PINKBIKE FIELD TEST
Allied Cycle Works BC40
Words by Mike Levy; photography by Tom RichardsAllied Cycle Works might not be as widely known as some other brands in this definitely-not-a-shootout group test, but they've actually been manufacturing carbon frames in their Northwest Arkansas factory since 2016. The 120mm-travel BC40 is their first mountain bike, though, and they're saying that the new 29er, ''blends XC Race with Downcountry abilities.''
There are a bunch of paint and price options to choose from, with the starting point being the XT-equipped version that costs $7,250 USD or a frame/shock/fork kit for $5,590 USD. Our test bike is spec'd with a wireless X01 AXS drivetrain, carbon Industry Nine wheels, Factory-level Fox suspension, and a $10,755 USD price tag.
Allied BC40 Details• Travel: 120mm
• Carbon frame
• 66.5º head angle
• 76º seat angle
• 435mm chainstays
• Reach: 445mm (med)
• Sizes: S, M (tested), L, XL
• Weight: 24.9 lb / 11.2 kg
• Price: $10,755 USD
• More info:
www.alliedcycleworks.com Not only does Allied cook up and paint the carbon frame themselves, but they machine all of the aluminum components like the suspension linkage as well. It's light, too, as you'd expect for a bike meant for some serious cross-country-ing; the frame is said to weigh just 1,950-grams. The checklist includes cables inside the frame (including the optional shock lock-out), a threaded bottom bracket, a replaceable rear brake mount and, notable on a bike intended for long, difficult races, room for a large bottle on the downtube and a smaller one on the seat tube.
The bike sounds unapologetically focused on racing and efficiency, with Allied saying that the frame employs a "second-to-none pedaling platform," and naming events like the lung-deflating Leadville 100 and the Marathon Nationals that are said to suit the BC40's personality. The suspension layout is similar to what we see many weight-conscious designs using: a relatively simple single-pivot system with an aluminum rocker for lateral rigidity and to achieve the desired kinematics, and the all-important flex-pivot at the dropout to save weight. Sealed bearings and pivot bolts are heavy compared to bendy pieces of carbon fiber, and some brands claim to save up to 200-grams by using a flex-pivot, so it's no surprise to see it on another speedy bike.
Given that many BC40s are likely to wind up at cross-country races of some kind on the weekends, while others could see rowdier terrain than they bargained for, Allied couldn't go too slack or too aggressive with the handling. They settled on a 66.5-degree front-end that makes a lot of sense, as well as a 76-degree seat angle and 435mm-chainstays on all four sizes. Our medium gets a 445mm reach, and it tops out at 501mm for an extra-large.
All of the above adds up to a respectable 24.9 lb / 11.2 kg after we installed the Specialized Ground Control tires that we put on all six of our test bikes.
Trailforks Regions Where We TestedGrowing up in British Columbia, I had never visited a real trail center in Canada before and wasn't sure what to expect from the Sentiers du Moulins trail system. The builders have done an impressive job putting together over 60km of singletrack, much of it crossing over rolling rock faces lined with endless green moss. Slab City is where we spent much of our time, an essentially all-granite trail that drops 200m off the back of Mont Tourbillon.
If you're looking for berms instead of rock, you'll find plenty of them linking up countless fun-sized jumps and a few sneaky lines, all of which deposit you conveniently at the restaurant for some post-ride poutine with triple the cheese combined with an ice-cold energy drink.
Sentiers du Moulin mountain biking trailsClimbingIt's cliche, I know, but the amount of travel a bike has doesn't define how it'll perform on the trail, and riding all of these bikes back-to-back only underlined that fact yet again. Allied's BC40 is a full-beans cross-country bike, no doubt about it, but it does that job very differently than the Lapierre XRM or BMC Fourstroke LT, two others I spent a load of time on in Quebec. Both of those have that traditional firm-off-the-top rear-suspension that sometimes had me double-checking to make sure I hadn't accidentally locked them out, whereas the Allied felt almost under-sprung in comparison. It wasn't - we checked many times - and both Matt and I were sitting at 25-percent sag; the Efficiency Test also proved that the BC40 is just as speedy on those loose and marbley gravel road climbs that some of us face getting to the goods.
This Field Test has already seen us spend too many words talking about that fine balancing act combining forgiveness, traction, and efficiency, but those are the most relevant talking points for these types of bikes. And the differences between the Allied, BMC, and Lapierre, all machines made to do the same thing, are stark. While the stopwatch showed it wasn't any slower, there's no doubt that the active suspension helped my cause when the roots were slimy; Mont Saint Anne can be a very slippery place after a summer rainfall, but the BC40 had the most poise when I needed to tip-toe my way through an ice rink of roots and rocks.
Where'd the BC40 lose ground compared to the others? It did require more steering input and brain output whenever the switchbacks got really tight. You know when the singletrack somehow doubles back on you in about two square feet? That's when the Lapierre and BMC both have front-ends that don't need to be told what to do, while the Allied requires a bit firmer hand and, regardless of the approach, less speed. There were a handful of corners where I needed to pivot the front-end over a few inches to get back on the right line, but I'd come through the same corner thirty minutes later on the Lapierre and consistently carry more momentum and not have to correct, and it was the same story on the BMC.
If your trails (or races) are full of non-stop tight switchbacks and little to no elevation changes, there are better options than the Allied. It's efficient, sure, and you can spec a remote lock-out if you'd like, but it's the riders and racers who routinely have to get up slippery, nasty, technical climbs where traction actually makes a difference who'll benefit most from the BC40.
Descending The BC40 reminded me a bit of Specialized's Epic EVO, one of my favorite bikes of all time, in how it felt so composed and stuck to the ground around whatever corner I wanted to goon my way through. While some of the other bikes had me keeping an eye out for anything that might upset them, however small, the Allied's calmness let me process things farther down the trail and relax more. That's probably why there were a handful of lines that I only ever took while aboard the BC40, especially following the afternoon thunderstorms that dropped more rain in thirty minutes than I thought possible.
With no shortage of green rocks and shiny roots on Mont Saint Anne's hillside, that rain made for some tricky riding on some trails. The BC40 eats that stuff up, though, and was easily the most stable and predictable of the bunch. So while I would take the safe low line, otherwise known as the boring line, on the other bikes, I'd always default to the more committed high lines when riding the Allied, wet roots at a 30-degree angle be dammed. It's not close to being a trail bike by any stretch of my imagination, of course, but it's certainly a cross-country bike that'll let some riders attack - or just finally enjoy - the descents instead of just getting to the bottom so they can attack the climb.
Not interested in downhill PRs? It took me years to realize that instead of taking crazy chances while trying to catch fitter racers on the descent, I could relax a bit while recovering more and still make up time before the next climb had me on the ground cramping. In other words, go the same speed but recover more and sooner, which sounds like smart racing to me.
Obviously, the BC40's biggest strength is its rear-suspension which packs a lot of performance into just 120mm of travel. It manages to be efficient when you're on the gas, supple at the top of the stroke and around the sag point, and it also has more than enough support and bottom-out resistance for whatever you're doing that you probably shouldn't be doing. That's a wide performance and set-up window, especially as many bikes in this category seem to be making sacrifices in one or more areas to benefit another.
I stumbled onto one trail in particular, a bit steeper than the others and still a bit soft and smooth from being freshly dug into the hillside, that the BC40 absolutely devoured. Fast, soft corners faded down into steeper soft sections, and the obvious approach was always to take a bit too much speed into everything. I had a near-death experience on each of the other bikes that were probably all 100-percent my fault, but I rode the same trail about ten times aboard the BC40 while going at least ten-percent quicker and didn't even cry out in fear once. Better yet, it didn't
feel like I was going any faster, which is always a good sign.
So, who's the BC40 for? As capable and fun as I made it sound above, it's still a proper cross-country bike fully deserving of an expensive race entry fee, number plate, and your tightest speed suit. It's just that it also deserves some baggy shorts and questionable line choices during your days off.
193 Comments
My bike is 22 pounds ready (cages, Garmin mount, pedals, sealant, etc) to race as built though.
The reality is here that there's former Specialized staff working at Allied so it's not surprising that the Epic Evo and BC40 are similar, plus the recipe is there for several companies... 2 Bottle mounts, flex stays, ect (Epic Evo, SC Blur, Kona Hei Hei, Cannondale Scalpel, I'm sure I'm missing a few that aren't in this test).
And they buy complete bikes.
Bikes made in Taiwan generally also have pretty good living wage and health and safety but bikes made in China, Vietnam, or Myanmar (ahem Evil) do not have those same standards and I think that should be important to mention not just as some random fluffy bourgeois check box on a bike.
Please ignore claimed. actual measured weight matters
It doesn't matter if its carbon covered in platinum and diamonds +$10,000 is expensive for a bicycle.
Also - I'm moving from NorCal to...Denmark in a few months. I've lived there in the past, and I know the trails there, while surprising fun, really don't require a slacker head angle than what the Exie has. The trails twist and turn like crazy through the forest, and I wanted something super nimble. Not to say that they Allied wound't be fine there...I'm sure it would be just fine....but in my splittling hairs analysis of a short stem/few dew degree steeper HA, etc., I thought the Exie would be a better 'fit' for where I am primarily going to be riding it.
It's nice they both both have 2 bottle cages in the frame. In my side large Exie though, I need to use a sideloader style cage on the seat tube mount.
If I were just going by looks, I would have gotten the Allied. On the internet, it certainly looks better....but in person, man, the finish on the Exie is just so thight. Seeing the carbon weave, up close, is really neat....and when building it up, there was not a wrinkle nor stray filament or whatever that I could see. Just really well constructed.
Stoked that there are options like this to have such frames made in the States these days.
I like them because I know they are from an Allied nation, the reasons @AndrewFleming describes.
Norco does not make any frames in Canada, but Devinci is currently increasing the number of alu frames that are Canadian made. I'd also add We Are One, as given the number I see out on the trails, are no longer a super small production company.
Meanwhile I will keep sending my almost 2 year old Element on terrain beyond it's intended use without worry. North Vancouver isn't kind on bikes but somehow (anecdotally of course) the Elements that staff are riding locally are holding up just fine.
Probably a pretty sweet rig.
Regarding price... All of these bikes can be built up to $10k and can be built up for different purposes. Really, we should just be comparing the frames (geo, base weight, bearings, BB, warranty, country of origin, etc.)
Seems like those two were the closest to what Downcountry was originally seen as by Levy, and (reading between the lines) that the Exie is their choice for racing first, fun second, and the reverse for the Allied... but again nothing actually stated as a direct comparison. Strange to omit that.
Also no mention of RSD or Evil in the descending comments. It’s possible each reviewer didn’t see equal time on each bike (or maybe no time at all on some bikes).
I was waiting for a bike that ticked as many of my "requirement" boxes as possible; I waited (and saved up) for a couple of years until this thing popped up.
What I was looking for in no particular order:
-Competitively light compared to other XC frames
-2 water bottles
-No proprietary parts or geo adjustment stuff
-Available as a frame/frameset
-Made in the US (my other bike is a GG!)
-120/120mm
-66ish HTA, 440-450ish reach
-Something I could race on, but also use as my daily driver in CO
-Frame internal routing for a shock lockout
-Aesthetic frame design with cool paint job
-Preferably from a boutique / smaller brand
With these specs I knew it was gonna be expensive, but they certainly nailed it.
Note that if you want one of these you might have to wait for a while!
I ordered the frameset in mid July and I'm set to receive it probably in 2-3 weeks; so about a 4 month wait total.
Maybe the initial rush of orders played a part here and lead times are more in control now; but just a heads up!
That's why the first thing in my comment is about buyers confirmation bias haha; I'm fully aware that this is acting as a feel good echo chamber because I dumped a whole bunch of cash into something that although looks perfect on paper, I ultimately haven't ridden.
Biggest category is 5000-6000.
www.pinkbike.com/news/pinkbike-annual-community-survey-full-2021-dataset.html
Allied head angle: 66.5, just right.
Evil chain stay: 430
Allied chain stay: 435
Evil seat tube: 75.5
Allied seat tube: 76
Evil geo: dated
Alied geo: amazing
Levy is great, and probably regrets ever coining the Down Country term. I hope they’re sitting at Aslan with the Evil crew laughing at all of us. It’s just bikes man.
cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0252/9997/6243/files/BC40_SADDLE_HEIGHTS_V2.pdf?v=1666795649
I don't race and I have to be honest with myself that a 200mm dropper (vs 150mm per their chart for my measurements) does more for my overall riding enjoyment than losing 2-3lbs of mostly sprung weight in a frame. YMMV. Looks like a great bike but I can't pull the trigger personally.
If the full bike price could be shaved $500-1000 without gaining more than a pound vs the XT build-there would be a LOT of riders queuing up for one of these.
no complaints from me...
www.pinkbike.com/u/Mike-on-a-bike/album/Kinematics
Thanks @Mike-on-a-bike nice work! Also confirms kinematics are very close, which isn't surprising really either as they both use almost the same design.
While I'm at it, any shootout should max out at $8k. Above that the bike just gets shinier. Let's see who makes the best bike, not who can bolt the most expensive crap to it.
I already needed FSA SLK Drop stem slammed on 95-100mm long head tube frame to not feel like the bar is too tall.
Allied size M has 105mm long head tube. And as shown in the video, without any kind of knock block, a slammed aggressively negative rise stem won't keep shifters/ dopper levers away from the top tube.
How's the BC40 compare?
www.mtbr.com/threads/allied-bc40.1206701/page-5#post-15782606
I'm glad Pink Bike finally got away from reviewing cross country bikes and saying, "it'd be better with wide riser bars, short stem, assegai tires, 200mm dropper, and a 140 fork."
Google 2013 Norco Truax image, now that is a visually balanced frame.
Join Pinkbike Login