Today Shimano announces new crankset and derailleur options to suit a wider range of rider preferences and mountain bike setups.
There are two new cranks, including an XTR option, which feature 55mm chain lines. The additional chainline spacing options aims to offer more clearance, should you need it. Currently, Shimano offers 51mm and 56.5mm options, both for use in conjunction with Boost rear axle spacing. The issue that Shimano is trying to remedy is not so much in terms of drivetrain performance but more so in regards to the current trend for thicker chainstays, and how sometimes chainring clearance can be an issue.
The FC-512-1 will be available in Deore or non-series models but they're essentially the same crank.
Shimano offers two new cranks, the FC-M9125-1 and the FC-512-1, which will probably be better recognised by their respective series names as XTR and Deore.
Shimano also announces a new, shorter Deore XT rear derailleur. This new model will offer greater ground clearance and is designed specifically with a 10-45T cassette in mind, which Shimano already manufacture. When designing a rear derailleur, the length of the cage is hugely important. The bigger the difference between the smallest and largest cog, which can be as large as 41T in Shimano's range, means the cage has to be longer to provide adequate tension to the chain.
There is also the benefit of being able to run less b-tension. This is because of the comparatively smaller lowest gear. Brands go some way to tailor the path of the derailleur to ensure that the top jockey wheel is an appropriate distance from the teeth of the cassette, irrespective of the gear that's selected. A 10-45T cassette, thanks to a smaller differential between the smallest and largest cogs, should allow for the b-tension to be lower and achieve a crisper shift in the middle and outer ranges of the cassette. A shorter cage can also mean less twisting forces are being put through the derailleur, which in turn can also aid shifting performance.
If you're lucky enough to be chosen to buy one of Shimano's fancy Centennial books, I bet you can read all about cables!
I like Shimano's quality and all, but you gotta admit they've been lagging behind in MTB drivetrains. They'd still be pushing triple chainrings if SRAM didn't force 1x on them.
Oh, and availability... I really wanted to put 12sp SLX or Deore on my wife's bike but no luck. Ended up with NX.
youtu.be/LlDVpl6m7Hk
youtu.be/OR6lRHCFWhM
At the end of the day, the derailleur needs to shift into the gear selected. AXS does that job very well, very efficiently, and VERY reliably.
SLX HG+ 12sp literally shifts better than SRAM AXS. Backed up by: www.bikemag.com/gear/components/drivetrain/a-mismatch-made-in-heaven-xtr-axs
Unless you want the novelty of wireless shifting (clean cockpit, ease of install) you'd be misguided if you think you're getting better performance than an SLX Shimano 12sp (shifter + der is almost 6x cheaper!).
Why should everyone just accept that SX/NX/GX is cheap inferior crap and move on? The entire line should perform the same with the difference being the weight.
@davechopoptions Everyone remembers to charge their cell phones, just plug it in overnight and never think about it, or if you can't do that, you can charge it in the car as you drive to the trailhead. And if you read more about GX AXS, you would find out that all it shares with its GX mechanical sibling is the name, and cheaper than X01/XX1 versions. It is MUCH better than the mechanical version, and with the built-in clutch overload and steel cage (cage and pulley wheel bearings are the only difference), could actually be stronger than it's higher end versions.
Again, anyone bashing it saying that it's just more Sram garbage has not tried AXS. "Assuming it's as bad as mechanical GX" is not helpful or factual at all.
www.bikemag.com/gear/components/drivetrain/a-mismatch-made-in-heaven-xtr-axs
He specifically says that his AXS/Shimano mishmash experiment still DOES NOT shift better than SLX HG+ but it's still a lot better than pure AXS.
People manage not to stay on top of Di2 charging, despite a single charge lasting months.
The cost of electronics required to make the tech work would need decent build quality to make it a decent investment. Time will tell whether this is up to the job.
youtu.be/jktgGzzZ8W8
Industry: Ok let’s get rid of the front one
Users: Not enough gear range
Industry: Ok here’s a pie platter
Users: Longer derailleurs get broken
Industry: Ok short cage
Users: Chain slap...
When did you actually last struggle to fit a chainring to a mtb because the stays were to fat? Or thought your bike would be better if the stays were up to 4mm wider. Other than some oval chainrings not fitting sometimes... but they don’t count as no one has purchased those since 2017. This hasn’t been a problem plaguing anyone.
The 55mm CL gives bigger ring compatibility to bikes that quote small maximum chainring sizes based on the standard Shimano/Sram 52mm CL.
If only they'd update the 10s system with hg+ and a steel cassette on alu carrier, that would be a bliss.
Other sites have reported that "Deore-level crank and medium cage XT derailleur aren’t expected until early 2022".
I too snapped 2x shimano12s long cage derailleurs last year. Though I don't think short cage would have fixed it. I hit the parallelogram on rocks, not the swing arm. Never been an issue on short travel or non-boost bikes, but I think long travel 29er plus boost spacing makes it way too easy to smash the rocks when plowing down boulder fields
Been on 12 speed Shimano XT as of last June. Two RD’s, two cassettes and three chains later until off bike this winter. I have found their 12 speed stuff too fragile and short wearing for me that went back to 10 spd (11-36) with Zee short FR RD, Saint Shifter, KMC 10spd chain. On moto bike now (Trek Rail) so don’t need the extra low gears with 12 speed
Yeah, 11spd XTR is good. Had same set up before damage the RD from hard wet wood stack as well. Was painful to lose that pricey RD since performed so well. I do love my $44 Zee RD though as well. With $44 Saint 10spd shifter, almost as good as XTR, but ever more RD pulley and cage clearance. Kind of feels good to backwards in tech. 12 spd XT when set up right does shift and work great, just too fragile and finicky for myself who hammers on shit
You want the 11 for a wider chain? I think I'd prefer the 12, but that is for a new setup - I guess if you have a hub and chain already and you need it, I agree it would be nice if Shimano offered it. I look at a lot of available cassettes and the 12 sp 10-45 is the closest to what I would do that I have seen yet.
Then we throw the horns and do the beer spilling!
The containers that Shimano needs to use for shipping from Japan to NA could be backlogged thanks to the Suez being gridlocked, or the ship heading to Japan to make the NA trip might be on the north side of Africa. Not to mention potential raw materials, and just generally ships being put behind original Just-In-Time schedules.
Suez is going to cost billions in collateral mitigation costs.
It surprises me that so many dislike SRAM so much. Both are good, but Shimano is more competitively priced.