PINKBIKE FIELD TEST
Salsa Timberjack XT 29
Words by Alicia Leggett; photography by Tom RichardsWhile the five full-suspension bikes on test play the game of trying to budget decent rear suspension and everything that comes along with that into a sub-$3k package, the hardtails take a different tactic: keeping things simple and doing fewer things, but aiming to do those things really, really well.
The Timberjack XT 29 is Salsa's workhorse trail hardtail, which Salsa says "just might be the best hardtail 29er for the playful types out there." The modern geometry aims to balance playfulness and handling on the descents with a centered climbing position, with a 66.4° head angle and adjustable chainstays to try to check all the fun, versatile, and efficient boxes.
The Salsa Timberjack XT 29 is the most expensive of the four hardtails in the Value Bike Field Test, coming in at $2,099 USD. For that price, the Timberjack gets a Shimano XT / SLX drivetrain combo, with mostly XT parts but an SLX cassette and chain. It also sports a RockShox 35 Gold 130mm fork, Shimano MT-501 brakes, Maxxis Minion DHF and Rekon 29" x 2.6" tires, and a TranzX adjustable travel dropper post.
The Timberjack is also available in SLX, GX Eagle, and singlespeed configurations with either 29" or 27.5"+ wheels, with prices ranging from $1,699 to $2,499 for complete bikes and a frame-only option for $699. There's also a Ti frame for $3,199, but I'm moving on from talking about that because Ti anything is far outside the scope of this Value Bike Field Test.
Salsa Timberjack XT 29 Details• Travel: 130mm fork
• Aluminum frame
• Wheel size: 29"
• Head angle: 66.4°
• Seat tube angle: 75.1°
• Reach: 453.6 mm (M)
• Chainstay length: 420 - 437 mm
• Sizes: S, M (tested), L, XL
• Weight: 30.6 lb / 13.9 kg
• Price: $2,099 USD
•
salsacycles.com Over the next few weeks we’re rolling out this Field Test on Pinkbike and YouTube as usual, but Beta MTB members get early access starting today. Head over to
betamtb.com to see all the Field Test videos and reviews right away, or
sign up for Beta MTB if you're not a member yet.
These tests take a lot of time and money to make happen, and we genuinely try to give riders useful, honest feedback about the bikes we review. We appreciate everyone's support!
Before we dive into the geometry and ride characteristics, the frame itself has some notable features. There's no need to worry about going thirsty - or hungry or cold - on the Timberjack, as there are two bottle spots in the main triangle on sizes S - XL (there's just one on the XS size), plus an accessory mount on the underside of the downtube, a bag mount on the top tube, and rear rack mounts for carrying all kinds of gear.
The bike also uses Salsa's clever Alternator 2.0 swinging dropout design, which allows for 17mm of chainstay length adjustment to dial in the ride feel. The cables are tucked away neatly inside the aluminum frame, which oddly enough, was lighter than expected, with our complete bike weighing in at 30.6 lbs - more than a pound lighter than the claimed 31.9 lbs for size medium. That weight puts it pretty squarely in the middle of the weight range compared with the other hardtails we tested.
As for the geometry, the headtube is 66.4°, which would have been on the aggressive side in years past but now sits nicely in the "modern but not overkill" zone. The chainstays, at 420mm to 437mm, range from lively to middle-of-the-road. Sizing is a tad on the longer side, so rather than our standard large frame, we tested a medium that had a 453.6 mm reach.
ClimbingThe Timberjack doesn't set out with climbing efficiency as its primary goal. Instead, it's designed as an all-around play and adventure bike, with climbing as just one part of the full experience.
The bike may not have quite the same snappy energy as a more XC-oriented bike like the Marin Team Marin 1 that we tested, but it nonetheless felt jaunty enough when pedaling, both seated and out of the saddle. The 75.1-degree seat tube angle made for a balanced climbing position over the bike and even with the chainstays in their shortest (420mm) setting, the rear end always felt plenty substantial and I never noticed the front end lifting or feeling hard to rein in.
With reasonable expectations set - that the Timberjack should be a bikepacking, high alpine adventure, or playful trail bike - it's a solid performer that lives up to what it sets out to do. It's not featherlight and doesn't have that aggressive feel that makes you want to sprint up the hill, but it gets the job done and makes it easy to enjoy the ride. And enjoy the ride I did, since - out of all the bikes, hardtail and full suspension - the Timberjack is the bike I most often wanted to grab as I headed out the door.
Descending My initial impression when I hopped on the Timberjack, right after arriving in the Tucson desert, was along the lines of "right, this is what mountain biking is supposed to be." Riding a hardtail - one that isn't designed for XC racing - feels goofy, low-stakes, and fun. It's a tool for just playing around, and I loved it.
While most definitely a hardtail, the Timberjack feels aggressive enough to take on some technical downhill riding and doesn't feel held back by its lack of squish on small jumps and drops or chattery, open sections of trail. The short chainstays made it feel agile, lively, and just plain fun, but since that short rear end didn't make the bike ultra-stable, it was also nice to have the chainstay adjustability to change the bike's personality if I so chose.
The Timberjack isn't as purpose-built as a bike like the Commencal Meta HT we tested, which seems more skewed toward descending but feels less at-home when it isn't pointed down something gnarly. While the Timberjack is a pleasant descender (and even the fastest in the timed testing), it feels equally ready to pedal just about anywhere you'd want to take a hardtail.
Since, as mentioned earlier, the Timberjack was the most expensive hardtail on test, it hardly feels fair to compare it to the rest of the field, but we have to anyway. With slightly higher-grade components than any of the other bikes, the Timberjack made the money count, and the Shimano XT drivetrain and MT-501 brakes were as rock-solid as they come. In fact, the brakes performed better than most of the other, more expensive Shimano brakes I've ridden recently, with sufficient power and without the notorious wandering bite point.
I also appreciated that the Timberjack came with what I consider extremely sensible tires: a Maxxis Minion DHF up front and Rekon in the back, both in EXO casing. The DHF was exactly what I wanted for cornering and playing around, while the Rekon kept the bike feeling lively and unencumbered.
The RockShox 35 Gold fork, however, was the weakest part of the build. While there wasn't anything particularly
bad about it, it had minimal adjustability and relatively little sensitivity off the top, sometimes feeling like it couldn't quite hang with the desert chatter. I would have loved to try out the bike with a pricey top-end fork, but I suppose that's not the point of testing value bikes.
All in all, it's hard to find fault with the Timberjack. It delivers on versatility and it's just easy to like. The willingness to go anywhere, the sensible tires and brakes, and the nostalgia of goofing around on a hardtail all make me want to take it out for yet another ride.
Uh, never ... non issue.
Exactly the same problem I have on my Marzo Z2 which was soooo much approved by Pinkbike (reason among others why I bought one).
Asking a suspension expert (Novyparts) he told me that the Z2 has exactly the same problem as.... the RS 35...
... and that it's "functional", and that I can eventually live with it.... unless I ask Fox service to replace the lowers by Fox 34 ones for quite a good amount of money.
And I discovered on internet that many Z2 owners have the same problem.
BTW: bushings of the Z2 are not replacable because they are... cast in the lowers, so it means that this fork is disposable.
Unacceptable, indeed.
The problem is (Fox service told me) that on my (OEM) 150mm Z2, the stanchions are not entirely taken in charge by the lowest bushings. When you compress it a bit, the problem actually disappears.
The issue would not occur with slightly longer stanchions.
Anyway...
I wish bikes model names used suspension instead of the drivetrain as an indicator. For example: Timberjack XT 29 vs Timberjack RS 35 29.
It's pathetic. All this for that?!
I don't know if the Z1 has some issues, but I'll definitely go back to Rockshox as soon as I can, or to Suntour: I have a RC2 Auron on my hardtail for 5 years and it works very well... and servicing it is a child's play.
C'est la vie
What do you need salsa for?
...Salsa is now the number one condiment in America.
You know why? Because people like to say "salsa." "Excuse me, do you have any salsa?" We need more salsa." "Where's the salsa? No salsa?"
Those are Deore level cranks, from the photo they appear to be the FC-MT510-1. Deore cranks are dramatically heavier than SLX/XT. Maybe cheaping out here is ok for the folks buying this bike but I'm in total agreement, this particular spec choice is mind boggling.
I already have 3.
Plus there's the human element... I'm just a dumb human, not a robot, and my riding totally depends on whether I'm daydreaming about dinner, feeling sunburned, whatever. The timing is kind of useful as a ballpark measure of (I feel) our comfort on the bike, but take it all with several grains of salt.
PB, I've been pretty quiet about the Outside acquisition... but they are DESTROYING your brand and reputation between this NFT bullsh*t and all the forced BETA content. Band together, buy yourselves back, and PLEASE become independent again. We would much rather read real, independent journalism than watch some videos where you copy Donut Media and team up with more journo's from the Outside network.
Hubs Shimano MT400 and Shimano MT410
BB crankset is a Shimano MT-510 - so pretty sure the BB is sealed
Headset - FSA Orbit NO.57E 1.5 ZS
I have hunch you are just trolling, but maybe you really think $2100 hardtail is spec'd with unsealed bearings in the year 2022.
Thanks thats the sort of spec deep dive I think is needed.
Sadly I'm not trolling or trying to be deliberately provocative. But it's not unheard of for brands to cut corners on components.
Eg my Orbea laufey which retailed for £1500 in 2019 or 2020 had and unsealed headset and it was a massive pain.
Or saying a bike comes with minions or similar, but actually they are the crap single compound versions.
This TJ was what I was going to buy last fall, but the frame only option was unobtanium. I decided on build up a Middlechild V2 frame instead.
Hoping someone can compare them in terms of frame and geo.