A new Pivot Firebird has been spotted under the Pivot Factory Team racers at the EWS race in Val di Fassa.
The Firebird is the longest travel enduro bike in Pivot's stable with the current version boasting 162mm of travel and 29" wheels. However, it also hasn't been
updated since 2018 and is one of the few remaining Pivot bikes to not receive the updated DW Link position.
In the past couple of years, we've seen the
Trail 429,
Mach 6 and
Switchblade updated to have a vertical shock orientation and the Firebird will be going in the same direction. This has allowed Pivot to shed weight on its other bikes and crucially also means a bottle can be fitted.
The change in shock orientation has also changed the kinematic of the other Pivot bikes to offer more small bump compliance and greater ramp-up, and we expect the change to the Firebird to have the same effect. The Switchblade and Mach 6 both now have enough progression to run a a coil shock, so we'll wait and see if that carries over to the Firebird too.
Other changes we're expecting would include some geometry tweaks and maybe an adjustment in travel alongside Pivot's design hallmarks such as size-specific tubing and Super Boost Plus spacing.
Pivot also released the following two clips that hint at what we're looking at:
We've reached out to Pivot for more information and will update this story when we have it.
Dw is a good compromise for the standard location of a chainring... which is where it is for obvious reasons. The problem with the std location and a dw link is that axle path and antisquat are directly linked and if you want more rearward travel you end up with more anti squat and more kickback. A dw link bike moves to forward axle travel just deeper into travel than sag.
There are dual link designs like the craftworks I travel system that is basically a dw with an idler mounted on the link...
No reason dw and pivot couldn't go this way
But I think commercials new high pivot / 6 link job is the way forward.
More independently optimizeable antisquat, antirise, and wheelpath
Don’t get me wrong, it’s a perfectly adequate suspension system. There are pluses and minuses just as there are with all the others. But I don’t understand when people talk like it’s the pinnacle of suspension engineering, transcending all others. Maybe that was the case when it was introduced years ago, but there are so many other viable designs these days.
To your point, I didn’t buy a bike with 160mm of travel to crush climbs. (And I did crush climbs). In the end, I monkeyed with the suspension and did everything I could to like it, but it never felt quite right. I wanted something that would plow, and there’s better out there for that purpose.
I just don’t understand this cult of DW Link. I mean, it’s fine. It works. But so does an FSR link. Hell, in my opinion, the concentric single pivot on my Kona works better than the DW on my old Turner. But dudes are always like, “It must be a kick-ass bike… it has a DW link.” There were people on the Turner forum on MTBR who, now that Turner is no longer making suspension bikes, will only replace them with Pivot and Ibis, because DW Link. I don’t understand that. Why limit yourself to two choices when there’s a whole host of bikes and systems out there that work just as well or in some cases better?
thats why i think more brands should be making there 29er bikes superboost, then there would be no problem with changing wheels
It's used by basically every dh bike and existed before boost.
"Super boost"
Was before boost.....
And I think even before 12x142.
Might be the oldest still used thru axle really.
We have come full circle
Definitely going to try and swing a leg over the new Firebird and consider it whenever it actually gets to shops.
I’m not saying all chainstays need to be long, but rather the larger sizes need to be more proportionate. The mediums in most bikes are very balanced and proportionate and ride very well. Us folks on the XLs get a bit more screwed with that same rear end as your medium stuck onto an XL front.
Like Santa Cruz, all pivots will look the same
Only to be defined by colour and fork/shock to those with sharp eyes
Yawn… boring.
These are not the older RT-86 either, as those had no heat paint/fins. thenotoriousmic is right, they look like a hybrid of older stuff. My guess - new Saint level rotors. Parts of that group are already being tested in the field.
I'm wondering if they will make the new Saint rotors in a 220. Or just the mt900 when the Saint group is released. We've seen the SLX 220 so Shimano is willing. I have the perfect bike for them.
I’d suggest trying a bike with long chainstays if you can. It’s pretty incredible experience and you’d be surprised how well they corner because of proper weighting on that front end. It’s a beautiful thing
www.usb-bochum.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Müllabfuhr-web.jpg