There's no longer any need to zoom in on blurry spy shot photos taken with a
potato – the new Norco Range has officially launched. 2022 seems to be the year of high pivot enduro bikes, and the Range slots solidly into that category with 29” wheels, 170mm of travel, and a carbon frame. It's dual crown compatible with up to a 180mm fork, good news for anyone hoping to build up a bike park smasher.
On the topic of dual crown forks, the
DH bike that Norco's World Cup DH racers are currently riding is a prototype, one that uses the Range's carbon frame components combined with a different shock link and dropouts to create a longer travel, fully downhill-oriented version of this bike. There's no word at the moment as to when that bike might be available for public consumption.
Norco Range Details • Wheelsize: 29"
• Travel: 170mm
• Carbon frame
• 63.25° head angle (size L)
• Chainstay length: 442.5mm (size L)
• Sizes: S-XL
• Price range: $5,599 - $8,999 Frame only: $3,799 USD.
•
norco.com Back to the Range. There are three complete models, the C1, C2, and C3, as well as a frame-only option. Prices start at $5,599 USD for the C3, and go up to $8,999 for the C1 version shown here. Highlights of the C1 model include a 170mm Fox 38 Factory fork, Fox Factory DHX2 coil shock, a SRAM X01 12-speed drivetrain, and a Maxxis Aggegai / Dissector tire combo, both with the thicker DoubleDown casing. It's great to see that the two lower priced models also get the same DHX2 coil shock and tires as that top of the line model.
How much does the Range weigh? Well, the size large C1 we have in for testing currently weighs 36.25 lb (16.4 kg), but that number isn't totally accurate – there was a wheel spec mixup, and DT Swiss' lightweight cross-country / trail rims ended up on a bike meant for plowing through everything. The wheelset that bikes will now be spec'd with has We Are One's Union rims laced to Onyx hubs. They're heavier, but much more appropriate for the bike's intentions. This bike will be included in an upcoming Field Test, and the final weight will be verified there.
Frame DetailsWith the Sight comfortably holding down the all-mountain fort, Norco's designers and engineers were able to concentrate their efforts on creating a bike that was focused on speed, a bike that could easily handle the roughest tracks on the EWS circuit.
The first step was creating an aluminum mule, which ended up being called the 'SPAM bike' due to the fact that its headtube shape looked just like a can of SPAM. That bike allowed for multiple geometry and kinematic adjustments, which made it possible for Norco's designers and test riders to experiment with different configurations until they found the one that best suited their needs.
Luckily, the frame that resulted from the clunky looking mule is a whole lot better looking, with a fast, futuristic appearance. The shock sits low in the frame, and passes through a tunnel in the seat tube to connect to the aluminum link that drives it. That shock placement also leaves room for a full size water bottle inside the front triangle.
The chain is protected by an upper guide at the idler pulley, and a lower guide from MRP adds another layer of security. Rubber chainslap protection is in place at the top of the seatstay, the underside of the chainstays, and along the downtube. There's also a plastic skid plate that helps keep the lower link from being damaged by rock or root strikes.
GeometryNorco took their Ride Aligned philosophy to the next level with the Range, tweaking the numbers on every size in an attempt to deliver a similar experience no matter a rider's height. Changing chainstay length depending on frame size has become increasingly common, a trend that Norco helped start, but in this case the Range's head angle and seat tube angle are different depending on the size.
The head angle sits at 63.25-degrees on a size large, and changes by .25-degrees for each size, getting slacker for the XL size, and slightly steeper for the medium and small sizes. This alteration, in conjunction with the different chainstay lengths, allowed Norco to achieve the wheelbase numbers they were aiming for.
The swingarm does technically have replaceable dropouts, but the bike's geometry numbers are intended to remain as they are out of the box. Since each frame size has a custom tune and leverage curve, as well as different shock links, Norco doesn't want riders swapping frame parts around.
Suspension DesignNorco aren't strangers to high pivot suspension designs, but they went with a little different layout for this bike. Where the Aurum used a high single pivot layout, this bike has a high virtual pivot design. It's essentially what would happen if you took a Horst Link configuration and flipped it upside down, with the shock driven from below, rather than above, and the main pivot high on the seat tube. When the rear wheel hits an obstacle it initially travels rearwards, pulling on the L-shaped lower link that rotates around the bottom bracket and drives the shock. The new configuration allowed Norco to reduce the amount of anti-rise compared to the Aurum, in order to allow the suspension to remain more active under braking.
The bike was designed to work best with a coil shock, specifically a Fox Float DXH2 or RockShox SuperDeluxe Coil. Those are the two currently recommended models – it's possible that other options, specifically ones with large air cans, won't fit due to the dimensions of the shock tunnel.
ModelsRange C1 / $8,999 USDRange C2 / $6,999 USD Range C3 / $5,599 USD
Initial ImpressionsAs you can see in the video, my first handful of rides on the Range have left me extremely impressed. Yes, the sun has been shining and the dirt has been perfect, which can help make an initial ride feel extra-good, but so far my second, third and fourth rides on this speed demon have all been just as eye-opening. It's the effortless speed the Range delivers that's especially noteworthy - I'd be hard pressed to name a bike that I've been on recently that handles itself as well in rough terrain.
The Range absolutely erases bumps, and yet it's still easy to tell what the wheels are doing - there isn't any vagueness at all. Somehow the geometry numbers blend together to create a bike that doesn't feel too big or unwieldy (as long as gravity is on your side), which makes it easy to keep the pace high. That slack head angle pays dividends in the steeps by making it easier to stay centered and in control of the bike, rather than needing to fight to stay behind the front wheel.
Granted, it's not the lightest bike, and climbing is more of a sit-and-spin affair, but in this case the Range's downhill performance is at such a high level that I'm a little more willing to overlook that extra heft.
We're going to be doing more testing on the Range soon as part of an upcoming Field Test, where it will go head-to-head against other contenders in this category – stay tuned for those videos and reviews later this summer.
I’ll see myself out.
(you can probably guess the era of my last Norco bike...)
That said, I bet they sell every one they make post haste
Would be great if they offered a frameset though,
ffs..what a joke.. what greedy mofos!, f them.. Norco just became a brand I'll never ever effin consider!, 10k for a medium-high component build.. what a joke!, it could be the next best thing since tap water and I would still not consider it. No one should... what greedy basterds!
and you, whatever you pinkbikere here... if you look at this 10k Euro build and say that is alright.. you are either taking the piss on everyone else or 10K for you represent spare change. I would never... never pay 10K for some basic RSCs, a one up and some X01. What a piss they take on their clients. "Good work Norco, good work!"
Not sure why your getting down voted so heavily, your speaking the absolute truth about this brand. The only bikes over 5k my shop sells are the ones that the handful of shop riders buy. They haven’t sold a high end norco to a regular consumer ever…
On the other hand Norco wholesalers have no bikes to offer so it’s all irrelevant anyways.
As far as Norco goes, yeah historically they have had more conservative/traditional designs but in case you haven't noticed, they've killed it the past few years with each bike release (who won the 2019 bike of the year again?) with geometry/bike designs on the cutting edge of the sport. I've test driven a bunch of bikes over the past few years and I can comfortably say that I preferred Norco's to Pivots, Evils and a lot of the other brands.
At the end of the day the "boutique" brands really aren't doing much different from the rest of the brands, its all in the marketing. But yeah Norco's R&D team is really ahead of the curve, read any article about them and you'll see how involved the engineers are in the tuning and set up.
The ride aligned program is pretty unique, how many of your 'boutique' bike brands give you set up tips like # of spacers under you stem, handlebar width, tire pressures and clicks of LSC/HSC/LSR/HSR based on your height, weight and skill set?
As it is, Norco knows that they have made a pretty good bike and decided to cash it out. The nice move would have been to increase the costs with exactly their own cost increase; then, I would have aplaud it and buy the damn bike..probably giving up my Giga order. But, ffs, it is as, or even more, expensive as a Spez enduro S-Works.. and this is no S-Works. When your lvl is Vitus.. you cannot ask more money than Cannondale...so, come on.. we're really not that dumb.. I hope.
Cheers!
(p.s. I do not own a Cannondale)
and your info are not correct. the current shipping rates are 6 times higher, not 4; I have explained above, I work mostly with asian based factories so, believe me when I say, I do know the situation.. closely.
There is no real reason to bump a price of a bike with 3k, other than because you think you can and will get away with it. No raw material cost, no labour cost, no shipping cost, no nothing will ad into the amount of 3k.
Then reviews the Cannondale Highish pivot: yeah pretty good
Then the Dreadnaught High Pivot : yeah pretty good
Then reviews the Norco High Pivot: man, haven’t ever ridden a high pivot; this is incredible!!!!
Which company pays highest sponsorship to Pinkbike?
pretty sure the cost is largely in part to do with the build, which includes the best of the best in every aspect without going AXS.
Any carbon bike, with carbon wheels, top of the line suspension and drivetrain is going to be expensive. The only companies that can beat this pricing are the ones that dont sell exclusively in bike shops, or brands that are specing NX cassettes on their XO builds that have Formula hubs laced to e13 rims.
also, im pretty impressed with the top tier build. Onyx hubs on We Are One Rims, one up dropper, deity bars.. its well thought out.
as for the build..yes, it is a decent one but, not a 10k one...so, not a high end spec.
again, I would no pay 10k for an S-works(which has a better build); I would never pay 10k for a Norco.. I think no one should.
and ffs, if the Giga is good and well for some of the fastest men and women on the planet, for sure it will be enough for an almost middle-aged, fat-ish slow guy like me.
but... note that no Optic is 10k Euro.
As for the 10K , not sure what you state here, this top Range will be in shops at around 8K in EU shops, but regardless, a 6K or a 5K for the C2 or C3 will appear shortly which is a heck of a deal to be honest for what the bike can push
I ride a bike with 460 chainstays and it’s incredible! I meant what I said with it could use slightly longer chainstays on the bigger sizes for a bit better ride. Just my opinion though! But I dig the direction everyone is heading
This bike has been the worst kept secret of the last year, but I'm excited to see how it would ride. Full 29 with a high pivot and 170mm travel will be an absolute monster on the descents.
How much?
What size?
What model
Thank you!
Appreciate it,
On it
Otherwise, another run should be here in less than a month (fingers crossed!) and some more towards the end of the summer. As you know ETA's are hard to guarantee so we cannot promise exact dates but we hustling them out to shops as soon as they land.
Many thanks to @j-t-g for where to find one!
LETS GOOOOOO!!
Why not in Australia? Seems pretty unfair?
Hey Norco, why no dealers om Scandinavia? Such a pity? I know myself and others have reached out about this before but no response.
Beautiful bike btw!
Very good.
Locally I found an XL (sold) and was told a Large would be coming shortly, but medium is the ticket.
Well, an Alloy Range, and an alloy Optic would really be the ticket. The $1000-$1500 price difference for carbon is hard for me, and my reckless nature to wrap my head around
We can all agree dropping Evans is a good thing, but no word on a new disti?
I love Indy Cycles! Great bunch of guys in there.
Also, why should an Enduro bike need to have a bigger wheelbase & reach than modern DH racing bikes that are built for the ultimate in gnar? If its proven to be effective, why don't DH bikes go this long? Even Commencals winning Supreme in XL isn't pushing a 1300mm wheelbase but this bike is 1329mm with a steeper HTA lol. Heck even the newer XL Summum is only 1320 with a steeper HTA too (tho adjustable). Its interesting.
My Bike has also a Smashpot so its another 600g+ , bigger discs 223x2,25 so how the frek did both , cannondale and Norco made them so heavy?
Dh bikes got super light for a while a couple years back (I think people were getting sessions to 28.5 or so pounds) but they realized light dh bikes get deflected a lot and kinda suck plus you’re either spending stupid money or sacrificing durability for the weight which really isn’t necessary on a dh bike and kinda a bad idea.
An alloy version wouldn’t be an issue to make but I bet it would have involved enough cnc or custom forgings that it would have made it uneconomical. I bet the engineers are working on that problem right now and in a year or so we will see an al version.
It doesn't look like we're getting an alu version of the Enduro, and Nukeproof have confirmed the Giga is carbon only.
Not a good trend for the discerning but budget-conscious enduro warrior.
I am doing enough with that bike and it's 16,4kg but its certainly cheaper and still got bling on it...
And no, even if you swap drivetrains and manage to put a dropper on it, the Gambler won't climb that well because of STA. Not sure how things like anti squat compare between the two.
Also AFAIK you've picked one of the lightest DH bikes on the market, more an exception than the rule
For your next geo chart, Norco: www.astro.yale.edu/astro120/SigFig.pdf
I have to ask though...I see all of these frames listed as DC compatible (Yeti sb165, this bike) but realistically what options are there for a 180mm DC? Boxxer, but I have heard it isn't so great in 180mm configuration.
Dorado? Not available anymore.
Ohlins, super expensive and hard to get.
Mrp bartlett. No real reviews or experience. I have heard quality is hit or miss. If anyone is using one, please chime in!
Any thoughts?
Hopefully there will be some options soon!
A belt driven system could render this obsolete. Besides that, it's adding complexity to the design.
Check back in 2031 to see if this is correct.
I had a Druid, it lasted a month in my stable, no bike has come close to such a fast turnaround.
High pivots allow the rear wheel to have amore rearward axle path, so the rear wheel is moving away from the direction of travel, which means it's lagging behind the bike, so this is good for hitting obstacles as it allows the rear-end to better absorb that impact, but if you need immediate response when clambering over a rock or you want to pop off a lip, that back end will not support you the same as a bike that has a less rearward axle path.
Think about how it feels to walk and run in sand: sand is soft, comfortable for landing when jumping, but hard to get going, and less responsive once you are going.
A high pivot requires more effort initiating anything, be it climbing over a ledge or popping off a jump. The only way to overcome this loss of efficiency is too add speed. In essence, a high pivot is best suited to downhill, gravity parks, etc... and is lest suited for use as a trail bike where you are climbing and negotiating obstacles at lower speeds.
The other bummer about that rearward axle path is he bike gets longer as you progress through the travel, so if you start with a 440mm rear end you will finish with something upwards of 450-460mm; yes, that affects technical riding in a big way. It would be better if they started with a really short chainstay, something on the order of 420mm, but that wagon wheel complicates things.
I suspect it won't take until 2031 for this understanding to be more common, I'm thinking by 2022.
Thanks for the thoughtful evaluation.
between the lines.
So Chuck, there are many types of riding, to say that one bike is suitable/advantageous to all types of riding is silliness. If you aren't willing to admit this then you're either a shill or FOS.
Don't be a shill and don't be Chuck.
Not sure what else to say lmao. Mine pops just fine, thank you.
I've been eagerly waiting for this release for a year, and the bike looks great
Any chance for a future AL version for those of us with pockets that aren't as deep?
Basically just curious if the carbon only is a covid-supply chain thing (aka, just carbon first, for now), or if you're planning on doing an AL/Carbon lineup like you do with the Sight "eventually".
Thanks, and keep up the good work
I was wondering if that could be the case, but guess I was hoping otherwise because the first mule (apparently the SPAM bike) was AL.
Thanks for clarifying so quickly
Let me help you out. The actual answer options to this question are:
a) yes, there will be an alu version
b) no, there won't be an alu version
c) I'm not allowed to tell you and was told by the business to keep it open
I can't really blame you. I fully understand that if you say "yes" now you might lose some early carbon (higher margin) sales and if you say "no" you'll be accused of lying if you end up releasing alu after all. Getting the higher margin product out first while the new model is hot and the hype is high to get return on R&D is nothing new and is understandable.
Your reply carefully avoiding the words "yes" and "no" to answer a closed question is still funny though.
@ocnlogan If I was a betting man I would take norco's comment as "possibly later" and wait a bit. Don't take me too seriously though. Maybe they want material to be one of the differentiators between this and the Shore. But they are avoiding a firm "no" and they are saying "ideal material", not "the only material" so take it as you will.
The rear triangle sticks out lower than the BB and it honestly scares me. During slow speed rock rolls and climbing I imagine it would hit quite a lot especially on the sizes with the larger wheelbases.
I think the floodgates have opened and we’re gonna see many more companies coming out with new versions of their “enduro” bikes with high pivots pretty quick here.
Another site did mention smacking the link on a rock on a climb I believe. I could imagine tech climbs could be a bit awkward in certain scenarios, but that’s not the intent of this bike in general
At least in the Colorado scene, the top of the field is usually separated by those who have trained the most and have the best fitness- Who can sprint and who is pedaling with the seat up. Regardless of fitness this bike is going to slow your race times down just due to the weight. Unless your Enduro scene = Downhill racing. No one serious about racing is interested in this bike. Just my $0.02
The bike looks great but I just had once question. With regards to shock placement I’m wondering why you choose a trunnion mount at one end and a clevis style with extender arm at the other. The trunnion mount exists so those who are tight on space can save themselves an extra 25mm. Clearly if you are then adding this (and more) at the lower mount then this wasnt a problem you faced. So my question is why not go with a standard eyelet? A standard eyelet places less side loading on the shock, and makes it almost impossible to damage the body if bolts come loose. If the bolt on your trunnion shock comes loose you risk stripping the threads and effectively needing to replace the whole thing.
Just my 2 cents but if there’s is a good reason I would be curious to know.
The slight rearward path of the Kenevo sl (or enduro) has been eye opening for me. Really keen to try a HSP someday
Let me know when you get it figured out.
You're the only one who needs to "figure it out". I obviously know it's 11k CAD, but you don't seem to understand no one cares - which is what I was pointing out all along.
It's also 994,866.45 Yen so why don't you go with that if you want a big, scary number? Or 1,111,016.54 Icelandic Crowns. ONE MILLION sounds much better than 11k when complaining about price. You get it now?
There's a recurring theme of this kind of crying from Canadians and Australians and I think your main problem is that both your local currencies are called "dollar" so for some reason you assume your prices should be compared to USD though they have nothing to do with each other. You never see the Swedish whining about 76k bikes because they understand that's how currency exchange rates work. If your currency was called a Canadian Kwacha instead of "dollar" you would look at that 11k number and shrug. It's. A. Different. Currency.
Note I'm not saying it's not an expensive bike. But stating "$11k Norcos" without specifying you mean CAD is disingenuous and makes the impression it's in Spec ebikes territory, which it's not. CAD is not universally/internationally used to compare prices between products. USD/EUR/GBP are (mainly USD).
Yeah, you don't need to add any extra links, from a standard chain to fit any Norco HP bike.
I wonder if the pricing will be more reasonable… and a Canadian made metal version? That would be the winner right there
The bolt-on rear dropout design offered a unique opportunity to adapt the geometry of Range to be appropriate for downhill without the need to alter carbon frame components, (In fact, that’s why you can see the bottle mounts in all those highly-analyzed video stills after the DH proto debuted at Crankworx last summer!) so we designed linkarms specific to downhill that provided the wheel travel and leverage curves required for the demands of World Cup courses and the Norco Factory Team’s fastest riders.
The current Enduro has been tested by every major outlet and has been pretty much unanimously agreed upon thats its the fastest bike going down,.
Did this Norco take the crown from the mighty specialized Enduro?
New Patrol drops, sick! When can I get one with good parts on it? Oh damn not til fall...
New Bronson drops, sick! When can I get one with good parts on it? No one even knows...
I tried to get a new Nomad a year ago...still no availability.
I assume we are looking at the same stuff here, it's not even window shopping at this point, it's just windows.
Switch infinity: everything else junk
Wreckoning: nothing can be better
Megatower: bike will rule forever
Enduro: will never be outdone
Range: best bike EVA
What a crazy market to be involved in. Tough to push the envelope when everything is already so dialed.
I have a question about sizing which I hope you may address in the full review. At 6’1, Norco’s size chart puts me firmly into the XL range. However, the XL is a big bike - like, really big. How did you feel on the L? Do you think this would be okay for someone slightly taller? For reference, I am currently riding a 2021 Meta AM size Large, which has the same wheelbase as a large Range via a shorter reach but longer back end. XL Range is bigger than an L Meta in every aspect and I am struggling to get my ahead around these numbers. I mostly ride steep and rough natural trails with a mix of high speed sections and tight tech, with a trip to a bike park every few months.
I’d also love to hear more about if the lower linkage caused you any clearance issues (steep rock rolls, janky tech etc).
Thanks very much Mike! All the best, Pat
Cons: The idler hasn't broken yet.
www.vitalmtb.com/community/jawlor,779/setup,39177
Yea, but just change it up a little.
Can a particular pattern be better than average? Probably yes. But by an irrelevant percentage compared to differences in skill between different riders. Or even between different themselves who think more about improving their skills.
Brands try to differentiate themselves by building the most diverse suspension solutions, to better attract the attention of potential buyers. It has been happening for 20+ years, but in the end all the schemes work and what matters in the end is the rider.
So in conclusion even if a particular scheme was objectively a 1% more perfermorante, I personally, I will buy the bike that I will like even more to see.
If you like the design of bikes with chain idler, ok it is a legitimate personal taste and it is also legitimate that I find it ugly.
Ps. And another thing about the idler pulley, for me is an extra part of the bike to be maintained and that it can break, against my "take it simple" philosophy
For me aesthetically the ideal is the "trek like" scheme (trek, transitions, etc.).
Shock beds/canals over the BB.