Ambitions Featuring Emily Batty, Season Final - Video

Dec 21, 2016 at 5:53
by Liam Murphy  

In the final episode of Ambitions season one, Emily reflects on a long and successful race season while taking some time to unwind.

Emily Batty

Emily Batty

Emily Batty

Emily Batty

Emily Batty

Emily Batty


MENTIONS: @trek



Author Info:
liammurphyfilms avatar

Member since Jul 7, 2012
23 articles

92 Comments
  • 48 12
 I think she is so understated for her riding skill. She may not be spectacular but she does stuff like it's by the best text book out there. The way she lands that drop is one thing, but the one she lands in Utah that you can see on her instagram is just absolute perfection. I wonder if she figures it out by herself or gets a coach, because I am seriously impressed. Thanks for great videos Emily, showed most of them to my daughter. Congratulatinos for this year and all the best of luck next year! CHEERS!
  • 10 1
 she took technical skills seriously, and practiced them with her husband. Got a moto as well. All around took a smart approach to improvement. In person, you can watch her skills on track, where she clears technical sections with ease and jumps to match transitions every time from first to last lap. Improved a lot technically, and it shows in the results. PanAm games was her and Pendral basically making everyone else look like it was their first time on bikes (sounds silly but ask anyone there).
  • 12 12
 @atrokz: I mean she must be on a regime. There's just so many things requiring separate practice and then coordination and she seems very effective. Sliding around looks super dope, but it ain't fast. Polish rider Maja Wloszczowska trains with Polish ex DH champ who's a great coach as well.

Awesome, awesome. Fantastic series.
  • 7 1
 @WAKIdesigns: iirc she is. I was around the XC 'scene' here a while back, and everyone was pegging her to be the next big thing. Super friendly, humble, and serious about her sport. She takes the training required seriously, and didn't sit in an echo chamber where faults wouldn't be worked on.
  • 3 0
 @atrokz: exactly why she is effen incredible. She rides and trains like no other and always smiling. Our true home town hero.
  • 1 1
 I would say, she loves what she do.
  • 5 1
 Right?! Aaaand, she makes spandex cool!
  • 2 1
 So true. I remember riding in the zone where Emily hit the drop in the vid and she came ripping down the trails and hit some of the jumps on her XC bike... twice as fast and smooth as any of the riders rolling Dh bikes.
  • 1 0
 @robwhynot: Hey dude! Hardwood hills? Or elsewhere?
  • 2 0
 @atrokz: "the secret trails behind Dagmar"

Which weren't much of a secret, and certainly won't be now Smile
  • 1 0
 @robwhynot: ah right. I know the spot. Invitational race spot.
  • 30 2
 *swoon* and she's from my hometown

#wastedtimeonthewrongladies
  • 18 0
 #likeyoueverhadachance
  • 28 12
 finally riding with a fricking dropper. I don't know how people ride without one....
  • 46 21
 Lots of people do just fine it's not that big of a deal.
  • 25 17
 Elite pride mixed with insecurity... even at the highest level. Although I think Nino just doesn't give a fk...
  • 3 1
 she's a great rider, and has been honing handling skills for a few years now, so the dropper is not surprising at all given that she seems to like jumps and drops more than most XCers. Super rad woman.
  • 6 3
 Simply they can afford it !
  • 17 8
 Why is it people who choose to ride without a dropper get so much shit! "don't know how people ride without one" ? Maybe cause we just feel we don't need one? Smile x
  • 9 5
 Only people who can stand to ride without one haven't spent considerable time on one. It's a game changer.
  • 4 0
 @WAKIdesigns: come on its about the grams
  • 3 1
 @madmon: And because If you are racing XC you can make an argument against the complication of a dropper. For everyone else, seriously, try it.
  • 2 0
 It's called downhill. Lol
  • 1 0
 @DARKSTAR63: i own a dozen since 2002 ....yer preaching to the choir.
  • 11 2
 XC rider here - rode forever without a dropper post. Decided to dabble in enduro, and wanted to get faster on some of our gnarlier local trails, so now I also have a trail bike with a dropper post, and I love it. But then I briefly put a dropper on my XC bike, and hated it - took it off and now ride a rigid post on that bike (so much fun!). It's all about what kind of riding you aim to do. I will say that those who say you "can't ride" without a dropper probably haven't spent much time actually trying it - you might surprise yourself with what is actually possible!
  • 4 1
 @tnelson: I'm kind of kidding around. Been riding mountain bikes for decades, and put off buying a dropper for a long time. I just won't ever go back ! I can ride well without one I just don't care to. To each their own. It's all good.
  • 3 1
 @DARKSTAR63: i figured so! ....... the oddity is I have trouble riding without one. One of my 5 bikes does not have the knob I continue to reach for like a missing finger
  • 1 0
 @madmon: Haha yup it's like driving an automatic car after driving manual awhile, going for the ghost clutch
  • 1 0
 @madmon: That's a lot of worn out-defective parts!
  • 2 0
 @wickedfatchance: amen and not to talk about the pile of droppers that never worked i shipped back.....like the ones that drop like a broken elevator from 12 floors...ya the gravity ass buster and crank brothers for days.....lets talk about RS oil all over every fuking thing I own...ya dropper memories for days.
Being in Jamaica with a screwed up, pre-cambrian bleed kit in 2005.
I am such a sucker.\
I am now looking at 3 that could be repaired or are missing a part but they are not Tomson or KS.
  • 1 0
 @madmon: makes me feel better about my KS experience. Lucky to have never tried that RS junk dropper that *everyone* returned.
  • 3 6
 @atrokz: Reverb will get there. It's like with hydraulic disc brakes in 2005-2010. You buy it , make a proper overhaul out of the box and sell it after a year before it goes to sht. And sorry if you talk to bike mechanics you'll hear that all droppers fail. Just because RS and KS stand for 80% of the market doesn't mean that others break as often by precentage... I'm looking forward to try some awfully simple dropper. Like Manic or Fal line
  • 2 1
 @WAKIdesigns: the shop owners I've spoken to all say the reverb is by and large the main culprit for returns. even taking into account the volume, it doesn't reflect the flawed design using a glyde bushing which requires tight tolerances that RS mfg overseas probably can't meet (glyde bushing seals are used everywhere and extensively on landing gear sealing surfaces under immense pressure that support the weight of massive airliners - but they require tight tolerance grooves as part of the design in order to function for their service life, so the seal isn't the problem at all), which led to the redesigned floating rubber seal by SKF that is supposed to alleviate the issue most were having (this seal expands and makes up for variances in the ID and OD of the assembly. Even before that though, the hydraulic actuation stands out as an unnecessary design that further complicates the system for no benefit.
  • 4 8
flag WAKIdesigns (Dec 22, 2016 at 10:39) (Below Threshold)
 @atrokz: I have second Reverb in 5 years and it pisses me off no doubts about it. Mainly because servicing is rather complicated to do at home garage. Now the only long term experience with other dropper I have, is KS Supernatural which was extremely sensitive to immaculate cable operation. Slight amount of dirt and resistance in cable pull was affecting the function. And it was going from great to sht in a matter of one ride. 10 rides - awesome! Feels better than reverb. In the midle of 11th ride: whoops won't go down or won't stop going up. The post worked perfectly with lever under tge saddle but not with handlebar mounted lever. 3 buddies mine sold LEVs after repetitive fails. My boss barely rides his bike with 27.2 Thomson. He's out with that bike maybe once a month. Yet he already had to overhaul it twice. Surprisingly people just keep mashing Command posts and Giant droppers. Sht rattles and looses glide surface but doesn't want to stop working. Next year I'm going fir Manic because it's a dead simple design.
  • 2 0
 600g for a dropper post is like 6kg in XC
  • 2 0
 when i got hooked on dirty sex, also got the same problem as all of you, used to experiment with a number of new stuff every year, spent a vast fortune on bizarre things, but none of them gave me full satisfaction, mainly because they always ended up failing at some point, always got ruined at the wrong time.

support groups for dissapointed users of droppers are doing a great job out there, if you're one of them, take a step forward and tell your story: hi everyone, my name is benito, venytócamelas, I'm addicted to seatpost droppers from the start, I'm broke, my wife left me, my friends aren't even speaking to me....

remember, there's still hope, #saynotodroppers
  • 1 1
 @WAKIdesigns: Crazy. so far my Lev has been great, 2 seasons no rebuilds, and I ride almost daily in summer and still in winter with -15C temps. So far so good. Can't say the same about the Eten, that was almost comical in terms of how it failed. The new ones are starting to look better, but I guess there's lots of room for improvement from these companies, especially at the prices they charge for them.
  • 3 5
 I grew up riding moto at a high level, and you can't lower your seat or rear fender when descending sketch on your fun days, so you learn how to ride. I've been riding MTB since '87 and still don't use a dropper, and no, I'm not the slowest one down, not by a long shot.
  • 6 2
 @DBone95: Do you actually think there's a relationship between a moto seat, which is low by comparison to an extended saddle on a mtb, to a bike seat height? Because pedaling is the reason why it's raised up so high, which is considerably higher than a moto, unless youre a midget riding a 250. In which case, your post makes some sense.

at any rate, the guys racing DH at a high level aren't riding their seats extended like XC bikes, and vice versa. And most of these 'high level' athletes have droppers on their trail bikes, just like Emily in this article... so there is clearly an advantage for lots of people and it isn't about 'learning to ride'. Learning to ride up XC requires an extended post. Learning to ride drops and jumps requires a lowered seatpost. Combine them and we are where we are today.
  • 4 4
 There is only one rule. Each body requires certain range of motion to perform certain actions on the bike. Then you need certain room to put your COM in a neutral position in relation to BB. Saddle can be used to steer the bike. That is true for all disciplines of MTB on all sorts of tracks. I live in terrain where dropper is more than welcome due to frequent ups and downs. For that reason XC racing is the fricking best place to have one. And droppers wil get into XC racing for majority of racers. It's just some weird mental resistance that racers have. Just because they learned to ride without one, doesn't mean it makes them better without it. Just because Sagan or Nibali can perfectly nail the brake spot with cantilevers, for a switchback after a downhill straight giving them 100km/h, doesn't mean that they wouldn't be better off on disc brakes.

I am not sure I'd use a dropper if I lived in bigger mountains though. If my riding would be mostly about reaching some trail head by climbing for 0,5-1,5h then ride down then climb again I would defo not use a dropper.
  • 2 3
 @DARKSTAR63: Alright alright, everyone keeps going on about how great it must be to have a dropper seatpost. So I raised my saddle to feel what it must be like. Felt horrible and lifeless. No fun on the climbs, no fun on the downhills, no fun on the level stuff even. Couldn't see the point. Dropped the saddle again, left it there and all is good again. Tell me, what's the point of raising the saddle on the fly if there is no point having it up? For some there is, for me there isn't. See, this gear has been around for a while. Most have already made their decision whether or not to adopt them and for which bike (if they own multiple bikes). I trust most have made the right decision. And sure, some may have made the wrong choice. Some should have gone for the height adjustable seatpost and didn't. And some definitely made the wrong decision to actually get one. To raise the saddle for the climbs, sit down, moan about inadequate seat tube angle, lack of available travel, reliability issues and play, lower back pain, knee pain, moan some more... Those most definitely would be better off with a rigid post. Drop it low, crack a smile and ride.
  • 2 4
 @atrokz: Some of us can ride without a dropper, and some can't.
  • 2 0
 @DBone95: everyone can ride without one. We all did prior to the last few years. Its not some magic that allows people to ride. It just makes riding more enjoyable for those that like to get lose.
  • 2 0
 @vinay: I can't tell if you are kidding. I don't think anyone doubts the concept behind a dropper post, it's just matter of whether or not you think the pro's outweigh the cons. For many they do. No point in having the seat up? I'm not sure what that's about.
  • 2 0
 @DARKSTAR63: on my last ride my Reverb got stuck mid way. It was better on downs than it was with pedalling. Yes I could climb standing no probs, but I couldn't really regenerate after a hard climb. And I felt it in my quads the day after. It's just nice to have that possibility to sit down and spin fast to ease the muscles. But downs surprised me. I rode very slippery, twisty steep shute with drops and didn't feel the saddle to be in the way too much. So I could probably live with 80mm dropper?
  • 1 0
 @WAKIdesigns: I run a 125. I'm only 5'8" so that's part of it but I'm also not into slamming the seat super, super low. On my DH bike its roughly between the knees allowing for some control with my legs in certain situations. For me having the ability to run the seat at proper climbing height for long sustained climbs but be able to move it just a little out of the way for mostly everything else is game changing. I don't think one needs a massive drop on their seat so I struggle to understand these new breed 170 length posts but I'm also short. I do understand the needed drop would be proportional to height. In any case, would a 80mm post work? Absolutely, especially on a more xc oriented trail bike, because I only "slam" my seat on the steepest chutes. Would be better than nothing. As far as reliability I have no experience with Reverbs, I don't like that you have to bleed them, seems a hassle to me and people do seem to have lots of issues. I have had two KS posts and I have been overall happy with them. The newer one seems to have slightly better function than the first and they are both LEV model although the second is internal route. Adjustment of the cable can be tricky, newer models have a barrel adjust at the lever, this makes adjusting for stretch an easy affair. I blew the cartridge on number one after two hard seasons. It started to sag a bit at the top and leak oil. Never got "stuck" in any one position. Number two has a full season and still works like new. I also have a Thompson on my winter bike that has been flawless and my new bike has a Fox Transfer. I have no mileage on the Fox, so I cant speak on reliability but so far I'm super impressed. I think they are getting better overall (dropper posts in general). I used to always run a QR seat clamp so I could adjust my seat up for climbs and back to "normal" for everywhere else. That's the way I look it, instead of the other way around. As an aggressive rider I never liked a seat up my ass all the time but for climbing it's so much more efficient.
  • 2 0
 @DARKSTAR63: tonight I will do what I believe will be the last service I have ever done on a Reverb. I'll ride it for two more months and sell it. Then it's time for something dead simple. Giants and spec posts that some of my friends have just don't want to die, no matter the abuse. they have play, they rattle, they bob a bit, but just keep going.
  • 1 0
 @WAKIdesigns: I'm hoping for good luck with the Fox. I really love the initial quality and function of the post and the lever, the quality of the head (an area I find the KS to be lacking in) I like the cable adjustment on the lever side, the whole package impresses. Just have to see how it holds up.
  • 1 0
 @DARKSTAR63: Don't worry, I'll try to break my post down into easily digestible chunks without (hopefully) introducing any new information. I might have to add apparently, if there were any doubt, I ride to have fun.

I feel riding with the saddle low is more fun for me than riding with the saddle up. More lively.
To accomplish my goal (of having fun) I'm much better off leaving the saddle low.
As a rigid seatpost already does an amazing job at keeping the saddle in that low fixed position, I couldn't see the point of using a dropper post for that.

As I already acknowledged, there sure must be good reasons for some to have the saddle up every now and then. My question was what that was. You couldn't return anything comprehensible for that, but luckily Waki could name something. To recover from a longer climb. That makes sense, for him that is. I don't usually need to recover from climbs because mine are short and I want to charge right down again. Of course I'm still open to suggestions. As you mentioned everyone needs a dropper to raise the saddle every now and then, I'm sure there are more good reasons to come. I'm not kidding. Strange you were wondering actually. I've posted this question more often and never got anything sensible out of it. More like, "no one questions that" as you gave me too. So let's say I'm open to answers. Give me sensible answers and I'll take them to heart. Give me bullshit and your point about the essence of dropper seatposts is bullshit. Fair, right?
  • 1 0
 @vinay: lol what the hell is wrong with you man? I was simply curious about your assertion that there is no point to having the saddle up? I feel that for most, on some parts of the trail, there most certainly is. I'm just making conversation here, you don't need to get twisted. Happy trails, enjoy them in any way which you choose.
  • 2 0
 @vinay: my climbs are short. We go high or max pulse a few times during a 2h ride. If I have any climb to do I put the saddle all the way up. Why wouldn't I? I stand only where it is nevessary and lower it a notch only for the most technical climbs. I use the dropper all the freaking time. It allows me to save energy in general. All our local Strava segments are short but long enough to make full use of dropper. You'd have a rather hard time on a local Enduro comp without dropper unless your fitness is comparable with guys taking top 5 spots. But if I lived in mountains I'd highly probably do more than fine without a dropper since I never drop into a descent after a longer climb without resting, where I could just use seat post collar. So not sure about necessity of having a dropper in mountains but definitely makes tons of sense for my hills or for XC racing. The more often terrain goes from up and down to more sense the dropper makes. Then for Enduro racing it makes perfect sense, since raising the seat up for pedally section and sitting down even for a few moments, makes a huge difference for your ability to Endure the whole stage
  • 1 0
 @DARKSTAR63: Sorry, my impatience came through near the end of that post. Didn't want to come across angry though, so sorry for that. As your initial statement was that a dropper post is essential for every mtb rider, only that some (XC racers) are willing to compromise (do I put that correctly there?) I was curious about why I should raise my saddle. As I pointed out as a trail rider (no 4X or DH) I didn't see why I would want to do that. I see why others need it for their riding (mid length climbs like Waki does) and I acknowledged that as well. So I asked "Tell me, ..." and somehow you turned that into that I'm claiming that there is no point for anyone to have the saddle high. Which simply isn't true.

So my impatience stems from the fact that, lik you, many others (PB reviewers and visitors alike) have been claiming everyone needs a dropper yet never explain why everyone needs to have the saddle high. When I ask, they simply don't answer. But don't worry, I dropped my expectations. It would still be nice if you'd clarify your claim, but I don't necessarily expect you to anymore.

@WAKIdesigns Thanks. Yeah I see it works for you. Yeah I also easily hit Z5 several times a ride (MTB or MUni) or when I run. But I don't compete. I do like the events but I'm not competitive. I ride a few marathon races but I don't do over 80km because I'm wasting too much energy early on having fun popping off roots and stuff. People told me to preserve energy and I tried that once but I got bored and decided competition isn't for me. ADHD, see? So after work (or school/study back in the day) I'd get on the bike, throw out all excess energy in a short blast, go home, shower, eat, hot chocolate on the couch, sleep. Trading the liveliness of standing up riding for a bit more efficiency isn't going to make me enjoy it even more.
  • 1 0
 @vinay: It's all good man, I just truthfully wasn't sure what you were trying to articulate. I understand that many riders don't need or want a dropper post. I rode for years without one, and like I said I put off buying one for a long time because I was sure I didn't actually need such a thing. Spending time with one changed my mind completely. I like to ride aggressively, fast pace, and don't like to stop. The dropper makes it so that I can do that, riding the downhill sections of trail like I'm on my DH bike and climbing like an XC racer. Previously there was always compromise. I guess I just don't understand the desire to climb even short sections of trail with the seat as low as I like it for descending. Very short, punchy technical, yes. But otherwise it is so much more effective to be seated, and have proper leg extension (think road saddle height) so that you don't tire and are efficient as possible. This way too you still have gas for the DH. This is not everybody's riding style, I know that, I was never claiming that there was a "correct" way to ride. I just assert that the dropper can be a highly effective tool. It's become my most valued component. One of my bikes is a fully rigid fat bike with cable actuated disc brakes, but it's got a dropper post fitted.
  • 2 0
 @DARKSTAR63: & WAKIdesigns - holy sh*t you guys should just phone eachother.
  • 1 0
 @Ritgut: But talking in RL is creepy nowadays.
  • 1 0
 @tigerteeuwen: gimme your Skype login and I'll talk to you. You can also give me your address and I'll visit you. Then we can talk even more. But hen you won't be able to hang up on me... when things get... hot... too hot
  • 1 0
 @WAKIdesigns: Come ride with me in Canmore, Alberta this summer
  • 1 0
 @DARKSTAR63: Well maybe I'm right there in that niche where even you wouldn't use a dropper Wink , considering your description. The trails I ride most, 5 minutes from home have climbs probably well under a minute. I try to maintain my momentum but also have to move my weight around to maintain traction, make it over obstacles or round tight turns. And with 11-32 in the rear (9sp) and 32t in the front (oval ring) I sometimes also just need to stand to deliver enough power (on the platform pedals). Yes a good rider could probably make it seated, maybe I could even do that. But to me that feels like a compromise, just like a high saddle feels like a compromise to most of us on the downhill sections even though (as pro XC racers show us) it can be done. If I travel a bit, climbs get longer but still nothing that requires me to sit down. Even at Megavalanche Alpe d'Huez which has quite a climb after you pass the village of Alpe d'Huez, I didn't feel like sitting down.

But I think both you and Waki eventually did what no one did before, explain why I might want to have the saddle up. For efficiency, to preserve energy for the other sections. If that is what it is, then I think it still isn't for me. I don't need to preserve energy on the trails. My rides are short (well under 2hrs) and I'm there to blow it all out. And I don't mind to stop for a few seconds, catch a breath and then blast down again. Yes when I lived further from the trails and had to ride 30-45 minutes to get there, I had the saddle raised because of course I didn't want to waste energy on the road. I had it low on the trails, but I set it high on the road to and from the trails. So I had my 400mm post at max (allowed) height in my 16" frame (I'm just under 6ft tall) which gave me the commonly recommended saddle height for cycling. But seatpost manufacturers apparently weren't prepared for me bouncing on that tall but thin (26.8mm) post and bent quite a few so I couldn't fully lower them anymore. Went through RaceFace, NC17, Kore... I just replaced the Azonic post by a Thomson Elite with layback (which can be had cheap now that everyone is after these droppers) so I should be fine now. I don't plan to raise the post anymore and Thomson claims to be better than what I've had before.

Of course the fact that others prefer dropper posts which (as I think we can agree upon now) really isn't for me or my style of riding, shouldn't really bother me. I can stick to what I have, no problem. The only downside I see is that companies releasing a complete bike without a dropper post are getting bad reviews in the media. And they're sensitive to that. So for bikes on more of a budget (at around 2000-2500 euros) product managers rather squeeze in a dropper post than for instance a higher quality fork. Or they compromise the ride quality with a larger diameter seat tube (which Stanton had to deal with at some point but they've got that sorted by now). And I like my toptube low, but a dropper requires some length there which probably is what keeps them from making them really low. Kona managed to do that on their Process with a chunky upper section of that seattube, Alutech did something nearly similar on their ICB2.0. But other than that, I think most frames are higher than they could be just to accommodate for people wanting to raise their saddle.

Anyway, thanks for clarifying your point. Cheers and merry christmas!
  • 13 1
 You had me at "...featuring Emily Batty"/
  • 8 1
 @liammurphyfilms amazing work. favorite sequence was the camping scenes. the music and the opening shot of the dog hit me in the feels. Cheers man!!
  • 10 2
 Like a lot of females, she's a bad ass!!!
  • 7 1
 Nice series, good luck in 2017 Emily !!
  • 3 1
 The ladies Olympic XC race was one of the best ever and to see Emily push Catherine that hard right to the line crazy. After her sprint at worlds we knew she is mentally one very tough racer, but wow she doesn't give up. Canadian cycling is looking as good as it ever has, with our long history of tough Canadian Ladies. Emily's spirit and smile are more valuable to our sport than buckets full of medals, or even dropper seat posts.
  • 5 4
 I love watching the mens and womens xc races. Tough stuff and exciting. I expected to really dislike this video, and mostly I did. All that makeup, the stupid slow motion Porsche shots, the privileged childhood, that awful music and the editing that uses and reuses the same clips - the industry marketing side is so necessary but still a big turn off for me. Just so cheesy. But then pretty much the first thing in the video she talks about come to terms with her close 4th place in the Olympics. Serious personal stuff she talked about, way more personal than I expected. I flipped from associating her with her marketing image to respecting her grit. Good luck Emily! Will be rooting for you next year!
  • 11 0
 I watched it and it didn't suck. The film and editing was good, and there was a lot of riding. I enjoyed her makeup but it was a trivial issue, like saying the video was ruined by all those autumn leaves that kept showing up. So she should ride around in pyjamas, no makeup, and a Chrysler PT cruiser to satisfy your desire for authenticity? She's attractive and supremely talented, she can do what she wants.
  • 5 1
 If you are mad about all this E-Bike stuff then just watch this...
  • 6 2
 Is she in the PINKBIKE Calendar? Send me a dozen!
  • 3 1
 Someone get her a kettle for her camp kit. Great series, well filmed and edited. Emily is as charming and affable as she is skilled on the bike. Congrats on a great season!
  • 3 0
 11 minute video. Tell me a good 2 minute chunk to skip to. Gotta get back to work. Wink
  • 3 1
 This video somehow made me happy, peacefull and all! Cheers to a fellow Canadian!
  • 6 2
 she's life goals
  • 2 1
 Awesome finale to a great year Emily! Great to see an awesome team working together to put out this videos!
  • 3 0
 Worst camper ever.
  • 1 0
 Bruce peninsula cliff jumpin'......good memories.
  • 1 0
 And she also users her middle finger for braking......
  • 2 1
 Liam Murphy, you do magnificent work.
  • 3 4
 Woman of the century right here, super humble, always smiling, always riding like a boss!
  • 1 0
 Check the battyon that
  • 6 5
 So HOT!
  • 1 1
 Smart, great rider, and beautiful. Whats not to love. Get em girl.
  • 1 1
 Nice I used to ride at Dagmar all the time. Love those lines!
  • 1 0
 Is she married?
  • 1 1
 MTB never looked so good...
  • 1 0
 Hotty
  • 1 1
 She's so ambitious.
  • 4 6
 SCHAWING!!!!
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.030230
Mobile Version of Website