First Look: Nukeproof Mega, Rook and Pulse - Eurobike 2012

Aug 28, 2012 at 16:26
by Alasdair MacLennan  
It seems hard to believe that Nukeproof only came to market in late 2008 such has been the speed of their rise to the position they currently occupy. In that time they’ve moved from offering just a few parts to now being a fully fledged manufacturer, offering bikes, frames, and of course running what can only be described as a successful World Cup team through Chain Reaction Cycles. The combination of that race team along with a group of R&D guys who all ride big terrain themselves. This ensures that the character within the Nukeproof brand focuses on high performance bikes that respond to aggressive riding with an emphasis on descending prowess. Despite both the Mega and Scalp proving successful over the past eighteen months for Nukeproof, they’ve been keen not to rest on their laurels and this means that they’ve been busy with the CAD and FEA in recent months in efforts to create some new rigs for us to see here at Eurobike. These are the Pulse which has already seen action in the hands of their World Cup team, the slopestyle inspired Rook for Jack Fogelquist and also a split of the Mega into two bikes, forming the 130mm TR and the 160mm AM.

Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Scalp
First of all let’s start with the Scalp, the existing bike in the range. Despite the introduction of the Pulse as the hottest downhill bike in their stable, the Scalp is not disappearing. Instead it remains largely unchanged from an engineering perspective but takes up a position lower down the pricing spectrum after some spec changes which should see it appeal to a lot more entry level riders or those who try to balance a tight budget for riding.

• Rock Shox Domain R fork & Kage rear shock
• SRAM X7/X5 drivetrain
• Avid Elixir 3 Brakes
• MSRP: €2,799 Full build, €1,699 frame only




Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Pulse
Next up is the Pulse. This is the new bike which is an evolution of the existing Scalp, a refinement of the theory and an introduction to production of the tweaks put by the team as a result of their experiences on the World Cup circuit with the existing bike. Although having only recently come out from under the covers the team were experimenting with revised linkages on the Scalp earlier in the season to ensure that what went on the Pulse was right from the off. Changes have been subtle but occur throughout and lead to a more rounded and lighter second generation product. Thanks to this race experience the suspension curve is essentially the same as the Scalp although the linkage works slightly further down the curve, improving small bump sensitivity and producing slightly less ramp up. The 210mm travel continues to be controlled through either a Cane Creek Double Barrel or Rock Shox Vivid RC2 Shock.

• Hydroformed tubing with revised profiling leads to improved ground clearance and greater standover
• Adjustable chainstay length with a chipset offering 435 and 445mm
• Longer front centres than Scalp for each size than (+12mm on Small, +10mm on Medium & +8mm on Large)
• Circlip retention system on the bearings ensures reduces movement under load and keeps flex to a minimum
• Integrated rubberized downtube guard is standard, as are both chainstay and seatstay items of similar construction
• MSRP: €5,099 Pro build, €3,899 Comp build & €2,299/€2,599 frame only (Vivid/CCDB)

Views: 6,552    Faves: 45    Comments: 4





Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Rook
Although not new to the world’s eyes this is certainly the first time that the Rook has been shown in near production condition. Built purposefully for Jack Fogelquist and his desires for a slopestyle bike that could handle the roughest courses of the circuit, the 105mm travel bike is the fruition of his vision. Run with a 110mm fork produces a sharp reacting 69deg head angle and a - 10mm BB height while the 160mm X-Fusion Vengeance built here slackens the bike and raises the BB to +20mm. Yet it still handles well according to Martin Astley of Nukeproof. All proof of its versatility and why it’s marketed at both slopestyle and aggressive trail riders. Probably the most unique feature is the integrated hydraulic Gyro from Straitline (although not included in the package) which is currently patent pending and enables the unit to be used without the stack height increase normally associated. Another first on a production bike, although seen on prototypes before now, is the downtube mounting for the shifter. Martin explained that they tried numerous options, including a time trial shifter, before settling on the SRAM based mount seen here for production. It bolts on via bottle bosses and is mated to a custom 6spd rear hub to give all the gears that likely riders of this bike will need. Handling the 105mm rear travel on production bikes is a Rock Shox Monarch RT3 shock rather than the X-Fusion setup seen here.

• Available in Regular and Long sizes, each with 420mm chainstays.
• Taper headtube including integrated hydraulic Gyro capability.
• BB Height -10mm > +10mm dependant on fork (110mm > 160mm)
• Downtube shifter mount enables bar spins without tangles, a first for a production bike.
• MSRP: €1,349 frame only




Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Mega AM
As already mentioned the Mega splits into two camps for 2013; the AM, spiritual successor to the original, and a new, lighter, 130mm rig called the TR. Where the old Mega built a name for itself with strong descending credentials was thanks to a slack head angle to aid descending with a steeper seat angle to keep your weight forward on the climbs. The AM continues this trend, upping the travel to 160mm to differentiate from the new TR despite being lighter, and keeping those aforementioned descending qualities with a 66deg head angle. Per size the new bike is approximately 10mm longer in the top tube measurement than the outgoing model while the shock rate, like the pulse, is slightly more supple in the initia; stroke to improve traction. With the exclusivity of the Reverb Stealth having now come to an end this means more manufacturers are including them in their range, including Nukeproof as you can see here. It really does remove one of the bugbears that comes with many dropper posts and keeps the cabling much neater. Also neat is the removable direct mount for the front derailleur which will feature on production frames. Significant time has been spent working with Rock Shox to tune the Monarch Plus to suit both the bike and the intended riding it will face, the result of which is a light low speed compression tune, with standard lock out and an aggressively high setting on the high speed threshold. This means that the contrast between the open and closed positions on the dial is noticeable to complement both climbing and descending. In keeping with industry standard the rear end now incorporates a set of 142x12mm dropouts with 135mm available as an aftermarket option.

• ISCG05 & Direct Mount front derailleur (removable mount)
• Shock options (216mm x 63mm) are either the Rock Shox Monarch Plus or a Cane Creek Double Barrel coil, giving riders options to cover all bases.
• Head Angle 66deg, BB Height +10mm (160mm fork)
• Chainstay length 440mm
• Sizes: S (15.6”) M (17”) L (18.5”) XL (20”)
• AM Pro: CCDB, Lyrik RC2 DH Solo Air and SRAM X0 Trail drivetrain
• AM Comp: Rock Shox Monarch Plus, Lyrik RC Solo Air, SRAM X7 drivetrain
• MSRP: €4,599 (AM Pro) , €3,299 (AM Comp) , €1,399/€1,699 frame only (Monarch Plus/CCDB)




Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Mega TR
As the Mega AM is essentially an evolution, the TR represents a whole new frame, a slimming down of the theory but still with an eye on the essential ‘character’ of Nukeproof as the team are at such pains to point out. Built around a 150mm fork, the 130mm frame features a 67deg head angle and a long top tube to build stability. A slightly more progressive curve to the Erosion linkage also found on the AM makes the most of the shorter travel and should enable aggressive riding without running out of travel too easily. Several other features are shared with the AM and keep it looking like a family, primarily the Reverb Stealth and custom tune on the Monarch (an RT3 here), but this extends to numerous finishing touches like cable routing, dropout styling and the 44mm straight through head tube. Only one full build is available and this is centred on SRAM x9 with Type2 rear derailleur, Elixir 5 brakes and a Rock Shox Monarch RT3/Revelation RL Solo Air combination. Of course there is also the Reverb Stealth dropper post included within the price of €3,799.

• ISCG05 & Direct Mount front derailleur (removable mount)
• Rock Shox Monarch RT3 (190mm x 51mm)
• Head Angle 67deg, BB Height +0mm (150mm fork)
• Chainstay length 430mm
• Sizes: S (15.6”) M (17”) L (18.5”) XL (20”)
• MSRP: €3,799 full build, €1,399 frame only inc Monarch RT3




Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
Nukeproof Eurobike 2012
35mm Carbon Handlebars
Also included on display were several new bars in the parts stable, both of which will no doubt attract attention. First up was a carbon bar, a first for the brand, and next a foray into the world of 35mm first pioneered by Easton. Although currently prototype neither are far from production. The carbon 31.8mm bar is touted as being nearly three times stronger than their aluminium counterparts while the failure point (everything has one) has designed to be gradual rather than catastrophic thanks to the introduction of glass fibres to the mix. Both 730mm and 760mm widths will be available while the aluminium offerings will continue in 760mm and 800mm. At just 235g for the 20mm rise carbon offering it's likely to prove a popular choice.
• MSRP: €129.99 Carbon• MSRP: €59.99 Aluminium 760mm, €64.99 Aluminium 800mm
• MSRP: €64.99 All stems

All of the products currently in prototype will likely appear in shops from January, in all three new colour schemes seen here. Yellow on black and black on yellow are mere revisions of the existing schemes while the gunmetal silver and red offer something different, and striking, especially so on the Pulse here. There are a few other new items which Nukeproof have to show us once things move indoors for the rest of the week. Rest assured we’ll be bringing them to you as soon as we can.

Author Info:
cloverleaf avatar

Member since May 26, 2003
178 articles

163 Comments
  • 133 1
 Nukeproof is doing it BIG this year!
  • 36 1
 love that they have kept the scalp, was scared they were going to drop it
  • 18 1
 X10 to BOTH comment above... Their new bikes look AWESOME, and I like that they are gonna pass down a gret bike like the Scalp to riders on a budget. It's been a GREAT rig so why dump it when there are lots of riders who'd love to have last years top end DH bike for a cheaper pricetag aye. Wish more companies would do this when they redesign their lines.
  • 4 0
 love these bikes!
  • 6 1
 the rook is my new bike Smile
  • 3 0
 everything looks pretty darned spot on!
  • 3 0
 that first build on the Mega looks SICK. Finally someone understands the benefits of a coil shock on a 6 inch bike. They really covered all the bases on the new Pulse as well.
  • 4 17
flag rockhopper15 (Aug 28, 2012 at 21:39) (Below Threshold)
 the rook might as well be a transition double...
  • 3 41
flag wallenisaac (Aug 28, 2012 at 21:50) (Below Threshold)
 JokerDead HorseFiremanCopCopFabBeerThumbs DownVery confusedtupReally MadWinkRolleyesRedface:PMadlolFrownEvilEekCry:Cool:ConfusedBig GrinBlank StareSmilePimpNinjaEmoJailJailbreakSaluteHelmetBatmanRobinJokerJokerJokerTwo-FaceTwo-FaceTwo-FaceTwo-FaceCameraCameraCameraCameraBookBookBookWhipWhipWhipMoonMoonMoon2 cents2 cents2 centsFacepalmFacepalmFacepalmDead HorseDead HorseDead HorseDroolDroolDroolDead HorseDead Horse
  • 7 2
 Why does everybody say that nukeproof is afforadble? Sure the 2012 frames are now blown out for little money but the mrsp isn't that low. There are better offerings in that respect.
  • 8 0
 I dunno, I'd say £950 for a solid lightish 150mm bike is pretty damn good!
  • 2 0
 if you were to ride a nukeproof you would say otherwise, it is amazing how nimble the scalp is, and the backend is more rigid than anything ive ever felt, such a sick bike, geometry is near on perfect and its so dam strong
  • 1 2
 When it comes to the Rook are they indicating that it will come built with a Lyrik or that the bike they showing has a Lyrik on. Because that is clearly an x fusion.
  • 2 0
 Where's this 150mm bike for £950? All of these frames are over £1000.
  • 3 0
 Think he means the current (2011/2012) frames as they are 150mm. You can actually get them of CRC for 6 hundred and something now.
  • 3 0
 and you know what i have just done.... bought a 2012 scalp Frown fml
  • 2 0
 Don't be down on your new 2012 Scalp mate... that's STILL a sick bike aye.
  • 2 0
 Shoulda clarified, I meant the 2012 150mm Mega, £950 RRP, I paid £760 for mine (black ano) and they can be bought on CRC for £650ish! :-)
  • 2 0
 ^^^ Steven41, there is barely any difference between the scalp and the pulse other than the look, the geo is practically the same and tbh the scalp looks nice in my opinion
  • 2 0
 SamDF: Where is that??? I must have looked right over it!!!!!!!!!

I LOVE the Mega AM aye... I'd gladly make it my "do it all" bike and I'm guessing it can handle more then it's fair share of abuse aye. Seeig what Fairclough was doing on his Enduro (the EVO is one of my dream rigs next to the Commencal Meta SX and the Mega AM) makes me think a nice bury AM bike is what I need... The Mega would fit that to a TEE aye... With all the amazing trail building going on you don't NEED a 7-8" bike anymore for general "free-riding" (they're till fun, but bac in the day, with all the drops to flat or nearly flat it was kind of necessity... like Monster-T's Wink ). The MEGA would be an awesome ride for say Blackrock where you gotta "earn your turns" by climbing ll the way up to the top. Plus, with a lighter bike I'll still have some left for the run down (nothing worse then being flagged for the fun stuff Wink ) and even a few more trips up and back. Plus I really want to try my hand at the Oregn Enduro series next year as they're racing on trail I built years ago...
  • 2 0
 Deepcreekmedia: Thats interesting you pointed that out... I thought I was just being too "simple" in my assesment of the new rig... glad to hear I'm not losing my mind aye.

The Pulse is a dead sexy bike (although I'd prefer the yellow-black-grey/silver color scheme's of the last few years to the new red color that just looks "off" to me) but it looks a bit TOO MUCH like the TR250 and 450 to me (not bad company to keep, I just expected a bit more "originality" from Nukeproof). Considering Transition is a fairly local company to me I might as well just support them. Although I hear that the Nukeproof's are pretty amazing aye. Sounds like the back end is quite stiff and really lets the suspension do it's work and tracks like it's on rails. Having grown up in the era of the Rocky Mountain RM6 and so on, that is no small thing to me Wink
  • 1 0
 Not sure you can get them in the US but www.chainreactioncycles.com/Mobile/MobileModels.aspx?ModelID=75355

Most sizes sold out now though! Having said how great the Mega is I blew up my Monarch shock on it today! :-( But it's being fully covered under warranty so it's not too bad and it did blow casing a sizeable road gap! :-)
  • 2 0
 Just bought a TR, been a great bike so far, holds the line really well
  • 39 2
 is it me or do the new rockshox's looks crap this year ?
  • 16 0
 Nope I agree, the new Boxxers look cheap imo
  • 10 0
 The new graphics and wordmark have taken a dive into the crapper, imo.
  • 7 1
 I mean don't get me wrong I'm sure they perform just as well as any previous models if not better but cosmetically yeah, I think the design department was very lazy this year.
  • 7 0
 +1... They'ev always LOOKED spindly, but now they're just kind of looking "toy-like" aye. I'm sure they're perfectly good forks (actually I KNOW they are) but they just don't look the part in a world full of Fox 40's and BOS's... Hell, the Totem makes the Boxxer look like a toothpick (or just an old Super T Wink )
  • 7 0
 The "boxxer" logo half on the stanchion and half on the lowers was the most eye catching thing they did lately. Now everything is so meh. Fox has been consistently classy. Marzocchi is hit and miss from year to year.
  • 3 0
 watch out for the 2013 X-Fusion stuff to hit the shelves - some of the sexiest suspension IMO.
  • 2 4
 is it just me or does the pulse kinda remind you of a tr 450?
  • 2 2
 Looks like they just fokussed on making it different from 2012 no matter what.
  • 2 1
 I agree, the new Boxxer logo on the leg looks so wrong.
  • 2 2
 the booxers look bad and so does the paint job on the pulse! why the red?
  • 1 0
 ^^^ +1000... That Grey and Red color scheme is just plain "off" to my eyes. I VASTLY prefer the old Black-Yellow-Silver/Grey color scheme of the last few years aye. The Grey/Red Pulse paint-job just looks "80's" to me... And I was actually ALIVE for the entirety of the 80's... we don't want to go back, hipsters and their love of 80's fashion is bad enough
  • 1 0
 I took my Nukeproof out for its first ride today... rear punctures happen easier than the V10, but boy does she carry speed!
  • 1 0
 Well that's down to your tyre/tube choice not the bike!
  • 1 0
 ran lower pressures on my V10 with no punctures on the exact same wheel, tube, tyre; including 2 weeks in Whistler a couple of weeks ago...
...so nothing to do with the tyre/tube choice, as they are consistent across both frames.
  • 2 0
 Well considering that that's all that really factors into the matter I'd say you just had a bad stroke of luck...
  • 1 0
 Doesn't have the V10 way more travel?
  • 2 0
 Yes it does...
  • 4 2
 Agree, need carbon version for those who want it, nice lines all round and some trick cable integration, but nothing we haven't seen before.... lots of 2013 stuff looking same across the board. Bits of this bits of that.. how long till we g evolve derailleurs and chains to something better? These things cause most problems with frame designs next to peddling and rear suspension. Just saying... open to criticism.
  • 1 0
 I like that we're across the world from each other and think exactly the same way. gimme a gearbox!
  • 1 0
 Yeah some kinda gear box is gonna be the furture I hope
  • 4 0
 I would be very happy with any one of those bikes, very impressed with the lineup (especially the downhill/slopestyle/freeride rigs)! Great work Nukeproof!
  • 1 0
 wait a minute... description of the MEGA TR said, "the 130mm frame features a 70deg head angle and a long top tube to build stability..." BUT the specs below also mention, "Head Angle 67deg, BB Height +0mm (150mm fork)"... is this a typo? Or the HTA becomes 67 deg WITH the 150mm form BUT 70 deg with a 130 fork?
  • 1 0
 I think its saying that its 67deg with a 150mm fork...
  • 1 0
 OH, okay. So with a Fork that has lower travel, the HTA gets steeper? correct?
  • 1 0
 Yes, that is correct. However if it is 67deg with a 150mm fork, it would be about 68deg with a 130mm fork. You would have to run something like a 90mm fork for the HTA to be 70deg, so it was just a big typo.
  • 3 0
 Wow. You guys got the calculations down. so 20mm is 1 degree? Cool.
  • 1 0
 Yea that's the generally accepted rule, but the longer the wheel base the less the change in HA, not really enough to worry about though, im just elaborating Smile
  • 5 0
 I'd love a Rook, but I sometimes need to move diagonally....
  • 2 1
 Smart move from nukeproof with the scalp why design a new budget downhill frame like specialzed did with the status when you can pass down last years proven world cup bike for less money. Not sure why more manufacturers haven't thought of this already as it gives the lower bike much more credibility. In my opinion the scalp is the nicer looking of the two though even if it isn't the latest technology.
  • 1 0
 I agree, I still love the look of the scalp, to me the straighter tubes of the pulse make it look a little old fashioned in comparison, however if it rides well I don't think people will care too much Smile
  • 2 0
 Well, sometimes the manufacturing process doesn't allow this. For example, instead of introducing the Status when the new Demo came out, you are suggesting that they just offer the older Demo as the "budget" model? Well, in this case, I'm quite certain it would cost a lot more to produce the older Demo than it would to produce the Status. It's so much more complicated. Hence, get rid of the old demo and introduce the Status.
  • 1 1
 I see what your saying but it must cost a lot to produce a completely new bike with design manufacture r&d then marketing where as an old design already has everything but the manufacturing done . It is really hard to say without knowing costs of manufacture.
  • 1 0
 Brilliant design and craftsmanship behind all nukeproof parts and bikes. This is example of a company that really wants to keep riders happy and moving forward. By offering replacement parts for every product nukeproof makes all other companies look juvenile and thoughtless. Keep up the good work.
  • 2 0
 got my self a scalp not so long ago rides like a dream. not too keen on the new pulse doesnt look as appealing to me. but the rest of the bikes are looking good
  • 5 1
 Never really been a big fan of nukeproof...... until now
  • 4 0
 Seriously stepping up their game now! Great to see.
  • 2 0
 Holy bawlz the pulse looks so sick!! I honestly like the mega from last year a bit more, would have bought it on Chain Rx if I hadn't of bought an Ibis...Great job Nukeproof!
  • 2 0
 I'm glad somebody feels that way about the Mega, I've got the old one, and after seeing this one mine feels a bit insignificant now lol
  • 1 0
 Yeah i have last years one too, I think the new one looks better but watching the video, the changes don't really seem to justify an extra few hundred quid in my opinion - My current mega rides really well, its a shame their prices are on the rise.
  • 1 0
 Well actually looking at it, the prices are the same as when the first Mega frame came out, and knowing CRC and their sales they'll probably come down in price soon enough!
  • 1 0
 Really? I thought they were RRP at £950?
  • 1 0
 I'm talking when they very first came out, they do now yeah...
  • 2 0
 Why isn't there a HT?? I've never seen HT in production from them?? It's the only key selling bike they need in their market..
  • 2 0
 "Nukeproof only came to market in late 2008"

Really? I remember them in the UK magazines in the 90's.
  • 1 0
 I think they meant their frames but I'm not sure...
  • 3 0
 Nukeproof of the 90s is not the same company as the Nukeproof of today. The original nukeproof (based in the Grand Rapids area of Michigan, USA) ceased operations for a while and eventually sold the brand name to the company that operates out of the UK today.
  • 2 0
 @dump thanks for the clarification. I had their unique (at the time) carbon hubs and one-piece bar-end handlebars in the 90s, thought I was so damn fly. Ha! Their new products look good.
  • 1 0
 kinda like Titus.
  • 2 0
 Owned by Chain Reaction now...
  • 1 0
 downtube shifter first for a production bike? funny that because the YT play has had a downtube shifter for at least 2 years!
  • 3 0
 Dammit Nukeproof I was happy with my current Mega, now I want a new one Frown
  • 1 0
 I really like how on this new model you can chop ad change between 160mm fork and a 180mm fork. I think this will make it so much more versatile! Can't wait till these come into production Smile
  • 1 0
 I'm surprised there isn't a gyro for the shifter as well, all in good time I guess for sx theres nothing wrong with the downtube shifter
  • 1 0
 Hydro shifters?
  • 1 0
 could use a mechanical gyro for cable shifters to.... itll mess up the stack height tho
  • 1 0
 Would that work?
  • 1 0
 With the advent of electronic shifting, I don't think this will be an issue for long. I think the downtime shifter will be a weird thing people tried once di2 becomes available for mtb.
  • 1 0
 Damn autocorrect. "downtube" not downtime.
  • 1 0
 this is true, they said the reason they didnt go wireless was itd be heavier than wired, but wireless shifting its obviously been tryed by shimano, why wouldnt they? itll take a while before it moves from xc to sx
  • 1 0
 A beautiful collection of bikes. I'll have to pop a Potassium Iodide Anti-Radiation Pill should I ever get near one let alone take one for a demo ride. Beauty! -CF-
  • 3 2
 They look like the transition bike. Pluse-tr450 mega-bandit. Looks pretty similar
  • 3 2
 Agreed. And the Mega AM and Rook also look similar to the Bottlerocket and Double. Pretty much the same linkage...
  • 1 0
 was thinking the same thing about my bandit... shove a 150 fork on there it would have pretty similar geo too
  • 1 0
 You say that like it's a bad thing...
  • 2 0
 I really don't like the colors............
  • 1 0
 I actually love the slope bike, plus Fogels rocking it so its gotta be good.
  • 2 0
 siiick, love the new mega
  • 1 0
 Scalp is cheaper then mega bikes and the AM comp is cheaper than TR. hmmmmm I
  • 1 1
 A bit strange to see a trigger shifter on the downtube. I can't see that being very ergonomic or intuitive. The TT-style lever shifters would seem simpler to me.
  • 2 5
 Smike rides co@k
  • 1 3
 Coak? Why, yes. Yes I do.
  • 2 0
 Nukeproof is definitely stepping their game up! Love the great work!
  • 1 0
 Some of the detailing on the Mega's looks spot on. Big things coming for Nukeproof in 2013 then.
  • 1 0
 You've gotta love the high tech bike stand used in the photos!!! Even better, you can recycle it!
  • 1 0
 I hope they make the top tubes longer on the new bikes. TT on the mega was too short.
  • 1 0
 nice design for the new Mega, much better than previous!
  • 1 0
 Lovin the nukeproof ! Very nice stuff!
  • 1 0
 5 speed cassette on the rook?
  • 1 0
 so many XO's! *drools on keyboard
  • 1 0
 Some awesomely sweet looking bikes
  • 1 0
 i like my 151mm travel mega Frown
  • 1 0
 I'm loving the Rook look...would like one as my do it all....
  • 1 0
 damn that mega am is nice
  • 1 0
 sooo nice.. i want em all
  • 1 0
 what happened to their dj frame?
  • 1 0
 probably just didnt update it, not much to update really
  • 1 0
 They have two hardtails for 2013: the dual slalom/4x Snap and a new steel dirt jump/street frame, the Solum.
  • 1 0
 oh my god all those bikes are so sexy!
  • 2 1
 only thing i dont like is the pulse looks like a 450
  • 1 0
 That mega and scalp look tasty as hell
  • 2 0
 6 speeds is enough
  • 1 0
 sweeet range of bikes damn
  • 1 0
 More 35mm bars and stems. Nice!
  • 1 0
 I was wondering why the scalp was so cheap now I know
  • 1 0
 They are nice but some more colour options would be cool
  • 1 0
 Extremely beautiful bikes
  • 1 0
 ugh the Boxxers look like shite. Throwback 2005 decals. Pass.
  • 1 0
 nukeproof pulse. i drooled a little...
  • 1 1
 Have fun if you have a problem with the reverb on the Mega AM / TR when the hydraulic line is inside the Frame.
  • 1 0
 This whole spread is sheer PORN!!!!!!!
  • 1 0
 Dale and ian haha
  • 1 0
 OMG BIKE PORN!!!
  • 1 1
 looks sick. downtube shifter is sort of silly though.
  • 1 0
 the pulse looks sweet as
  • 1 0
 i'd tap the DH
  • 1 0
 New Mega AM looks sick!
  • 1 1
 have nukeproof never heard of anything other than a 1x10 drivetrain...?
  • 2 5
 My Enduro will still whip the piss out of that mega AM any day!
  • 2 3
 I agree completely..!!
  • 1 2
 Im just really not tickled by that 1 x anything drive train. Its seems too downhill oriented.
  • 1 2
 That's why The Enduro has 20 gears.. It pedals really well.. Dunno about the Nukeproof though.. Can't say anything against it until I've tried it..
  • 1 0
 I just like the idea of having 20 gears to choose from. My Enduro is from 2010 too.
  • 1 3
 Big COCK
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.043934
Mobile Version of Website