Maxxis Ardent Tires: Parts Check

Feb 8, 2010 at 11:08
by Mike Levy  
The latest addition to the Maxxis tire catalog is the Ardent, a high volume XC/AM tire designed to roll fast and offer confidence inspiring traction year round. Inside we'll have a closer look the Ardent.

Read On...
Maxxis Ardent Tires

photo
Maxxis Ardent 2.4"

The Maxxis mountain bike tire lineup spans nearly every discipline one could participate in. From the fast rolling 285 gram MaxxLite XC tire, to traction monsters like the Minion and Highroller DH tires, you should be covered no matter what sort of bike is under you. Smack in the middle of that spectrum sits the new Maxxis Ardent tire.

photo
Ardent 2.4" on the right, 2.25" on the left

The new Ardent is clearly not your fly weight racing semi-slick. With full height directional center knobs and high volume casings in both the 2.25" and 2.4" sizes, the Ardent will make an excellent choice for riders who are looking for an 'everything and all the time' sort of tire. Ramped center knobs combined with a 70a rubber compound will improve both rolling resistance and wear dramatically.

Maxxis Ardent Details

• Ideal in medium, loose, and wet conditions
• 26 x 2.25/2.4" sizes
• High volume single ply casing
• Durable 70a tread compound
• 60 TPI casing
• Weights from 645-815 grams
• MSRP $73.90-$109.90 CAD

Aggressive side knobs look ready to dig in to the earth and generous sipes on both the center and side lugs will help out in the wet. While both sizes use a single ply casing, it's far from the paper thin offerings found on other tires and sturdy enough that one could drop a few psi to take advantage of the higher volume. Billed to excel in medium, loose, and wet conditions, the Ardent should be a great all-around tire for aggressive XC and AM riders looking for something that they can run year round.

photo

Maxxis has a tire for nearly every sort of vehicle and conditions, head on over to their site and have a look.

Author Info:
mikelevy avatar

Member since Oct 18, 2005
2,032 articles

71 Comments
  • 10 1
 Come on man, $110.00 tires? Give us a break, its rubber!
  • 4 0
 Paying as much as a car tire!
  • 7 1
 I am seeing more and more people rolling on these tyres!
They seem like an awesome tyre for most coniditions, but do they make a DH specific version?
  • 5 0
 This is what I've been running. I find they are great for most riding but as soon as you hit mud, you'll be begging for wetscreams Otherwise, I'd buy them again
  • 5 4
 What are those rims i want some!!!!
  • 12 1
 there crank bros rims, and they are EXPENSIVE!
  • 5 0
 They make a 3C 2.4 version that is great for DH but wears out as fast as Sam is going down a track. I happen to run a front Ardent 2.24 & Aspen rear with Crank Bros iodine wheels. The three of them perform amazingly well.The Aspen grips pretty well for climbing and they both offer great rolling resistance & handling. The wheels are just outstanding..
  • 3 1
 These tyres are amazing. I have a 2.4 and a 2.25 (front/rear) and they are prime as. ever since I have had them I have been pushing myself more and more into the corners, they just hold on and do an amazing job of it. Took them to the skate park, massive Understeer (but they aren't street tyres anyway). In all dirt they are awesome, sandy crap, loam, gravelly crap.... highly recommended
  • 2 5
 I had the 2.6 version of this tyre and sold it on as I could not get on with it. Minion DHF or Cur Scream are my favs still I am liking the Conti Rain king on rocks though, but it steps out a long time before a wet scream does in the mud even on a well cut scream that has been used for a seasons racing.
  • 4 23
flag luigi (Feb 10, 2010 at 8:00) (Below Threshold)
 Its spelled tires.... I have been meaning to get a pair of these tires once my minons where down.
  • 24 0
 Luigi, both are correct - 'tires' in North America, 'tyres' in Australia, NZ, Scotland (see below) and England etc.

'Wear', on the other hand, is only ever spelled 'wear', but there is a homophone spelled 'where'.
  • 5 1
 Dang, I missed that one. Good catch ;-)

On-topic, love the tiyers. Too bad I can't afford them.
  • 2 0
 Yes Maxxis makes a DH version of this tire.
  • 1 1
 They make DH versions too... in a 2.4" and a 2.6" size. Best tires around for anything but mud. Been running the 2.6" 3C's for awhile now and absolutley love 'em.

@SupremeDork.... Sure you can, they're only $20 at Jenson right now!
  • 1 0
 WHA?! Thanks man! :-)
  • 3 1
 Little late to the game huh? I rolled these tires all last season. They are a drifter's dream, but an absolute nightmare in the wet. The 2.6 is a good front, wouldn't really recommend it as a rear if you like to brake. Also if you ride on any kind of rocks, you might as well get used to shelling out the money for a new set every 6 weeks or so since they wear out insanely quick.

Anyone interested in the Ardent should check out the Geax Neuron, basically the same tread pattern with a little more predictability at half the price.
  • 2 0
 Definitely late to the game. I saw this and was wondering why even post this here. No news, and the reviewer even botched the durometer. Were you running the 3C?
  • 2 0
 I ran a 2.25 / 2.4 combo on my Nomad last year. great tires if you like to two wheel slide into corners. they roll super fast, high volume is great, sidewalls sucked bad. three of my buddies and i all ran these tires tubeless and the sidewalls all got sliced open at one point or another......7/10
  • 1 1
 Did you have slices in the 2.4 casing? I know the 2.25 is short lived if tubeless in rocky terrain. But I haven't had any issue with the 2.4 I have run.
  • 2 0
 I'm running these right now ... might roll a bit faster than a nevegal ... tread seams to last longer than a high roller
Not having any problem in the wet, just air down a bit ... they ride a lot like a nevagal to me, so save the $
BUT at Whistler I'll take a high roller over all.
  • 4 2
 Why is there an article about a tire that does not test the tire, or talk about its actually ride characteristics? Reading the comments has told me way more about the tire then the article did. The article seemed to be a copy and paste of the Maxxis catalog description. Thank you to all those that poseted how the tire actually preforms, which is the reason why most of us choose to read the article to begin with.
  • 2 0
 knighhit,

The article is clearly not a "review" by any stretch of the imagination and wasn't intended to come off as such. In a perfect world all of us here at PB would be out riding all day and have some other people do the typing for us, but thats not how it is. As such, I thought we'd share some photo's and info on the Ardent tires as there is no review forthcoming.
  • 1 3
 We readers might just appreciate more actual content and less blatant advertising. If we wanted to we could have gone to maxxis sight to read their sales pitch there.

If theres not enough time for real content then maybe just run less stories?
  • 4 0
 kevinthelilbiker,

Duly noted =) What small info pieces like the one above are great for is the ensuing discussion, as can be found above. While we may not have had time to put a lot of saddle time on the Ardents, it looks like a lot of other riders have and are stoked to share their opinions on them. The intention is two fold with articles like these: one, we provide some photos and info that will hopefully start a great discussion like is found here, and two, you guys share your experiences and opinions about the product.

There will be a few more of these types of pieces coming up soon, but as the season begins to start up again you'll see much more testing content from myself (and other contributors as well) than in previous years. Enjoy!
  • 2 1
 I have a set of ardent 2.4's as well. they are respectable but not my favorite. the article is definitely accurate in that they roll fast, and theyre great for hopping around to different lines. the corners are a little tricky though, as far as traction goes its less forgiving on the rider when it comes to sticking a tight turn. granted theyre marketed as xc/am tires so freeride wasnt really a design concept. still decent tires by anymeans. anyway, thats my two cents
  • 1 0
 I didn't care for the high-volume style of the Ardents...felt like balloons to me. I now run the front-specific Maxxis Minion light casing tire on the front and back of my all-mountain bike and I feel all grippy and fast.
  • 2 0
 I live in the pacific NW and run a 2.4 Ardent in the back with a 2.5 Minion DF in front and the combo is excellent for just about anything i've run into up here year round!
  • 1 0
 www.jensonusa.com/store/product/TI299A00-Maxxis+Ardent+Steel+Bead+Tire.aspx 20 bucks for Ardents 3C version and 2.4/2.6 widths crazy price all things considering
  • 2 0
 if they did a higher volume/width one, and they cost less, these would actually be amazing
  • 1 0
 oh wait no they do a 2.6, dont worry lol
  • 3 0
 nice tires, but the rims are sick.
  • 3 3
 agreed, these rims are an absolute esthetical pornography, and this picture is just hitting some non specified part of my brain, that wants to my hands get the credit card out of my pocket and open the CRC website... it's just the overall price then that hits the other brain cells while the other try to say something about... how expensive would it be when some nasty branch comes in between the spokes?
  • 5 3
 Huh looks like a weirwolf with the middle (between the center and outer) knobs cut down
  • 10 2
 stop smokin so much crack and it will probably just look like a tire again/just like it should
  • 1 0
 These tires are good for trail riding, but have their limitations... There's a write up on them at www.ondirtreview.com/2009/11/ardenttires
  • 1 0
 Had m2.25 front and rear on trail bike.Felt like balloons even in 2.25 size.Only worked good on dry,even then,side knobs very squirmy.2.35 minions were way better!
  • 1 3
 i have this tyre on the front and would recomend it to anyone, it grips and grips and it roles, i am using it on my DH bike as it do alot of cycling to and from places and wanted a good light gripy tyre. They are awesome, me and all my mates agree they are better than high rollers
  • 2 0
 Better than High Rollers? Helllllll no
  • 1 0
 Depends on your preference. They don't rail as hard as a HR, but they are a lot more predictable on the transition. The 2.25 is also a lot more round in profile. 6 of one half dozen of another. Better? No, just a different tire for different conditions/preferences.
  • 1 0
 i have tyres like this but there called or made by johnny and there really good
  • 2 0
 They got allready Dh version with 2ply wall
  • 2 0
 Have they? 2.5 version?
  • 1 0
 DH are in 2,4 or 2,6 in 42a compound, nice tires!
  • 2 0
 I run an Ardent on the rear and it's a 2.6 :S I've had it on my RMX and well, you really do rail corners with them anti-drift side knobs, infact they tend to out grip my minion up front!
  • 2 2
 2.6? Very nice. Maybe 2.4 on front and 2.6 on back Smile
  • 1 0
 I'm running the 2.4DH front and back, they're beast all round tyres
  • 1 0
 Yeah...but you're a pinna
  • 2 0
 My Ardents(2.25 folding) have been on my bike for nearly a year now! I only run a rear brake and there is still loads of tread left, I love em in everything apart from mud, but that's because they are not a mud tyre and advertised as a tyre for hardpack dirt and loose gravel or dirt, Martin... Bond has had these tyres in 2'6 since just before glentrail, did you not know that?:P
  • 1 0
 Yeah I knew he had ardents...but not 2.6 - strange width. Sounds like a good trye for Innerleithen
  • 2 0
 Why would you run a skinny tyre on the front and a thicker tyre on the rear martin?
  • 2 0
 To cut through mud
  • 3 1
 Good in the dry.... but HORRIBLE in the wet.
  • 1 0
 70a rubber ? what does it do on damp rock/roots?
  • 1 0
 That is incorrect. The Ardent is a 60A MaxxPro compound or a 3C is available in the DH version. Even so, the Ardent isn't my first pick for wet trails. It packs with mud and slips a bit more than I care for on wet roots/rocks.
  • 2 0
 it's a best pneu !!
  • 1 0
 could it be; Nevengals with real sidewalls?
  • 1 0
 I thought so and gave them a try. I had the 2ply 60a and they felt very strong,gripped great and rolled wonderfully. but they felt squirmy on hard pack where the Nevengals felt good in all conditions untill the side walls gave out,hahahaha. I now run weir wolfs and love them!
  • 1 0
 Are these a replacement for the Advantage?
  • 1 0
 I have ardent 2.4, they are good choice from all mountain riding to dirt.
  • 1 0
 what does "wear dramatically" mean??
  • 1 1
 im pretty sure the "aspen" is the newest maxxis tire, not the ardent.
  • 2 0
 You are right, Aspen is the new XC tire from Maxxis, was featured in January 2010 MB Action USA
  • 1 0
 The Aspen is the newest but it is only available in a 2.25 at it's largest. We'll look into those once winter is gone and it's not too muddy around here.
  • 1 0
 EXPENSIVE
  • 2 0
 Yes here in Canada, Maxxis are the most expensive tires that you can pick up it seems. Kenda is close to half price. Various duties and taxes seem to make them almost unreasonable to buy, but it seems that we're willing to pay for performance.
  • 2 0
 and i quote... "performance, its the name of the game, i pump up my tires and lube my chain" ....
  • 1 0
 High Rollers... cheaper
  • 1 4
 I think mtn kings would be a better investment, and whats up with the random word 'tyre' in the mountain biking world, its TIRE!
  • 1 0
 Mate the word TYRE is the "english" spelling version instead of the "american" spelling of tire. The whole world dosent spell everything the same. I have been running an Aspen/Ardent combo. Have tried both on front and rear on my AM machine. On the hard pack clay stuff and loose gravelley that belies our lovely area I have found the Aspen to be way tackier than the Ardent. Now having to review the TYRE situation as keep rolling them off the rims.







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.033217
Mobile Version of Website