. Even if few people buy boutique bikes like the Brazn, the learnings from outlier designs help advance the entire industry.
I do agree that a direct multi-link layout likely works best for most riders in most situations, because most suspension designs these days are very well sorted (and quite similar in the resulting kinematics). Interesting comment about the bypass shocks and it’s possible advantages, I’m not up to speed on these and will have to learn more.
I also agree it’s great to see small brands trying different designs, exploring new ideas, or revisiting old designs with a modern interpretation. I love that we have all the options we do regarding suspension designs.
I did however just purchase an indirect multi-link bike… yet to confirm if it’s better than my 4bar bike but it super is pretty.
Cheers!
They are built for the owner, and no-one else, so unlike most other bikes out there, you don't have to put up with a colour choice you may hate, or a bike tuned to a person who rides and or weighs nothing like you!
Fox Float X2 blown in 1/2 of a ride
They ride great too! Like I expected it to ride well post some really good conversations on it with Milton over the last 6 months or so, and yet it still blew my mind that something with the comfort support and 'feel' of a DH rig in the way it takes up all the chatter and makes the trail disappear under you, still pedaled with almost zero bob - it actually messed with my head a bit as all bikes are generally a compromise in some way, this one didn't feel like it was burdened with that problem though! (even with my fat butt on it!)
As a hint, look at the pic above showing the trail bike with the e-bike in the next photo. Take a look at the shock and bottom bracket positioning on them both, and how the motor could potentially line up on both bikes!
But on the park bike, wouldn't the shock work better upside down? Like more oil on seals for dusty park laps?
The coming trail and park bikes will in turn be evolution's of the bikes shown in here!
The BRAZN, on the grand scheme of things isn't actually THAT expensive!
I love mine. They are still being made, mine is a Taniwha Mullet 160/180 full coil.
mtbs.cz/media/2012/10/24/Trek9500celk1_cl.jpg
Join Pinkbike Login