Velocio has launched their 2023 mountain bike apparel line, a collection that includes lightweight shorts, long- and short-sleeved jerseys, pants, and two rain shells.
One interesting (and possibly polarizing) feature of the shorts and pants is that they're designed to be used with a belt rather than having any sort of built-in adjustments. I have mixed feelings about the concept, but the good news is that an Arcade belt is included with the pants and shorts, and its stretchy fabric and low profile design makes it one of the better options for this application.
I've been able to get in a few rides with the new clothes so far, and the materials and construction all seem quite nice. I'm also a fan of the relatively subdued color palette, with a few brighter options in the mix to keep things from being too drab. I'll see how it all holds up after a bunch more muddy and dusty miles and report back.
More infomation:
velocio.cc
velocio.cc/pages/why-its-so-expensive
The entire page is dedicated to bemoaning expensive materials that somehow don’t affect non-MTB brands.
WHY IT'S SO EXPENSIVE (AN OPEN LETTER TO THE PINKBIKE COMMENTS SECTION)
Our clothing is expensive. The materials we use to make them are expensive. The labor is expensive. The shipping is increasingly expensive. You can buy three pairs of jean shorts for one pair of our Ultralight Trail Shorts. Better yet, you can just ride what you have in your closet. It will definitely work. Your bike won’t combust and you won’t be faster or slower. (You may however be less comfortable).
There are cheaper brands than Velocio. They use cheaper fabrics. They use cheaper (less verifiable) labor. They don’t have a repair program. They don't donate. We’re planting our flag in competition with those brands by highlighting that the gear we make will feel better, work better and last longer. YMMV.
1) I can't speak for everyone here, but I would gladly pay your prices and support you 100% if your products are made with natural materials (plant/animal fibers) and are sewn in democracies by people getting paid a living wage (#GTFOChina - and by extension #GTFOVietnam, #GTFOPakistan, etc.).
2) Base on what I typed above, there is a problem. A large part of your line is made with plastic, supposedly recycled plastic, but plastic nonetheless. My issue is stamping out items with 100% man-made fibers and then going "its great for the environment", because the molecules in that item are going to be around longer than 10 human lifespans. Even if I only buy what I need and take care of it for the rest of my time on earth, its still going hurt Mother Nature in the long run.
3) Looks like many items are "made" in the European Union, which is great. All hail our EU overlords. But where is your fabric being made? Is there some factory on a river bank in China pumping out supposed "environmentally friendly" fabrics that none of your staff has seen, which, in fact, is poisoning river dolphins? Again #GTFOChina for everything.
4) I like wool as a fabric. Its great for clothes. But, I also like animals. I like animals being treated with kindness and respect. (Even the animals I eat.) Where do those sheep for the wool live and has any of your staff verify its coming from where its supposed to be?
DeMarchi makes similar items at less cost. If you don't care about "bike specific" Varusteleka makes great wool items and has an explicit #GTFOChina company policy. So what do you have that those places (and those like them) don't have?
I think instead of justifying your pricing you should take onboard the over whelming consensus of the target demographic. Your prices are too high.
Is it not ideal to take all the posts and learn from this. You are basically getting a free focus group.
I think most of us are willing to pay the following:
Jersey: 50.00 USD
Pants: 75.00 -125.00 USD
Shorts 50.00 - 85.00 USD With Chamois 100ish USD
We are your target demographic
Where is your clothing made?
What actually do these people get paid?
www.importgenius.com/search/velocio
Sunning Webbing Manufacturing's (a Chinese company) top trading partners are Arcade Belts and Velocio.
I have a Patagonia jacket that’s nearly 20 years old and will still keep me bone dry in torrential rain, zippers still work flawlessly, etc. and should I ever tear a hole in it I can send it in and have it fixed. I might be tempted to pay Patagonia’s ridiculous prices again.
What % of materials is coming from China? Arcade belts are manufactured in China.
I'd be willing to accept that pricing and argument if you were making these in the US from US made material but go ahead and continue to shit on a large part of your demographic. Maybe just read the comments and decide on if you want to act on it or not. Making stuff in Lithuania (not exactly the highest labor rates in the EU) from Im guessing asia sourced material makes your stance on this tough to accept.
I am very fortunate to own many kits, that I have collected over the years. What if you only owned 2 pairs of shorts or 2 jerseys? Still willing to pay these prices.
However, saying they are not well researched is not helping things.
In my eyes it’s your job (you as in Velocio, maybe not you personally) to make that research as easy as possible for your customers. And I think there is room to improve. Earlier in this thread you offered to answer email enquiries on your sourcing and manufacturing. That’s information that could be openly available on your website, it’s not like there’s anything to hide, right?
And why do I have to read what amounts to several pages of marketing spin on the history of your location in Piemonte, just to come away still not knowing if all your stuff is actually hand-sewn there, or just a percentage of it?
There’s several companies that put country of origin information right next to each product on their website, which I would imagine is not too hard to do, unless it is sourced from all over the world, and this kind of transparency is what I would consider best practice.
so, as much as you might think you are in Velocio's target demo, you just might not be. Now, I get that you don't find the value past a price point, but some of us do, because of differences in priorities and disposable income. I have a very wealthy friend that shops for food at Walmart, but also has 3 Ferraris......priorities! lol
The MTB jersey I was looking at is made in Albania.
♩♪♫ Albania, Albania,
You border on the Adriatic,
You are mainly mountainous,
And your major export is chrome!
You're a communist republic,
You're a red regime...♩♪♫
Ketl is small, high quality, lifetime warranty, fits great and has a classic look. Literally checks all your boxes.
Paying 200.00 for a pair of shorts that is just a shell is really silly, and just a waste of money.
If I didn't find a value past a price point I would not own 20k in bikes. I find value in product that is actually worth the value.
I agree TLD has high quality, I own a ton of it living close to its home.
I just don't understand how anybody can honestly stand behind 200.00 MTB shorts that are just a shell. I can buy 3 pairs of good quality shorts from a notable brand for 200.00.
I understand the company has the right to charge what they want for a product but the only way they will move inventory is when they put everything on sale. I doubt SRAM bought the company to watch it die.
Like why not answer what several of us have asked? Why only refer us to online documents that don't actually give the information we want?
And here's the deal, I use some NF gear and it is priced very much on the premium side of things, but they also make theory gear a half days drive from where I live so I'll happily pay that.
Your gear ships with a silly belt needed that is MADE IN CHINA! But then you go on about premium materials and say 'made in the EU' which is a very generic answer. Some places in the EU are great, others (probably where you're making stuff) are less good.
velocio.cc/blogs/features/velocio-sram
We are headed into a recession and the MTB boom has been and gone due to covid.
their marketing and business model was suspect at best. Making your core business about highend cycling apparel for obese women, is not a good way to go. I mean, make that stuff, because there is likely a market for it, but not enough to sustain an entire line....
People definitely get into cycling to lose weight, and that's amazing. The issue is, most people that start out aren't going to drop $300 on bibs and $160on some jersey. They will when they have been cycling long enough to know what they want, but by that time THEY AREN'T OBESE ANY MORE.
FWIW, I personally know the founder of Machines, and she well admits this failure. so you know....
we probably SHOULD be in recession, but the government is just taxing you(inflation) out of it. when they printed 11,000,000,000,000 out of thin air, they just imposed a tax on the money you held by devaluing it with the glut of new money in circulation. So now a Stumpy evo costs $8000 instead of $6000, and most people just blame Spesh.....lmao
House prices are now slowly declining and the only people buying real estate are investors, Blackrock and Vanguard.
The cost of living has sky rocketed.
People are barely making it.
But according to you we are not in a Recession or on the cusp.
I understand inflation and taxes but to say we are not heading in the wrong direction is silly and you are being ignorant.
Big tech is on hiring freeze and has laid off thousands.
You don't understand the most basic principles of Macroeconomics, if you somehow don't think all these examples aren't intrinsically tied back to my point.
cheers.
oh boy! looked at some recent comments of yours.......I f*cking nailed it. Tuscaloosa, and all you do is insult people. literally nothing meaningful, other than calling people pussies and projecting your own latent homosexuality on others. I get it....Alabama would be a hard place to be out....
What I *won't* pay for is a pair of MTB shorts that require a belt. Who thought *that* was a good idea? Like many riders I routinely wear a hip pack. I can't imagine having a buckle on top of another buckle right where I bend at the waist while riding is going to be at all comfortable. Yeah, I'd say the belt choice is definitely "polarizing".
But like many other brands too, you are not giving any specifics on what you are actually doing different and how you do it.
The word here is transparency. And in this case, this is not corporate secrets. This is something you should be proud of and wanting to communicate.
Today if I go buy a steak, I get the address of the farmer on the packaging, in some cases even the name of the cow.
Thats what I want to see from you guys. This is the only way you can create trust for the claims you make.
The trust that is needed to make me even considering buying your more expensive products over other brands.
- If you source your fabrics tracable you must do it publicly
- If you claim to donate 1% - Make it public on how much that is, and where it goes.
- If you pay your factory workers fair prices, name the factory
...
There is nothing here to loose or what are you afraid of?
Anything else is just greenwashing to justify a higher price tag. Your marketing stunt addressing PB complaints is funny, but it does not play out.
And last but not least: Let's be honest: Look at Patagonia - Is there any other brand out there that does more for the environment? And they do NOT use the term sustainable...
$80 shirt made out of plastic.
Even the merino options have plastic in them.
As I said I wish them the best, but looks like I'll still be going to Value Village
$180 for shorts is well within the demographic window....
However I am probably in the demo but still won't pay that much. I generally buy off season and pay less than 150 for pants and less than 100 for shorts .
This winter hopefully even more overstock deals and I can spend even less.
So an outlier to the actual demographic.
I don't see any mtb liner shorts on your website. Are they being developed?
velocio.cc/products/mens-trail-mesh-bib-liner