Pinkbike Poll: What Factors Influence Your Bike Purchasing Decisions?

Mar 10, 2023 at 12:26
by Matt Beer  
photo

Inflation - we’re all feeling the pinch and it’s a topic that no one can escape, even in the freedom of the bicycle world. 5-digit mountain bike prices have quickly become commonplace and the question as to whether or not we’re seeing the bang for buck diminish is tough to answer. Either way, we’re all still lusting after new bikes but at some point, we have to decide what features are most important to us.

Mountain bikes are complex, human-powered machines. One of the first gestures that we often make is to pick up a bike to feel out its weight. That’s a topic that has been argued time and time again. Seb Stott believes you shouldn’t worry about it too much, but there’s no hiding it requires energy to get to the top of the hill, or at least to handle the bike.

Two major factors that should come into account are fit and effectiveness. Does the geometry match your body type and where you ride? You don’t want to look like a circus bear while riding your miniature bike around and if your trails are fairly moderate in terms of terrain, a slack, long-travel bike doesn’t make sense there either.

Suspension design and the amount of travel is another backbone of the bike’s intentions that can quickly overburden the effort needed to maximize the enjoyment out on the trails. If you spend the majority of your time in the air, a high-pivot might not be the most intuitive suspension platform to jump.

The bike will also need to be serviced and that’s not free either. You’ll have to set aside a budget for routine maintenance, even if you perform the labour yourself. Getting a hold of those parts isn’t always straightforward either. Proprietary components and access to local dealers is a worthwhile concern to have, especially if you leave off the beaten path.

When the time does come to say goodbye to your beloved ride, you’ll want to capitalize on your return. Choosing a mainstream brand might reduce that amount, since there could hundreds of others just like it to compete against. On the other hand, having an obscure brand might scare off a second-hand buyer.

On that note, the manufacturer's warranty is worth thinking about too. Is it just one year? What does “limited” lifetime really mean? Nowadays, brands like Specialized are even offering a transferable warranty to second-hand owners.

We’re also purchasing a good, so chances are, you aren’t going to purchase a bike that you hate to look at, performance aside. Similarly, I bet you gravitate towards a brand’s image that aligns with your values. Perhaps you’re not after the cheapest bike and care about where and who makes the frame. A brand’s image and how they perceive themselves in the mountain bike community can certainly influence your purchasing decisions.

What Factor Influences Your Bike Purchasing Decisions the Most?



Author Info:
mattbeer avatar

Member since Mar 16, 2001
327 articles

260 Comments
  • 230 1
 Another big one for me is making sure the bike has no proprietary standards! You never know when a company is just going to pull support for that standard and you'll be left stranded with a bike that is suddenly unmaintainable.
  • 22 1
 Like the silly Overdrive 2 thing from Giant a few years back!
  • 12 9
 Curious, what would you consider a proprietary standard on current bikes that will be unsupported in the future?
  • 36 3
 @onawalk: Nothing on my current bikes - but the bike that comes to mind the most when I say that is an old 2012 Cannondale Jekyll that I used to own. The 'pull shock' was a nightmare, and I ended up giving the bike away earlier this year because I didn't feel right taking money for someone for a bike that I knew couldn't be properly maintained.
  • 13 0
 @beestrangler: I'll give you proprietary suspension, Cannondale, Spesh, Trek for sure.
Those engineers must really believe in that design to go that route, cause it cant be cheap.
However, Interior suspension, and cascade suspension can take care of all those shocks still
  • 17 4
 @beestrangler: I mean X2's dont seem to have much better reliability....
  • 15 0
 @onawalk: Tonnes of shock/pivot hardware is proprietary (try to find a main pivot for a 10 year old frame). Trek Thru-Shaft shocks (pretty sure they'll abandon this in the future). Bearing mount shocks. The idler wheels on current high pivot bikes might be hard to replace in 5-10 years time. I'm sure there's a tonne more.
  • 6 0
 @tom666: Uuugghhh! tell me about it. What a nightmare, especially when you can't find an exploded diagram for your make/model with part numbers. It becomes a crap shoot (just don't through anything out until the new stuff has been installed).
  • 8 10
 @tom666: Replaced all the pivot hardware on my 2005 Norco 6, in 2019 when I sold it. The bolts I couldnt get, I simply went to BC Fasteners and had them get it for me.

Replaced all the pivot hardware on a 2003 RM, couple items had to be subbed out, but easy enough.
Anything like hardware you can get or have made. You might need to explore some different options. but you'll get there.

Trek shocks are noted, but like I said, both Interior suspension, and Cascade suspension can get you sorted on pretty much all of it. Is their relaibility any worse than X2's?

Maverick suspension pieces is tough to find as branded Maverick, but I've found replacement parts while digging into RS and Manitou spares.

Idler wheels will be easy, again, you might need to be creative, but you'll get there.

Elastomers for odd ball suspension stuff can be daunting, but that stuff was hens teeth at the time it was manufactured.
  • 5 3
 @ismellfish: Why on earth would you throw something out before the new one has arrived, my lanta!
  • 10 0
 @onawalk: switch Infinity, sliders like on that Trek XC bike, headsets with cable ports, integrated seatpost clamps
  • 13 0
 @tom666: the trek thru shafts are a proprietary shock, but they're a standard size. If they break (which they do) you can still replace them with a regular shock. So they're not nearly as big a problem as the shocks on something like the old jekyll.
  • 10 0
 @onawalk: yeah, what you forgot to include in your list is thousands of hours to do such research to find all the pieces. Who has time for that?
  • 4 0
 @toast2266: The Thru shaft shock that came with my 2021 Slash was surprisingly amazing, tuned perfectly out of the box. However after a half a summer of weekend warrier riding, it leaked all over the place. Warranty covered it but it never went in. Significant upgrade from the reaktive stuff they did before though. I have a feeling they're onto something.
  • 3 0
 @onawalk: Specialized shocks in the past.
  • 3 0
 Bike Strandards
  • 2 0
 If the price allows me to pay the mortgage or not.
  • 1 0
 It's amazing to see how many bike Co's offer "lifetime support/lifetime warranty", knowing you likely won't own said bike for longer than 2 years. After that cycle it seems as though the "support" lead times on the proprietary parts become harder and harder. Part of the reason I got rid of my old downhill bike is because of that.
  • 2 0
 @onawalk: Ai spacing on current cannondales is a hassle
  • 1 0
 Like Stanton
  • 3 0
 @spokedwheelfreak: And does absolutely nothing. Companies trying to convince riders that there's a better way to build a wheel need to go away. Not to mention, Cannondale wheels are dog crap.
  • 2 7
flag scrawnydog (Mar 11, 2023 at 13:55) (Below Threshold)
 @JohSch: Switch infinity improves the ride. While I admit it's a hassle to maintain you can't knock a technology that actually improves the function of the bike.
  • 2 0
 @tom666: trek abandoned through shaft already did if im not mistaken
  • 2 1
 This is a big reason I bought a GG. They list all their bearing specs online, so you can buy new bearings from any supplier. Not being tied to begging the MTB manufacture for overpriced bearing 'kits' is a big step forward. Supporting NA manufacturing was another big reason I went with them, and the price is reasonably competitive with Asia produced companies.
  • 3 1
 @Longrider: actually from an engineering standpoint we should all be on od2 with 31.6mm bars.
  • 1 0
 @pearlwham: it's too bad they've moved on from it. The newer models do not have the thru shaft shocks anymore.
  • 1 0
 #wallet your funking twits
  • 108 6
 You forgot water bottle in front triangle
  • 39 2
 Jokes aside, this is actually important to me. And 2 water bottles in the front triangle for XC bikes.
  • 3 1
 hell yes
  • 41 4
 Press fit BB is another go/no go for me.
  • 11 3
 @Snowytrail: Concur. Press fit can go GFItself
  • 11 0
 @Snowytrail: I prefer threaded BB, and my new frame on its way has one.. but for anyone feeling frustrated with their press fit BB, Wheels Manufacturing makes a PF BB that threads together. I have run it on two Honzos now and it's mint. If a bike is ticking most of the boxes but still has a PF BB, it's good to know such options exist.
  • 1 0
 @mikealive: unfortunately I don't think they do them for BB92 SRAM Dub. Would like to be wrong, but just been on their BB selector tool.
  • 3 1
 If it can't fit two water bottles inside the front triangle, I won't consider buying it.
  • 4 1
 @matyk: lol slim picking for ya then
  • 1 0
 @dmackyaheard: I know. It's a damn shame.
  • 1 1
 @mikealive: This is the problem though. It's a workaround to a system that works perfectly well. Manufacturers can bang on about tolerances, clearance, weight, stiffness etc. all they like, but everybody knows it's first and foremost a cost savings exercise. Thank you Nukeproof, GG, Knolly and others that stick with it.
  • 1 1
 @Snowytrail: Press Fit takes all the flack when it should be directed at manufacturing tolerance and QC
  • 62 1
 Price ain't no option?
  • 10 1
 indirectly covered under component specifications. Looking at $/build kit
  • 13 0
 Has the poll been changed in the mean time? I do see it mentioned as an option.
  • 5 0
 Where’s the ‘I bought a bike but still waiting months after projected delivery’???
  • 7 2
 Missing (limitating) option: my wife is my accounter.
  • 3 0
 @vinay: they definitely added a couple options since it was first posted
  • 2 0
 Correct, it isn't not an option
  • 57 6
 I also want to add look. I cannot ride things that do not look pretty, more so with a bike. It is one thing to ride well, but also need to look pretty when I park the bike and look at it.
  • 32 0
 Maaaan.. I feel cheesy admitting it, but this is also a big factor to me. If I'm going to have 4,5,6k into a *bicycle*, I better be stoked when I look at it. Fortunately bike geo seems pretty dialed in and suspension components are as good as ever, so we can actually have the luxury of moving 'pretty' up the list of deciding factors.
  • 31 2
 Traded a Sentinel (great looking) for a Knolly Fugitive (questionable).

If im honest, I've never liked the looks of the Knolly bikes, the recent protos with the straight top tube look way better, However, the bike is a blast to ride, feels like a BMX bike on the trails. Has changed my mind on the bike, I friggin love it!
Give the ugly ones a chance every now and then, you just might be surprised
  • 3 0
 Ditto. Was a big influence on my recent purchase. I normally ride Giant, but just couldn’t stomach their colours when I went to buy.
  • 7 0
 @mikealive: I dont feel bad about it at all. My bike was a huge investment so I should be happy with everything about it, including the looks, or Im not buying the right bike.
  • 3 0
 Looks like they fixed it, but I'd really like it reworded to, "How do it look"
  • 8 0
 @mikealive: I wouldn't feel bad about it.

I'd say for me it's probably a combo of aesthetics and brand ethos. 99.9% of us don't get paid to ride bikes and, despite what some of us may think, nobody else really gives a crap how fast we are.

My bike buying advice is to define some sensible parameters in terms of geo, travel, etc. and then go buy what makes your d!ck hard. You should never buy a bike you're not totally stoked about just because it checks some box on paper.
  • 1 2
 Top category- aesthetics
  • 3 1
 @dancingwithmyself: 100% with what you said.

Good looking bike also makes you additionally stoked to go ride it, especially if between the rides it stands somewhere you can see it on daily basis.

Buying from the brand that gives back to community and respects its customers/employees is just a right thing to do, a part of a healthy money cycle.

Combining these two factors with a bike being relevant to my needs / riding style / local terrain makes purchase a no-brainer.
  • 2 0
 @onawalk: agree, I had a Fugitive and it wasn’t the sexiest in the room for sure, but boyeeee it was fun.
  • 1 0
 @Bhaack: Man, you know these guys can’t do polysyllabic words!
  • 2 3
 I totally agree. Looks are important, and I get tired of people here pretending they aren’t. Or like you’re not cool or hardcore or whatever if you care how your bike looks.
  • 1 0
 The best builds combine function with form. The worst builds prioritize form over function. Vanity bling builds with poorly chosen components that don't make sense for the bike's intended purpose just look dumb to me.
  • 48 0
 Not having headset-routed cables.
  • 6 0
 Yep, why is that one not an option?
  • 2 0
 Though I get most people aren't going to make that their primary concern, it's a major consideration for me.
  • 1 0
 which bikes dont have the option to route cables externally?
  • 24 1
 After a significant amount of research centered around a $4000 budget, I decided on a Norco Fluid A1. Why?

- GREAT component spec. Suspension, drivetrain, brakes. I'm happy to rock a budget wheelset
- Proper geometry/travel for my local trails. High desert foothills with lots of long, non-technical climbs and descents
- Reliable and highly-reviewed construction and suspension kinematics
- Available through a trusted LBS
- OMG have you seen that green? It's beautiful
  • 7 4
 SAME except not a Norco. It went like this... OMG that frame color YES I want a Zeb over a 36 Price well within my budget Geometry and travel aligned with what I want THANK GOD I don't have to deal with a LBS to get it
  • 3 1
 theyre a cool bike, well done
  • 5 0
 @onawalk: Thanks! I actually pick it up tomorrow, beyond stoked
  • 4 2
 @TranceAllez: Sweet,
Enjoy that bike, looks like a real winner. Norcos been on a tear for quite some time, making world class bikes built to be ridden.

The HP Aurum, Optic, Sight (tip of hat to the Transition Sentinel) , Range, Shore, and now Fluid. Winners
  • 2 2
 @mca896: Cool,
Zeb over 36, just curious why?

You dont like LBS's?
  • 1 0
 @TranceAllez: My Fluid was love at first pedal stroke. I hope you can get a massive ride in this weekend!
  • 22 1
 As above, all of these things. However, recent experiences with an SB130 have put reliability and serviceability at the top of my list. The wet season in NorCal (I know not joking) DESTROYED my bearings and SI unit. In my personal opinion, I think the SI design (with regards to durability) is flawed as it places a sensitive suspension component right in the firing line of a ton of debris. I tried to stay on top of cleaning lubing etc of the unit but just got sick and tired of removing both wheels, undoing the main pivot, cleaning the unit entirely, then reassembling. Call me soft but even at its fastest an SI unit clean took me 15 minutes, which is way too long to spend after each ride. Not to mention the three sets of bearings I blew through in 18 months. Yetis ride nice, but just not for me
  • 2 1
 What about a piece of clear heli tape over the window with a slot cut in it to allow the main pivot to go up and down. Wouldnt be a permanent solution, but would help keep most of the debris off the slider, and youd be able to tell through the clear tape whether or not it was getting a bit dirty in there. Just a thought from a horst link rider whos has little to no premature bearing issues...
  • 3 0
 @onawalk: hmm, really good solution, I didn’t think of that. I did try to install some sort of fender much like the forbidden bikes but wasn’t able to get it to not rub.

I see your solution was swapping to a Horst link, which was coincidentally my solution as well (SJ evo)
  • 3 6
 @fpecan: ah, you prefer blown shocks to worn SI's
brave choice good sir!

Ive tried almost every sus design out there, and seem to fit well with Transitions, Norcos (Horst link) and Konas (Faux bars)
I just dont seem to get along with most dual link bikes (Santa Cruz, Ibis, Pivot) but can get sorted on Giants maestro
  • 2 0
 @onawalk: Haha, I’m just hoping my 135lb rider weight is light enough to prevent a blown shock, we shall see. I also hope the new Float X is better at handling side loads.
  • 1 3
 @fpecan: Godspeed my friend!

A buddy is on a SJ Evo, loves it,
over forked to 170mm, running a X2, he couldnt be happier on it.
Hes a ripper, but smooth like butter
  • 3 1
 That is why I won't consider Yeti bikes! If they got rid of that unit I would be very interested in their bikes... It's too many moving parts and too many opportunities for problems like you had.
  • 2 0
 @mybaben: same here. One long term tester in the UK warrantied the SI unit three times in a year when he had one. For dry conditions only.
  • 1 0
 @BarneyStinson: Agreed. I live in the PNW in the US and we are def NOT dry weather...
  • 1 0
 @fpecan: I can't speak to the Float X, but I have blown up and rebuilt the original Topaz multiple times on the SJ Evo. An RS Super Deluxe has been just fine, though.
  • 30 9
 No motor.
  • 8 4
 What about seeking out companies that don't make mopeds? Far and few between these days, but may go that route on future purchases. Yeah, will probably end up on an steel custom made in a shed or something.
  • 4 0
 @JDFF: Revel, REEB, Guerilla gravity, We Are One.
  • 1 1
 @garrisond5: Pretty sure Reeb has made a few eBikes, GG has said they want to make eBikes but don't have the resources to make them happen. I guarantee Revel is working on one. WeAreOne is in the same boat as GG, big aspirations, no $$ for manufacturing at scale, I'd bet they have an eBike on the roadmap.
  • 1 0
 @GTscoob: Remember when we all thought Transition was gonna hold out. Now they have two
  • 18 0
 Could add a 'things that will make me not buy your brand':

- Proprietary crap
- press fit BBs
- cables routed through headsets.
  • 14 0
 Bought new by someone who paid top dollar during covid, rode it twice and is selling for a fraction of the MSRP. That is my jam.
  • 10 0
 This last bike I finally decided to buy a bike that fit the places I ride 90% of the time. In the past I always bought a bike that would fit the 10% I rode, which generally meant lots of travel. Turns out short(ish) travel is fun travel
  • 11 1
 turns out bikes are fun!
  • 3 0
 @grnmachine02

Me too, I was very fortunate that I could buy the newer version of my old bike, with less travel and for about the same money that I spent five years ago. It’s been a win all around for me.
  • 10 0
 Weird poll. As others have said, it’s kind of naturally, instinctively, automatically it’s a matrix of all these things and more.

Also, this quote from the lede: “ the question as to whether or not we’re seeing the bang for buck diminish is tough to answer.”

I mean, is it really tough to answer? Doesn’t seem that way to me.
  • 5 0
 My current $6300 SJ evo (now $4700!!) is far, far better than my ibis mojo HD from 12 years ago that was more expensive in inflation adjusted dollars.

If that's not bang for the buck, I don't know what is...
  • 3 0
 It definitely is difficult to answer because of how much the industry has changed, how many extra components and the quality of components expected on an acceptable build has changed, cost of shipping and supply chain has changed, and the US dollar has inflated 73% since the year 2000. Just because the numbers are bigger does not tell the whole story
  • 14 0
 All those things
  • 1 0
 Yes, all things count. Can't say which one is more important, but in the end, price is the limiting factor.
Also add:
PB (or other) reviews & comments
Water bottle in front triangle
Frame Storage
  • 8 0
 I recently bought two Orbea Oiz H30 for my wife and I, and chose them over all other XC bikes for the following reasons:

1) Price - a lot of bike for less than $2500
2) Availability - they had them in stock at our LBS to try and fit, an XL for me and an M for my wife
3) Race proven geometry
4) Appreciate the craftsmanship of the aluminum frames that are still made in Spain
5) Familiarity of the Shimano components
  • 8 0
 Plus if you wreck something you got spares from another bike
  • 8 0
 There are some factors like "overall weight" that I don't generally think about much, but would consider if they passed a certain threshold. Same with "Brand Image/Ethos". I generally don't think much about it, but a company could f*ck it up so badly that I'd put it down as a negative.
  • 6 1
 five digit bike prices are commonplace? maybe on the sales floor but far be it from me to recognize a $10k bike on the trail. even Yeti's in the shop are running $8-9k.

the only way my bike price has five digits is if you tack on a leading zero.
  • 9 1
 How it rides. Top of the list.
  • 1 0
 Nailed it. If I don’t like how I rides during the demo (remember those from a couple years ago), who gives a shit about anything on the list.
  • 1 0
 IF you can actually find one to ride. The ability to demo a bike is key...ideally on familiar trails. After purchasing a great bike without a demo (Transition Sentinel) that I just couldn’t fully enjoy (probably just because I’m awkwardly between sizes), I learned the hard lesson not to ever again spend $5k+ on a bike I haven’t ridden.
  • 9 1
 Value
  • 3 1
 And ride feel. Both somewhat subjective. I don’t care (or know enough) about geometry to pretend I can look at those numbers and make a decision. But riding the bike even in the parking lot is worth a thousand numbers.
  • 11 6
 Pinkbike is publishing a lot of these "polls" lately. Gathering data for an Outside/PB online mega store?

Trailforks all over again...
  • 13 1
 They are gathering info for their rage bait articles.
  • 24 4
 @Stuartkbmx, we've been running a weekly poll on Fridays for the last, oh, 8 years or so. It's nothing new.
  • 18 2
 @mikekazimer: the long con.
  • 11 1
 hahaha absolutely. If anyone thinks pinkbike ISN'T doing this for the benefit of advertisers or some other capitalistic venture, they're nuts.
  • 1 0
 @RonSauce: Henry's next article fir sure.
  • 1 0
 @stuartkbmx you can probably relax. Unless Pinkbike has good info on the characteristics of the choort of mountain bikers that replies to their pools (they might!), asking an anonymous audience questions on the web is not the way you get data of much significance.

Still, it is annoying to see so many industry press releases, buying guides, and questions about purchasing stuff. It does not seem the way journalism should work.
  • 2 1
 @soulsurfer9:
which is imo completely fine, because that way we can show em to go fk themselves with their moronic e-bikes.
  • 5 0
 How easy it is to service yourself. No headset cable routing. Rear brake line outside the frame. Other internal cable routing done well.
  • 3 0
 The "component specifications" is a funny one, for someone who doesn't buy complete bikes but just replaces what needs replacing (including the frame). Buying a complete bike seems like a bitch. You have to start all over again to make everything work the way you want it to. Brands also seem to have this funny tradition of building complete bikes except for the pedals. To give the customer some choice. As if that is the only thing people are picky about. Watch the PB comment section rant about tires, seatposts, saddles, grips...
  • 4 0
 In my opinion all shifting gx and up, or deore or up work just fine. Suspension a fox 34 or Suntour Aion work fine, I'm sure a Pike would as well. My point being, unless you are really picky, or there are major oversights in the spec, a lot of stuff is just good enough. Personally I couldn't be bothered to built a complete, bought an ibis Riley af with 12 speed deore and fox suspension. A handle bar, some grips and a saddle are all that needed changing.
  • 3 1
 @Ido83: Brakes
  • 2 0
 @adamdigby: deore brakes are fine, there is literally nothing wrong with them.
  • 1 0
 @RonSauce: other than the metal flakes that always seem to end up in the hydraulic fluid when you bleed them...
  • 1 0
 @Ido83: YEP! All this stuff will work for 90% of riders but somehow we need to have the highest spec everything. I just bought a used rift zone 3 a year old for half price and man it seems like a deal considering.....but what do I know?
  • 1 0
 @Supergirl56: Yes indeed. The M615s on what is now my spare bike are ten years old and still stopping fine. But every time I bleed them the fluid has turned black. What's up with that? I find it hard to rhyme the persistence of this with no loss of function.
  • 1 0
 @vinay , the OEM advantage often makes buying a whole bike and selling the parts you don't want a better deal than building up a frame from scratch.
The thing about the pedals is probably that a bike with spd is very hard to ride on flats and vice versa. A bar with a few degrees less than ideal upsweep is still fine for a car park test ride.
I've always thought the 'a la carte' options that brands like Propain or Rose offer was a great idea. OEM pricing, near-custom choices. I wonder why that never caught on with bigger brands like Trek, Giant or Specialized. The bigger your brand, the easier it is to stock many different options that will average out in demand.
  • 1 0
 @Ido83: Yeah, the thing is, a lot of stuff works fine already. Including your current bike. If you're in the market for a new bike, apparently you have very specific demands that aren't met by your current bike. But you were riding your current bike for a reason too. It can't be that you weren't happy by your entire bike, were you?

@ak-77 : As this didn't seem to be an article targeted at beginners in particular, I expected it to be aimed at people who have a bike already. I've often calculated through some scenarios where I'd either got the complete bike or got just the frame, put my current parts on it and bought some new stuff I would wanted to upgrade or because my current parts wouldn't be compatible. Almost always it was cheaper to just get the frame or rolling chassis. And in case of Cotic of course, you can just leave everything behind that you don't want but I haven't discussed such an option with Cy how that would work out for me.
  • 1 0
 Agreed from someone who operates very similarly. Replace parts and frames as I go and sell what I don't like. New standards can be a pain, but learning how to build my own wheels helped out there a lot. Sometimes I think a part is going to work great for me and it doesn't perform as well as I'd hoped. I'm happy to replace that part or frame with something else. I enjoy the tinkering aspect of it all anyway, so it adds another layer of fun on top of my already fun hobby or riding. Avoiding weird standards makes this a lot easier.
  • 1 0
 @vinay: How that equation works out is different for everyone. Some people sell their complete old bike second hand (before or after swapping out components with the new bike). Last time I bought a new bike I decided to keep the old one (a hardtail) for muddy days and as a spare for those cases when you are waiting for a replacement of a broken part.
  • 3 0
 How about value? Most of these bikes are not that different in performance but there is a lot of variety in the components. Questions like the quality of the components and whether are they the right fit for the bike's intended purpose. To, often these questions are not thought about until the bike is purchased. Pink Bike classifieds section being full of take-offs proves this.
  • 3 0
 Geo is king, together with the linkage they are the most important factors regarding the actual feel and performance of the bike out on the trails. I would take good geo and linkage with mid suspension and low end groupset over bad geo with a mediocre linkage and TOTL suspension and groupset any day of the week. Ofc the price and support also affects my buying decision, but it's a way lower priority than geo. Funnily enough then my last 3 bikes have been DTC brands and have gotten much better support from 2 of them than I have ever gotten from a LBS.
  • 3 0
 Can choose more than one? There are likely multiple factors, boxes that need checked for most mtn bikers, at least those whom have been riding a bit. I know I could check several boxes as being equally important.
  • 7 1
 You don’t know that you can check more than one? Boxes are check all that apply. Round radio buttons are choose one.

Are you new to the internet?
  • 5 1
 did you try clicking on more than one box?
asking for ma friend
  • 1 2
 @BrambleLee: I don't participate in the polls, and read the article quickly, not seeing anything about clicking all that apply. But please, feel free to think you are superior internet hero.
  • 2 0
 @BrambleLee: wow....I legitamately never new that and I am def not knew to the WWW
  • 7 2
 Pinkbike Data Collection: Please give us your data so we can sell it and profit off you.
  • 23 4
 Ha, except that the results are all public. Who would pay for that?
  • 5 0
 How else are Mike and Mike going to afford doughnuts? Timmy's aren't free my friend.
  • 5 0
 Are you reading this for free and for your personal profit (whatever that may be, entertainment probably)?
  • 5 1
 Holy shit are you suggesting that polls are a form of data collection? Big if true.
  • 3 1
 Oh man. All these brands are gonna be so bummed when they find out @deeznutz69ryder’s mom actually buys his bike from Sears and this data is meaningless.
  • 1 0
 I just did the pole and wrote the numbers down on the back of an old Outside magazine. Now I am off to Trek and Specialized to start a bidding war for MY data. I should have a luxury yacht by noon! Really people. Think about it.
  • 2 0
 Availability has to be in there. I have fallen victim to purchasing the wrong bike because it was all I could get...though in the end, being forced towards a shorter travel bike than I was after taught me a lot about how/what I actually liked to ride.
  • 6 0
 I do what the voices tell me
  • 5 0
 How about if it’s even available?
  • 5 2
 Do I need it? Or Do I just want it? Espcially JP just crash the market yesterday and the impending doom of multiple countries coming....yeah... I'll pass buying this year.
  • 1 0
 I'd rather have zero dollars and a sick bike than just zero dollars.
  • 6 1
 No pressfit bottom brackets. It’s 2023 for gods sake!
  • 4 0
 No option for 2nd hand and happily take your expensive bike from 3 years ago off your hands for pennies.
  • 3 0
 Keep in mind that the results are from Pinkbike users, a more involved and informed subset of all riders. The poll is useful but biased.
  • 1 0
 Yes, we are pretty sofisticated when it comes to our bike knowledge and preferences. It's about time someone noticed. (I wanted to use the word "palette" in here to make it sound fancier, but I couldn't figure out how.)
  • 5 2
 Hey PinkBike, I’d suggest adding one.

# support the brand/shop my family/friends work for.

The value goes both ways because it’s often possible to get a better deal.
  • 5 0
 You seem to have left out 'Getting it past the wife'...
  • 5 0
 Just make sure it's the same colour as your old one, then you're all good.
  • 2 0
 I never thought geo meant that much, and laughed at bike nerds who looked up every spec, until I bought the wrong bike.. That was an expensive mistake. Geometry and warranty is the biggest thing for me.
  • 1 0
 The frame should be the number one thing that decides a new bike. You cant change your frame's geo, material, size, or features, which are all things I learned the hard way. The first mountain bike I ever bought I sold because the 27.2 Seatpost diameter meant I couldn't fit a long dropper, my second bike I sold because the quick-release axles meant i couldn't easily upgrade my wheels, and now my current bike I'm looking to sell, because it's a bit too small for me
  • 3 0
 Looks - if I don't like the look, the rest doesn't matter. Travel - no need for a 170 bike where I live. Frame material - better match up with the price.
  • 2 0
 Where's the poll option/answer referring to testing a bike I can afford and finding it's a sufficiently big step up in enjoyment from my current bike to let me rationalize the purchase?
  • 4 1
 It has to look a lot like my old bike. My wife believes I've been riding the same bike for 15 years now. Let's keep it that way.
  • 1 0
 Little details that make a bike easier to live with. Specialized has this dialed. Good cable entry and exit into the frame (if internal), solid chainstay slap protection, SWAT, meaningfully adjustable geo with good setup guides, threaded BBs, easy to service suspension bearings, nice quality hardware and axles, etc. all add up to make the ownership experience really nice. Even if I eventually kill a shock on it, all of the other features of my SJ evo make it a great bike and so easy to just get out and ride.
  • 3 0
 Must have Frame-only option. I never bought a complete bike. And so, my main components must fit the new frame (wheels, fork, drive train)
  • 2 0
 Amen
  • 1 0
 Answer: the bike I like the most that costs the least and uses common standards from axle-to-axle. Everything after that is just a bonus.

Aesthetic goes a long way… if you hate the way a bike looks, you won’t be stoked to ride it no matter how good it actually is.
  • 1 0
 There's not a real singular quality that makes the decision. I want carbon, I want high level components that I don't need to upgrade (gx or better, rsc brakes, performance or select+ suspension, etc), I want a bike that looks good, I want a proven design from a reputable company, in some cases it needs to be under a certain weight threshold... I guess all of this is to say that if I'm continuing to drive cars from the 90s so I can afford to ride new bikes, there's a lot more at stake than any singular facet. Which is why I've been riding xo build Transitions for the last 4 years and counting
  • 1 0
 I know press fit gets a lot of hate on here but my Canyon Spectral 2019 (650b) has a press fit BB and I’ve replaced it once in 3 years with no creaking or drama I’ve actually been amazed at how well it has lasted with zero maintenance. The headset on the other hand I may as well have a F1 pit team ready to replace it they go that often
  • 1 0
 There should be a 'cable routing' option in the poll as well.
For me there's a lot of factors - price/quality, suspension design, geometry, sizing, wheel size, weight is a big factor as well - no, I am not buying a 15.5kg trail bike. You can tell me it's "just 2 seconds slower on a 10min climb", but when I go for a ride I don't go for a 10min climb and come back home. I do 40/50/60 or more miles, and weight is a huge factor there. $10,000 carbon fiber trail bike that weights over ~13.5kgs is ridiculous.

Same with the cable routing. I ride my bikes and I service them. I won't buy a bike with headset cable routing. Period.
  • 4 0
 Must have 1 previous dentist owner!!!
  • 2 0
 Looks/Frame design is important. I hate seeing cables everywhere and loud bikes. Cable clamps and good rubber for chain slap. No Ibis noodle top tube…
  • 3 0
 Found myself checking everything but weight... Then checked weight for the sake of it
  • 4 0
 Long dropper post fitting, low standover.
  • 5 1
 Factor NOT influencing buying decisions: "Influencers"
  • 4 0
 Does the company engage in frivolous lawsuits to protect “trademarks”?
  • 3 0
 I broke a 7 year old out of warranty Yeti. They gave me 20% off a new one. Brand loyalty option?
  • 1 0
 Broke my YT 2015 rear triangle. All they said was that the rear triangle is nolonger available. I'll get it repaired, but I'm not buying another YT. I didn't expect anything. But something other than, "Sucks for you" would have been nice. I'll check out the Yetis.
  • 1 1
 I normally would buy with geometry, suspension design, and price at about an equal level. Recently I turned 50 and instead of buying a Corvette I wanted a nice bike so I mostly threw out price (or considered it less, I guess). I think there's a decent chance that this is last bike I'll purchase.
  • 2 2
 Wow! An industry pool! I wonder how much the industry pays to do this. One wonder what this has to do with mountain biking.

But just to help out, what would motivate to buy buy buy? Cheaper costs than the current exorbitant ones.
  • 1 0
 Is that a Pro Flex in the picture of the bike shop hung up high on the wall at the back? I still have mine, no longer use it but back in the day that was an enduro bike of its time and cost £1,200!
  • 1 0
 Looks like it, with a Girvin fork too.
  • 3 0
 If it doesn't come from Squatch (pictured) probably not buying it.
  • 1 0
 So you are a dentist?
  • 2 0
 I also factor in the help / advice & attitude I get from the shop / employee I choose to go to to purchase my new bike.
  • 4 1
 Why is cost missing. Are you and the industry scared of hearing the truth?
  • 3 0
 Price is the very first choice.
  • 3 0
 Brand image/ethos option = Yeti and Santa Cruz fanbois?
  • 2 0
 Of course people who get to ride all the snazziest bikes for free would forget to include "value" as one of the criteria.
  • 3 0
 Really y’all? Price doesn’t matter? Dentists
  • 3 0
 1/ Price
2/ Aesthetics
3/ Suspension
4/ Frame Material
  • 1 0
 The state of the industry and economy. If you can, wait until this fall as the deals will be plentiful. Already seeing that around town.
  • 1 0
 Bikes might come down, but essentials like food, gas, and utilities may do the opposite. If things get real bad, I won't regret the bikes I bought as I'll be more mobile than some.
  • 1 0
 I usually purchase based on reviews and livery ( yes, seriously. I am not going to ride something ugly) Surprised "Positive reviews" wasn't an option.
  • 1 1
 When are people going to work out, with tech and scale of production in 2023, bikes should actually be getting cheaper, its debasement of currency that is happening ..... look into it
  • 1 0
 Everyone should check weight and price since they are so desperately trying to convince us to spend more money for less. Luckily we passed peak stupidness.
  • 1 0
 Where the weight is matters more than total weight.
  • 1 0
 I like how the question is "What Factor Influences Your Bike Purchasing Decisions the Most?" but you can tick as many boxes as you like....
  • 3 0
 No option for "How it rides"? Quite telling, Pinkbike.
  • 2 0
 We Russians have our special hidden option in the poll, called SANCTIONS. And no, that doesn't seem to stop the war.
  • 1 0
 Can we maybe just decide that conflict with a dual slalom mtb race between Putin and Zelensky? Would make so much more sense than throwing bullets and bombs at each other.
  • 4 1
 All of these things?
  • 3 0
 All the things listed.
  • 2 0
 whoever is sponsoring SteveOOOsuperfan at the time of purchase
  • 1 0
 ewwwwwww.... YT???
  • 1 0
 who is SteveOOOsuperfan?
  • 2 0
 The Pinkbike peanut gallery of course!
  • 2 0
 Availability on the used market, i.e. BuySell
  • 2 0
 Pinkbike comments: I check there first for most things.
  • 4 2
 What my local bike shop recommends.
  • 2 0
 Amount of headset cable routing
  • 2 0
 Orbea cause worker cooperative
  • 2 0
 Could you please elaborate on this?
  • 1 1
 everyone hold on to their cash, the economy is crashing and so are all bike companies discounting 2023 models on their websites
  • 2 0
 I checked marked all the factors. Lol.
  • 1 0
 9 of 13 And I'd say wheel size is covered by resale value, that's why we ride 29ers
  • 3 4
 the ONE thing for sure is NOT taking any of the BS this pinkbike editors have to say. theyll have you buying some steal welded frame with an idler some euro guy is welding inn the car park.
  • 2 0
 They need a frame only option too.
  • 3 1
 Price, price and then price. After that, I would say price!
  • 2 0
 water bottle cage has left the chat
  • 1 0
 Needs a "I select a bike based on PinkBike comments" option - would win hands down
  • 2 0
 If you didn't choose price, you f'd us...
  • 2 0
 Orange fork deal breaker...
  • 1 0
 In summary PB readers want that sweet geo and they don't care how much is cost!
  • 2 0
 Easy, not listening to anything pinkbike says about every bike.
  • 1 1
 If people on here answered honestly, brand image/ethos would've had the most votes. A majority of mountain bikers care about how they look over anything else.
  • 1 0
 Geometry, as the top influence! Think quite. Few folks need to be more honest when filling out these surveys
  • 1 0
 Need a separate poll on why what factors would keep us from NOT buying a bike. Then PLEASE give it to all manufacturers!
  • 1 0
 I buy whatever levy hates the most. I literally bought my last bike for the climb switchz and flips chips
  • 1 0
 When you're 6'6" there aren't very many options so geometry is really the only dealbreaker.
  • 1 0
 N. All of the above. But in reality, how much fun it is to ride is the biggest factor for me.
  • 1 0
 How mucgh money I get it for, also your face
  • 2 0
 Everything and more
  • 1 0
 Price and availability are also pretty big factors for me...
  • 1 0
 yeah I checked every single one. also looks, to a small extent
  • 1 0
 Hello? No option to vote for colour?? I'm out...
  • 2 0
 Ummmm, a good bike?
  • 1 0
 Youtubers that are average riders, definitely.
  • 3 2
 Why is "Sam Hill rides one" not an option?
  • 1 0
 How much horsepower does it have, how fast does it go m8?
  • 3 2
 Must have big battery and big motor
  • 1 0
 “Mountain bikes are complex, human-powered machines.”
  • 1 0
 “What organ can I sell this year?”
  • 1 0
 Price and build kit for me
  • 1 1
 Actually weight is big.......... but geometry is cool............Bro Biker Sales Snobs....... Not
  • 1 0
 Sometimes check for dents
  • 1 0
 My 2012 Scott wasn’t so Genius with a pull shock.
  • 1 0
 Availability in my size has been the biggest issue for the last few years.
  • 1 0
 are we still asking this question
  • 1 0
 I try make sure that parts from my old bike will fit
  • 2 0
 Drugs & Alcohol
  • 1 0
 Where's the Pinkbike reviews/field test option?
  • 2 0
 C. All of the above.
  • 1 1
 For me? Watts up is all that counts. Give me the watts baby...I want to go fast.
  • 1 0
 Easy servicing (simple suspension design, câble routine,..) !
  • 1 0
 Availability is the top right now.
  • 1 0
 If I can get mates rates.
  • 1 0
 If you asked my kids they would say color. Smile
  • 1 0
 ALL of the above, it is ALL important
  • 1 0
 If its shiny and new, I want it. If its ridiculous, even better.
  • 1 0
 Reputable brand with lifetime warranty, alu and badass geometry
  • 3 3
 None of the above. The size of the battery and motor manufacturer.
  • 1 0
 PRICE!!!!!
  • 1 0
 29 is dead
  • 1 0
 My LBS is first
  • 1 0
 Speed and Power
  • 3 5
 This is stupid. It all matters to some extent.







Copyright © 2000 - 2023. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.047137
Mobile Version of Website