News: Welsh Government Seeks Views On MTB Access

Sep 24, 2015 at 16:39
by Fraktiv  
The Welsh Government is seeking your views on how they can improve the public's opportunities to access the outdoors for recreation (which includes mountain biking). Their consultation is open until 02 October 2015, and you can submit your views via their website.

Their website states:
bigquotesEveryone should have the chance to experience parks, woodlands, mountains and the coast through a range of activities. Outdoor recreation makes a valuable contribution to Wales and creates a number of health, environment, social and economic benefits.

We are seeking views on:

- ways to reduce the costs and burdens associated with administering public paths and wider access

- how we could better meet current and future recreational needs

- ways to tackle some of the practical difficulties of improving opportunities for all, not just for those who can afford to travel or those who are already enthusiasts about an activity.

https www.facebook.com TheHillAreAlive

The Trails for Wales campaign - set up in response to the consultation - is organised by CTC Cymru, Open MTB, Welsh Cycling and British Cycling, who recently applauded the Welsh Government’s proposal to adopt similar rules on access to the countryside as those enjoyed in Scotland. The Trail for Wales campaign is calling on all outdoor enthusiasts to support their campaign Trails for Wales, which they can do at www.ctc.org.uk/campaign/trails-wales

Currently in Wales, the Rights of Way system is based upon recorded historic use of routes instead of suitability. As a result, cyclists have rights to use just 21% of the network, with permission to ride along narrow rocky sheep tracks on steep ground but denied access to thousands of miles of public footpaths lying on metalled farm and forest roads.

In Scotland, following the Land Reform Act 2003, it is very different. Scotland enjoys ‘presumed access’. This means there is a presumption of “responsible access”, subject to exemptions laid out in the Outdoor Access Code (eg forestry operations). Consequently, Scottish off-road and leisure cycle tourism are booming and contribute between £236.2m and £358m per annum.

Recent research indicates that outdoor activity in Wales contributes to nearly 10% of the Welsh tourist economy. The Trails for Wales campaign argues that changes to countryside access within Wales could dramatically increase this figure, thereby offering more social, transport, recreational and health benefits for both residents and visitors to the country.

https www.facebook.com TheHillAreAlive

bigquotesI don't think we can exaggerate what an amazing opportunity for mountain biking this is. A change in access laws in Wales could potentially open thousands of kilometres of currently out of bounds trails. It would put Wales back up there with Scotland as one of the best off road destinations in the world, and at the same time, would increase take up of the sport and local participation. It would also potentially pave the way for future changes in England. We urge all off road enthusiasts, in England as well as Wales, to add their voice to our joint Trail for Wales campaign. - Tom Hutton, Snowdonia-based mountain bike journalist and guide, speaking on behalf of Open MTB

bigquotesFollowing on from the Active Travel Wales Act this green paper provides another opportunity to realise the ambition of the First Minister Carwyn Jones to make Wales a cycling nation. A refresh of our access laws could make Wales the cycling centre for the UK, and would provide a healthy boost to the economy. I recommend everyone with a passion for the outdoors to show their support for our joint campaign, Trails for Wales. - Gwenda Owen, CTC Cymru

bigquotesWales has been at the forefront of mountain bike trail centres for many years now. I've used them extensively over the last 20 years of my racing career, but there are so many more trails out there to offer cyclists than just these purpose built centres. By opening up rights of way for cyclists, Wales could be one of the best mountain biking destinations in the world. That's why I am supporting the CTC and Open MTB's Trails for Wales campaign to change the current out of date access rights and open up these rights of way for the enjoyment of all cyclists at all levels. The open access policy has worked so well in Scotland, making it a go to destination for mountain biking. Wales could shortly be enjoying the same benefits and then I hope we will see the same across England too. - Tracey Moseley, Trek Bikes

The coalition of cycle groups are calling on everyone to write to the Welsh Government in support of their response, and can do so through CTC Cymru's online tool here.

Photo credit: The Hills Are Alive.


MENTIONS: @geebeebee / @TheHillsAreAlive



Author Info:
fraktiv avatar

Member since May 14, 2008
227 articles

54 Comments
  • 13 0
 Wales, I love you xxx.
  • 9 6
 No its sheep your thinking of not whales
  • 21 1
 Judging by this weeks news, you lot seem to to enjoy roasting pigs?
  • 11 0
 Wales is home to the best trails I've ridden in my life, anything that will expand their network is Awesome News!!
  • 1 4
 You need to get a passport and use it.
  • 8 0
 Come on guys calm down - this is a good thing.

The Welsh Government started this and has asked US to let them know how they can make things better for US!

Why is this being treated so negatively here?
  • 21 16
 do gooders kicking up a fuss about a problem that doesn't exist in the real world. i've ridden up, down and across pretty much any where i like for 25 years or so and never had a single problem or cross word with anyone. all this is going to do is stir up the walkers and council folk.
  • 6 7
 Spot on bud i fully agree
  • 5 2
 Well, lets not start a fight before they've even had a chance to say what they think eh?
  • 23 1
 So you've been riding all over Wales, enjoying it, very probably breaking a few laws but had no issue, and you're annoyed that they're now trying to encourage the same behaviour by legalising it?
  • 10 0
 @b45he5r Tell that to the Peak District riders who lost Rushup Edge to resurfacing work. The small (but loud) minority of walkers who object to mtb aren't going to change their minds one way or the other, and the councils are generally supportive of anything that will bring tourism and jobs. I think this is a great response to the government who, bear in mind, *have actually asked us what we want from rural access* - so wouldn't it be more than stupid not to be represented in the public consulatation when all the other stakeholders (ramblers, farmers, etc) certainly are?
  • 3 9
flag b45her (Sep 25, 2015 at 6:54) (Below Threshold)
 as far as i'm aware riding on footpaths isn't breaking the law as such , its more of a gentlemans agreement kind of thing.
  • 9 0
 Pretty sure footpaths are for walkers only. Legally. Bridleways are bike friendly. But in reality I just ride where I enjoy riding, don't take the piss, and apologise to anyone who takes offence. Unless they are a dick...
  • 1 0
 The issue for me isn't necessarily access, the CROW Act should be looked at to reflect current use, my issue is that if it is adopted, 'right to roam' or just increased access, some will see it as a right to build. It has the potential to allow individuals to build trails on land that is still owned, leaving the owner liable for any accidents caused by badly designed jumps or trails, that they, the owner, may not have known about. It happens already and managing it costs money that could be better spent elsewhere.
  • 7 0
 the solution to that surely is to change the rules around suing the landowner because someone's been an idiot and hurt themselves. If your gonna do a dangerous sport, bloody man up and take responsibilty when you hurt yourself.

As it happens, Chicksands had to remove all their north shore cos some bloke fell off, broke his arm and sue'd the park for "lost earnings". When I pointed out that perhaps he shouldn't have gone up there in the first place, the builders were actually on his side, saying "aww, but he's got kids to feed"

So I repeated my original point, maybe he shouldn't have gone up there in the first place...
  • 2 0
 Maybe, but until they do the landowner remains liable. So when someone watches an edit on here and wants to emulate what they've just seen they head off into the woods with dreams of building north shore, instead they cobble together some pallets, piss around for an hour or so, then clear off home. If someone else rides over it, the structure then collapses, who does the injured take that up with? Currently the landowner, as they should have known it was there and should have taken steps to remove it. The builder (using broad strokes here) has no responsibilty or liability, but complains on forums that his hard work was ripped down. And if the landowner has lots of land to manage, like the FC, The National Parks, the National Trust etc, how to they keep up?
  • 5 0
 I don't see why the BMC's comments on this (from a rock climbing perspective) can't apply here too. "Volenti non fit injuria: The principle that if someone willingly and knowingly places themselves in a position where harm might result, they will not be able to bring a claim against another party if suffering injury as a result." (the latin literally meaning "to a willing person, injury is not done"). www.thebmc.co.uk/Handlers/DownloadHandler.ashx?id=944

In the case of Chicksands the north shore was presumably official, not rotten stuff installed by some local kids, which does make the duty of care different.
  • 2 0
 But concerns about liability are valid I agree @gandalfsdad. Possibly this should be raised to the government as well seeing as they are asking us what needs to change in the law?
  • 3 0
 Agreed @sideshowb , I'm assuming if they're reviewing access, they then have to take into account liability and the landowners rights. To be clear I'm not against access, far from it, as a regular visitor to South Wales to visit my in-laws it's the ungraded, 'natural' stuff that's as big, if not bigger draw (looking to catch up with South Wales MTB next time I'm down), it all needs tidying up, but I'm with you on you access fairness and spirit of adventure (your other reply to another).
  • 2 0
 @b45her I don't know what it's like where you live, but here in North Wales there is a huge amount of animosity towards anyone who rides on anything except bike specific trails. I am always very respectful and friendly towards anyone I meet, yet I have even had run ins with walkers while riding on bridleways (Which are totally legal to ride on). Weirdly the walkers don't seem to have any problem with horse riders, who unlike mountain bikers are a pretty unfriendly bunch.
  • 2 0
 Walker (especially older ones) tend to be a funny bunch. We have had walkers poke sticks at us when riding Yogurt Pots in the Surrey Hills which has been an mtb track for as long as I can remember.

I think mountain biking is becoming more accepted as a mainstream sport / activity rather than a fringe extreme sport. Younger walkers are probably fine with bikes as such things should only get better.
  • 4 0
 As a Welsh man, mbt er/ 4x4 er we need to open up the beautiful Welsh countryside to the public!

Any support needed I believe we should all get behind any European funding available!!!!

Let's get Wales on the map and one of europes best place to ride!

Peace out !
  • 3 0
 Opening up the access means improved rights, but coupled with increased responsibilities. The Scottish model works, because outdoor users show respect for the environment and the castodians there of. Idiotic, litter dumping, skally's aside, ( pretty sure North of the boarder has a few of these too), there is much to be gained by improving access. Qualified and insured outdoor education and MTB trail leading companies will have a greater scope of routes to legally ride on, spreading access to more areas reduces the excesses of use, over a wider area, less erosion, more options, less conflict of use. Yes there will need to be restrictions, like the one agreed on MTB use on Snowdon, but that's good, for walkers and riders. The land is no ones birth right, we are castodians, when we are gone, it will remain, more access, more opportunity, less laziness, more adventure.
  • 1 0
 P.s.s let's think about the honey pot site of brechfa, horse riding, mbt, walking....... Actives for everyone n the heart of Wales! A very popular place for all! Let's keep Wales on the map
  • 2 0
 2nd October is cutting it a bit fine, i've posted it on our club website, it has a huge base following, lets hope they pay attention.
  • 3 0
 Yeah I don't know why pinkbike hasn't picked up on this before. Still, it only takes 1 minute to click the ctc link and send in a copy of their form letter if you're pushed for time. Here again if you missed it: www.ctc.org.uk/campaign/trails-wales
  • 3 3
 This is an interesting debate and one for which Im undecided on.
As a walker and climber myself, I dont want to suddenly encounter some idiot on a bike because lets face it, for every 50 riders that pass through, at least a handfull will be inconsiderate. Thats just a fact. We like riding techy trails fast. Perception of that is that we are being idiots.
Comparing it to Scotland does not work. Wales is easy access for most of middle England so has a huge influx of outdoor tourists. Scotland is miles from anywhere and so the usage population is hugely lower reducing conflict.
And there is that word. Conflict. We as riders have a general dislike for horses and trail bikes as they destroy everything they touch. Ramblers and walkers dont have a great love of us. You cant open access to one (group of non-walkers) and not the others. The reality is that there are many many more walkers than cyclists in Wales.
Wales is on the map for its Trail centres and what sprang from that. They are heavily funded by EU money into the Welsh Governent. That funding might not be there soon anyway...
Whilst this all sounds exciting, do we want to use flat overgrown bridleways? I live in a rural area and walk the footpaths. They are nearly all too narrow and overgrown. Fine for a walker but not for a 780 handlebar.
Wales is massive. Id argue that if you think you need to use pokey footpaths, your spirit of adventure needs expanding.
Thats my two pence anyway
  • 5 1
 Disagree on a lot of that sorry.

Scotland has 1.1 million people living in Edinburgh and Glasgow. That's more than Cardiff + Bristol. The country around Edinburgh/Glasgow is subject to open access just like the highlands, and I don't think any significant conflicts have been documented as a result.

Conflicts, yes. Let's take the two trail users who get on least well (bikes + horses imo) and put them on the same, limited set of trails. Widening access means each group gets to choose the more approriate trail for their own use which reduces conflict. Where there is an actual, proper conflict, this is better resolved by both parties having equal rights to the trail and reaching an agreement. Snowdon is the perfect example of this.

Footpaths. The plentiful ones I *cough* want to ride are neither flat nor overgrown Wink

Spirit of adventure. Seriously mate, who are you to judge others intangible qualities from behind a keyboard?

I am a walker and climber as well, nobody wants to encounter an idiot, trouble is the idiots are already biking (and driving, walking, horse riding) everywhere they shouldn't be, and doing so idiotically. This is about legitimizing what us sensible lot do.
  • 6 0
 Following up on "access to most of middle England". Despite our bike park being splashed all over the mtb media every month, the majority of riding that happens in south Wales is done by the locals. Opening more trails is not going to bring an unmanageable new influx over and above the local impact. It will bring good business though, as people coming from afar need places to stay, eat etc ie they spend more per head than locals do on a biking trip.
  • 2 0
 This isn't about access to narrow footpaths, i wouldn't want to see hedgerows destroyed to make way for my bars either! I just want to ride the places I currently ride but with a clear conscience. This is about access to the wide open lands and hills and valleys where we can enjoy adventure on bikes as it is meant to be. If we respect it, access will remain, if it is abused then I am sure those areas will soon become unaccessible due to council and forestry commission gates and fences etc
  • 4 0
 We heard that CROW would bring devastation to the countryside - it didn't.

We heard that the Land Reform Act would be unworkable, and bring devastation to the countryside - in fact it ended up with half a dozen minor problems, all of which got sorted out.

At the moment, theres thousands of miles - literally thousands of miles - of footpaths that are anything from 3 metre wide tarmac paths (where bikes aren't allowed to ride) to rocky sheep paths that link two bridleways - at the same time, we see identical narrow rocky sheep paths that we are allowed to ride, theres just no sense to any of it. On top of this there are thousands more miles of tracks over access land, everything from tarmac roads to forest/moorland roads, that we remain banned from, but walkers are allowed to walk all over unrestricted

Its all bollocks!

the system either needs to be sensible, or scrapped.
  • 3 0
 We all need to understand and respect each other as trail users. If you want to shread a DH trail or ride like an idiot go ride a bike park. If we all ride sensibly and are friendly to other trail users people will start to take us seriously.
  • 1 1
 Think you missed the point of my rant. Never said that it would be bad.

What I did say was sort out what we already have avalible. They quote that we only have access to 21% of rights of way, what they don't say is how much of that 21% is actually rideable. sort that first before getting into a land access fight. Spend the money on that.

But it's not going to happen as spending money on something shiny and new brings more headlines than sorting out the old stuff.

And finally yes, I would like mountain biking to remain a bit more exclusive, if I wanted to join the herd I'd be a football fan.
  • 3 0
 Why pour money and effort just the 21% when some of it will be rubbish even if you invest £££ in it, while some of the 79% will be excellent with no investment whatsoever.
  • 2 0
 Responding to questions the government asked already costs a lot, lot less than fixing thousands of km of trails.
  • 2 0
 "what they don't say is how much of that 21% is actually rideable. sort that first before getting into a land access fight. Spend the money on that."

The law says that the council doesn't HAVE to spend money making bridleways rideable for bikes, thats why it will never happen. Equally we have thousands of miles of footpaths that ARE rideable, but are not allowed to use.
  • 3 1
 Yeah, you should have approved the awesome lift access plans, and not that shitty bus uplift system they have at bikepark wales.
  • 1 3
 If you don't like it don't use it and pedal up Smile

Personally I think a day out at BPW with 10 DH runs is well worth the £30 I pay.
  • 1 3
 The uplift at BPW is great... apart from you need to book 3 months in advance and the trailers are full of ' do it all bikes '
  • 2 0
 Does it really matter what bikes other people are riding?
  • 2 0
 The Lake District could really do with taking onboard some of these approaches!
  • 2 0
 My opinion on the matter will be purely based on the Rugby result this evening.
  • 3 0
 Bike racks on snowdon train..!
  • 1 0
 At the end of the day.... Let's make full use of the Welsh mountains and all enjoy!!
  • 2 0
 £6.50...
  • 1 1
 Ps. Let smash England tomorrow! If not, let's enjoy the day!!!
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.032073
Mobile Version of Website