Paul Angus - or Pang as he's known - is one of the owners of
Vertigo Bikes in Queenstown, and has had many special bikes over the years. He's one of those people that hop from bike to bike, each new build more tasteful and suitable than the last. We've all got that friend who habitually buys the wrong bike, but Pang is the antidote to that. His bikes are always dialed and built with the right balance of curiosity and pragmatism. The bike we look at today is a bike very close to his heart - his 1999/2000 Giant ATX One DH. The bike is largely period correct, although sourcing parts is hard enough for current bikes, let alone bike that are two decades old so it's still a work in progress. It's a passion project for Pang about enjoying something that gave him so much, and not about getting so caught up in the details that you can't enjoy the bigger picture.
He originally had one that he raced at the beginning of his race career, a career that would eventually take him to the World Cup circuit. After falling in love with the ATX, he had Vanessa Quinn's old frame hung up in the Vertigo shop for several years before deciding to build his own, sourcing all the parts to be close to the original era's spec.
I love the contrast of colours. It's loud, yet unobtrusive.
The linkage looks slender and fragile. Compared to the bikes of today it looks like it could snap like a chicken's wishbone, but it did deliver 150mm of rear travel. Pang says that he used to run a Goldtech rocker link on his original ATX to take the travel to a remarkable 200mm. He coyly explains, "Preserving geometry wasn't a thing back then, getting more travel was all that mattered. The links would lift the BB, steepen the head angle, and usually blow your shock up after a week due to increased leverage ratio."
The RockShox lineage lives on, still at the sharp end of racing to this day.
Although Hope is still a company making fantastic kit, it could be argued that the peak of their dominance was in the time of bikes like the ATX. Pang remembers having a set of C2s on his original race bike. He recalls "The Hope C2 brakes were fun on long descents. At Fort William you had to wind the silver bite point adjuster on the top of the reservoir fully out, so the brakes basically didn't work and pulled straight to the bar at the start of your run, just so the wheels didn't lock up half way down once they brakes heated up."
In the days before narrow-wide chainrings and quiet guides, things were a little different. Of the proprietary chain guide that came on the ATX Pang informs us that "It failed to do two things I like chain guides to do: Firstly, keeping the chain on and secondly make the bike quiet. The chainguide, plus the box section frame, made it sound like a spanner had been left inside the frame during manufacturing. You could fit an MRP or Mr. Dirt Gizmo with a bit of hacksawing to the frame and chainguide."
The chain line of the bike was built around a 135mm rear hub.
Tire tech has come a long way, but not necessarily in terms of tread patterns. Yes, these look slightly dated, but not so much as some other parts of the bike.
660mm wide bars and a 70mm stem. In a 25.4mm clamp, naturally.
Pang used to cut the 660mm stock width down to a slender 640mm. The stem options were in either 35, 50, or 70mm. Pang would run 50mm on slower tech tracks and 70mm on faster more open ones.
Talking to Pang about this bike, and the process of building it up, I asked him just how much the ATX meant to him, and what kind of influence it had on him as a rider, as well as a racer. Did he think that his life would have worked out all that differently if he hadn't bought his first downhill race bike, his very first ATX?
 | For me, yes, I believe so and I believe it was this bike, the Giant ATX One DH that did just that.
It was the bike I saw in the magazines, at races, in videos. It was the first bike I truly coveted and scrimped and saved to buy. It was the bike I did my first downhill race on. It was the bike that took me to my first podium as a junior. It was the bike that took me to my first win as a senior. It reliably navigated me through my progression as a racer and eventually allowed me to be promoted to the pro-elite ranks in the UK.
Over the four years of owning the ATX it made me realise there was nothing else I wanted to do with my life but ride and race bikes and it carved out the start of a ten-year race career which took me all over the world eventually leading me to New Zealand where I now call home. I have never stopped riding and racing and I have made this industry my career, now owning a bike shop and running grassroots DH races in Queenstown, NZ. Would I have got here without owning the Giant ATX One? Who knows, I like to think not and because of that it will always be a very special bike for me. What a bike.— Paul Angus |
You can see another of bike of the Vertigo Bike museum that we covered last year - the
Lahar M8 gearbox bike - as well as countless others either in the store or at
Veritgobikes.co.nz
135 Comments
And maybe (just maybe) a new Reign 29 that’s a legit enduro bike?????
With mullet option, in-frame storage, redesigned lower down-tube eyelets for shock mounting,...
And make the main lower pivot (front of lower link) bearings bigger-those wear out at 2-3 times the rate of the other frame bearings.
As for mullet - me, personally, would like to have that option from manufacturer.. )
I own Reign Advanced 1 2016 and as soon as finances will let me - will definitely buy 29 fork just to get "mullet". )
I’ve seen (or broken) a few recent (last 10 years) Giant frames. Top tube will develop a lengthwise crack from stresses on the front of the bike. Chainstay brace can fail on the rear subframe. Haven’t seen or heard of an eyelet failure.
Hopefully a new model is coming, and they're reading this.
But, what about SX ?..
Girlfriend and I are still riding our 2016 Reigns and are looking to buy something new after this year. Been really happy with our Reigns and if they don't making any changes to the new ones we will be getting Transition Spires.
1. As I said - "as an option from manufacturer", so the customer will have an opportunity to decide what ti buy (to do) .
2. I've "mulleted" my Reign Advanced 27.5 1 2016 (installed 29' fork with 170 mm of travel). And I definitely got what I desired, I liked it. Fork wasn't mine, some after half of a month I gave it away but - mulleting is for me, for sure. Well, maybe 170 a little bit much but 160 would be perfect.
Seems like now, full speed, full throttle & bikes / cars are SO dang good it's hard to break them.....not complaining, but riding with a sense of mechanical sympathy was always a kind of an interesting part of racing we don't see much anymore.
Modern bikes are so good, a phrase every generation utters, that I do get the sense we're well into diminishing returns for most technology from a performance perspective. You can hold on and grit your teeth through anything now, and you and your bike will survive. The bigger horizon is the continued push of the tech and quality to lower price points, though I think the way the modern performance bike market is structured that isn't happening - it's at least perceived as easier and more profitable to push yourself up the price curve/down the supply curve vs. go the other way and make more bikes better. A $2000 bike today is still better than a $2000 bike of a decade ago, but represents a different position in the bike market, relatively.
Only in (rose tinted) retrospective could flimsy tires, lousy suspension, poor frame design, unreliable drivetrains and the predominance of pretty but lousy machined parts that defined mountain biking for so long be looked at as anything but bad.
But hey, I’m sure you can go on eBay and buy a bunch of used, old high-end parts and be gripped every time you hit a drop or roll into a rock garden. Relive those glory days-and make sure there’s video for Friday Fails!!!
Things like 26” wheels getting caught on a root where you didn’t have perfect body positioning to the more slack geometry helping you with that slightly heavier landing.
Would I go back, no...but I'll say, it's a bit less interesting when any of us can bike at the shop with 0 mods that is EWS worthy out the door.
...But originally 20mm axles were naturally 110mm spacing. Correct me if Im wrong?
images.app.goo.gl/RjFRLWNtXmtGT4738
@henryquinney
I have a 5 bolt 195mm Hope proto rotor that never made production.....
And the marketeers should never have downgraded us from 20x110mm axles...
But yeah, what an iconic bike. One of the classic DH racers that most of us who are old enough lusted after but probably couldn't afford - I had to settle for a '99 Giant Box 1 instead which was unbelievably s***! (URTs, got to love 'em - not!) Had a bounce on an ATX though and just felt so plush for it's time.
Did they come with a frigging step stool to help you mount up, like one might have for a big horse?
(I know the BB _looks_ extra high because of 26 inch wheels, but it's still pretty damn high)
www.pinkbike.com/photo/19163498
Found this pic of me from a Midland super series race which I think was 2000.
Just had the ATX frame and was running RST HI5 forks and silver 521 wheels with some tan wall tyres
As was only clearance for 6 1/2" travel, check it out if do not believe me?
A correct way for more travel was to replace the old shock mount below and drill a new one a little further down, this you fitted a damper with more stroke at the same geo!
Or at least the ATX one that I used to have did?
Karpiel and Intense had 200 mm travel bikes and Foes was at 180 or more. Guess that’s why so many were around at that time- at least in the USA. Rebuilding my Disco Volante with a hammer in the campsite after one wet run was good times
Perhaps in Europe sintise B1 and Sunn didn’t have quite that much travel but they had high pivot linkage driven bikes and Formula Disc brakes.
I have a 40h set in a tandem and they are great, feck they are heavy!
Hope we’re innovative all the time and I think they were just experimenting
Join Pinkbike Login