RaceWare Garmin Edge Stem Mount - Review

Oct 21, 2015 at 4:41
by David Arthur  
RaceWare Garmin Mount

RaceWare is a small UK-based company that specialises in mounts and accessories for cycling computers, lights and action cameras made using the 3D printing manufacturing method. More accurately, it’s additive layer manufacturing (ALM) and we’ve seen quite a few bike companies investigate the possibilities of using this state-of-the-art technology to develop bike components in recent years, including Charge with its titanium dropouts and Empire with a complete bike.

This is Raceware’s Garmin Edge Stem Mount, a smart alternative to the standard Garmin mount, and is especially handy for anyone with a very short stem on their bike, because the Garmin simply doesn’t fit very well unless you've got a cross-country length stem. Even the smaller Edge 200/500 can be tricky to fit, and forget it if you’re trying to squeeze an 810/1000 on a short stem. You can, of course, mount the Garmin to the handlebar, but there it can look a bit precarious, plus it’s off-center and doesn’t fit well with some riser bars. RaceWare’s mount fits right over the stem, fixing to the steerer tube, and floats the Garmin above the stem.

The mount retails for is £19.99 (approximately $31 USD) and it is available in 11 colours from www.racewaredirect.co


RaceWare Stem mount
Small and light it doesn't take up much space on the stem


RaceWare Stem mount
But it keeps my Garmin Edge 500 in a prime position over the handlebars


Pinkbike's Take:

bigquotesIt works really well, and installation is a breeze. Simply whip off the steerer tube top cap, remove a spacer if you have one there, and tighten the RaceWare mount into place. I've swapped it between different bikes with different styles of stems and not had any issue with the mount fouling the top of the stem - the Garmin mount section is raised just high enough to provide the necessary clearance. The only issue I've encountered has been on a bike with a particularly sunken star fangled nut and a too short bolt. In use, I much prefer having the computer centrally mounted: it's easier to view the screen when riding then having it hanging off the handlebars to one side; it's also much more secure, doesn't rattle about and won't ping off in a crash. There's certainly no shortage of aftermarket Garmin mounts, but the Raceware is a neat and smart way to attach a Garmin to your mountain bike, and it's available in a wide range of colours. - David Arthur


Author Info:
davidarthur avatar

Member since Apr 12, 2015
73 articles
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

79 Comments
  • 101 7
 Ok.
  • 4 15
flag chillrider199 (Oct 22, 2015 at 7:53) (Below Threshold)
 Wait, how?
  • 3 5
 mike levy is that you?
  • 68 0
 Can you rampage with it?
  • 9 24
flag boadway (Oct 22, 2015 at 7:43) (Below Threshold)
 ^lol
  • 22 2
 No only enduro
  • 13 5
 Not with a direct mount stem
  • 6 1
 I use a BarFly mount + Edge 25 on my DH bike. Fits perfecly over the direct mount stem.
  • 61 4
 Or, for $25, you can get a machined aluminum one from K-Edge which is nicer than some 3D printed plastic one.
  • 16 1
 I agree, the K-Edge version is a superior product.
  • 34 4
 The K-Edge is too stiff! I crashed with it before, and it broke the tabs on my garmin. I'd rather have the mount break than the expensive garmin. Kind of like a derailleur hanger
  • 8 0
 I have crashed many times with my K-edge. Three times hard enough that the internal part breaks where the Garmin snaps into it. This is how it is supposed to break. I than call K-edge and they send me a replacement piece which is held in by two screws. Also K-edge has a model that is infinitely adjustable for the viewing angle which is the one that I use.
  • 3 2
 Good point! I have (thankfully) not had that bad experience yet. I may consider exchanging the K-Edge...
  • 3 0
 K-Edge hinged version does the same thing for less $ and it has a replaceable insert for wear and tear and crashes.
  • 4 0
 The BarFly 3.0 is another good option for MTB.
  • 1 0
 Never had a crash issue with my K-Edge, and it's a much nicer looking product.
  • 1 0
 Another vote for the K-Edge hinged. I need to buy one more for my second bike.
  • 5 2
 The derailleur-hanger analogy is spot-on: if you crash, you want your mount to break, not the Garmin housing.
The K-Edge insert design might give in certain directions, e.g. rotating forces, but if it is a shear-impact, it's going to be the computer housing that gives first.
I've had to replace a Garmin for this very reason, which is why I don't use stem-cap-direct-mounts anymore, period.
Mounts w/ rubber bands or extended plastic arms allow the mount to flex on impact.
There is also another significant reason why I'll never buy an aluminum mount for my Garmin, or GoPro, for that matter:
They weigh 2-3x what plastic mounts weigh. Take for example K-Edge's out-front mount which costs $45 and weighs 300% more and costs 50% more than 3D printed options.
I haven't had 3D printed mounts fail any faster than Garmin's stock plastic mounts, but I have had overly-stiff mounts snap off my Garmin's mount tabs.
Chose your own risk / reward scenario.
  • 1 0
 Yes, but the come in endure colours man!
  • 39 1
 The problem here is that there's no USP, other than the fact that it's 3D printed, which really isn't of any benefit to the end user. It's great for prototyping, but it costs more than the equivalent injection moulded part, it's not as strong, and it doesn't solve any problems that an injection moulded part doesn't - there's nothing novel about them.
  • 4 0
 The cost thing isn't always strictly true, it cost a fair bit to set up moulds etc for injection moulded stuff and if you've got very low production numbers then it can often be cheaper to 3D print. Personally don't have a garmin so can't talk about unique selling points but I guess if its better for people with really short stems but even that is aiming for a pretty niche market.
  • 1 0
 There are already products that do that, and they're a lot stronger. I don't think 3d printing is appropriate for a commercial product, but that's my opinion. The initial cost of injection moulding is high, but moulds can now be 3d printed for smaller batches, lowering the initial cost. That's what I'd do, personally. 3d printing is very useful, but it requires a different business model really.
  • 1 1
 I just realised that I sound quite negative. I love that they're trying to do sone thing different, I just think they're approaching it all wrong. With the skill and technology they have, they could do so much more interesting stuff, and potentially earn a load more money.
  • 1 0
 Injection moulding has its place with out a doubt, however when you're looking to out lay £10k for one set of tooling you need to sell a hell of a lot of mounts before you recoup that cost. With 3d printing you can produce a product in any configuration within hours and for 10s of £s not thousands.
Im really impressed with mine and never had an issue in the 2 years ive used it. The fact that people are complaining about the mounting break when they crash is just silly. Would you rather break a £15 mount or a £300 computer?
  • 1 0
 Did you read what I said about 3D printing tooling for small-batch injection moulding?

I have some 3D mounts that I've 3D printed, no I've not broken any yet, but I can't see it lasting longer than an injection moulded part that costs half as much as these guys are charging. The great thing about consumer level FDM printers is that you can knock parts out for pennies. What's the point if you're going to charge £30 for them?
  • 1 0
 I agree with the FDM side, its great for mocking things up but usless for anything practical. However these parts are made using selective laser sintering (SLS) which is a completely different technology altogether. Parts are alot stronger and very close to that of injection moulded parts.

You mentioned about printing the injection moulds, however this is incredibly expensive as well. Plus the surface finish of the part isnt up to the standard required for injection moulding so theres still alot of machining required. Even if you did take this option you wouldnt get much change from £10k for the tooling.
  • 1 0
 Hmm okay then, sounds like you've tried it?

I hadn't realised these parts were SLS - they don't look quite as nice as I'd have expected. Their website doesn't really go into a great deal of detail on that.
  • 1 0
 Why do you even have a 3D printed vs. injected debate about a product, that mounts on the STEERER TUBE?? The thing is designed to be compressed, get any playstic (that's not wedged deep into a hole at least, like the headset wedge in some cases) as far away from my stack as possible! What happens if you overtighten this, it cracks and falls appart? Loose stem and headset much?

Who in their right mind decided that it's okay to charge for a product this dangerous?
  • 1 0
 Are you serious?
  • 2 0
 If you've managed to crack a spacer doing up a headset then I seriously suggest that you back away from the tools and let someone who knows what they're doing sort it out!

I work for a 3d printing company so quite lucky to have a insight to whats possible now and whats to come Smile
  • 1 0
 Awesome, mind if I ask who you work for?
I'm a design engineer by trade, but haven't managed to have a go with any top end 3D printers yet. The place I do most of my work is having an Objet Connex (350 or 500, can't remember) delivered very soon though, so excited to see what that can do!
  • 1 0
 @commencalcruzer how many spacers have you seen made from plastic? How many of those are 3D printed?

And no, i haven't cracked a spacer by tightening it up. I won't ever, since i don't use plastic there, and even if i would, i wouldn't crack it by tightening it up. Riding it is a different story though.
  • 26 2
 Excluding laser metal sintering, 3D printing is poor choice for any commercial product. It's suitable only for prototyping and very small batches. The strength and durability of a 3D printed product is far less than that of most other manufacturing techniques. I'd definitely stay away from any company that touts it as a bonus...
  • 5 4
 winner winner chicken dinner. It's great for prototyping but as a final product I'd rather have something machined or molded. 3D printing this in ti would be could but stupid expensive.
  • 1 0
 Should be glass-reinforced injection molded nylon. 3D print it if you want to offer custom parts with the rider's name embossed. Which would be silly.
  • 2 1
 Metal sintering is a great process, however at present its incredibly expensive and is no where near a consumer level. The advantage with 3d printing is you can put material where you want it rather than where you cant remove it. You say its only fit for prototyping, however its far from it. There are hundreds of parts flying on passenger aeroplanes at the moment and have been for a few years now. Its all about getting the design right to maximise the process.
  • 5 0
 I worked as an aircraft mechanic from 2010 to 2013. I can pretty much guarantee that there are absolutely no FDM 3D printed parts on any commercial aircraft. Bit far off from 'mil-spec'. I have two 3D printers of this style sitting in my living room, and I've run them through their paces. What they put out has no place on store shelves.
  • 1 0
 FDM isnt the only type of 3d printing available... Most of whats on aircraft is either SLS or DMLS based technologies.
  • 17 0
 You can't tell, but I'm bubbling with excitement. This is thrilling.
  • 12 0
 butt.... will it blend??
  • 8 1
 I've had 4 of these Raceware in various types (handlebar and stem mounted), the plastic is very brittle and snaps to easily. Currently using a Sram one and it is still going strong 9 months later.
  • 2 0
 mine broke as well... yes the plastic is very brittle... 3d print material.... but nice position and idea
  • 16 0
 Thought you would've learnt after the first 3
  • 9 0
 I use the 0$ one that came with the garmin.
  • 6 0
 I can't wait for the four year review!
  • 1 1
 You mean 6 month?
  • 2 0
 Not trying to be an a$$, can someone explain to me why a garmin is better than using your iPhone for gps? Why are people riding with these things? I just keep my iPhone in my pocket.
  • 5 0
 i'd mount it!
  • 4 0
 K edge make nicer, stronger, aluminium ones, in colours too!
  • 2 0
 I like the k edge aluminum mounts better, they even have replaceable inserts so if you crash you don't have to get a whole new mount
  • 1 0
 Used to have Garmin 800 on my handlebar. Once had a small stupid crash and cracked the glass and the matrix of Garmin. To expensive to repair, total loss The Now ive got a new one so im thinking where should i carry it ?
  • 1 0
 I have an etrex and use the garmin handlebar mount for the etrex but zip tie it to the very top of my top tube. Seems to stay out of harms way there. Being a bit paranoid, I've looped an elastic band to the hoop on the back of the etrex and then put a zip tie through that and attach that around the bottom of the stem. I do that just in case it gets bounced out the cradle. Bit of a faff but keeps it safe.
  • 1 0
 @Dmitry81. That's odd as a friend just had an Edge 800 with a cracked screen refurbed by Garmin for $105 which is a pretty reaonable price for the damage.
  • 1 0
 And more expensive than the K-Edge mount that is beautifully crafted from aluminum, comes in different colors but it might be a tad longer but fits good on my 50mm stem still with a Garmin 510
  • 1 2
 Funny how all these people with Garmins seem to crash........

......perhaps its like driving whilst using a phone because I dont use a Garmin and subsequently (though I never realised it was the reason) I dont crash very often.
  • 3 0
 I don't crash very often. But when I do, I do it with or without Garmin.
  • 2 0
 SOL for those who ride GIANT bikes with the OD2 steer tubes... Frown We never get anything cool. DAMN YOU!!!
  • 1 0
 Specialized already does this with their computer mounts. definitely the best position
  • 1 0
 I use Dual lock Velcro its snaps away in a crash and clips back in place. cost 3 dollars
  • 2 0
 Now that's a great... mount.
  • 2 0
 Make it purple and im a buyer
  • 1 0
 They do quite a few colours, and purples one ????. Had mine for a few years now and never had an issue
  • 3 0
 Winter sux
  • 1 0
 Only now ur catching up with this. Been using mine for a couple of years now and cost me £5.99 on ebay
  • 1 1
 My limited experience with 3d is how less durable the printed piece is compared to traditional plastic. Faster wear and no flex.
  • 2 0
 Can I just see more pics of the bike in the first pic? I like orange.
  • 1 0
 What top cap is that? I saw it on many bikes now and i cant find any info about it. Does anyone know where to get one?
  • 1 0
 It's a specialized top cap
  • 1 0
 It's nice to have some adjustment if needed depending on the place you are riding. It also helps the resale value
  • 1 0
 The plastic to hold my $300 Garmin. Nope I will stick to metal KEdge mount.
  • 1 0
 ProMountBillet's one is nicer.
  • 1 0
 a stem mount for a gps, because thats what we want reviews for
  • 1 0
 Oh for God's sake.....Just get on your bike and ride it.
  • 1 0
 I could say the same to you...but here you are moaning and groaning all the time on Pinkbike.
  • 1 0
 What about magellan?
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.023889
Mobile Version of Website