PINKBIKE FIELD TEST
Evil Following
Words by Matt Beer; photography by Tom RichardsEvil Bikes are known for their roots that have been dug deep into the gravity side of mountain biking for some time, but their 120mm short-travel trail bike, the Following, shouldn't be neglected, because it punches well above its rank.
All design elements scream that this bike is clearly an Evil through and through; namely, the DELTA suspension system designed by Dave Weagle, compact rear triangle, massive headtube, and a monochromatic paint scheme. Distinguishing between the models in Evil’s lineup isn’t always straightforward, but the 130mm travel RockShox Pike fork steers the Following to the more pedaling-focused consumer.
Evil Following Details• Travel: 120mm rear / 130mm fork
• Carbon frame
• 66.9 / 66.4º head angle
• Reach: 460mm
• 76º / 75.5º seat tube angle
• 430 / 432mm chainstays
• Sizes: S, M (tested), L, XL
• Weight: 13.04 kg / 28.75 lb
• Price: $9,050 USD
•
evil-bikes.com Evil sent us the middle tier build, which isn't exactly middle of the road in terms of pricing - it's $9,050 USD, to be exact. This XO1 Hydra parts kit features SRAM X01 carbon cranks, and Evil’s own Boomstick and Loophole carbon wheels. The carbon hoops are actually made in the USA from Fusion Fiber, and Evil also states that the rims are recyclable through the manufacturer because they use a different process than traditional carbon fiber, as explained
here.
There are some subtle but clever part choices that prove why this isn’t your average downcountry bike. Although we swapped all of the stock tires for a control set for all of the bikes, the Following came with Maxxis DHF EXO tires. The rear was appropriately downsized to a 2.3” width; another nod from Evil to say they want this bike to be able to carry some tempo when the pedals ask for it. There’s also a large 200mm rotor up front to slow you down when you take this bike to its limits. A high 35mm rise bar promotes a more playful approach to trail riding than a flatter option that would lower your body position towards the front wheel.
A large part of the way the Following flows through flatter terrain is the geometry. You might expect Evil to have slackened out the head angle on their trail bike to downhill bike digits, but it actually leans towards the steeper side at 66.4 in the “X-Low” setting. Combined with a reach of 460mm for the size medium frame and stubby 430mm chainstays, the numbers surrounding the Following certainly make for a snappy ride.
Despite its bold and stocky appearance, the 13kg (28.75lb) Following doesn’t ride like a heavy bike by any means. Does it have the get up and go compared to something like the Allied BC40? Definitely not. On the flip side, the Following is a bike that is capable of making appearances in a bike park or flowing through jump lines without feeling like a wet noodle underneath you.
Trailforks Regions Where We TestedBustling with activity, the beautifully constructed, and well-stocked, headquarters of the Sentiers du Moulins trail system was just one of the networks we explored on the Evil Following. Filled with long, exposed bedrock, a healthy dose of machine made and naturally flowing tech trails, this zone surprised us with all of the gems hidden on either side of the valley.
To go hand in hand with the flicky nature of the Following, a cruise down the blue flow track, Maelstrom, presented tons of berms and rollers to find ambitious rhythms through. On the backside of Mont Tourbillon you find close to 200m of descending down the infamous "Slab City" trail that rides primarily a sheet of granite that hides just under the mossy carpeted forest floor. There was plenty of action between the high-speed jump sections and undulating Canadian Shield for the Following.
Sentiers du Moulin mountain biking trailsClimbingThe Following has to be one of the most unique climbing bikes that I’ve ridden to date. Out of the saddle, there’s a good amount of support through the suspension when you jump on the pedals or push into the bike to lunge up a ledge. However, the seated position left me scratching my head: high bars, short chainstays, and a slack seat tube angle.
Although sitting over the rear axle provides traction, the short rear center does make it prone to front wheel lift on steep climbs or steppy uphills. 35mm rise bars didn’t help how far back you sat in the saddle, and in order to combat the upright riding yet slightly cramped position we lowered them after the first shakedown (more on those later).
Reach is the all important number to look at for the descending body position, but top tube length plays a more crucial role in how a bike climbs while seated. The 75.5 and 66.4-degree seat and head tube angles spread out the room between the saddle and the handlebars, placing weight well over the rear wheel, but barely enough weight towards the front. Typically on a bike with those angles you’d find a stem of 60mm or more to slow down the steering, but the Following came equipped with Evil’s own 45mm length, 12 Gauge unit.
Moving to a longer stem and low-rise bars would certainly slow down the steering and shift the rider weight forward, but I’d be afraid to lose some of the positive traits of the Following when it was pointed downhill. Another option would be sizing up; something that was hinted at for maximizing the gravity fed bits of trail too.
Descending Part of the beauty that hides in this little trail weapon is that it turns even the most basic singletrack into a feature-filled lap. I’d stick my neck out and call it the freerider’s cross country bike. It’s stout, stiff, and snappy.
All Evil bikes look the same, or do they? Side by side, there are subtle differences. The tube diameters of the Following’s figure are slimmer than its enduro sibling. Combined with a healthy dose of progression in the 120mm of rear wheel travel, the frame never winced once. At the other end of the stroke, the grip through the single pivot-driven DELTA suspension provided exceptional grip across rooty off cambers and through slimy rock gardens. The Evil was pushed the hardest on jump trails because it always asked for more. There was just the right amount of everything from the frame and its kinematics; not too soggy, and not too dry - Goldilocks approved.
You’ve got to pay attention to steering at high speeds. As mentioned in the climbing portion, the handling is quick and keeps you on your toes. It’s crucial to mind how much weight is on placed the front wheel because it does feel like it could tuck and bite back.
One component that we all agreed we’d change immediately, if this was our own bike, was the handlebars. Evil states that their Boomstick carbon bars have a 9º backsweep and 5º upsweep. Whatever they may be, we could never find a comfortable balance with them.
Getting the Following off of the ground is never a chore, and the short 430mm chainstays pop on command. Paired with that 66.4-degree head tube angle, the downside of the geometry is high-speed stability. In order to combat that knife-edge handling, installing a headset to reduce the head tube angle by a degree could be one way to settle down the steering dynamics.
There isn’t a lot of forgiveness through rubbley washouts or dusty berms, but then again, none of the other bikes in the test were as much “fun” as the Following.
Like, you're still making us click the volume indicator (as audio doesn't autoplay) if we want to watch - why not make us click the video itself (and thus starting the video + audio)? Get rid of two annoyances with one swoop.
Turned it off, still autoplays. But not all videos, but definitely the field test ones.
It’s kinda shifty if it’s something to generate more ad revenue, on the backs of people’s data. Data is pricey up here in Canuckistan, and you should be able to switch it off if you’d like.
No response from @brianpark on my couple of requests
Asked nobody ever in the PB comment section.
Very funny
Its chainstays are too short, but they used to be too long.
Its suspension is really good, and hasn't changed in ten years.
Really get the feeling this bike is being designed by ignoring professional bike reviewers.
Evil really needs to spec this bike with an Ochain equipped crankset.
Interesting that they say the Allied has "great geometry" for an all around bike, and yet it's very similar to the Following's with merely 5mm longer stays and .5 degree steeper seat tube. Leads me to believe all the geo minutia is less important than overall weight. The Following is just a heavier bike with overbuilt frame and DH-oriented components/suspension.
Low setting (so higher setting) with -1 headset and a 130 fork is the best setup I've tried so far. I measure 76.5 effective STA, 66 HTA, 1194 WB, and 333 BB height. This is on a size medium.
It takes $9k and carbon wheels to get this guy down to 28.75lbs. Meanwhile, (for comparison’s sake) the Spur’s $7,200 build comes on at 25.2lbs.
I believe Matt when he says it doesn’t ride like a heavy bike, but at some point (usually about 1/3 of the way up a long uphill slog in my experience) the facts of gravitational reality will make themselves known.
Chonky short travel trail bikes can be great bikes. But if I was spending close to $10k to buy one today, I’d have a hard time feeling like weight wasn’t a serious downside of this Following.
Between the components (Sid vs Pike, brakes) you might have about 1-1.5lbs difference tops, the rest is just (unnecessary) chonk.
I had a Spur and Following V3 simultaneously. The Spur lasted a week here... yeah, was 3 lbs lighter, but like 2/3 as fun.. maybe. 10% weight penalty means I ride 90% as far for my suffering. But I was rewarded with 50% more fun...
It's all just math
Additional mitigating circumstances: that debacle happened when they were a brand new company. They've been working with a new manufacturer for a decade, and those issues are pretty clearly in the rearview. That context is important.
I was worried about this myself when I was considering purchasing an Evil a few years ago. I talked to people at a shop that sells a lot of high end bikes (Evil, Transition, Ibis, Forbidden, Revel, Specialized) about Evil's track record. They told me that they didn't have an aberrant number of warranty claims and that the company stood behind their products. I'm on my third Evil now, and haven't broken one. I don't tend to ride bikes past their intended purpose, but I do weight 230 lbs and ride often. Nothing bad to say whatsoever.
The other on tells you to slow down before you are out of control, since it is an XC bike with a longer fork.
2022/2023 - "The chainstays are too short"
I never liked short chainstays. Too hard to climb. Longer stays make for a more stable bike and provide more traction on steep climbs.
Weird that we have someone above talking about beating people for making frames with geometry he doesn't like, but that's probably just a manifestation of some personal issues...
Geometry matters, but I find it hilarious that people believe a centimeter of extra chain stay flips a magic switch from "bad climber" to "good climber." I agree that it's "a sport that relies on balance as its core principle," but it ain't the bike.
It's fine to like long chainstays, short chainstays, 27.5, 29, 26, plus tire bikes, whatever. I don't want all bike manufacturers to converge on one "perfect" geometry. I love the "stupid" geo on my Honzo ESD, with 490 reach and a 417 chainstay! It's a riot.
“First principals” lol.
But when I had my 15.5” chainstay hardtail, I did just constantly fall over, so maybe you’re on to something.
Wait no, that didn’t happen.
It's fine to like something different. There isn't one perfect geo for everyone, even if we're the same height.
To proportional chainstays, I don't see it as a selling point. I only own and ride one size of a given bike at a time...
I am also 6’3 and I prefer something in the 345 range. 430 is pretty short to climb comfortably with my legs being as long as they are. Obviously seat tube angle plays a large roll in that as well.
To each their own ! I just like the way they look but I want longer chainstays!
I've been riding a long time, and I have observed a sea change in mountain bikes from when I started. Back then, it was aspirational to learn to be a good enough bike handler to be able to ride a machine that was so quick steering it practically had road bike geometry. Steep angles and short stays made those bikes handle like Ferraris.
Bikes now are built to roll over the worst obstacles in a straight line. Gone are the telepathic handling qualities of bikes like my custom made Ritchie.
I know people ride unbelievably difficult terrain with new geometry bikes, but I can't help but feel as if something has been lost.
Nothing has been lost though, as long as there companies making all sorts of different bikes. It's why the sentiment I mostly fight against is that there is one geometry to rule them all.
Example: also had a YT Jeffsy. Riding in Dupont & was climbing Cedar Rock trail (fairly steep in some sections) I kept wondering why the bike felt so bouncey and squatted down in the rear end. Get to the top, realize that there is almost no air in my rear shock. Still got to the top though!
Evil bikes aren’t for everyone but they’re a riot to ride!! I’ll bet this thing is super easy to throw some big shapes on.
I think Levy means no one at Pinkbike wants it, but Outside are forcing it due to views/advertising revenue?
www.bikemag.com/videos/2014-bible-of-bike-tests-roundtable-reels-evil-uprising
My anecdotal evidence via one frame (a used one at that) has been awesome. Others seem to have had bad experiences, so I can understand the hate. If the warranty process at Evil is trouble free and in good faith, I wouldn’t be overly concerned.
I’d buy one again, maybe even brand new.
I'm on an Following MB and I already pedal strike enough in the low setting to not want to go any lower.
I see what you did there.
and your only complaint seems to be that it doesn’t pedal as well as the others up steep singletrack, right?
So what is this supposed to be then?
Just like other short travel bikes seemingly combine the best of both worlds, this sounds like the worst of both worlds tbh.
I can't help but feel most of their issues would be resolved with a bar change and a Large frame?
I'm 5'11 and some change - the Large is perfect for me, I'm running a low rise One carbon bar and a 50mm stem
Come and ride mine
Considering this following. A revel rascal. Or an ibis ripley.
What do i do lol?!
References to poor warranty always finds their way into Evil threads too. I saw the damage of one such claim from someone who evidently didn’t care about his steed much. I’ve had one warranty replacement and one crash replacement in 3 years without hassle from Evil so have zip to complain about in that dept too.
.we're in trouble.
Personally I like the higher setting with 140 fork. I tried the anglesets, both the 1.5 and the 1.0, and they took some of the fun outta my jibbing.