Scott Trail Protect FR 16 Pack - Review

May 4, 2016 at 7:06
by David Arthur  
Scott Trail Protect FR 16 Pack


Nobody plans to crash. While the main purpose of a hydration pack is to provide fluid delivery during a long ride, as well as being a handy place for storing food, tools and spare clothing, Scott has integrated a back panel protector made from D3O, the same material commonly used for knee pads, into the back of this Trail Protect FR pack.


The D30 impact protection that forms the back panel is integrated right into the pack, and rests against your back. The back protector runs the length of the pack, wider at the top and narrower at the bottom. The properties of D30 are well known and probably don’t need repeating here, but the material is soft and flexible during normal use, and stiffens substantially during a substantial shock impact. The Trail Protect FR pack's D30 element is a slim, vented panel that conforms to the curve of the back and, although it doesn’t add much bulk or weight, you can't remove it.
Details:
• Intended use: all-mountain, trail, enduro
• Integrated D3O back protector
• Attachments for open and full-face helmets
• Tool compartments
• Mobile chest pocket
• Emergency print with safety instructions
• Weight: 1050 grams
• Size: 30 x 50 x 14 cm, 16 litres
• MSRP: €169 (not available in UK or USA)
• Contact: Scott Sports / @SCOTT-Sports


Construction

The gravity-oriented riding intentions of this pack are clear, not only from the back protector, but also from the addition of straps for stowing a helmet (full-face or XC lid), and knee or arm pads to the outside. That’s useful for long climbing transitions or riding the gondola. A big pack needs some decent straps to keep it in place, and the Trail Protect features a generously wide hip belt with a double Velcro buckle closure and twin buckle chest straps. They all ensure the pack doesn’t shift or slide about when throwing some shapes on the bike. The pack offers a wide range of adjustability and can be adjusted vertically to better cater for longer or shorter torsos.

Inside, it’s a well-appointed pack: there’s a pocket for everything. A dedicated zipped compartment for a hydration bladder (not included) plus a useful array of pockets for organising all the tools and essentials you might want to lug around on a ride. Outside, there are a couple of useful zipped pockets, one on the chest strap and another on the hip belt, two stretchy side pockets and a soft lined top pocket that is ideal for a mobile phone or GPS device. The front outside pocket is a bit tricky to get to because you have to first remove the helmet cover flap, and as a result, I didn’t use it much. If the 16-litre capacity is too large for your requirements, Scott offers a smaller, 12-litre version. I found the larger size about right for an all-day ride, some food, 2 or 3-litres of water and a rain jacket.

Scott Trail Protect FR 16 Pack
An integrated D3 back panel provides extra crash protection.
Scott Trail Protect FR 16 Pack
The many pockets help you keep your stuff organized.

Scott Trail Protect FR 16 Pack
Perforations aid cooling on warmer rides, but comfort is an issue on longer rides.
Scott Trail Protect FR 16 Pack
The non-removable back panel is only attached to the bag at the four corners.


Issues

The Trail Protect pack doesn’t come with a hydration bladder, which seems a bit of an oversight, especially when you look at the price tag and compare it to other hydration packs that do come with a bladder. Of course, it does mean you’re free to use your own favoured bladder if you have one. There’s space for a 3-litre bladder in the zipped compartment.

The back panel will appeal to anyone wanting some extra protection when riding, but on some longer trail rides, the back panel can start to feel a bit uncomfortable. It's quite firm and presses into your back and is especially noticeable if wearing just a thin jersey. Add a couple more clothing layers and it’s not so bad. The D3O foam means it’s flexible and it does move with your body, but a bit more cushioning would go a long way to increasing the comfort.

While the pack is good at spreading the size and weight across your back, I found it tricky to get the waistband tensioned correctly, not helped by the combination of a large velcro strap and buckle clip that means it can’t be adjusted on the move. A simpler arrangement would probably be just as secure and allow easier adjustment on the move - and allow you to loosen the pack for the climbs and tension up for the descents. The high number of straps is a bit fiddly and it’s not a quick pack to put on and take off.


Pinkbike's Take:
bigquotesIt's definitely not a pack for lightweight trail riders for an hour blast after work in the evening, but for longer rides in challenging terrain or a longer enduro ride where you might favour a bit more protection, then the Scott Trail Protect is certainly appealing. The wide shoulder straps support the pack and spread the load well across the shoulders, and even loaded up, the pack never felt overly cumbersome. The back panel does compromise on comfort but is only really an issue for long pedally rides. For bigger rides where descending is the focus and extra protection is high on the list when you're padding up and wearing a full face, the Trail Protect has a lot going for it. - David Arthur



Visit the high-res gallery for more images from this review.




Author Info:
davidarthur avatar

Member since Apr 12, 2015
73 articles

61 Comments
  • 47 1
 Wait aren't we supposed to tape everything to our bikes now and use sippy bottles? Cmon pinkbike you're confusing us.
  • 23 5
 Either option has got to be better than the 'enduro fanny pack'.
  • 16 9
 @shakeyakey: I'll continue to use my Dakine 'Enduro fanny pack' because it's just bad ass for short 1-2 hour rides.

For you, I'd imagine style and looking cool is more important then the actual ride.
  • 13 1
 @LiquidSpin: Bad ass. Literally.
  • 6 5
 @LiquidSpin: Fashion over function, obviously... (fellow fanny pack owner)
  • 6 0
 @LiquidSpin: No as someone who has been left in a wheelchair after a spinal cord injury anything that protects the spine most important to me.
  • 3 2
 @shakeyakey: I've had two lower back surgeries. I understand and know what you're going through. However, you can easily crash and twist your spine with the best back pack protection available and still wind up with spinal injury.
  • 2 0
 Don't forget about the "Enduro Sash"
  • 2 0
 @shakeyakey: unless one would want to protect one's fanny!
  • 1 0
 @BCIYA: One's fanny is a precious commodity hahaha
  • 1 0
 For short rides under 2 hours I just shove a 500ml bottle of water in my shorts pocket, a multi tool, mini pump and tyre levers in the other and have a tube taped to the TT. I then proceed to drink lots before hand. Otherwise I'll take a pack. It doesn't get too hot that often in the UK
  • 2 1
 @CustardCountry: I tried that several times. I ended up just needing to stop and pee during my rides haha
  • 18 1
 So it's available in Canada? We don't want it though
  • 8 0
 How does it compare to the best protection backpacks out there, i.e. Evoc?

Evocs only have one downside in my opinion: Heat. Does not seem that Scott ticks this box any better.
  • 1 0
 2 problems; heta and that stupid waist band which is like wearing a corset (yes I do know thank you very much) and restricts breathing.

I like scott stuff, they make some very good kit but the prices are extraordinary so I have never bought any.
  • 2 0
 @Dobbs59: those waistbands on the evoc are horrid.I tried the one I bought on and instantly called my buddy and gave it to him.
  • 6 0
 @nug12182: Do you wear them across the chest? Smile When applied to the hips (bones), they don't constrain breathing and take load off your shoulders. But in uphill the sweat is a pain.

Never owned a backpack with better fit downhill than Evoc.
  • 5 0
 @Dobbs59: I actually like the Evoc waist band. Fits nicely, is elastic and stays in place. And does not cause any bruises in the waist area when you crash and your backpack gets twisted or caught on something... unlike the ordinary "nylon strap" waist bands most of the backpack have.
  • 4 0
 @Dobbs59: I have the camelbak "fanny pack" and I initially had gripes about the fit, but there's a sweet spot on the hips and the right amount of tightness that lets it sit just right at your "Ass Neck" so as not to restrict, and also not slide off your rear end. The Goldilocks of ass placement if you will.
  • 1 0
 I'm a big fan of the Evoc waist strap. So comfortable compared to my camelbak. Though the heat is serious. I know it's a trade off between the back protector but still, it's mentally warm. That said, I still grab it over the camelbak every single time.
  • 1 0
 @Ferisko: Mine wasn't elastic, it was (I had it tailored as it was unusable) fabric with a velcro closer.
At around 4" thick, it was like wearing a corset. Awful thing. I love it now I have got rid of the stupid padded bit though.
I used to unclip for pedalling, clip it back up for riding back down etc etc. Ballache.
  • 4 0
 @minotro: +1 for 'ass neck'
  • 6 0
 I'll take one! "NOT AVAILABLE IN USA or UK", hmmmmmmmmmmmm big sales mistake you think???
  • 7 2
 Where are the water bottle cage mounts?
  • 3 1
 Huh.... While most pack designs focus on minimal body contact, Scott has designed a nice sweater, with pockets. Sincerely, Phoenix AZ
  • 6 3
 And it's not available in the US why, exactly?
  • 5 5
 Because Scott. Their upper-level bikes had triple cranksets up until about 3 years ago.
  • 6 8
 Sue-happy f*ckwads?
  • 7 1
 Because we have Camelbak and Osprey and there is zero reason to deviate from that.
Well-thats my view anyway being biased towards my personal kit choices Smile
  • 2 0
 I'm in the market for a pack with spine protection, then… not available in the UK.
  • 1 0
 So this is good for longer rides, but on longer rides comfort really becomes an issue? Sounds like a giant fail to me. Also, a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.
  • 1 0
 Why is Scott stuff so hard to buy in US ? I cant even order on line. Would have to travel over 100 miles to a bike shop in Flagstaff and order through them. Never mind,
  • 1 0
 Berghaus Freeflow 25 all the way. Hard shell protection, space for 3 litre reservoir & the shell allows air across your back. Buff said
  • 1 0
 Another pack built with spine protection, but not designed to work well with a neck brace? I guess I will continue waiting...
  • 1 0
 go check www.prism-offroad.com for a good backpack with a back-protector and 10 years warranty !
  • 2 1
 does the back proector works at all? any studies why it is equally better than basic spine protector by e.g. Dainese?
  • 2 1
 • MSRP: €169 (not available in UK or USA)

not available in the EU either then
  • 5 0
 Now taking orders for Antarctica.... so if you have a friend of a friend of a penguin you're golden!
  • 1 0
 never even saw a decent side profile that would of been good
  • 2 1
 A "hydration" pack with no bladder, someone dropped the ball.
  • 1 2
 Nope. Pass.
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.025869
Mobile Version of Website