About a year ago, we wrote about the
Super Wheel, which claims to revolutionize our understanding of cycling efficiency by providing pedal assistance without using a battery or motor. Now, the design has moved forward and Super Wheel has shown more prototypes online, but we remain thoroughly unconvinced.
Super Wheel has remained somewhat vague about the actual mechanisms that supposedly provide this boost, which certainly doesn't exactly help the project's credibility. Still, it seems Super Wheel is attempting some transparency, and recently posted on
Facebook, "We will begin the technology disclosure of the SuperWheel - Weight-to-Energy Conversion Technology (WTECT). The 4 mm gap between the inner hub and external hub meant [sic] the weight causes the spring compression and decompression at 12 o'clock position +4 mm and 6 o'clock -4mm, total spring compression at 12 o'clock position 8mm, and the energy conversion continue [sic] throughout the rotation."
Is your head spinning yet? Good, because the Super Wheel isn't...
The WTECT purportedly works because it harnesses vertical movement, caused by a rider's weight, and turns it into forward motion. Somehow, apparently, the springs compress at the top of the cycle and decompress at the bottom, using the potential energy released as the springs decompress to spin the wheel. (Now, how is that energy not recaptured by the springs compressing at the top? If Super Wheel has figured that part out, it's unclear.) In some ways, the idea seems similar to the claims about
Slingshot bikes back in the day, which some said could harness vertical movement with their spring-and-cable situation and use that energy to create forward propulsion. That claim of "sling power," to my knowledge, has never been substantiated.
The latest prototype looks to have nine, rather than eight, springs, and claims to give more assistance than the last version. Super Wheel also plans to develop a version for cargo bikes, alongside its current effort to create more efficient wheelchair and recumbent bicycle wheels. There's also a front wheel in development, which is smaller and lighter than the rear wheel and makes the whole situation seem even more perplexing, and even a Super Cycle, which will supposedly be developed this winter and will be an entire bike based around the concept of Super Wheels. Super Wheel has certainly been busy.
Founder Simon Chan, who was born in Hong Kong and now lives in Ireland, said the original version made bicycles 30% more efficient, and he continues to set his sights even higher. It's very unclear where that 30% comes from, as there's no public documentation of any testing whatsoever and, given how efficient bicycles already are, it would be highly unlikely to make such a large gain from a simple wheel swap. A well-maintained bicycle is quite efficient, with the drivetrain efficiency
as high as 98.5%, though of course there's significant energy loss to rolling and air resistance.
Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like there's more definitive efficiency to be gained from raising that seat a couple of centimeters.
To give the technology a slight benefit of the doubt, we know that technology exists that uses springs to harness and release energy, generating motion - think of a trampoline. A trampoline, of course, relies on the input of a person jumping on it, just as this wheel, in the alternate but maybe slightly possible universe in which it works, relies on the energy input of a person pedaling a bike. A trampoline, however, works thanks to Newton's third law, which states that
for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction combined with Hooke's Law, which states that the force needed to extend a spring is proportional to the length of spring extension. For that spring extension, there's an equal and opposite reaction: the trampoline effect. It would be cool, of course, if something similar could be harnessed in the Super Wheel, but if that's the case, it'll take some more convincing for me to believe it.
The Super Wheel has been granted patents in Australia, China, Japan, the United States, Canada, and with the World Intellectual Property Office. The European Union patent is set to be finalized in December. Remember that a patent doesn't validate technology's efficacy, only its originality.
We'd all be eager to see an independent test of the Super Wheel, and we here at Pinkbike humbly volunteer Mike Levy to put it to the test.
More information is available on
Super Wheel's website, along with the option to shop, if you're feeling very, very lucky.
When a paywall comes, outside+ work on the notion that not everyone will pay - and they don’t care - as long as enough pay to make the venture profitable.
People’s jokes, stances, whining etc matters not. There are a huge number of readers that will pay and that’s all that matters.
Allow me to save you time and PB money.
Perpetual motion machines are fantasy, there’s no free lunch, and in the end thermodynamics always wins.
Be safe be well,
Incognito Robin
Be safe be well,
Incognito Robin
This be safe and be well bullshit is enough. Damn annoying to sit here and read your smirky anonymous cock stroking
Be safe be well,
Incognito Robin
That being the case, I'd be even more concerned about the proximity of genitals to back wheel.
q.e.d.
Pretty sure that'd classify it as an e-bike, or some other sort of pedal assist.
www.walmart.com/ip/Radio-Flyer-Inchworm-Classic-Bounce-and-Go-Ride-on/9203279
Not interested unless there is a Huck to Flat test too
From a review: ‘ Thin tube walls and a noticeably resilient rear end put a spring in the Handjob’s step that burlier frames simply can’t match, taking the edge off everything from high-frequency vibration to square-edged stutter bumps in a way that has to be experienced to be believed’
Sounds like a Handjob was the way to go back in the day…I certainly felt so.
I had a Kona Sex Too way back in the day. I call false advertising - I got the bike but not the sex too.
I guess times have changed though, too many people in certain parts of world would take offense. Also, the tongue in check slapstick hunor has evolved/gone out of fashion a bit too.
The amount of money and effort he's put into this thing he could have a decent road bike with the saddle at the correct height.
From the site: "Weight (mass) to energy conversion technology’". In other words, the more body positive the riders is - the faster it will ride.
So it is clear that PB hates the fact that body positive person can be faster then them!
Or someone could find a way to connect a buttered cat to a bike? Unlimited range!
Be safe be well,
Incognito Robin
Imagine if we removed the clunky and non-environmental batteries with a nice internal combustion engine. Revolutionary, I tell you!
infinitysav.com/magneticgenerator
Get Mike Levy an online session with that dude. I will watch every second of that
Also - Why isn't it being used on the Donut in a 29"/26" mullet configuration to fix all of the "pedal like dogshit" that was a mandatory design requirement? Seems like a no-brainer.
If Pinkbike doesn't already have one on order to test on the Grim Donut, i will be disappointed.
What is surprising here is that the US patent office granted a patent. They don't give patents to perpetual motion machines...which is what this claims to be.
The sort of device described above could be possible with some sort of heavy internal flywheel connected to an external shell via activating a sprag clutch mechanism, and external blade and coil springs between the hub and the rim to smooth out the sudden rise in angular momentum when connected.
Such a contraption would require good bearings, solid materials, and a lead flywheel and weigh a ton. Efficiency would quickly deteriorate on any extended climb as the angular momentum of the flywheel was converted into linear motion
www.superwheelsystem.com/testimonials
What do you identify as?? A Kettle?, a Screwdriver, maybe a Penguin?
I do have a degree in physics, I would not need one, however, to see at a glance that this idea is stupid.