PINKBIKE FIELD TEST
Trail Bike Roundtable
4060 ST vs Jibb vs Stumpjumper EVO vs Murmur vs Hugene vs Riot Trail
There aren't any hard and fast rules when it comes to bike categorization, and trying to figure out exactly what the difference is between an an aggressive trail bike and and all-mountain bike is like trying to eat soup with a fork. That doesn't mean it's not worth trying (the categorizing, not the soup eating), which his how we managed to put together a somewhat eclectic, and very interesting, selection of bikes for this year's Field Test. The contenders in the aggressive trail category all had between 135mm to 150mm of rear travel, and were designed for big days of pedaling up and down technical terrain
Which bike is the best? That's a tough one, and there's really no clear answer. Alicia Leggett and I were both very impressed by the Scor 4060 ST, but its Achilles heel emerged during the countless wet and muddy rides we took it on – it's a tough bike to keep clean, and the shock tunnel is an absolute mud magnet. That took it down a notch in our books, which put the Propain at the top of Alicia's list, due to its all-round abilities, and snappy pedaling performance.
For me, I'd put the Stumpjumper EVO alloy on the top of my list thanks to its high level of adjustability, and that SWAT box. Honestly, I'd be at home on any of the bikes in this group, with the exception of the Ghost Riot Trail – I just wasn't able to click with that bike due to its geometry and suspension kinematics.
When it comes to surprises, it was the Starling Murmur that ended up riding differently than I expected, in a good way. Yes, it had that oft-touted extra-compliant feel of steel, but it didn't feel completely glued to the ground, with a nice amount of pop for hitting jumps or hopping over mid-trail obstacles. The weight wasn't out of the ordinary either – it was right in line with the aluminum-framed Stumpjumper EVO and the Raaw Jibb. That Jibb felt like a mini-Madonna, which may be exactly what some riders are looking for – a stout, shorter travel trail bike that's no slouch on chunky, rough trails.
Watch the roundtable video to see more of our thoughts on this batch of bikes, and keep an eye out for an upcoming Pinkbike Podcast where we go even deeper into our pros and cons lists.
I'm pretty curious about the Ghost
Course that wouldn't have helped the sizing issues they had.
At least they aren’t pretending to drink a craft beer like certain rival publications.
Specifically with the 130LR, I'd bet it still comes close to the top. It was the favourite bike of two out of the three reviewers in the round-table in 2019, the suspension curve seems to be what a lot of other companies are trying to mimic now, and the geo is still very current and checks a lot of the extra boxes (room for a long dropper post). Obviously, having one makes me pretty biased, but I've had it a few years and usually this is when I start having thoughts about the next bike to replace it. But nothing I've seen (available or not) seems to offer anything I don't already have with this bike.
www.propain-bikes.com/en/info/brexit
@ODubhslaine : Does that go for you Irish people too? I thought you'd keep an open border though I don't actually recall what was decided, merely that it was a massive discussion.
This differs from brands who get their frames manufactured in the Far East, in this case import duty is liable.
So the process is a bit more complicated: we remove UK VAT from sale price, customer pays their countries VAT as it enters the country, custom add a few pennies for their efforts. The net effect is pretty much the same price as before Brexit, just a little bit more complication.
I only knew about the Vitus and NP situations cos I had looked at both before I eventually bought a new bike. I assumed it would be the same across the board, and never considered that British made bikes would be different.
For the next field tests you should add more info about the frame quality, specially for the carbon frames. We don't know where it's made, we don't know if it's reliable, we don't know anything.
Besides we don't have any info about the bikes reliability. Over the last years some bikes got some awards because they were light and efficient.. but afterwards if you check some forums or groups you see there are tons of issues because manufacturers saved too much weight.
We need more info about quality, sourcing and maintenance support because it makes a huge difference when you have make a final choice.
Because thats the question we really want: is any specific new bike better than a well used old one when that old one was the best of its day?
In addition, your skill set has not evolved because you have not grown with the technology, so yeah, you have no idea.
My suggestion would be to get rid of your dinosaur, get a new bike, and start pushing your skill set.
But if you don't want to ride better, that's a choice too.
I mean you can find some good value alloy trail bikes for under 3000$ (Canyon recently), so 5000 is already up a notch, 7000 is more than a notch, it's hi-end.
And if we are talking under $5k, Scor, Stumpy and Propain have some really good options under. Most of them just need damper upgrades and a few other small upgrades and they are mostlythe same as reviewed bikes.
£3250 bike with a Rythm fork LOL. What's next year, a £4k build with a Recon?
And no, the Elite tested here isn't the best value it could be either. The fact they specced Factory instead of Performance Elite says it's a margin&marketing-driven build, not customer-driven. A good value build would have PE+GX for a lower price, or put the money saved on pointless kashima into brakes/tyres/drivetrain at the same price. Then they can add a top end kashima+X01 build if that niche needs to be filled.
Look at that £3250 evo comp alloy with NX, Rythm, some own brand tyres, short travel X-fusion dropper...
Now look at the Privateer 141 GX build for £3389: GX, Pike Ultimate, Float X Perf Elite, Hayes Dominions, long travel OneUp dropper, tyres are personal but it has the right casing and compound - no paper thin sidewall plastic tread shenanigans - and the front MM is a safe choice. This is a min-maxed rider's spec not a marketeer's spec. Not to mention geo that someone actually spent time thinking through instead of giving it an angleset because they couldn't decide (e.g. the ST angle that's actually steep not just on paper). Inb4 "it's heavy", the frames weigh within 100g of each other from what I've checked (3600g for the Spec, am I right?).
I agree, though, that Performance Elite would have been a good spec choice for the Evo reviewed here - I'd rather have that extra cash go to having it come with Code RSC brakes instead of RS.
As for the Privateer frame, that's certainly a contender, but the Specialized's frame is a more refined option - the SWAT box, the geometry adjust (even if you don't like it), and little things like cable routing do set it apart. Either way, I'm all for more aluminum options, especially ones that aren't super expensive.
I concede it's a more refined frame, no doubt. SWAT is genius. I fully accept it should cost more vs the Privateer designed using stock tubes. How much more, when you compare the build kits for a similar price and how many bikes Spec will sell is another story.
Then there's the very individual question: does more refined = better on the trail.
EDIT
@wyric Totally agree on enjoying the non-gucci reviews.
My question wasn't really "are they the best value on the market" but "are they the best Spec could have made them". If it's "no" to the latter, it annoys me in the same people the Porsche Cayman annoyed Clarkson when it first came out and was deliberately made worse than its potential to hit a market tier and price point.
Is everything a conspiracy nowadays or something?
Just don’t mention the Illuminati/reverse vampires angle.
Handmade no asian factory product...
Who deleted my comment? Was it u pinkbike?
And no, your comment wasn’t deleted check the bottom of the page in ‘below threshold’ - it was downvoted for its stupidity.
Ah got it