Lawsuit Claims Search & Rescue Delays Contributed to Mountain Biker's Death
A lawsuit lodged against Riverside County Sheriff's Department, Southern California, claims that delays in a search and rescue operation contributed to a mountain biker's death, the Press Enterprise reports.
Andres Martin, 34, died while riding Santiago Peak on the evening of March 1, 2014. He phoned his wife just before sunset saying he was injured and sounding disoriented. He was found dead from hypothermia the next morning, having only worn clothing suitable for a ride in moderate temperatures. The temperature was not recorded on Santiago Peak that night but a nearby mountain that is 1,800 feet lower recorded a temperature of 39°F (about 4°C). A post-mortem revealed he suffered a blunt impact head injury that is not thought to have been the cause of death.
Martin's widow, Christyna Arista, has now filed a lawsuit claiming a "shambolic" response was a significant factor in her husband's death. She claims her family was told a search and rescue operation would be performed only for it to be cancelled two hours later. Arista and six other family members then took it upon themselves to begin a search at 3:45 am and it was a good samaritan from the Riverside volunteer Mountain Rescue Unit who eventually found Martin at the next morning. He rode up the mountain on his motorbike “before ‘search and rescue’ could even finish their briefing,” the suit says.
Arista claims that she had to endure overhearing a sheriff's lieutenant commenting that Martin was probably out cheating on her, a claim that her attorney called "pure speculation". She also asserts that when she raised her fears about hypothermia, she was told Martin was a "grown man" who would survive the night.
In the days after Martin’s death, authorities told local journalists that rain over a period of days made a helicopter rescue unsafe and made the clay ground too slick for vehicles and ground conditions too dangerous for a foot search.
In the days after Martin’s death, authorities told local journalists that rain over a period of days made a helicopter rescue unsafe and made the clay ground too slick for vehicles and ground conditions too dangerous for a foot search.
Santiago Peak, south east of Los Angeles
An internal study conducted a month before Martin's death noted that search and rescue calls had gone up from 115 in 2011 to 237 in 2013 and advocated for a department wide search and rescue team. As it stood at the time, Riverside's search and rescue team was made up of volunteers and reserve deputies that the study noted might have lacked co-ordination and training.
The Press Enterprise (PE) reports that, "the Sheriff’s Department, in a statement, has said that while the agency 'does not have a dedicated search management and rescue team,' it does have sworn personnel who are formally trained in search-and-rescue techniques and stationed throughout the county. The department also has several internal teams and bureaus to aid in search-and-rescue operations, as well as volunteer groups, and uses mutual aid from outside counties."
The PE continues: "Riverside County has argued that its employees had no duty to rescue Marin, that it did nothing to put him in danger, nor did it prevent a qualified person from performing a rescue, adding that there is no constitutional duty to provide trained rescue employees. The county also denied creating a “special relationship” in which Arista and her family might have expected its employees to search for Marin."
This defense stood in April 2017 but has now been overturned on appeal. The Fourth District Court of Appeal Division Two said Arista could indeed seek damages for wrongful death, negligence, and negligent infliction of emotional distress, assuming her version of events is correct. The PE quotes the Appelate Court as saying: "Sheriff’s Department personnel (the deputies), through their actions, undertook the responsibility of rescuing the victim.” That included “using reasonable care not to increase the risk of harm.”
Arista and her lawyers are seeking compensation but also improvements in search and rescue efforts. She said: "My goal is that they get a search-and-rescue team that is effective and in place, so that no other family goes through what we went through, to save some other life so that my husband’s life was not lost in vain."
More details: here.
Author Info:
Member since Nov 14, 2018
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup
Lemme just say that if I were in the area and heard a search was called off and an injured rider was somewhere on the mountain bleeding, I’d like to think I’d get my bike and lights and head up the hill. Probably wouldn’t be the only mountain biker to do so given the chance.
You and others on this site are blindly assuming this is the truth and how it went down. I can guarantee no one, especially a group of people, would "laugh it off he's probably cheating" when someone is lost in the woods with possibly a life-threatening injury.
Social justice warriors, assemble!
The article says "She claims her family was told a search and rescue operation would be performed only for it to be cancelled two hours later."
If S&R had been like "Nah, we're not doing anything" and I was familiar with the area and had some idea of his location, I'd be with you, but even then that's from the perspective of someone who has some wilderness first aid training and is comfortable outdoors.
His wife and family might not be outdoors people. They might not know where he was riding, or have the capabilities to do anything if they did find him. She was allegedly being told there's an active S&R operation in a now-closed, huge, park, at night, on terrain she might not be familiar with.
I think the family's actions were reasonable; chill out, let the S&R do their jobs, then when you find out they're not actually searching take whatever action you can. I don't think that the lawsuit alleging that those 2 hours lost due to the S&R blueballing them on the search will be successful, but, given the facts stated in the article, I'd like it to be. Finally, I'd love to hear from the S&R guys and girls about this; they're normally gung-ho as anyone, I'd really like to know more about the conditions that stopped this search and just more of their side of the story in general.
Not bloody likely.
@scott-townes:
"There are two sides to every story". Don't just recite a cliché. Not every story has two sides.
"blindly assuming". Not at all.
"I can guarantee no one...." No you can't. There are plenty of jerks in the world. Maybe this guy is one of them.
"social justice warriors, assemble". Name calling isn't making a point. And it sure doesn't add any force to your point of view.
It maybe different in America but cell triangulation is a thing of tv and certainly in the UK will give vast seach areas (sometimes half a county!) Apps can narrow that but it relies on more than 2g. Good luck with that rurally.
So many variables but ultimately tragedies occur.
On the one trial that went to court which stemmed from a fight at a Chargers vs Raiders game, I was actually dropped from the lawsuit on day one (the attorney that filed the complaint named every cop within miles of the incident it seemed) but the trail went on and the plaintiff lost of course when the truth came out from 50+ witnesses at the game. That plaintiff, an off duty police officer from a neighboring city, also had to pay for my City's cost of defending the frivolous lawsuit.
Don't get me wrong, I think this is bullshit, but everyone should be aware that this is the way it is. Welcome to government service.
That being said, I understand the personal responsibility argument. However, I think that *could* be dealt with by the fact that the guy and his family (presumably) paid taxes to fund the sheriffs department and their search and rescue team. So when you pay for a service, those accepting the money can't deny you that service. I would think if this was a private search and rescue company (pretend this exists... like an insurance company that provides search and rescue service), they would certainly be held liable. Government agencies have the best of both worlds - they get to take your money and have as little accountability as possible.
I know there’s tonnes of red tape to deal with but someone has died that could’ve been saved , this widow is right to take action !
One of the things that distinguishes humans above other animals is that we take some collective responsibility for the safety and well being of others. That is how society works. It's not about whose "fault" the situation is, it's about a group of people who is able to rectify the situation either doing or not doing that.
If this lawsuit brings about an improvement in the way the Search and Rescue operations are organised in that area, it will have achieved something positive.
I don't know much about US SAR teams but in this instance it does sound as though there is the potential that the rescue operation in this case could have been better coordinated - the report published by the same department a month before the incident says the same thing. If that's the case, the court case could have a positive outcome.
They tried, it didn't work out. Someone died. It happens to everyone at some point.
Don't waste money on a payout. If there is money to be used, I can think of at least two better ways to use it off the top of my head.
You could walk past someone lay on the floor only a few meters away and not see them, so you would probably have to cover the same area again in daylight. I have actually been out riding at night and not seen a cow beside me on the track no more than 5m's away, until I turned my head a shone the light at it.
The question here is whether the SAR team made the correct decision or not. Not whether they are at fault that he crashed.
It appears that the only way she can have any say in whether the arse-kicking or improved training (whichever is needed, if either) actually happens is by exercising her right to argue it in court.
I understand what you mean, but I think that's a bit of a contradiction. We can't rely on the support of others unless there's an implicit agreement that it will be there when we need it and that we will provide it in return.
The reason humans have risen to the top of the food chain is because we are able to work as a team and not only for our own benefit - you probably wouldn't fare too well in the woods with the wolves by yourself, Waki...
In NZ, the Police would look at this and say ‘holy f*ck, how did we get that so wrong’ and learn from it. Our national accident insurance would cover compensation to the family.
Anyway if you’re riding away alone near nightfall in sparsely frequented areas, carry a personal locator beacon. In NZ once you set it off the national rescue co-ordination (they’ll try to contact you to see if it’s a false alarm, if they can’t reach you the flag goes up) they’ll dispatch rescue helicopter/ boat/ landSAR to the location in minutes.
If you don’t have a PLB, but have cell coverage, call 111 (or 999 or 911....) instead of your family because most centres now tag GPS location on all mobile calls.
This is all too late for Andres but at least others can learn from his tradegy.
This is why you can't trust gov't to have your best interest.
- Why did she wait for hours and not go try to find him herself?
- If my spouse called and said i was injured on some mountain side, i would drop everything to get there, not wait till
3:45 am to go out.
Be responsible for your own safety as well. A private rescue service wouldn't have ignored this call.
Fella over here had bad luck. As simple as that.
It is incredible and amazing to be helicoptered out, 6 man hiked out on a backboard, winched up out of a ravine by a cable and pulleys, etc. But that is all purely goodwill and NO ONE SHOULD SUE ANYBODY IF YOU FALL OFF A MACHINE AND HIT YOUR HEAD!
Seriously...I cannot believe the shithole this world has become that any of you justify, let alone so many of you curmudgeons, a LAWSUIT TO MAKE THE GOVERNMENT BABYSIT, RETRIEVE and or RESCUE YOU OR ANYONE ELSE WHEN YOU'RE WILLFULLY AND KNOWINGLY TAKING RISK OF YOUR OWN ACORD AND KNOWLEDGE!!
TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR ACTIONS HUMANITY.
If and when help arrives, that's butter on your biscuit.
That being said suing the government for personal damages NEVER changes anything. The government has deep pockets and most workers operate on a "cover your arse" policy. They get sued, use tax payer dollars to settle, then go back to business as usual. Rather than suing for monetary gains it would be nice to see someone suing to eliminate someone's job, or enact some sort of impartial oversight over the department/individual in question.
Since you weren't there and don't know all the facts, yes you are blindly assuming.
1.) Yes it is a "well known network" but even though you are never are that far from civilization (as the crow flies) it is pretty remote up there especially at that time of year. Many times when I am solo up there I don't see anyone else.
2.) Another thing people might not understand unless they lived here is that our soil doesn't handle rain well. Once a threshold of rain is reached, the mud starts to cake to tires so bad that you literally cannot make progress. You have to shoulder your bike and walk as every 50 feet it gets so caked again you have to clear it.
3.) The ride he was doing was a pure gravel grinder. It is not "gnarly" in any sense. It's a 12 foot wide fire road.
4.) Hikers and bikers are routinely rescued with helicopters around here.
It's obvious in hindsight but heading out solo into a remote area that can't handle rain well, when rain and cold temperatures are in the forecast and not being dressed warm enough had fatal consequences. The rain and weather was what prevented the helicopters and trucks from going out like they normally would have.
In no situation (seriously) would there be a friend in trouble that I wouldnt load up gear and head out... of S&R is there too... great.
This isnt backwoods skiing or snowmobiling.
Sucks how unfortunate this story sounds but I bet she / his family wish they would have done more.
If they determined the conditions were too severe to search themselves they could have called the coast guard that will fly in any condition.
The fact that there was a known victim in a relatively known area that made a phone call in distress, probably on a cell phone that the Sheriffs could have more than likely pinged with GPS puts them in a very negligent situation.
- Let wife and/or friends know where I am riding
- Do more tame trails/XC rides
- If I am riding more difficult DH trails, I ride with a bit more reserve (70% speed).
But yes. Lots of the tracking apps like Strava or Runkeeper have live tracking. Usually as part of their paid services. They all require a mobile phone (probably >= EDGE) connection though.
Hell, why even answer the phone?
Oh right... that’s their job
“To serve and protect”
What happened to this guy was horrible and i feel for his family and friends, I've lost people like this, I know how it feels. That said, this is a legal move that I don't agree with (most likely recommended to the grieving family).
Our company has supplied nearly 100 agencies with data relay and optics systems, as well as training. Other companies have prob done as much work as we have.
Bad weather? ok. Use a fixed wing and not a rotary. Night time and it's cold? Perfect, our FLIR will work better.
Their job isn't to come rescue dumbasses who hit their heads and call their wives instead of dialing 911. That's just natural selection in action, no matter how much you cry about Brown people and speeding tickets.
It's hilarious how you pansies are so appalled by the idea of being personally responsible for your own safety and desperately want to make this the RSD's fault.
Have some compassion. @badbadleroybrown:
And if he didn't have the survival skills to live through a 39 degree night then he has no business being out on trails alone. The simple fact is that every circumstance which ultimately led to this man's death was solely his own fault. Had he called 911 and they disregarded it, I'd say they dropped the ball but the reality is that the search and rescue team is a volunteer component of the RSD without the resources to handle launching a rescue op for every housewife that gets a call that her old man crashed his bike... and suing them because she's bitter isn't going to do anything but ensure that trail access gets reduced and that they never have the resources to do anything in these situations. This bitch isn't trying to build awareness so this doesn't happen again, she's trying to cash in so she doesn't have to work again.
We lost a fellow biker and that's never a good thing. I'm glad articles pop up like this because more people will leave the house with "just in case" plans
Lemme guess, you were 5.11 pants and pretend to be an operator while you're spewing all your tough guy bullshit
PS - Kudos for the irony of displaying bigotry while crying that someone else is a bigot.
You have no clue what I do, how I was raised, or how I conduct myself. I'd put money on my IQ being higher than yours, but that's nothing to brag about.
If all your word vomit towards me is because I have sympathy for a fellow rider that has passed, have at it. Not going to change how I feel.
In the meantime, eat a bag of d*cks.
Oh, and it looks like you're a pretty sh*tty rider too
I'll take that bet, PM me and let's set this up cupcake... name your wager, I'll happily match it.
I have sympathy for the deceased rider... sucks to be him. But I'm a realist... and, in reality, he got himself killed. Period. Sheriff's department didn't do anything that led to his death and I have zero sympathy for a litigious bitch trying to cash in on tragedy because she can't accept that her husband got himself killed.
Guess what though... this "shitty rider" has survived every crash and walked his broken ass back to the truck more times than he can count. So... if I'm so low IQ and such a shitty rider, by your own judgement, and I've managed to survive then really anyone ought to be able to. See how that works... even by your own logic, this dude f*cked himself.
But y'all keep on crying and virtue signaling, it's really hurting my feelings.
Don’t feed the trolls. This clown once offered to fly me down to California so we could fight in his driveway of his condo. I assumed he had a rage induced stroke and died, as his shit posting faded away to zero.
PS - I can’t be a bigot if I’m factually correct. Don’t bother replying because I don’t want to waste my time intellectually raping you a third time.
One very important fact that the article and people's comment didn't elmphasize is that the day this event happened, it was a stormy day. The weather was unstable throughout the day, and was worst during evening (heavy rain, wind, and snow/frost at high elevation). In short, rescuer's safety is also important that's why search/rescue mission has to be postponed until next day.
I also stated a few facts that I learn from various news in other comment section (within this page), you can read it by searching my user name.
It's horrible that this happened to this person and i feel for their family and friends...
several times. So you and I only know what it sounds like. We were not there.
I have been involved in a few search and rescues and the lives of the searchers are taken into consideration 1st. You don't send searchers out when there is a go chance they will need to be rescued.
Tragic accident...she may have a case. However, pretending the attorneys care about more than a payout is laughable. I'm sure I'll be down voted for that assessment.
www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjojM7pwdPfAhVJAqwKHS_cD8QQzPwBegQIARAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ocregister.com%2F2014%2F03%2F04%2Fmountain-biker-found-dead-in-cleveland-forest-was-celebrating-birthday%2F&psig=AOvVaw2Lctcv5HX9qpohVUEwXx9V&ust=1546670253479313
The key points I remember is based on various news article at that time:
1. He ride alone and he had been there before
2. The storm was coming and weather was unstable throughout that day
3. He didn't bring any food
4. He called his wife as he wasn't able to find his way back somehow
5. Recuse mission couldn't happen due to bad weather
6. He was on his bike when he was found dead
I used to host group ride so I try to learn from other people experience and use it to educate new member, and this event is a life lesson for many. In this case, I think the rider is responsible for his own safety when riding in extreme weather and we cannot expect fireman or rescuer (who also has family member and loves ones) to risk their life in these condition to perform a searching mission.
Now, it may be true that the Sherrif's office and SAR team did do their best in this situation, and that meant waiting till morning. Maybe that was the right call, for all the reasons mentioned by others (darkness, effecient use of resources, and so on). We only have one limited side of the story, but, based on the information here, there are at least three things that make me think that the public bodies made serious errors and may be legally liable. 1) The possibility that they told the wife that they were starting a search and then cancelled it several hours later, 2) The possibility that they have made those insulting comments, and 3) The internal report which previously found fault with the institutions. I mean, really, we are not talking about a risky backcountry environment here, like the high mountains. How hard could it be to send some folks up the trails, shouting, blowing whistles, and so on. If the rough set of facts presented in this article are true, I think they should be held liable for their failure.
As an aside, yes, we live in a litigious society, but the repeated comments on here that "The bitch is just looking for a paycheck" reveal a deep misogyny and, I would say, a great fear of women. The instinctive hatred is revealing.
Last, for all those who say, "It was his fault, shit happens, he should have been prepared," I would say, be careful of the belief that you have it all under control, that you will always make the right decisions, that if you get in trouble you will be able to extract yourself, or that if you do pay the price, whatever that might be, including death, that you will accept that responsibility with individuality and grace. Pretending that you may never need help, or that you will bravely accept the consequences of your own actions at all times, betrays a lack of experience and self-reflection. Humility and empathy are advised.
"...be careful of the belief that you have it all under control..."
What you think you can and/or will do in a given situation from the comfort of your armchair or in a hypothetical is not the same as when that given situation actually occurs. From my work I can attest to the myriad variables involved in peoples' decision making and that one cannot simply remove the human condition from situations like this. From anyone...the rider, the wife, the public bodies (which are run by human beings). It's unfortunate that part of the human condition for some is to create black and white situations where there needs to be blame or absolutes installed.
For those of us lucky enough to be alive a healthy to read this we should take inventory of all good things around us, and plan as best we can to know how to react should our adventures turn to disaster.
These types of lawsuits don’t help anyone.
Fact is Riverside if a dense city and I can't imagine an excuse besides unprofessional management (or lack thereof) that caused the man to die. We know the coordination search and rescue team was documented as possibly inadequate. I know all those people made an effort to the degree that they thought was possible. But obviously their effort was not enough to save a lost man's life.
Perhaps there was SARS mismanagement no one on call?
Perhaps the management miscalculated the severity of the injury?
Perhaps the family was not convincing in communicating the information?
Perhaps the SARs protocol did not cover this situation?
Lots of possible things to go wrong and a wrong chain events lined up and ran to lethal completion.
My opinion as, someone with wilderness first responders training, is that a link in the chain-of-life was not operating as it should have. This should not have happened especially in a near urban setting. So while the sheriff's department may not be legally responsible for the death, the municipality should take responsibility for lack of emergency preparedness.
Conditions were some of the worst the area has seen, with saturated ground, erosion and slide potential. The storm system had not passed, but there was a window which he saw as a ride opportunity. The route he chose was ambitious in good conditions due to mileage, none of it on ST but remote for the area. Rider was not equipped for conditions, let alone contingency. These forest routes are in spots steep, loose and rocky; many riders have taken a surprise digger.
Overlapping factors conspired to make this tragedy. Crash, riding alone, sketchy weather, limited skill, no emergency communication means, little or no weather and survival gear, delayed rescue response.
RIP, rider.
I was formerly very involved for many years in a rural Fire and Rescue department and had friends in Law Enforcement and Search and Rescue. Yes, they are more gung-ho than you can imagine. They do make mistakes, but often only in hindsight,
The most important thing for survival in a wilderness trauma situation is to get the injured person to a hospital. That may require locating them. Make the S&R team's job easier. Have some sort of location device.
A GPS location is a joy. But terrain and vegetation may reduce the accuracy. I have seen a GPS tell a stationary ambulance that it was 500 meters from the actual location, and that it was traveling at 20 Km/Hr. Wet trees and a stiff wind can make a mess of your GPS coordinates.
The GPS in your hand held device in not better than the one mounted on that ambulance. While they should be better than a cellular based location beacon, a satellite locator may or may not be able to get a location message out.
And tell someone where you will be going.I ride alone a lot, but I always tell or text my wife with the planned route of my ride. Then, send a text message if your route changes.
If human trackers or tracking dogs are an option, stay out of the search area. I have seen a dog and handler track an intoxicated and head injured person who was hiding. If you go tramping around you will make their work difficult if not impossible. Dogs are probably not an option for a bike rider... until they abandon their bike.
I had a friend who was involved in a search for a child who went missing while riding her horse. The local community did a massed human search. When the dog arrived a few hours later, they were unable to track the child, who was found dead several months later.
Next, remember that aircraft can't always fly. There are times when you just have to wait. Searching a large area at night in the rain or snow is most likely going to be a waste of time and energy. Flying a helicopter at night in rain or snow? You have got to be kidding me. And yeah, I know that the Oregon National Guard once plucked an injured climber off Mt. Hood. I worked with one of their pilots. That was a huge risk. You can't expect that kind of thing.
Carry a first aid kit, but know your limits. Do you have a cervical spine stabilizing collar? Do you know how to measure and fit one? Ever stabilize a pelvic fracture? Ever placed an oral or nasal airway adjunct?
None of us in the field know the severity of an injury or what dangers are hidden. A sharp bone fracture near the femoral artery? Spinal fracture? Think you can see those without some kind of imaging device?
It is possible that the best thing to do is stabilize the injured person where they are and wait for trained and equipped response team. A radiant heat trapping wrap is a good idea and can fit in the under seat bag where you put your emergency tube. It is hard to cause harm with one of those.
Lastly, respect the mostly volunteer groups who are attempting the rescue. They are putting their lives on hold, often at personal risk. Maybe even join such a group. It might just be the most rewarding thing you do in your life.
The article is not about whether the SAR team should or shouldn't have gone out that night, or whether they have an obligation to do so.
It's not about taking part in a dangerous sport at your own risk, riding alone, or not being prepared.
It's most definitely not about the spouse of a deceased rider who is trying to "cash in" on his misfortune.
The spouse claims that the Sheriffs department assured her and her family that a search will be done, only to be cancelled hours later.
The Sheriffs department who is in charge of dispatching the SAR team made a conscious decision that a search and rescue was possible. They would have been aware of the weather the days prior to the incident and the forecast for that night and the days following. They had all the information they needed at the time of the request and they willingly took on the responsibility knowing the SAR teams capabilities and the challenges they would face.
IF the Sheriffs department didn't have the information at hand to commit to the task the decision should not have been made at that time.
Any competent Emergency Management team knows that the difference between life and death can come down to minutes and even seconds. There was clear mismanagement in this situation and it drastically reduced the chance of survival of a fellow rider. Even worse was the attitudes of some Sheriffs department staff members who commented that the guy was probably out "cheating" on her, and as a "grown man" he should have no problem staving off hypothermia.
In this case it seems there was blatant disregard for a human life, the very thing the Sheriffs department is sworn to protect.
The Appellate Court said "Sheriff’s Department personnel (the deputies), through their actions, undertook the responsibility of rescuing the victim.” That included “using reasonable care not to increase the risk of harm.”
They failed. They should be held responsible. They won't make efforts to change on their own.
I hope the wife wins her case. The risk of another lawsuit should be enough financial incentive to make the needed changes in management.
Oh and it has trails on it
www.trailforks.com/apps/map/%20target
If triggered It has a 30 sec countdown to avoid false alarms.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing thing, it was a tragic accident that resulted in the loss of a life and no amount of discussion, arguing, lawsuit will bring them back.
The outdoors is unpredictable, we can minimize risk by taking kit with us, telling people our routes and when we will be back, don't rely solely on technology (it can break) however we will never eliminate the risk.
Ride Safe People.
The logical reaction of the landowners of the property we ride on (private and public) to being sued is to close the property to our use. I'd rather prepare by riding with others, letting someone know when and where I'm riding, bringing first aid equipment and clothing that fits more than just the sunny Wx I hope for. And then accepting the responsibility if things go wrong.
Of course the wild card is that I have no control over what my heirs and lawyers do after my death. And the call of a big check from a lawsuit is very tempting.
I know the trail, mostly fire road, the area is open , not dense wooded area, only bushes with few trees in between. Barely any shade there. It's pretty tame area, even when it rained.
First and most importantly it's not a SAR members duty to die trying to rescue you- their safety comes before yours.
Second if you ride mountains and you don't have one of these $5 blankets- you're fool.
www.amazon.com/S-Survive-Outdoors-Longer-Reflective/dp/B00266H5VI/ref=sr_1_16_a_it?ie=UTF8&qid=1546641798&sr=8-16&keywords=emergency%2Bblanket&th=1
youtu.be/Hhrhx8X6ya4
Surprised Pb even took this angle. Sadly a fellow rider died doing our sport. RIP.
Just a reminder that whatsapp has a share location function that is very fast to get going (i.e. as easy as calling your friend/partner).
I allways ride with a jacket an small first aid kit including a survival blanket if I'm going into the woods.more water than I need
www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBHNsc5EL1Q