Hafjell, Norway
BULLS
Wild Core Prototype
WORDS Mike Levy
PHOTOS Vanja Kodermac
Designing a downhill race bike from scratch is a daunting task, especially when that bike will see its initial testing take place throughout a full season of World Cup racing... talk about being in the spotlight. That is exactly how it is often done, though, and is also how Hendrik Gehring, the engineer behind the 200mm travel BULLS prototype shown here, took to the challenge of designing a competitive machine. The German BULLS brand is well known for their range of affordable bikes, from city cruisers to cross-country rigs, but this entry into the downhill realm is part of a three year development plan that will eventually see them offer a production version of the downhill bike pictured above, with it presumably being priced as competitively as the rest of their lineup. Tasked with developing the bike is 'Team BULLS powered by Mountainbike Rider Magazine', a four man squad that includes New Zealander Wyn Masters, German racers Christian Textor and Tommy Herrmann, as well as team mechanic Mikey McCallum and slope rider Teo Gustavson from Sweden.
The complete team bike sits at a claimed 37.9lb with a solid looking build kit that includes Shimano's Saint cranks and an FSA cockpit, and the team uses Mavic's Deemax wheels shod with special tires from Schwalbe that are part of the 'First Ride' development program. This gives Wyn and the boys access to some trick rubber that most racers won't be able to touch for quite some time, as well as putting them on equal footing with some of the larger teams when it comes to tire options. Suspension is an all RockShox affair, with a custom tuned Vivid R2C out back that has been shimmed to work well the Wild Core's suspension layout. An XTR derailleur from Shimano has been chosen due its longer cage, something required due to the chain growth caused by the bike's high main pivot, and Saint brakes slow the team down.
| There will be one more update before the bike goes into production. The team-program has a contract for three years, so it's the aim to develop the bike more and more over the coming years with their help and feedback. - Jorn Hessen, team manager |
The bike shown here, which is Textor's race bike, is actually the third version that the team have been on since the project began, although there have been many more variations on the computer during that time. The basic layout has remained the same throughout it all, though, with some alterations to the bike's geometry that have come via feedback from team riders, including a bottom bracket height that has been shifted 10mm lower than the original, as well as plans to lengthen the top tube on the production bike. The pivot hardware and idler pulley setup used on the early prototypes have also been replaced with much cleaner pieces that one would expect to see on the final product. It hasn't all been smooth sailing, though, with delays in the large sized prototypes forcing Wyn to race aboard another brand's bike for certain races, and teething issues with the evolving design that are being resolved during the season. Such is the development cycle of a downhill bike, with teams often dealing with problems that will be long sorted out by the time consumers see a production version.
Suspension Design
The bike uses a single pivot layout in conjunction with a linkage the activates its RockShox Vivid R2C shock to offer 200mm of travel, and while a linkage activated, single pivot design isn't breaking down any doors in terms of a suspension revolution, BULLS is certainly pushing the limits when it comes to main pivot placement. The reason for the ultra-high pivot, located nearly half way between the bottom bracket and the top of the bike's stubby seat tube, is to allow for the drastically rearward axle path that one usually associates with a bike that carries speed well on rough ground. A closer look at the side profile of the BULLS reveals that the pivot is actually well behind the imaginary vertical line drawn between the bottom bracket and seat tube, and mounted on an extension of the bike's top tube, a design trick that adds to that rearward axle motion. If having a rearward axle path was the single key to designing a fast bike you'd likely see a whole lot more designs similar to the BULLS bike on the race circuit, but it's far from being that simple.
It comes down to tradeoffs, with there needing to be a balance between all performance aspects in order for the bike to perform well, and such a high pivot is usually associated with two drawbacks: chain growth as the axle moves up and away from the cranks, and the suspension stiffening due to pedalling loads when a rider is putting down the power. The latter issue was addressed by placing an idler pulley that routs the chain up from the Shimano chain ring and nearly inline with the bike's main pivot. The negates the chain's action on the suspension by eliminating its tendency to pull down, thereby allowing the suspension to work to its full potential when the drivetrain is under pedalling loads. The pulley itself features an integrated chain guide, complete with rub blocks, that should prevent any derailments, and its nicely finished aluminum construction looks to be ready for production. BULLS is far from the first brand to use an idler pulley (
Canfield and others have done it for many years), nor are they the first to employ such a high main pivot, but they look to have pushed the concept to its extremes.
While Wyn and the rest of the team are loving the bike on fast, rough tracks, its high main pivot does make for a bike whose wheelbase grows quite a bit as the rear suspension nears bottom out. This can help by adding stability when the rider is landing in rugged terrain, but the downside can be geometry that changes drastically as its suspension compresses when thrown into a hard corner. ''
We can only see from testing what is good and doesn't impede the performance of the bike's high pivot,'' team manager Jorn Hessen told us when questioned about it. ''
We're trying to search for the best compromise.'' And word is that testing will likely result in the final prototype, the fourth iteration of the design before production, making use of a slightly lower pivot location that will sit a few millimeters down from the current placement. There could also be a final change to the linkage setup as well that will alter the progression slightly so that the bike ramps up a bit later in its stroke, another change that comes from Team BULLS powered by Mountainbike Rider Magazine racers putting the bike through its paces during the 2013 season.
One thing is for sure: we aren't often privy to such knowledge from team riders, with the public only hearing about how great the bike is, no matter what, from those who are paid to race it. Don't be fooled by the straightforward admissions written above, though, because all of the world's top bikes have gone through, or are still going through, similar processes before becoming the usually polished production bikes that you see in the catalog. We're looking forward to seeing and riding the production version that is born from the team's development work.
www.bulls.dewww.facebook.com/TeamBullsDH
Think it looks a bit like a torpedo or something :p
And btw, looks alot like a Specialized daily.
"It hasn't all been smooth sailing, though, with delays in the large sized prototypes forcing Wyn to race aboard another brand's bike for certain races, and teething issues with the evolving design that are being resolved during the season."
www.bulls.de/bikes/show/wild-beast
Chinacatalogwaremashup - now with pulley.
Placing relatively fragile and very expensive parts in a high risk area is just begging for trouble, if you ask me. They could at least have made some sort of replaceable skid plate for it.
And good eyes, bulldog. There is in fact already a mark on it.
Having said that, I'm neither a bulls fan nor particularly excited about this frame or anything... I'm just being objective and unprejudiced.
yep totaly snug and out of the way. err wait a minute. . .
Don't know how it is with the V10c, but I'm sure there are several other designs with exposed linkages.. first that comes to mind may be the Lapierre DH with pendbox system as well as the Intense 951 which looks exactly as pictured above.
Also, the pulley system is the only way to compensate the chaingrowth which is affiliated with high pivots. Therefore it absolutely makes sense because you can incorporate the benefits of a high pivot (rearward axle path) pretty much without the downside of added chaingrowth which would restrict the suspension performance.
Are you saying the engineers of Canfield or Ghost don't have a clue of what they are doing? Are those designs not done properly?
@mazze - Lapierres DH rigs can't be compared to this in any way. Completely different suspension design and nothing hangs below the bottom bracket - in fact there is just about NOTHING around the bottom bracket haha. The 951, yeah, but not as extreme and the linkage itself is somewhat protected by the swinger being in the middle. If you take a look at the M9-FRO though, the linkage is tugged up into the frame, as it is on the V10. Maybe a hint about how it should be done ideally...
As far as the suspension design goes, I'm just saying that in my opinion, four-bar linkage is the way to go on long travel bikes. High single pivot belongs in the past.
www.pinkbike.com/photo/9713857
Even if you wanted a nice racy light der. you could have that with all the benefits [closer, more accurate shifting] of a short cage.
ya masters on a pivot...