The combination of the short Fouriers stem and 35mm diameter handlebar makes for an imposing and confidence inspiring cockpit, one that looks as if you could mow through a stand of alder trees if you only had some bark busters mounted up. We obviously didn't test that assumption, but both the bar and stem certainly saw a fair bit of hucking action and had nothing to say about it - no creaks, groans, or any issues that might cause us to lose faith. Is the setup any stiffer than a 31.8mm bar/stem combo? While the Fouriers bar and stem's 35mm diameter clamping area would understandably have you assuming that the combination is much more flex free than the "puny" 31.8mm standard that the majority of the industry uses, that isn't really the case. In fact, we noticed no real improvement in rigidity over other short stem and wide bar setups, and we're not sure if we'd agree that having a stiffer cockpit setup than what is currently available is a good thing, anyways. When was the last time you stopped on the trail and said to yourself "damn, if only my bar and stem interface were stiffer.'' Probably never, and no properly looked after bar or stem should be breaking these days, either. So, the 35mm system from Fouriers doesn't feel any more rigid or comfortable than anything else on the market, but leaving it that would be selling the black and red kit a bit short. The 780mm wide bar is priced competitively at $147.99 USD when compared to other carbon fiber offerings, and while there are lighter wide bars out there, its 270 gram weight is quite reasonable. The 205 gram stem is also in the ballpark when it comes to weight given its intentions, although its steerer tube clamp arrangement had our knees shaking in fear due to the prominent edges that look ready to tear into any exposed skin. With all of the above in mind, neither the stem or bar would be at the top of our "must have" list, but the Fouriers components' reasonable cost might mean that they'll make sense for a rider who is looking to move to a 35mm clamp system, or someone who wants something different from the more common brand names out there. - Mike Levy |
The XR Mud is, as its name suggests, quite condition specific, but it's for that very reason that a mud tire can make the difference between laying it down or keeping it upright as we work our way into the wet weather riding season. We were reminded of that fact after we installed the XR Muds onto the front and back of one of our test bikes, a job that turned out to be quick and mess-free due to their tight fit on the bike's Stan's Flow EX rims and "tubeless ready" construction - there was zero pressure loss straight from the get go, and they seated straight with a floor pump by the time we hit 30PSI. While Bontrager does advertise the XR Mud as being trimmable, that is something that is rarely performed by the average rider and it could be said of any tire on the market. Regardless, a racer-type may way to trim down the XR's crown a touch to increase rolling speed, but we left it stock during our time on them. Given their relatively skinny width and aggressive, open tread pattern that's designed to both penetrate and shed mud, it wasn't really too much of a surprise to find that they offer a stunning amount of grip in the slop compared to a standard high-volume tire. Climbing traction is the most noticeable difference, with the rear tire biting in hard enough that it was almost like riding in the dry (almost, but not quite), and we scooted up messy climbs in far more control than other riders with regular "all-season" tires. Cornering traction on the way back down was also far more predictable, with a level of grip that can't be equalled by anything but a true mud tire when the conditions suit it, and it is that last fact that potential buyers should take note of. The flip side to the XR Mud, or pretty much any mud specific tire, is that its prowess in the slop is offset by its sketchiness on wood and hard packed ground, something that certainly doesn't suit it all. That may not matter if your trails aren't littered with roots and wood bridges, but sprinkle a few of either of those onto a wet trail and you better be on your best behaviour if you have the XRs mounted up. It only took a few close calls - the bike jumping out from under us over slimy roots, or sliding across a wood bridge - for us to learn to ease off when coming across either. A higher volume would certainly help as it would allow for lower air pressure and a larger footprint, but you'd then be sacrificing some of the tire's ability to cut through the slop. It's always a balance, and that is never more clear than with tires. So, we'd give the XR Mud a big thumbs up when talking about how they perform in the mud - the exact type of stuff it was intended for - but we'd also recommend that you look at another option of your riding includes much in the way of roots and bridges, or even mixed conditions that vary between soft and hard packed ground. - Mike Levy |
The SM3's relatively flat and angular shape, as well as its carbon fiber rails, are likely to be polarizing factors when a rider first takes a look at the 213 gram saddle. That was the case with us, at least, as many years in the saddle has shown that we'd usually prefer a skinnier and more rounded shape than what the unique looking Ergon brings to the table. With that in mind we have to admit to finding the SM3 reasonably comfortable under us, and we didn't have any of the suspected fit issues that we thought might arise. The key to the SM3 is finding both the correct fore/aft position and angle atop the seat post, as we found that its sweet spot is smaller than what you might find from a more standard saddle shape. We found a comfortable setting after some tinkering that involved lowering the seat's nose and sliding it forward a touch more than the seat it replaced, although making such adjustments are in order anytime a seat change happens. Having said that, we'd like to have a go on an SM3 that is one size down in width as we felt that there was a bit of awkward pressure after the two hour mark. This is where Ergon's three different size options begin to make some real sense because it allows riders to stay with the general shape that they prefer, but move up or down in saddle width to best suit their body. Ergonomics aside, the SM3's carbon rails brushed off our abuse, which really says something because the seat was intended to be used as a lightweight option for cross-country racing rather than being bolted to a bike that is going to be pointed down some rowdy terrain. Would we recommend the less expensive, 'Tinox' hollow railed standard SM3 if you plan on using it on a longer travel rig that will see some air time? Probably, since it does offer the same shape at a lower price ($139.95 USD) and with metal rails, two facts are likely to win over some riders. - Mike Levy |
About Us
Contacts FAQ Terms of Use Privacy Policy Sign Up! SitemapAdvertise
AdvertisingCool Features
Submit a Story Product Photos Videos Privacy RequestRSS
Pinkbike RSS Pinkbike Twitter Pinkbike Facebook Pinkbike Youtube Pinkbike Instagram
That Ergon seat looks the goods, it's even got a little cradle for your family.
Secondly I do like this stuff PB review (sometimes) im just having a rant cause i cant afford it :-) ha ha
Keep up the good work PB :-)
eh ridiculous statment of the day !!!
Of course i wanna look at them ! the point is, thats all i can do!
Anyway THATS ME TOLD :-(
While the SM3 is dedicated XC/Marathon and all-around-mtb designed saddle, the 2014 SME3 will fit in here better with the Pinkbike riding styles. All the same technology of the SM3 is 'tweeked' to a more aggressive and technical riding style; softer closed-cell foam, shorter saddle length, no sharp edges for potential hooking of shorts, etc.
More on the 2014 SME3 saddle, due out in Feb here on Pinkbike from their Interbike coverage: www.pinkbike.com/news/Fly-Racing-7iDP-and-Ergon-Interbike-2013.html
Rock solid and not bad for weight, why would I pay more? Bling doesn't make you a better rider or faster.
Why doesn't someone copy that shape?
yeah, whatever...