Outlier Bike of Year Winner
Contra MC
There was no shortage of interesting bikes in 2022, and any of our four nominees would have been more than worthy of winning this very subjective category. Reeb, Antidote, and Digit are all doing some really neat things that set them apart, but it was Contra's MC enduro bike that we all decided on in the end. The Contra's small-diameter, rootbeer-colored steel tubes and aluminum dual-link layout, large idler, and a bunch of chain mean that it'll never be mistaken for anything else, and it delivers on the trail as well.
Kazimer
reviewed the MC back in August and had this to say:
"I wasn't surprised to get my fastest timed lap on the Contra, and Matt Beer had the same experience. This is a bike that comes alive at higher speeds and on rougher trails, with loads of traction that keeps the rear wheel glued to the ground no matter how slimy the conditions are. That stuck-to-the-ground feeling doesn't mean it can't jump, though, it just means that it feels most at home on bigger hits rather than hopping and popping over little mid-trail hits. It would make a great park bike, especially for riders that like to mix it up, hitting chunky DH tracks one lap and floaty jump lines the next."
Either way you fly your flag, support these guys in what they do by buying a bike!
Or a frame
Or some swag, he’ll even a sticker!
I sincerely hope this means enough funding for Evan to have a bigger (or at least a second!) production run so that I might have a chance to get one!
Seriously though, I love new bikes that think outside the cube…
1. I love the delicate looking nature of the smaller tubesets, alu gets kinda chunky looking, especially when lower grade alu is used. Carbon gets real chunky looking, my Spire has a top tube that I could roll out a picnic blanket on.
2. Some will claim a certain ride feel, if we were talking about road or gravel bikes, then absolutely, but that ride feel gap gets smaller then more big tires, and supple suspension get thrown into the mix. Steel does have a great ability to dampen out some of that high frequency noise that can tire you out.
3. It’s easier to build with, with more traditional building methods. You or I with little investment could be up and running building frames in our shed, the quality would be questionable unless we had some skill and knowledge, but alu, titanium, carbon, etc require larger investment to get rolling. You can build stronger for relative investment.
4. Post building process can be a little easier as well, or more accessible anyway,
Painting, etc can be done by just about anyone. Alu, titanium, etc require a bit more post build work to get ready for paint.
Hope that helps, all of these bikes are outstanding in my opinion, I love the Reeb, and lust after the Contra…..the Darkmatter is like looking at an untouchable hypercar.
1. I like the carbon/alu frame shapes.
2. I ride 140mm - 170mm bikes
3. I don't build bikes.
4. I don't build bikes.
Thanks again.
It's not that they are producing steel frames because they necessarily believe the material is the best for the job but rather because it's what they have to work with that will do the job.
As with anything, it’s always worth giving things a try if you get the chance.
My Sentinel did as well
As a note, not all steel frames are created equal, as can be said for alu, and carbon ones.
Steel frames done poorly don’t offer any particular benefit over a good quality alu or carbon one.
I’m sure you’ve seen plenty of Canadian Tire steel mountain bike frames, they don’t ride any better than an alu one from CT. You get the point.
There’s some great steel bike frame builders out there, and you can get pretty much any custom geo you want, that’s part of the draw as well. Along with the ease of frame building, comes a custom experience that is much harder/expensive to get in alu or carbon. Just cause you don’t build frames doesn’t mean that there aren’t inherent benefits from the ease of manufacture, you just need to read between the lines a bit