Just like previous World Cups this year, the UCI has handed out more fines after the World Champs with 14 riders failing to "present to the start".
After the incredible weekend of racing the UCI announced that it has handed out 14 fines to riders who were announced to race but did not "present to the start". The list of riders includes the likes of Tahnee Seagrave, Tuhoto-Ariki Pene and Oisin O Callaghan. It's interesting to see Tahnee on the list as she shared just before racing kicked off that despite being on the GB team she would not be riding.
We have looked through the UCI rules and regulations and while we couldn't find an exact match for this rule breach we did spot this in the
specific World Championship rules.
| Unless prevented by an act of God, a rider once announced as taking the start and who fails to present, shall be liable to a fine of CHF 500 to CHF 5,000.
An injury or sickness shall be recognised as an act of God only if the rider is declared incapable of taking the start by the UCI official doctor.— UCI |
This seems to fit with the "fail to present to the start" reasoning for the fines from the UCI although it's strange that Tahnee Seagrave who is suffering from concussion symptoms wouldn't have been signed off by a UCI official doctor. We are not sure what fine the riders were given in the wide range of CHF 500 to CHF 5,000 ($523 to $5174) if this is the rule breach that has been applied to the 14 riders.
#RobGotWarner'd
In which century do we live?
yesterday morning I was contacted by an invisible power from above. With words of almighty wisdom I was told:
"You shall not start your journey down the abyss called Mont Chery downhill track in Les Gets. For those who conduct breach, eternal damnation and a shitload of flat tyres shall be awaited."
If x rays aren't enough for the UCI, then a proper riders union is seriously needed
"Find a sentence/word/phrase, be offended...and post about it before someone beats you to it."
Well that does go a long way to explaining why their default is to be naturally good at doing evil shit.
Ramen.
In which century do we live?
In which century do we live?
Boy...are you in for a surprise. It's official language in most all policies. Acts of Nature and/or Acts of God. But hey, if you don't have a God, they don't have to cover it?
www.irmi.com/search?query=acts%20of%20god&collection=irmi-search
www.google.com/search?q=insurance+for+acts+of+god&rlz=1C1RXQR_enUS932US936&oq=insurance+policy+acts+of+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0i22i30j0i15i22i30j0i390l3.4994j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
UCI: "Nah, gib money"
And to be clear, I don't have a problem with the fine for not starting, or really for her being fined in this instance because it is against the rules. She, or her backers, would have decided that the fine was worth it for the publicity. It's the lack of response from the UCI, and how they still say that there are only an insignificantly small number of concussions in the sport that I have a problem with.
Canyon also made a custom paintjob for World champs
But I'm confused as to why she wasn't pulled off the start list any way the day her plane didn't leave home.
Alternates are assigned and attend right? So wouldn't another rider have been on site in the event of an injured rider and be able to slot in immediately? Or were there just no other UK riders available to fill the position of alternate?
Seems narcissistic of people "seeing" if they can race the day of. Federation spending a boatload of money on trying to put forth a team based on availability and merit.
Merit is trumped by availability every time.
If this were soccer, football, baseball or any other team sport (which Worlds is a team sport broken up by country)...every coach knows that one.
"The greatest ability that can help our team is availability"
That's why so many sports decisions are made before the team even leaves for travel. Some are game day decisions, but are we really going to pretend that a vestibular and cranial injury is a game day decision?
Me ranting meanwhile some noble, feel good girl is sitting back on the couch, missing out on Worlds is having to get ready for Val di Sole thinking "I'm such a good teammate for supporting her option to not race"
Who knows what her reasons were, but i dont think anyone should fault her for it based on assumptions.
No. Putin is not God.
Devil, maybe.
However, I don‘t really have enough information ob the cases in question here. Did the athletes actualky provide sick notes by their physicians to the UCI, and those were not accepted? Or were they simply no shows?
Really? f*cking get a life UCI and stop trying to play god.
On top of this, she is a junior who is not supported, not even by the Norwegian cycling federation, and had to finance her whole race privately.
"An injury or sickness shall be recognised as an act of God only if the rider is declared incapable of taking the start by the UCI official doctor."
-I think being in hospital should automatically qualify.
- Starting with your wheel in front of the start line = 100 chf fine
- Wearing the wrong clothing on the podium = 500 chf fine
- Not showing up to the start line = 500-5000 chf fine
So the UCI thinks this is 10x more egregious than wearing incorrect clothing on the podium. And 50x more egregious than getting an unfair advantage against other competitors (e.g. cheating...aka wheel ahead of the line).
Priorities...
F*ck the UCI
And yea, I know Tuhoto was hurt during at least. Others like Oisin and Tahnee had longer term injuries that they decided not to push it. Oisin was even in practice but dropped out.
ALSO who has our backs when is comes to the lack of live or even replay footage from this event
As soon as there is a substantial amount of money at stake (and careers of riders and everyone around them), you need a form of "legal framework" to help decide what is or isn't correct. This is true at a small scale (e.g. our cycling bubble), but also at bigger scale (think of a company investing in building a factory in a foreign country. You want to have the laws in place that protect your investment there).
Proposing a "Red Bull Series" is somewhere between childish and naïve. Does anyone think they wouldn't end up with a similar set of rules as soon as the stakes are high enough? As soon as there is money, you are forced to come up with rules. If I sponsor a trade team, I'd better now what races I can expect my team to be allowed to enter so I know what exposure I get in return.
So for the particular case at hand, idea behind the rule is easy:
1.) Don't take up one of the limited spots for entering the world champs if you know you wouldn't be able to race
2.) If you have an injury, see the UCI official doctor
It always a bit shocking when the overwhelming number of comments shows zero managerial/contractual/legal experience.
dirtmountainbike.com/features/interviews/exclusive-dh1-interview-raymond-freecaster
www.pinkbike.com/news/DH1-Canceled-Redbull-Media-House-Tackles-World-Cups.html
probably all the XC kids that got bullied growing up
But they don’t?
How many are happy to take money out of the sport and put nothing back in??
Forget red bull, we don’t need those kinds of sponsors in the sport
World Champs.... riders are entered by their national federations. These federations will have appointed team managers. It will be the team manager that will be the point of contact with race officials (and having a rider withdrawn from the start list). I'd be surprised if anyone representing UCI would be personally following up with riders?
So I would imagine in all these cases, that either...
(a) The rider hasn't informed the team manager they won't be starting. Or...
(b) The team manager hasn't followed the process required
So while I'm no fan of the UCI. These fines surely come as a result of managers and/or riders not following procedures
Don’t worry pinkbike editors will write a piece on why the uci isn’t that bad for mtb gravity based sports
As to me if you sign on and pick race number up you are there and should be at the start line/time, unless sickness/crash (act of god) etc stops them and yes they should inform the organizer.
IF the did NOT sign on and pick numbers up, then for what ever reason they not racing and to fine them is bang out of order IMO.
The only thing I can see worlds been diff is that all "Team" numbers prob be in one envelope which can be picked/signed for by team manager/mech/helper.
I was dissapointed when the EWS signed up to their "services". A missed opportunity to have a section of the sport demonstrating that they dont need their approval or validation.
sack them off, and leave them to meddle in road cycling.
Sue the UCI for not allowing me to watch in the USA. That’s how dumb these fines are. SUCK IT @uci and while I’m at it SUCK IT @usacycling as well. #moneylaunderingorganizations
Looking at that list, I see this applies to Callaghan, Oisin, who has the "o" before his name. What then, did the other 13 get fines for, was my immediate thought?
Surely I can't be the only one who read it that way initially?
They've just put the second name first, which is why he has O in front.
As far as I know they were all fined for not racing.
He pulled out on day 1 with a persistent wrist injury. So it was known he wasn't going to race, another swiss rider ended up a separated shoulder after practice. It appears to me that the UCI fines you for getting injured.
As a privateer this rule was never stated or obvious to me at the few WC's I raced back in the day.
Just another way for the UCI to flex some power.
I still haven't been able to watch the Men's DH
Continues to show exact match
I don't know why every one here didn't make the start. If some are like as @tgr9 said and weren't up to the standard and decided to not race, the yes, fine the body that sent them
As for fining riders that are injured is beyond a joke
All the UCI has done is implement the rules.
It has to be the responsibility of each nation to ensure that they understand and follow the rules, some, if not most of the blame has to reside with them. (only and assumption and apologies if this is not correct).
Each nation will have its own internal policies, this may mean that certain responsibilities reside with the rider, the riders team or the local federation. (or maybe its not written down anywhere, I dont know)
Without the complete knowledge of each case its impossible for the court of Pinkbike to apportion responsibility.
Maybe.... Pb should investigate further before placing a click bait article on their home page to get the keyboard warriors all upset....