Spot have added two new carbon-framed bikes to their lineup, the Mayhem 130 and the Mayhem 150. Both models use Spot's signature Living Link suspension design, which uses a titanium leaf spring on the lower of the two links, a design that's intended to create an extra-efficient pedaling bike. As you'd expect, the number in the model name indicates the amount of rear travel (in millimeters), with the 130 aimed at all-around trail riding, while the 150 is geared toward riders who plan on venturing into more technical terrain.
Compared to Spot's previous Living Link-equipped models, the suspension curve of the new bikes is said to offer improved small bump compliance and more end-stroke ramp up. There's also a geometry adjust feature that allows the head angle to be altered by .5-degrees, and the bottom bracket height to be changed by 8 or 9 millimeters with only one tool
Both bikes' claimed weights, if accurate, are quite light – a medium 130 frame weighs a claimed 6.4 lb, and a medium 150 frame weighs 7.4 lb, numbers that allow complete builds to come in around 27 and 30 pounds respectively. All Spot frames purchased after January 1, 2020 are covered by a lifetime warranty.
Mayhem 130● 140mm front travel, 130mm rear travel
● Frame material: carbon
● Available in 29 or 27.5+;
● Weights start at 27.2 lb (12.3 kg)
● Prices from $4,999 with four build levels.
● Frame only: $3,199 USD
GeometryMayhem 150● 160mm front travel, 150mm rear travel
● Frame material: carbon
● 29" only
● Weights start at 29.3 lb (13.3 kg)
● Prices from $5,199 with four build levels.
● Frame only: $3,299 USD
GeometryMore information:
spotbikes.com
Remember when the primary benefit of using Amazon or Wayfair, etc. wasn't only the selection and convenience, but they could offer lower pricing because they didn't have to pay retail employees and storefront rents everywhere and it was just some massive warehouses with economy of scale? Or online bike stores like Jenson, etc. that could do the same thing?
Guess what? They all figured out that once customers got hooked on the online convenience and the retail competition starts to die, they could just raise the prices to "normal" and make even more profit. They don't need to worry about retail problems like offering any deals just because a new shipment is about to arrive and shelf space is an issue. And they can better control and automate prices.
Go check for yourself. It used to be that you could go online and find most products for a bit of a discount. Now it's trending the opposite--you're probably as likely to find a better sale price at a big retail store than online, and you can actually look at it and talk about it with a semi-knowledgeable person before you buy.
Bike stores aren't any different. If you're not just window shopping and buying online for 10% cheaper and bringing it to them to do the work, they'll give you that 10% back--whether in free advice, free labour or help, and increasingly price matching (or getting close to) online retailers or offering better bike deals, since those online prices are creeping up a little.
Just watch. If the trend continues like it has elsewhere, we'll all be shopping online but paying the same price we always were--and it's not like you'll be able to convince them to knock a few bucks off, like you can your friends at the shop. I hope we can manage to keep good shops that know what they're doing and really help with buying, advice and maintenance.
To that intent, you can add the fact that as soon as the product gets some traction, online prices are not a good option anymore; the bigger the store, the bigger the price.
The last example that comes to mind is 2020 spez enduro elite.
Bike24, one of the largest online retailers in EU: 5999.99 Euros
A small (also online)bikeshop in Italy: 4059 Euros.
2000 Euros is a biiiig difference. Not only that but, the base/retail price of the bike in the Italian store is 5799.99 Euros. So, bike24, not only sells the bike without any discount, it also has a 200 Euros higher RRP.
Why is that..well..because they probably get away with it. Bike24 probably does 100k in orders only in weekends. That Italian shop, I'm not really sure it makes 100k in orders per month. Although..these months have been higher than average for the industry.
Probably there are numerous other examples as well.
Personally, I would really like them(the big retailers) to stop doing that.
I am not a fan of normalizing the >$3000 frame + shock. Chinese- and Taiwan-made bikes don’t cost that much to produce, and should be cheaper to the consumer as a result. BUT, I bet the profits are a nice way to support that new supermoto you took on your fishing trip while you dream up the next brotastic marketing video to distract from the fact that your bikes aren’t anything special.
That being said, the value from some of these companies (Guerrilla Gravity, Canfield, Canyon, YT) is awesome, and should be the standard. There are a lot of non-boutique/not-high-end bikes that charge boutique prices. I honestly don’t understand why people waste their money.
I've had the Rollik for just over two years and it has been a great bike.
That sentence implies that the "signature ... design" _IS_ a titanium spring. Except it's not, it's CF or Ti, depending.
Literally no mention that they switched from carbon to titanium. There must be a reason for it... but it shall remain a mystery, it seems.
Titanium as a leaf spring is used in lots other brands. It is a wide flat piece of material that is shaped to flex. It doesn't have to be composite.
I thought titanium is susceptible to work hardening? That doesn’t sound like a property a leaf spring should have. It also doesn’t have the ability to control the layup like carbon can. I’m interested to hear Spot’s reasoning behind the change.
This means for riders with long legs who need more post, we dont end up sitting over the cassette like on an evil, Santa cruz etc.
most (all) suspension frames that have a kinked ST do so to allow full wheel travel without the need for 7.5 foot long chainstays.
Look at the earlier Intenses. The spider and recluse had straighf seat tubes with sub 420mm chainstays.
I own a new single speed Spot Rocker and absolutely love it! Fantastic bike.
I also own a 2011 geared Spot Rocker and love that too!
The Spot Rocker is the best hardtail I’ve ever ridden. I love Spot so much I ordered a Spot Mayhem and I’m waiting for it to arrive in a week or two.
I can’t wait for @hardtailparty to one day review a Spot Rocker.... love your channel Steve!
Oh awesome! Happy to know they’re being supported locally. Very cool.
I think you didn't quite Spot my intention with the comment.
Honestly, I don't know how internets works. Is that one way sites generate income?
Only 2 of the 6 articles I found about the new Mayhem models mention Ti, and 2 specifically mention CF spring.
Is it going to be Ti going forward? What happened to the tune-ability of using a composite spring?
It seems like a pretty good improvement according to everything you've said. Maybe you should go work for their marketing dept.
As to the switch from carbon to titanium, I, and others here, just find it odd that they don't discuss it more, for the simple reason that most companies are eager to tout any change on a new model as "20% stronger" "16% lighter" etc...so, to just in passing, mention a materials swap on the defining part of their design goes against the norm for bike marketing. Imagine if Commencal (a company we all associate with advocating aluminum frames) came out with a carbon bike, and just said "Oh, BTW, its carbon", with no further explanation for the change in strategy. My guess is that most companies go bananas on the marketing, touting all sorts of stuff that actually isn't that big a deal, and occasionally end up having to either backpedal or hope everyone has forgotten about what they claimed a few years prior when the company decides to go a different direction later.
As for the actual materials science, you seem to both be saying that the swap to Ti is no biggie, and you can "tune" metal just as much as you can "tune" carbon while at the same time arguing that the engineering behind the old carbon link is important enough to modify and tune for each bike, and they modified the layup as part of the tuning. As you presumably know, carbon is anisotropic, whereas titanium is isotropic, so if they were getting creative with the layup on the old carbon link then it is actually possible that there could be characteristics of the old carbon link that they couldn't simulate with Ti. I actually agree with you 100% that either Ti or carbon could be fine in this application, so if the titanium one is close enough in behavior and is easier to make or attach to the frame, then that's fine. What I am pointing out is that it's not unreasonable for a consumer who might spend $5k+ on a product to want to understand why it had a seemingly big shift in materials selection.
Dude listen to yourself. This is why I say conspiracy. Because some of you bike geeks just go so deep in your mind of not trusting actual design engineers who test their stuff constantly to prove its worth. They don't have to give you all the lab analysis data to prove anything. They have riders on prototypes months before release. They get real feedback. Not internet feedback. Real bad ass riders who can notice slight changes.
It isn't a big shift. Go back and read about the original link. Look at a link alone. Pinkbike posted it several times. That link could be steel or titanium easily. In fact the first prototype was metal.
www.mountainflyermagazine.com/view.php/spot-brand-to-enter-full-suspension-market-with-leaf-spring-design.html
How it turned into carbon is another story. A mystery perhaps
A horse just told me your wish was granted on instagram.
1) I just switched the shock on my 27.5 to the Fox Float DPS. It has a 3-way switch that I love compared to the 2 way shock that I had before. The middle setting works great for so much. Will the 2 way switch that comes with the 150 builds be a downgrade?
2) Does the 150 make for a good alternative to something like the Pivot Firebird which is bigger and which is super popular here in CO. Or is that apples to oranges comparison?
[MEDIA=youtube]Sya7cCfMMn4[/MEDIA]
[MEDIA=youtube]Sya7cCfMMn4[/MEDIA]
[MEDIA=youtube]Sya7cCfMMn4[/MEDIA]
Good looking bike, i'd definitely consider it after the Firebird
I think the boss is a tall guy, and as a tall guy myself, i love high anti squat too !
I see the link as a solution to avoid getting into DWLink pattent territory.
Moreover as this joint as such a small range, why not ! (same idea as pivot less dessign near the dropout for xc bikes)
I like the lines of this bikes, and this would be on top of my list for a new bike.
But i think that my next bike will probably have a motor...