1. We are really going to miss Thomas Lemoine's creativity on the course.Saturday marked Tomas Lemoine's last competitive slopestyle run, and we going to miss him. The French rider's 2022 Joyride run was inarguably the most mind-blowing moment of the entire festival, when the entire crowd held their breath (skip to 1:10 if you're short on time!). His creativity can be seen across all his projects - if you follow him on Instagram you'll get an insight into his love for French rap as well as a Levy-esque obsession with aliens.
2. Emil proves he is this generation’s god of slopestyle. All eyes were on the Swedish star after he crashed and injured his shoulder during practice Saturday morning. After much anticipation, the crowds were treated to an amazing show where Emil Johansson once again proved unstoppable, pulling off the perfect season with a winning score of 92.4 points. This was enough to secure Johansson a 13th Crankworx gold medal, become the winningest Slopestyle rider in history, and also pull off an undefeated season whilst winning the Crankworx FMB Slopestyle World Championships.
 | I don’t even know where to begin. I busted my shoulder this morning and I wasn’t really sure what level I would be able to perform. I decided to play it as safe as possible and really just wanted to make it down the hill. I made it down and I don’t know, I just try to pinch myself because it hasn’t really sunk in yet and I don’t know if it will.—Emil Johansson |
3. Judging is Hard, but (Mostly) Fair.Emil’s score - well clear of Paul Couderc's silver medal score of 87 and Tom Isted's bronze score of 83.8 - left a few viewers confused. Opposite spins and complex tricks are hard to follow as a spectator, and demand incredibly complex judging rules and criteria that most of us struggle to fully comprehend.
Paul Couderc put down the run of his life including two double flips, including one on the gnarly final step-down feature. Likewise, Tom Isted put down a heater of a run, including a frontflip tuck no hander and a 1080 twister, earning his second podium of what is definitely his breakout season. Emil did a bunch of stuff that makes me go cross eyed just typing it, including a three downside double whip, his signature three windshield wiper, and an opposite three whip over the awkward final jump. The finesse and skill required to pull off these intricate, opposing movements remain extremely highly valued by the judges, and Emil is a seasoned expert.
In the end, both judges and athletes had a long wait, and in the end only had one chance to score. It's hard to imagine sitting at the top of the course for as long as they did, and still have the mental space to perform at the absolute highest level, and all riders absolutely delivered.
Brian typed up a nerdy comparison of the top 3 runs for you all to argue about.
Emil:
Footplant 3
truck to downside whip
opposite 3 undown to x-up
3 windshield wiper
flip double bar to x
3 downside double whip
opposite 3 no foot can on
nose press 3 can off
540 xup undown
3 toboggan
opposite 3 whip
Couderc:
3
flip bar
opposite cork 7
7
double flip
flip whip
whip on
flip off
180 whip
3
double flip
Isted:
3
flip tuck
twister
cork 7
double flip
frontflip tuck
truck on
cork flip off
flair
cork flip
flip tuck
4. Women Belong on the Slopestyle CourseOne of the major takeaways from the Women's Slopestyle Jam on Sunday was that a) Patricia Druwen is the future and b) it's time for women to be hitting the Slopestyle course more often. Not only did Patricia just earn a Red Bull helmet, she 360'd the first drop of the course, suicide-nohandered the second stepdown hit, and tricked several more massive jumps on her way to the middle of the course. It’s clear that with some more practice time, she and the other ladies riding the course would have no problem doing top to bottom runs.
We’d love to see the ladies get more time on the course. This year was challenging for organizers as they were forced to move practice around constantly to find weather windows, but we hope that a few top women get the opportunity to practice with the guys in the future, and get to drop in and compete when they decide they’re ready.
5. We Need To Heli In A Giant Wind Blocker / DomeThis year, riders had a massive time crunch on their hands after three hours of painful weather delay, mainly due to high winds and riding with the sunlight directly in their faces. The crowds - in their thousands - were running wild when the contest finally got underway, and the Red Bull Joyride delivered an absolute pressure cooker of a 1-run contest. However, we still prefer the regular format of 2 runs and would like to see some kind of Simpson's Movie-esque dome installed next year to mitigate any weather hazards.
(joking of course ya neanderthals)
Does anyone disagree??
But I can’t help finding it a little cringey, and kinda disrespectful? Especially when the podcast hosts did it. No shade to Kaz though, as he is otherwise good value.
Also, all the complaining about this being gymnastics is weird. There are basically 4 slope style contests a year. It’s not like we have to watch this kind of riding only. It’s 4x a year that these people show us the boundaries that can be pushed on a bike, and that’s cool. Would i rather just watch Emil flow through the gorge, or something similar, definitely, most the time. But judging a contest of just dudes doing dipped 3’s and tables would be boring.
The winningest dudes in slope, also have some other the best style (Semenuk and Emil) we get to see it year round on IG and in edits. Let them throw their insane gymnastics tricks a few times a year.
All that said, i think slope is less gymnastics-y than even bmx dirt or park. Watch bmx parks contests for the Olympic shit, and there is zero creativity in those runs. Complete video game stuff.
Alot of money, hype and hoopla for what amounted to about 8mins of actual riding. All course issues and weather delays aside this is not enough riding for me. I enjoyed watching the practice runs. Fill out the format and at least have a single trick booter for demonstration purposes when there is a crash or delay. Shield one jump from the wind so that riders can safely jam in the downtime. Great chance to throw in some ladies or amateurs. There are lots of ways to get more ridng in the broadcast without wearing out the stars. Back to World Cup DH where the action is full on for a lot longer than 8mins.
The Slopestyle course was raw it was still MTB but we were able to compare both build
Somehow I do miss this raw riding on un manucured trail…
Time as change Slopestyle is not my stuff anymore …
I am really glad I lived those moment back in the days when dust and rocks were flying on the landings.
However, given the precarious state of the discipline (far from a mainstream sport), the live crowd reactions to the runs, and the reaction in various forums thereafter, it'd be folly to continue to deny that there is an issue with there being such a disconnect between the judging criteria and spectacle.
BMX has to some extent cracked this by adding in additional judging criteria and considering the diversity of runs, and originality of course usage, as major factors.
Oppo scoring should be a very minor criterion - some people are naturally more ambidextrous and it is currently used as an excuse for repetition of tricks without penalty.
You can jump on the Emil hype train all you want, but it is the sport - upon which the industry depends - that will suffer.
First, there's no way to 'water down' a competition to cater to spectators. If you want a spectator-oriented slopestyle event, you want a show like Masters of Dirt. A competition is about being the best, even if it goes over the heads of the common spectator.
BMX has in no way cracked this problem, and nothing you've listed would end Emil's domination. Within freestyle BMX the same disconnect between what spectators liked watching and what judges value highly definitely exists. For example, during the Olympics many people felt like bronze medalist Daniel Dhers deserved a higher score. Similarly, the same problem is all over freeride events like Rampage, where fluidity and speed also exist as judging criteria.
I think the real problem is just that common spectators don't have the skill to be judges, and so can't judge for themselves what a good run is. I would even say you can see this play out when you watch women's BMX. In women's freestyle BMX, where the skill level is lower, it's much easier for spectators to understand these judging decisions and so there's less controversy. It's easy for us all to understand when one competitor does a backflip and the other does not, or one does a double tail whip and the other does a single.
Ultimately, yes, it's frustrating when the run you liked best doesn't score the highest. But this clearly exists in BMX and Freeride, and I think it's just the price of progress. To say it's damaging all these sports to the point they need to change is incorrect.
And finally, it is absurd to suggest that opposite tricks should not be worth more, or that an opposite trick is 'the same trick' as a regular one. Ask anyone in these sports and they will tell you about huge struggles to learn opposite tricks. Many people will tell you that learning an opposite trick can be more difficult than learning it regular was. We can't discard that reality just because one person has gotten so good at oppo tricks.
I'm honestly not on the Emil hype train. I'd love to see a rotating cast of winners. And I would love to continue to see changes to slopestyle courses to make them more dynamic and challenging to the athletes. I think innovative courses are a key to maintaining spectator interest and sustaining the sport.
But changing the structure of the sport just to make it harder for one guy to win is reductive and harmful. This line of thinking is like saying since women's downhill racing was boring when Rachel Atherton won every race, because Rachel was so good racing with both arms, we need to change downhill so that everyone races with one arm behind their backs so it can be more fair and exciting to spectators.
One thing that might help, and is done elsewhere, would be giving more of a breakdown- produce an individual score for each feature, potentially have a seperate column for flair, etc, then we'd have a greater understanding of how (points wise) a 1080 compares to an oppo 3 truck driver.
There was a rider who did back to back 720's if I recall which looked really good and stylish, but only because they were back to back and demonstrated a clear distinction. This made it stylish. I suppose I'm trying to say points for style rather than for oppo tricks just for the sake of an oppo trick (which are virtually always done worse than the natural way).
I used to be a Bmx street rider and did a lot of tricks. When you are watching a Bmx video edit and you don't know the complexity of the tricks, its just like okay that was cool. but when you are trying the tricks and learning them yourself, it brings a whole new level to watching edits and comps. You really understand how complex and technical those oppo tricks are and how a ridiculous amount of hours went into learning them.
Catering something relatively niche and special for the general public seems like a great way to destroy it for those who hold it really close and passionately. The last thing they should do is chase a bunch of temporary fans who want to go party in Whistler once a year. Buy them Nitro Circus tickets.
Oh god yes, you approach something that you feel you should already know how to do and feel like you're starting over with your hands and legs tied together.
I really don’t care how many rotations after 1, maybe 2? I mean if you can 7 you can 1080 it’s not like they’re different.
It what it is. Hats off to the riders.
Boring repetitive runs.
Did you forget that Semenuk exists?
How about you learn to 360, then learn to do it the opposite way, and get back to us on if that should be scored the same.
It's like if I go and watch a sport that I don't know much about then that's on me, I'm not gonna expect the judges to shift their scoring to what I suddenly deem to be the most impressive but sounds like you would regardless of technicality, difficulty or risk involved with each aspect