Poll: Do You Want Continued Bike Access In The South Chilcotins?

May 26, 2014 at 12:27
by Anthill Films  
Rene Wildhaber and Jeremy Horgan-Kobelski riding in the Southern Chilcotin Mountains British Columbia Canada. Photo Sterling Lorence.

Mountain biking access in the South Chilcotins is at risk. BC Parks is currently putting together a Draft Management Plan to restrict bike access in the area, but there is still time to speak out.

We’ve put together a few questions with the hope of getting a general idea of what people think about this situation. Please take a moment to answer them if continuing to bike in the Chilcotins is something that is important to you. The results will be sent to the Minister of Parks and Tourism on May 30th.

Please take the following polls to let us know how important this riding area is to you:











There is also an online comment form that you can fill out if you wish to share your views to a greater extent.

We believe that a management plan can be created where all recreationalists are treated fairly and that wildlife, tourism and recreation can flourish together in the park. Thank you for your support.

Author Info:
anthill avatar

Member since May 17, 2009
178 articles

38 Comments
  • 35 0
 The new bill restricts mountan biking in the south chilcotens, because apprently it speeds up the erosion process and is destroying the wildlife.

But the new bill will open the area to Heli Skiing, Snowmobiling and Oil 'TESTING'.

Its all for money, the government dont give a shit about the enviroment, more about lining there pockets !! Makes me sick!


www.env.gov.bc.ca/bcparks/planning/mgmtplns/lillooet/background-documents/big-creek_south-chilcoltin/sc-mtns&big-crk-draft-mp.pdf


www.desmog.ca/2014/03/25/bill-4-passes-b-c-parks-now-officially-open-pipelines-and-drilling
  • 6 18
flag gnarbar (May 26, 2014 at 18:54) (Below Threshold)
 the oil and gas industry brings jobs and prosperity. not like we need well paying jobs in BC is it? because we can all live off the leaf of the lotus
  • 18 0
 Not everyone wants to live a 'get rich quick' lifestyle. I'd rather live by humble means doing something hopefully fairly positive for the world (in my case running a bike workshop...) than ripping up and burning the remains of the world's resources for short term gain. But hey, that's just me.
  • 7 15
flag gnarbar (May 26, 2014 at 19:38) (Below Threshold)
 I'm not talking about getting rich. talking about employment for grown adults, not teenage day dreamers or people who want to live off a harvest of organic alfalfa sprouts
  • 9 1
 there's oil and gas development everywhere. lets keep it out of the parks please. Organic alfalfa sprouts and mtn biking are probably both low impact stuff for parks!
  • 9 0
 This teenager daydreamer is 41 Big Grin
  • 3 5
 ^ :-)
  • 7 1
 Maybe they could have a daily fee, say 5-10$/day to help fund trail maintenance and sustainability practices. That way young enthusiasts can go up, do some trail mantenance and make a few bucks while giving back to the environment. Just an idea
  • 26 1
 I think the park's ecosystem health should come before recreation, but I don't see how mountain biking is any worse for the environment than hiking, and especially equestrian trail usage.
  • 8 0
 Coming from an area with lots of horse riders, and being one myself I see horses tearing up the trail ALOT more than mountain bikes, except on the case of digging up dirt for jumps/berms; yet mountain bikers seem to get shafted the most when it comes to trail usage. It really is too bad, as there are some pretty awesome places withib bc/ Canadian parks that would be a riot in a bike, but shut are for hikers/bikers only. Hopefully this doesn't happen in the chilcotins, seems like a wicked place to ride!
  • 7 0
 I think this is partially because until now hikers and equestrians have been better organized and lobbied better for their demands.
  • 1 0
 Horses are the main cause out there.
  • 6 0
 It's a well documented fact that horses have a negative effect on the integrity of a trail system. I have in fact ridden in the Chilcotin's and have seen what degradation that the equine traffic causes to the trails. I also think it's sad that you can put power lines through this region let alone prospect for mineral extraction. If the govt had a monetary gain in allowing mtn biking in the region things would be different.
  • 6 0
 For more on this topic www.pinkbike.com/news/chilcotin-parks-plan-public-comments-needed-by-april-30-2014.html

Here's a summary:

-------------------------
The Chilcotin is one of the world's beautiful places to ride mountain bikes in the alpine. It's now become part of the BC Parks system. BC Parks has put forward a draft plan seeking to regulate and restrict mountain biking in the area.

The BC Parks's draft plan unfairly singles out mountain bikers as impacting wildlife. The draft plan is based on conjecture, guesswork and is unfair in its recommendations. Please ask BC Parks to make decisions on a science-based factual approach and not just restrict mountain biking because of stereotypes of the mountain bikers.

Comments must be received by May 30, 2014. Send comments here www.env.gov.bc.ca/bcparks/planning/mgmtplns/lillooet/lillooet-dmp-online-comments.html
  • 5 0
 Not being fortunate enough to visit BC (yet) as a Brit, I think it would be a shame for any national park to restrict biking. Fair enough if they plan to introduce specific way-marked routes to avoid hikers and equestrian folk, so long as we're not left out. Riding trails is hardly damaging to the environment (or at least over here). We should all have an equal opportunity to enjoy the beauty of these areas no matter which way we choose, so long as it keeps the future in mind. Surely a horse churns up more than a bike tyre? Shouldn't they impose restrictions on them too, if that's the way the intend to play?
  • 1 0
 In BC we're very fortunate to have some of the best trails in the world, but our BC parks do not represent mountain biking in it's highest glory. plus, I don't wanna ride a bc park, there are so many better options Wink
  • 1 0
 Skioo, have you ever ridden in the Chilcotins? It is one of the most incredible places you could ever put down tire tracks. From wildlife to scenery to the sense of remoteness it provides, I could never imagine NOT wanting to ride there.
  • 9 1
 I think 38 people clicked yes on the last question by mistake. No way anyone feels the mtb is well represented in BC Parks.
  • 1 0
 @shirk, I agree with you that in this case mtb is not represented well by BC Parks. Overall as compared to Ontario, the representation is adequate. Before I moved to BC, I was getting kicked out of pathetic park trails. Most locations in BC are wide open for use at no cost.
  • 1 0
 @tacky I think you are confused between BC Parks and all the open riding locations. Almost all of the trail infrastructure that is actually inside of BC Parks is closed to mtb. Sure there are some wide gravel paths open, but the vast majority of trails are closed to mtb. BC Parks is struggling with budget cuts yet they continue to disregard mountain bikers. On the other hand Park Canada is starting to open up to mountain biking, they've reviewed the trail impact studies and from the last I read are looking to open some alpine trails to mtb.
  • 5 0
 So oil and gas pipeline can go through a park but not a mtn bike? Am I missing something? It doesn't make any f*ckin sense!! This government should f*cking shack their head in shame.
  • 6 0
 Horses dig up trails worse than anything, mountain bikes are pretty trail friendly.
  • 1 0
 Aaand they crap everywhere making trails less fun for everyone.
  • 2 0
 Gotta love riding the Chilcotins on a wet day and getting little flecks of horse manure flying up in your face.
  • 3 0
 In reference to the comment about mtbikes causing erosion: These trails were first made by horse-packers and continue to be used by horses. It's a fact that horses cause far more erosion than bikes. I wish some university type would do a scientific study to prove to the "powers that be" at Parks Canada, (as our Mountain N.P. have some sweet trails to be ridden, if they were open to it), and BC Parks that this is so. So that this long-time held belief and dispute btwn bikers, horses and hikers would be put to rest. The key point for us mtbiker's is to to STAY on the trail, particularly in those alpine zones that are sensitive and ofcourse, ride don't slide. I've been going to the S. Chilcotin's for 20 yrs and feel blessed to be able to ride there. Hope to continue! for man years to come!!
  • 4 1
 What's the point of this poll? Somehow I don't think an online poll on a mountain biking website is going to carry much weight with the folks at BC Parks.

I've only biked in the Chilcotins once, but it truly is an incredible experience and hopefully the bureaucrats listen to the feedback they get from mountain bikers. There's no way you can say mountain bikers do more trail damage than horses.
  • 2 0
 Everybody, be sure to submit something to the government! It needs to go on record, don't give the politicians a chance to say "well we only had a dozen submissions against the proposal". There is power in numbers, you don't need to do anything fancy. Just say what they are doing is irrational, throw in a few simple points, and get on with life.
  • 2 0
 Have a read here www.imba.com/resources/research/trail-science/environmental-impacts-mountain-biking-science-review-and-best-practices. It contains a wealth of information regarding studies etc. The only tacitly true comment in the report for the Chilcotins parks is mountain biking can impact grizzlies more than others. We move quickly and quietly. This might entail closing some sections at certain times of the year and get this set minimum rider counts for riding on trails. The suggestions seem to contradict the desired outcome. Mountain bikers impact trails at worst the same as hikers. Hikers tend to do much more off trail excursions so loose out there.

I've ridden in the Chilcotin's for more than 20 years. Been on the Gun creek trail more times the many of the local trails. It would indeed by a terrible change if mountain bikers where to be banned. I know most parks people couldn't care less. Manning park has strict policies against riding but my friends ride there and do substantial trail work. The BC Parks people are happy they are there. So in the end a single grumpy outfitter won't really impact my riding. The place is so large you can get lost and never be seen by the train of horses heading to Spruce Lake from their camp.

I'd say the finger pointing in the original article by Lee was lacking in substance i.e. why its not valid to state what is there. I would never have known about it though so kudos for bringing it to peoples attention.

One last word. I hate horses but cows they are the worst. So many rides spoiled when you ride through a fresh danish on the trail that was covered with dust. So many places allow free range cattle yet technically no bikes allowed.
  • 1 0
 ya the district doesnt care about the enviroment. here in north van the district destroys all bike trails and keeps the walking trails and even builds new ones. so what if some one breaks a branch or digs a hole. the government does it all the time. its better than driving a big ass truck to the trail to destroy it. revolt
  • 2 0
 Discouraging access in any way from a natural park spells bad news for mother nature and good news for loggers. What's worse, an eroded trail, or a clear cut?
  • 1 1
 I've been fortunate to have ridden the Spruce trails and surrounding area for many years, and it would be a terrible loss to have these trails closed to our use.
A few points to address are (and these may have been covered by others, but I haven't had the chance to read all the posts):
(1) We need to remember that these trails were established by horse and cattle from the ranches that operate(d) in this area for many decades (and road apples and cow pies are part of the mix that creates dirt :-) ).
(2) The biking community needs to work with other similarly impacted users, including equestrians, as this creates a much stronger voice to represent our position to the governing bodies.
(3) It is possible to work with BC Parks and other administrative bodies to continue and expand mountain biking within BC Provincial Parks. One of the best examples is NOCS (North Okanagan Cycling Society www.okcycling.com) and their work maintaining and establishing biking trails within Kalamalka and Ellison Provincial Parks.
  • 1 0
 BC Parks in some areas are very amenable to working with mountain bikers (another example being Central Vancouver Island). Unfortunately Parks is capricious and inconsistent with how it treats mountain-biking. Eg outright hostility to mountain biking and regulatory capture in the Garibaldi Parks and South Chilcotin area vs the cooperation you get in your areas. Count yourself lucky
  • 1 0
 its not like there are motor cycles going in and ripping up the nice land. just mountain bikers checking out the rad trails and sceneries like a hiker would
  • 1 0
 Annnd there's always the one obvious answer. Wink
  • 1 0
 yes. only one... but, what kind of question to start with?! nonsensical!
  • 1 0
 such a pretty area. You guys living nearby sure are lucky.
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.034560
Mobile Version of Website