Little Cottonwood Canyon in Utah - Video

Jun 21, 2016 at 10:59
by Jon Cracroft  
(Password protected)
Views: 1,066    Faves: 1    Comments: 3
This video is password protected.


From the water-carved granite creeks at the top, the tight jagged edges of the rock gardens in the center, to the sandy berms and water bars at the bottom, Little Cottonwood Canyon DH trail offers a variety of challenging and technical features. Rich with dense flora, a churning white and blue bubbly river, mountain goat packs wondering the upper granite wall cliffs, and beautiful single track, LCC DH strings together Snowbird Resort and the base park and ride at the mouth of Little Cottonwood Canyon. This trail is packed with large granite boulders, stacked rock features, dirt jumps, tight trees, logs, berms, and loads of water bars. If you're looking for an upper intermediate to advanced trail with variety and beautiful features this one is worth checking out. Please share on your social media if you like it. Thanks! -Jon

Principal cinematography and edit: Jon Cracroft.
Additional cinematography: Justin Olsen.
Riders: James Perri and Steven Morgan.
Production assistants: Josh Perri and Mallorie Cracroft.
Music: Baby C'Mon, Jet Trash.

Little Cottonwood Canyon mountain biking trails


MENTIONS: @justinolsen / @joncracroft



Author Info:
joncracroft avatar

Member since Jul 7, 2015
2 articles

82 Comments
  • 55 1
 They post this without even knowing a single thing about the history of this trail!! This trail is one more pink bike video away from being shut down to bikers. Save our canyons posted this week about it--completely trashing mtber's and there are always complaints about biker/hiker head on collisions. Please think before posting this video. This isn't some secret shredding gem. It's a trail loved by the neighborhood locals (me) and needs to be ridden with care. Saturdays are full of kids (mine) and you need to watch out. This trail needs no marketing. It will only get it shut down. Post something about corner canyon or PC please.

Half the crap ridden in that video is illegal. What they didn't show you in it is the 10 angry hikers you encounter on every decent ready to club you.

First PC instagram, then mtb enthusiast on facebook, now pink bike. Social media at it's finest.
  • 19 2
 "Half the crap ridding that video is illegal"

This^^^

It's tempting, but seriously when you're on the Wasatch Front, and ESPECIALLY in a watershed area, if you don't know, don't go. And sure as hell don't post a video without making sure the areas you're riding are kosher.
  • 5 24
flag Knollyrider346 (Jun 21, 2016 at 16:34) (Below Threshold)
 If it's not some secret riding gem why are you so worried about it? Forest service would have shut it down years ago if they really wanted too. I haven't encountered any hikers wanting to club me. You are delusional
  • 15 1
 Yeah. Especially riding down the flowing creek. Posting stuff like that can be death to trails. Its proof of destruction for all the activist groups to use against us.
  • 8 1
 @Knollyrider346: They've been trying to for a long time. The last thing this trail needs is more exposure. Stop talking outta your bum.
  • 2 1
 @scott-townes: I knew I could count on you.
  • 9 3
 @Knollyrider346: you must be like 19 years old so we'll forgive your ignorance. Here's a story. Once upon a time (20 years ago) there were riders in the little cottonwood area that had to learn how to ride with cooperation with hikers. We got along extremely well. These riders @scott-townes and others have continued that tradition on the crest, PC and elsewhere. Enter your crowd. The trail is mine and get the f*ck out of my way crowd. You'll be responsible for the shut down of Little C, Mill D North as well as Dry Creek. You probably don't even know those names. You probably call them "enduro this" and "enduro that".
  • 9 1
 I love it, I expected the comments to be filled with "oh man sick where is it?!" but excited to see everyone else was thinking the same thing as me! Count me in as one of the "why the hell did you bring attention to this trail?" crowd. I love this trail and have been on it for years as well... And now you have kids building shitty kickers in the MIDDLE of the Quarry trail???
Quick history about this trail from my end - I was first shown it via one of the OG builder guys, back when Allergy Alley was a runnin'. I remember he was like "ok I'll take you to this thing but its pretty down low". Luckily this was pre-Strava days, and I remember we actually would wait till there were no cars before dropping in all 'secret' style! And there seriously were only a handful of people that really rode it. Fast forward five more years and there are obvious shuttles at the entrance. Fast forward another five years to today and we're posting high profile videos of it...
@Knollyrider346 and others who are thinking this - they HAVE shut parts of it down before. There is ebb & flow every few years: it gets built and ridden, then Forest Service comes shuts a bunch of portions; there was a sign at the entrance to the lower section a couple seasons ago... I guess this video is the harbinger of the tide going the other direction - ride it while you can! I won't be surprised when the Forest Service mows down a couple hundred trees to shut most if it down again, like they did ~4 years ago...
  • 4 0
 Yup, f#cking asshats. This is an extremely busy multi-use 2-way trail. The video mistakenly showcases it as if it were a DH specific bike trail so bad form you f#cktards. We all love it but this vid is a strong argument against our access. Tread carefully and respectfully and don't showcase DH riding on trails with a strained history.
  • 6 0
 I think the thing i hate most now is that all the local shops seem to be using the trail as a demo area. Every time I pedal up I almost get hit by atleast 10 bikers that are shuttled to the top. I don't think anything is going to stop the trail from being illegal...which sucks bc i love the trail
  • 6 10
flag cheeverbrent (Jun 22, 2016 at 6:55) (Below Threshold)
 Went somewhere else to watch the video and I have read through most of these comments. All im hearing is f pinkbike f john cracroft f shuttling bla bla bla. First of all how is pink bike supposed to know the history of this trail? Its not their fault for putting this up. Secondly I think that going keyboard warrior status on the guy who made the video is a little uncalled for. If there arent signs saying no bikes allowed on the trail then why can't he shuttle it and film a video? Yeah he crossed a creek and that probably wasn't good but other than that i didnt see anything wrong with the video. Sounds like its more of a bunch of locals getting pissed that their very "own" trail is getting attention. Im sure there are hundreds of bikers that have ridden the trail just like this guy but the only difference is that he filmed it and you didn't. Not trying to start an argument. Just my opinion.
  • 3 0
 Yess!! Please take this down.
  • 2 0
 Looks like the somewhat took a hint thankfully. All password protected now.
  • 4 0
 @cheeverbrent: The problem is that for most that have ridden the trail for the last few years, there have been several attempts by the Forest Service to shut down the trail.

They have claimed over the years that the downhill portions of the trail (which used to be much better than they are now) should be closed due to: watershed violations; runoff,; pollution; moose habitats; other wild animal habitats; conflicts with campers; conflicts with hikers; conflicts with uphill riders; trespassing; unauthorized building of features; flood danger; etc. They even got a judge to agree to a $10,000 fine for anyone that was caught riding some portions of the trail. They ripped out some amazing man-made features.

Then they somewhat chilled out and said basically turned a blind eye to the trail, so long as nobody complained about user conflict and so long as no new manmade features were built.

The problem now is that ignorant people that do not know the status or history of the trail are doing a great job at promoting the trail. Promoting this trail is guaranteed to cause more people to ride it. New riders will start building new features (i've even seen a few built on the main hiking trail recently) and more riders will increase the chance of user conflict.

If Jon Cracroft and PinkBike even read these comments, they should know that the video will do more harm than good and should remove it. Jon Cracroft should at the very least disguise the video by removing anything that makes it obviously "Utah" or should delete it from the internet completely.
  • 1 3
 @Reignonme: f*ck enduro I don't ride any of those trails anyway so I won't be the causeWink
  • 19 1
 Great trail but if you want a good long constant descent that you don't have to worry about smashing in to hikers and can carry good speed through, look elsewhere (Draper DH, Bountiful DH, Empire DH etc). SO disappointed that PB would pick this trail to highlight as there are so many better options in the Wasatch Front! What about a good write up and video about Crest, Flying Dog, Armstrong, Mid MTN etc. I will give credit though, the short article that was done about Arcylon last week was spot on. We need more articles like that!
  • 3 1
 wish I would have said this. 100% correct.
  • 6 1
 Flying Dog, lulz. Talk about trail conflict high speed wreck central. They need to make that trail directional!
  • 1 0
 @Drbillin: Yup. Problem is I like going up and down the same side of the loop Razz
  • 19 1
 F*ck you Pinkbike! Seriously take this sh#t down. This seriously could be the straw that breaks the camels back and gets this shut down.
  • 5 1
 To be fair PB doesn't know squat about this trail, they merely posted a video that Jon numb nut submitted (and who should wise up and request it be removed himself).
  • 4 0
 @WasatchEnduro: I completely agree. Just needed to voice my initial outrage. So how bout it Jon Cracroft? Do the right thing and take this SH!T down. I can't even fathom why you thought this was a good idea. Anyone with any knowledge of the Utah mtb scene knows how close this trail is to getting completely shut down.
  • 13 1
 And as a sidenote, I spoke with FS peeps years ago about this trail. They related to me a day when they tried to have a conversation with DHers when coming through the campground. But instead of being mature and responsible, 100% of the bikers that day rode by at warp speed and flipped off the FS personnel (per their report to me). That's when they gave up on a meaningful conversation on the issue and hacked ~20-30 trees down to close the upper trail.

Sometimes we are our own worst enemy. Let's be a bit more intelligent.
  • 11 0
 Another local here.

Clearly the Forest Service (FS) is aware of this trail, BUT if there aren't user conflicts and peeps don't try and build an Ewok village (I.E. ladders, wooden stunts, etc), I've been told the FS will let it lie (unofficially of course, no guarantees).

The 1 thing I appreciated with the vid was where the trail started. Riding above this area causes (and has historically caused) problems when riding through the campground.

Above all, please ride with courtesy and caution. Don't piss people off. And especially when on the main (legal) trail, don't chase a KOM.

This is one of my favorite rides, so be good. Thanks for your support. That is all.
  • 2 0
 Interesting to hear your feedback re the FS. I had heard about the campground being an issue and you make a point that the below-campground zone has been running for awhile, and it aint secret.
  • 10 0
 To the esteemed "cinematographers" - This is my local ride and I (and many others) don't appreciate the blatant media coverage. If you want to film nifty videos in the interest of self promotion, please don't use a sensitive and controversial trail to do so no matter how rad it is. Not to be harsh, but this is a 3ish minute mediocre video loaded with cherry-picked slo-mo. Is it worth sacrificing trail access for whatever nonsense gain you might see from this video?
  • 8 0
 Get a freaking clue Pinkbike!!! Take down this post!!! Take a look at all these comments. This kind of video is the absolute last thing that this trail needs. It's a real shame to put a trail's access at risk for a little bit of shameless self promotion. @joncracroft get with the program, take this down!
  • 8 0
 First off, my deepest apologies to everyone. I obviously made a huge mistake by creating a video about this trail. I’ve taken down all videos and info associated with this LCC video where I can. I’m still working on a few shares that I don’t have control of but will eventually get handled. I want to see this trail stay open. I would hate to see it closed, especially because of any un-needed attention I brought to it with this video.

I'd be happy to talk individually with any of you if you feel there is more to be said. If you’re interested in how this mistake happen keep reading. If not, again my apologies. -Jon

Laying a little foundation seems relevant...I grew up in SLC, I was given my first real mountain bike when I was about 14 years old. I’ve biked just about every trail in and around the valley and the Wasatch Back I could find. And I've travel a lot around the state and the West to bike. I love mountain biking and being outside. Little Cottonwood has always been a special place to me. I learned to ski at Alta when I was 2 years old and have maintained a season pass since then. I’ve hiked most of the trails on the mountain and in the canyons. I’ve camped at many of the upper lakes, and summited several of the peaks. I’m general aware of what’s going on in the area, but obviously blew it on this one. I’m active in the discussions regarding Ski Link/One Wasatch, resort development, The Wasatch Accord, etc. That said, I should have known better. What’s been said is true, I only started riding the upper section of LCC about 4 or 5 years ago. So am I poser? Well you can think what you want, but I don’t think so. In that time I have never seen a closed sign or any type of FS sign indicating it was closed or illegal. I’ve spent hours in the spring moving downed-trees from the winter snow and shifting rocks back into place where needed. I’ve never build any features but just tried to maintain what was there. I had no ideas about the handshake agreement between the FS and the riders. I don’t want to make excuses though, I realize I screwed up on this. I’m not part of the core Cottonwood Heights/Sandy LCC community, but I respect what has been said. And I hope to be able to contribute to keep our trails open and not cause any harm.

For nearly 20 years I’ve been an outdoor and action sports photographer. I recently got into film making. I was asked early this summer to make a video by a local marketing company that would get people stoked to ride. They asked for something fun, fast paced, and beautiful. Naturally LCC was top of mind because that’s where I’ve spent so much of my time playing. It was unfortunately never realized amongst our group that there were sensitivities about the trail, not during planning or shooting the video. We even ran into several people on the trail while filming and no one said a word. We shot the video and had a good time doing so. We feel we put together a good edit showing some of the highlights of the trail and the surrounding beauty. Knowing what I know now, I’m totally fine letting that hard work go down the drain. I’d much rather protect the trail and it’s access than have our work seen. There are plenty of other bike videos to be made and I’m already moving on to the next. Moving forward I’ll be doing more due-diligence and making sure to not disrupt any local sensitivities. If any of you want to work on, or be part of upcoming videos please contact me. Again, my regrets and apologies. -Jon
  • 2 0
 Right on Jon, Hopefully more people find your reply. Thanks for doing the right thing.
  • 7 0
 Rode Little Cottonwood DH on Saturday, just a couple of days ago, and the entrance from the canyon rode had been blocked by tons of trees purposely cut to block the entrance. Walked over them and got to the concrete slab at the top of the trail and there was a ton more cut down trees to block access to the trail. Potential for this trail to get shut down seems likelier than many would think.
  • 8 0
 Take this down! Blowing up local trails to increase web traffic and make money is ruining biking and many awesome trails get shut down because of stuff like this!
  • 11 5
 ....and when they shut down this trail to bikes because of knobs & d-bags using it for shuttle runs, that will be one less trail on the Wasatch Front to ride. Stick to Corner Canyon, Draper Downhill & the Park City area, idiot!
  • 6 16
flag Knollyrider346 (Jun 21, 2016 at 16:32) (Below Threshold)
 really? Is it necessary for you to call people d-bags for just shuttling? f*ck corner canyon f*ck draper downhill. Go troll somewhere else ya squid
  • 6 1
 @Knollyrider346:

That's exactly the attitude that's going to get it shut down
  • 5 0
 Pinkbike please take this down!!! I will echo the sentiments by many of those on here, this trail is already in jeopardy of being shut down. Please don't get into the business of shutting down trails just so you can make a "cool" edit.
  • 4 0
 This is a new low @pinkbike. If you weren't already aware of the history and sensitive nature of this trail, this comment section should give you a pretty good idea. Mountain bikes are already unwelcomed guests as far as the forest service in Salt Lake is concerned. We're not going to have anything left the rate social media is going this summer. This is a truly unique trail in the Wasatch; we can't afford to lose it @joncracroft. I hope building up your portfolio was worth losing access to one of the only quality rides in the Wasatch. Do the right thing here and take this video down.
  • 5 1
 The trail shown on Trailforks is not really this trail, but the lower trail. The real DH trail has been kept off of Trailforks. The Quarry trail shown above, is a trail that has been there for years, as posted on UtahMountainBiking as the "Little Cottonwood Trail" or often called "Temple Quarry Trail". It has been posted on many mountain bike trail websites, the one on UMB has been there since 1999. Other MTB sites have posted videos of illegal trails by the Bountiful B, which also are left off of Trailforks deliberately. I imagine PB is just doing their best to find interesting bike videos, and a video of a "hidden gem" that someone put some editing work into.

As long as we don't post the actual "Legalish" trail location and access information, and just show a video of random rocks, it is probably not that big a deal. You can actually find the real trail, and all the illegal tech lines right on Strava. Why is it that nobody beats them up about posting every illegal trail out there? According to the description above, it includes Snowbird and the Quarry trail below, it really doesn't say anything about the rocky goodness in the middle. I live here and ride that trail too, and I didn't drop a load of mud in my pants when I saw this, it was more like, "yah, that's LCC, no real location information, meh"
  • 5 1
 Todd you obviously took the blue pill and not the red one. Free your mind to understand how other user groups and the Forest Service could perceive this video in light of the history of issues on this trail. Not the useless history you shared with us.
  • 6 0
 @WasatchEnduro: My point is simply that this trail is well known and has been for a long long time, with lots of information that points to its location and how to access it, which this video really does not do. The USFS uses the Strava heatmap more than any other resource to show proof of what is actually being ridden and the speed riders are going. So if you have ever submitted a ride of this to Strava, you are more the problem.
  • 3 0
 @todd: Valid point Todd and one we all need to consider for trails like this.
  • 2 0
 @todd:

is there a way to make my rides private so they don't add to the strava heatmap?
  • 3 0
 @dbodoggle: Yes you can make them private so that people cannot view them on the site, but that may or may not keep it off the heatmap and raw data. Strava makes their real money selling their raw data to both governments and businesses. USFS has used Strava to determine where illegal trails are and shut them down. It is very easy in GIS software to import a strava ride layer underneath government trail/road data to determine where undocument paths exist.

PB/Trailforks understands this, and excludes an entire ride from taking part in its heatmap, if the track uses any illegal trails anywhere within the ride. They do not want these trails shut down, and go to great lengths to keep them hidden.
  • 3 0
 @todd: thanks for the info. I don't typically ride unsanctioned trails but do have a few favorites.
  • 4 0
 It happens like this. Complaints are filed by hikers or other users, often landowners. They go to their Congressman who if swayed can lobby the federal government for direct action. If they cannot sway state government, they go to a legal defense fund like the NRDC or the Sierra Club who hire scientists to do environmental impact surveys. For example bank erosion or other disturbance of the stream bed might be found to impact spawning fish or other species of interest. They use this data to force the state and federal governments to do their own Environmental Impact Report. That can be enough to get the trails closed.
  • 3 0
 Yep, I remember about 3-4 years ago the Forest service shut down the upper DH part, the part that is actually illegal. I heard their reasoning was because "its an illegal trail, the builders know nothing about soil conservation." The way they close it by taking a chainsaw and falling multiple trees across the trail... I am glad they know something about soil conservation. Then it takes about a year to get the trail running again.
  • 2 0
 I remember about 3-4 years ago the Forest service shut down the upper DH part, the part that is actually illegal. I heard their reasoning was because "its an illegal trail, the builders know nothing about soil conservation." The way they close it by taking a chainsaw and falling multiple trees across the trail... I am glad they know something about soil conservation. Then it takes about a year to get the trail running again.
  • 4 0
 for f*cks sake take this video & post down. these kids are doing exactly what is going to shut this trail down! f*ck.
  • 1 0
 At the risk of giving this trail more exposure, this is still a problem. I've spoke with the maintenance crew and they are aware and have knocked down the jumps in the middle of the trail a couple times now only to have them rebuilt. The guy said if it continues they may have to ban mountain bikes again like they did 10 or so years ago. Mountain bikers are the problem, and to the eye of everyone else were all the same. If we don't want to loose this trail (or any trail) we have to be the solution. Don't build jumps, discourage others from doing so, and if you see them knock them down. Invite others to check out any of the awesome bike parks in the area, Corner Canyon, Canyons, Trailside, Bobsled and more I'm not aware of.
  • 3 0
 This is ridiculous, Jon what the hell. Why would you ever post this up. With all of the other places to ride, thanks for ruining it for everybody.
  • 4 0
 @joncracroft Congrats on being the most hated man on Pinkbike right now. Besides ProTour
  • 5 1
 In @joncracroft defense, He is a good dude. I personally wouldn't have made a video of this trail because I agree with a lot of the statements here as far as it being something that is a delicate subject and it has had problems with the FS. But His intent was not to be a bad guy nor to create waves. Expressing your feelings on the matter is a good thing, but lets not go on a witch hunt with pitchforks and burn the village down.
  • 2 0
 @stevelloyd: I am sure he is a perfectly good dude, I was not the one with pitchforks here, those are the guys yelling f* jon, f* that. I was just (sarcastically) pointing out that he isn't exactly a liked guy on this comment thread.
  • 2 1
 @ianswilson815: Ian, Yea I wasn't specifically saying that you were on a witch hunt. Just happens your reply was the one I put my post under. I guess is was a general response to the entire form. But Yea I love this trail and what is being said is kind of spot on. I just wanted people to know that Jon, is not a bad guy.
  • 1 0
 @stevelloyd: Cheers to that. Always sucks when stuff like this gets inadvertently highlighted and brought to the attention of many. Our community already has enough problems with user conflict unfortunately as I am sure you know. I feel bad for Jon as he is getting absolutely murdered on here, but its Pinkbike and we all know what goes on here.
  • 4 0
 @ianswilson815: Haha, Pinkbike, they either love you or really hate you.
  • 2 0
 @stevelloyd: ^ truest comment I've seen on this site
  • 4 0
 Good you password protected the video, but please remove this article COMPLETELY from the site. Respect sensitive trails.
  • 8 8
 If you ever start taking things too seriously, just remember that we are talking monkeys on an organic spaceship flying through the universe! For fu*k sake! The water shed? Really? We all... F*#k the canyon up. Whether you... Drive, bike, hike, or fly a f*ckin kite. To criticize one over the other is ludicrous. Just look at the Giant ski resorts right up the road. Look at the millions of people that flock there every year. Look at the damage they've caused. To say that riding through a short section of river once or twice a week is gonna get this trail shut down is ridiculous! People know about this trail. A shit load of people ride it. The forest service knows about it. Everyone bitching needs to smoke a bowl.
  • 5 2
 Point is mute. It has little to do with environmental impact and lots to do with shared access on a muti-use trail and what is perceived as one user group being careless.
  • 7 1
 @WasatchEnduro - agreed, this isn't so much about the 'watershed' as mentioned, it's about a trail that although known by FS and most people in the scene is like the crazy alcoholic uncle of the family - completely awesome yet you're not surprised when they end up in big trouble. In fact, issues arise not because of watershed, more for FS control and more specifically Wilderness area. The creek is the boundary of the wilderness area and, god forbid, a bike goes in a wilderness area on a semi-secret trail for 100 yards! That and the upper upper WP to CG zone was shut for wetlands protection, but that was long enough ago I don't think anyone here even knows about that... It has just had a weird history - Quarry trail is completely gtg, and shared. But then there are always sections and links that pop up - sometimes they are good for a couple years, sometimes the FS comes in and destroys them, its just been a back and forth for a long time... And thus, bringing a 'sick edit' of a video to light that highlights some of the more, um, contested/controversial parts of this trail is not great. In the end, I do feel bad because I think Cracaroft and the riders were stoked, almost sad to see them get blasted. Nonetheless, as we all grow older, you learn sometimes there are things/places/experiences you need to just STFU and not share. Kinda like Vegas - 'what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas'. Yes this trail gets ridden and is well known locally, but the response reinforces the mindset that this particular trail, with its unique history over the last decade, is NOT a trail that needs to be highlighted.
  • 3 2
 Wow...lots of hate here. You could kindly explain that there is a huge history here, but I think that @IamZOSO had a great point with the FS. Just don't go to crazy. Well shot video! Props on the work.
  • 4 1
 Its called the quarry for a reason. Quarter mile long rock gardens that aren't steep enough to carry speed through.
  • 1 0
 seriously! that upper section is so hard to carry speed on. The rest is fun aside from the 10 billion people that now ride the trail so you have to stop constantly
  • 3 0
 Lol upper intermediate - right.
  • 7 3
 Liberals....
  • 4 1
 this discussion is so Utah
  • 3 0
 Looks like Jon Cracroft made the video password protected. I can't see it.
  • 1 0
 Man cool username I bet u have cool family
  • 2 0
 Also just learned this was filmed for SkiUtah and video was posted on their Facebook pages as well WTF! take it down
  • 3 0
 HEY I LIVE HERE
  • 2 2
 Ya but its dangerous for joggers on the trail. I would recommend running somewhere else. Maybe give mountain biking a try, if you want to use this trail.
  • 1 0
 @hamncheez: That's the point--this trail's history-even shut down June 2008- is a hiking trail. Biking is seriously the minority on this. Hell, rode it this morning, there were 3 bikers and maybe 10-12 hikers.
  • 1 0
 @Reignonme: its a joke because coleman will never come ride with me
  • 1 0
 @hamncheez: ahhhh my bad.
  • 1 0
 @Reignonme: I've run it on occasion, not the best trail run but fun nonetheless. There's room for everyone as long as riders aren't treating it like a bona fide DH trail. A good reminder for me to keep speeds in check on the faster sections on the bottom half of the trail.
  • 3 1
 Cracroft is a LCC poseur and full time tool.
  • 2 3
 So... is this a legit trail or no? Looks mildly interesting, but I'm not going to ride it if this is a contested/illegitimate trail...
  • 2 0
 Yes it's legit. Message me and we'll go hit it up good and proper, how it's meant to be ridden. This trail is like a fine wine. It's NOT what this video markets it to be. You want this video go to Draper and bomb Jacob's to Rush.
  • 4 1
 @Reignonme:

There's even been a lot of hikers on jacobs now everything is closed in CC with the gasline construction.

I'd argue to hit up maple hollow (draper DH) if you're in that area, maybe even bobsled if you're more north. Eagle mountain is also pretty good, the flintstone trail is super gnarly in spots and a lot of fun.
  • 4 4
 You only live once. FREERIDE!
  • 2 2
 fuck me







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.135032
Mobile Version of Website