PINKBIKE FIELD TEST
Trek Fuel EX 9.9 XX1 AXS
Words by Mike Levy; photography by Tom RichardsThe fifty-second generation of the Fuel EX is by far the most radical, most adjustable, and probably the most capable that Trek has ever put together. It now has 140mm of travel and a 150mm fork, and you can even run a mullet wheel set-up if you use a 160mm fork. Coil-sprung shock? Not stock, but you can put one of those on as well.
There are nine 2023 Fuel EX models that start at $2,699.99 USD, but only eight of them are new bikes. That first price is for the EX 5 that's actually a carry-over using last year's aluminum frame, which means it has 130mm of travel and a 140mm fork.
Fuel EX Details• Travel: 140mm rear, 150mm front
• 29" wheels
• 64.5° head-tube angle
• 77.2° seat-tube angle
• Reach: 485mm (lrg)
• Weight: 31.9 lb / 14.5 kg
• $10,750 USD
• More info:
www.trekbikes.com The new platform starts with the aluminum EX 7 which costs $3,700 and gets the same features as the pricier carbon bikes, including a storage compartment, adjustable geometry, and coil-compatibility. Carbon fiber shows up with EX 9.7 which costs $4,700 USD. If you have more than twice that to spend, the 9.9 XX1 AXS tested here gets all the expensive bits, including a set of carbon wheels, and will set you back $10,749 USD.
The new frame gets a much meatier-looking front-end and a more complicated design at the seat tube and bottom bracket area, but there are a few things you might recognize. Trek's ABP suspension design is one of them; those three letters are short for 'Active Braking Pivot' and describe what it's supposed to be doing. Instead of using a Horst Link or pivot on the chainstay, this system rotates concentrically around the hub axle.
Trek's also given it a 10mm bump of travel on both ends to 140mm and 150mm, making it the biggest Fuel EX ever and also the first that'll work with a coil-sprung shock. A flip-chip at the lower shock mount tweaks the leverage curve to add the progression needed to run a coil shock, or to suit rider preference.
The Mino Link pivot hardware holding the rocker and seatstays together has also been updated, but it still offers a 0.5-degree head angle and 8mm of bottom bracket height adjustment. If you want more, the biggest news is that Trek is selling different headset cups that change the angle by a full degree in either direction. The stock number is 64.5-degrees, but those who want to go slacker (or steeper) can buy a set of cups that does both. You install them one way for 63.5-degrees or the other way for 65.5-degrees. The upper cup will drop in, Trek says, but you'll need a headset press for the lower one.
The downtube storage compartment is on the new bike, and while it seems like Trek has put all the things onto the latest Fuel EX, there's one that they didn't: Knock Block. The 2023 Fuel EX has gone back to a curvy downtube with plenty of fork clearance.
ClimbingThere's a spectrum of good, and the previous Fuel EX was certainly somewhere in there on the climbing, but it also had active, forgiving suspension when left fully open that sure felt like it added more traction than speed. That's great if all your climbs are steep and techy, but it also leaned on its pedal-assist switch anytime they weren't. The new Fuel EX is an entirely different animal, though, with more jazz for your jam that meant the only time I firmed up suspension was on a long, boring paved climb before we hit the steep pitches leading to Whistler's Flank trails.
I would have left the suspension open had Kazimer not been half-wheeling me since we left our rental house, but I need all the help I can get at the end of the season. When I did get onto the chunky and tricky stuff, the Trek isn't as nimble as its predecessor, but it'll still get around almost anything at slow speeds if you're used to modern geometry. You can't hide the wheelbase, of course, but some foresight and body English will get you anywhere you need to go.
It's nearly as big as the Genius but manages to not feel anything like it through tight switchbacks, and our leg-o-meters were telling us that it's more efficient than both the Yeti and Norco. When you do get a brief respite between the ups, or when you can pump instead of pedal, it's also pretty good carrying speed when the ground levels out. It's obvious that the new Fuel EX is more capable than the old one, but that goes for the descents
and the climbs.
Descending I've spent
a lot of time on various iterations of the Fuel EX over the last fifteen-ish years, so the mustard-colored Trek was the bike I was most interested in riding. Like all the other long-lived names, it's changed and evolved so much over that time, but this is like when you go back to school a foot taller and a lot hairier after the summer break. All of a sudden, it's a much bigger world and you have a hell of a lot more freedom to have fun and inevitably get yourself into trouble.
So much is different, but let's start with the new bike's suspension. Instead of an oddball shock, there's a normal Float X with what feels like an ideal tune; it's plenty active and fluttery when you need traction, but manages to balance that with much more support than the previous bike provided. This means that it doesn't feel like you're sacrificing one for the other, and it also means the Fuel EX is much more fun than the old bike when the trail was smooth and more level than down. Yup, despite it having more travel on both ends and being a much longer, slacker bike, it's much easier to pump and carry speed on the new Trek, a notable trait for a bike meant to be ridden everywhere and anywhere.
If my local trails were elevation-challenged or Sea Otter smooth but I still wanted a capable trail bike, I'd be choosing the Fuel EX out of our five test rigs. That sort of impression used to mean the same bike could feel a bit nervous and on-edge at the other end of the trail spectrum. Not. So. Much.
Whistler has some challenging terrain both in and out of the bike park, and there's a decent chance that the 50-year-old lady who bagged your groceries, that quiet kid sitting by himself, or the guy in a button-up shirt and no gloves are all riding some seriously scary shit on their trail bikes. The level is high, but the Fuel EX didn't have a problem with any of that kind of riding. Both the Trek and the Genius ST had the most poise when the trails were rough and fast, and the Fuel was remarkably stable and attached to the ground despite endless rocks and dust. It was also the quickest during Kazimer's timed downhill testing, further driving the point home. Again, credit to the bike's rear suspension that offered great control over the second part of the travel, never asking for more progression but also feeling like it was using the shock stroke wisely.
You can relax the front-end out to 63.5-degrees if you want to, but I spent my time on the Fuel EX set to the stock 64.5 number and didn't find the need to push that front wheel out any further. The stock handling seemed to suit my sometimes-loose riding style well, and the Fuel had a bit more composure on the steep tricky stuff than the Hightower, although I don't think I got around a single corner on the Trek as well as I did a few hundred on the Santa Cruz. But the Trek had the edge when smashing through a mess of roots and rocks, not feeling like it was moving around as much under me as the other bikes, and I just seemed to usually be in control for longer on the Fuel EX.
In the slow stuff, it had the upper hand on the Genius but seemed on par with the Yeti, Santa Cruz, and Norco in that it didn't exactly feel agile but I managed to not fall over too many times on any of them.
Getting into the details, there are a couple of picky complaints and a couple of things to like, mainly the wide range of adjustability. If the Fuel EX's suspension was still the same as the previous version, making it coil-compatible or giving it such an adjustable head angle might have made for a bike that only felt half-ready for fun. But with suspension that manages to feel both efficient enough for any sort of pedal-mission you'd have in mind while also being ready for some seriously rough terrain, it makes sense to be able to steepen or relax the handling depending on where this bike is going to end up in the world.
In the less-good column is Bontrager's one-piece carbon handlebar and stem that even comes with titanium clamping bolts. Personally, I like how clean the cockpit looks because of it, but Kazimer and I both noticed sore hands and shoulders that we didn't get when riding the other bikes. That could be down to the handlebar's stiffness, something Kazimer also noted went with a different bar on another Fuel EX he's spending time on. Other quibbles include paint that sure chipped easily and, if I had just spent this much money, I would not want to see the downtube protector sagging away from the frame. Small detail but unsightly to me.
366 Comments
Thank you very much for all these new bike reviews. I appreciate the time and effort it takes you to create this content for us to view. I understand that you can’t review every single bike brand, but the ones you did review look really great. I also am educated enough to understand that there are many more affordable models from each brand and that most of your comments and thoughts would translate to the lower cost models. Unlike most of the comments, myself and the people I ride with, as well as most of the bicycles I see at the trail head, are in the 6-10k range. I enjoy seeing the latest and greatest parts and look forward to saving and spending my money on my favorite sport and past time. I am not a dentist or doctor, just a regular guy that enjoys nice things that I work hard for. By paying attention to the economy and understanding inflation and supply chain issues, I see why the price of bicycles has gone up.
Keep up the great work and thanks again for the content.
-lol do you think I will get downvoted?
I'll always prefer more "confidencial" and exotic brands, but for sure Trek knows how to make some bloody good bikes.
When it comes to cost of bikes ... well, for me it is still hard to believe that nowadays one has to shell out $11,000 to ride a bike that is 32 pounds without pedals. It is nutty weight, that used to be close to downhill territory.
And sure the reviews says "most radical, most adjustable, and probably the most capable", but one has to wonder ... how is it possible that bikes gets "most radical, most adjustable, most capable" literally every single production year?
And on the other hand, do you think geo is enough of a justification to send twice as much or even more on a frame?
Crash replacement on a seat? No problem. Unfortunately, we don't have the direct part in stock, but here's three options that we can offer.
Derailleur out of adjustment? Let me fix that right away, and no cost.
Want to us install brakes you bought somewhere else? Sure thing, we will discount the labor charges since you bought the bike from us and will have it done in 24 hours.
The customer service at my local Trek store is the main reason that I seriously considered buying the new Fuel gen 6, even though I think it's really, really ugly (especially in alloy).
With all the work required on my ride, I think this is might very well be my last boutique bike…
You will need an extra chain lying around for the extra links. Idler pulley replacement alone is close to 100$ a year. Keep the crunch zone clean and protected. Not every store carries the Forbidden derailleur hanger or the idlers for instance.
My point is, I Love the bike, but I would trade it for a generic bike with the same great ride quality in a non high-pivot bike.
If their service is half that good still I'd have no qualms riding a Trek.
The additional cleaning has nothing to do with a boutique brand bike, that’s just a specific frame design issue. Willing to bet the Commencal, and Norco bikes would be the same.
Up until the advent of the UDH, we all had specific brand, and usually model and year specific der hangers. Both the Druid and Dreadnaught use the same one, and NSB makes em as well.
Maybe I’m missing something, but I don’t see your stated issues as “boutique” brand issues. Maybe regional specific, friggin trip over Forbidden bikes around here, WAO’s as well, Yetis’, Santa Cruz, Transition none of these brands are ones I would call “boutique”
An Antidote, or Canfield, or Unno, or Deviate, now those would be boutique, hell, even an RSD would be cool to see.
If you think Treks customer support is good, I’ve gotten emails direct from the company orders about product questions and support (suspension setup, custom options, warranty questions with aftermarket suspension goodies)
They have been incredible, full stop.
I worked with Trek for years, and their support (at the time) for anything mtb was below average. Think early 00’s when Lance was king, and Treks flexy carbon stays broke at first sight.
I was even a certified Rolf wheel builder, and couldn’t get Trek to support their own wheel builder program.
Maybe it’s better, and if that’s the case, fantastic
Cheeba cutout?
Hash hole?
Ganja grotto?
Cons: looks fugly now
Someone beat it with the ugly stick and it recovered from its injuries that much better.
But in terms of looks I like 2020 version more.
Yes it transformed bike. It doesnt bob so much, it rides higher on its travel and have good small bump sensitivity.
I never liked that reactive DPS, if I open it it is supple but bob too much, if I put it in trail mode (in the middle) it doesnt bob too much, but it is harsh-because I rode it with 25% sag. Also that DPS made some clonking sound during repetative fast hits.
This new Fox Float X is awesome, and bike looks better with it
And let’s face it, it is a factor.
If this bike was given to me I would ride it with zero complaints. However, if I am dropping 10k+ on what is ultimately a hobby, yeah, I'm gonna also want to like the way it looks in addition to how it rides. (Noted: beauty is in the eye of the beholder, etc.)
10lbs/4.6kg is a full 2lbs more than my '08 Session frame with a coil DHX2.
If you’re strong enough and light enough that weight really matters, shave them legs and get a purebred XC bike.
Scored an excellent deal on a new Yari and it's drastically better. These bikes should not be coming with a fork like the 35.
I’m a year or 3 out from a new bike, but a Fuel Ex (
The new Fuel Ex is a compelling bike though but I will hang on to my current Slash for a while with the X01 drive train, 150mm fork and 35mm rise 800mm bars. It's just a lovely bike and it's in British Racing Green (would like to paint over the TREK logo on the down tube though).
Few thoughts. At first, I wasn't sure how I felt about the bike. Took me a while to get the suspension dialed where I wanted. But that's on me.
I've since began falling in love with this bike. I've never had so much fun climbing, and it descends like my Remedy. I've tried it in both the mullet and full 29" configurations and I'm sticking with the 29" but with a 160mm fork.
BUT. This bike is noisy AF. It creaks so bad on hard square hits and huck to flats, that I swear I've bottomed out and broke the bike, but when I check the fun-o-meter, the ring is not blown off the bottom. And I am quite confident that I'm not smashing my rims.
I also had the Integrated tool (BITS) installed in the headset which made it so loud up there as well. Tried tightening that up yesterday and the thing exploded (pretty confident i wasn't over tightening it either. It spun pretty easy until it blew up). That ended my ride early. More money spent at the bike shop yesterday to put a star nut back in the steerer tube.
Anyway. I'm no bike mechanic here. The bike feels amazing, except for when it doesn't'. But I'm convinced that once I quite this thing down, it will be the dream machine. Really.
Oh and steam bolts needed to be re torques after a few weeks ( but never after that).
I’m all for pressed in cups.
I have a 200mm DH bike, a 160mm enduro bike, and a 0mm gravel bike. I want to replace the 160. Demo'd a Spur but wasn't sold immediately on the feel but I didn't touch the suspension.
Still lost on 120 vs 140 and weight 27 vs 32.
I was asking myself that same question you are. For what it's worth, I just pulled the trigger on a Canfield Tilt frame for delivery Spring '23. I crunched the numbers on the build, fairly confident I can get it under 30lbs without having to go to carbon rims. Rear shock can be set at 125mm or 138mm, 140 fork. I'm curious what other bikes could be built up lighter (than advertised) with minor component changes?
Short travel trail bikes can be fun, but 140-160 travel bikes are better daily drivers if you’re riding still is more send than good off and jib.
Or heck just get a Ripmo.
Edit. I see the stand over is the same for small and medium. So never mind
But man, Levy, seeing your phone in back pocket on that type of terrain makes me cringe some. I surprisingly went down on my back side with phone just like that on mellow turn at speed in the backcountry. Result was phone smashed into side/back of thigh, massive contusion to hematoma to major internal infection from old fluid hanging around that almost let to sepsis to urgent surgery to drain with draining tubes sticking out of me for week following with minimal mobility and no riding for at least a couple of weeks. Just saying! Don’t want to see that possibly happening to you as well from phone placement in side pocket. If only most phones could fit in the storage compartment.
Sucks to spend $6-7k get a great spec with carbon wheels and then have to buy a matching 27.5 carbon wheel and tire along with 160 air spring to get the config you want.
To a certain extent even a bike with a mediocre frame with wonky kinematics could feel good with the top of the line spec. I understand only one bike is in a different price point, essentially, so it's "fair" but I still think its misleading when the majority of people are buying the cheapest trim and it has some questionable parts like that X-Fusion shock.
This has become the Theater of the Absurd.
A lighter version of the Troy would be an awesome trail / light-all-mountain bike. So it makes sense that the Fuel EX is pretty darn good.
-irregular sizing with a weirdly large gap in between sizes L and XL
-extremely low stack height
-very low BB
-absurdly expensive
-obviously not pretty
That’s why in 2002 everyone was riding farmgate filing cabinets down the hill.
We can get back to even lighter higher performing bikes by making things simpler.
Less range,smaller chainrings.36mm stanchions(because all the flex is in the steerer anyway)simpler linkage layouts.tires that are Actually between Dh and trail.etc
Let’s say you were well inside of the top two percent of 50 year of XC racers.
How much of a detriment would a 28 pound Fuel EX be, relative to a 24# Top Fuel?
Gonna try an aluminum replacement swingarm and hope it lasts longer than a month!
Input (full article):
Can you write a forum comment to this article like it was Pinkbike user Waki who wrote it?
"Hey everyone, Waki here! I just wanted to give my thoughts on the new Trek Fuel EX. Overall, I'm pretty impressed with what Trek has done with this bike. The adjustable geometry and compatibility with a coil shock are definitely standout features for me. The new, beefier front-end and updated design at the bottom bracket area are also nice touches.
I'm definitely considering picking up the 9.9 XX1 AXS model for myself. The carbon wheels and all the high-end components make it worth the price tag in my opinion.
What do you guys think? Are you as impressed with the new Fuel EX as I am? Let me know in the comments!"
From chat.openai.com/chat>
Input:
Can you make it more poisonous and sarcastic?
"Hey Pinkbike, it's your favorite user Waki here again! I just had to come back and give my two cents on the new Trek Fuel EX. I have to say, I'm absolutely blown away by just how much Trek is trying to charge for this bike. I mean, $2,699.99 for the base model? Are they kidding me? And don't even get me started on the $10,749.99 price tag for the top-of-the-line model. Who in their right mind would spend that much on a bike?
But even setting the ridiculous prices aside, the new Fuel EX still leaves a lot to be desired. Sure, the adjustable geometry and compatibility with a coil shock are nice, but is it really worth breaking the bank for? I don't think so. Trek may as well just take all my money and set it on fire at this point.
Anyway, that's just my two cents. What do you guys think? Are you as unimpressed with the new Fuel EX as I am? Let me know in the comments!"
If you are really on a budget, build up the aluminum frame. It's $2.5k. The same options simply don't exist for Yeti and Santa Cruz - neither of which seemed to offer the performance of the Trek in this review.
I used to be a chronic bike flipper just because it was fun to swap bikes out but nowadays unless you have money to burn it’s tough to justify. In particular frame prices these days are just a complete ripoff.
Like start with a trek but when the ride gets ruffer turn it into a session?
Personally, I don't think they look good and can't imagine there is a huge second hand market for expensive, carbon, one piece stem/bar's (because I would absolutely remove it and sell it if it came on a bike I bought).
Edit: it was my browser. Different one = no stutters.
I'm being told to screw off and get in line for faster Strava times & doing my local trail approximately 6" faster than last year is where it's at though...even if I have to take a straighter line and NEVER squat off the back.
they also make the front feel much stiffer and direct. you run out of stiffness on short numberd headtubes as you run longer steerer and it starts to wobble when you start riding beyond green trails
Atherton doing two stack heights per reach (+ custom) is awesome. Wish I could afford.
Hope you feel you have good options for your preferred kinematics and geometry.
Low fronts and Slack STA Suit XC... Which is anther thing i find funny, We dont climb walls so the excessively steep STA are getting a bit dull as MOST climb trails arnt vertical inclines
Body proportions, skill, flexibility, and terrain all matter. We should all have options. But I do believe lower better weights a rider with the bike. Just like taller people have an advantage at basketball, if you’re lucky to get along with lower stack, it’s a plus.
But often those picking long reach with lots of spacers are less good riders looking for stability and comfort. So it works for them, and manufacturers like it, they appeal to both. Again, I get you don’t want spacers, and you have a good argument.
Trek is particularly low in recent designs. Reviewers are raving. Longer reaches require to a degree lower stacks as well lest a bike get too big. So the trend is not helpful, and that feels crappy when it affects you.
I just hope you are able to find the one for you. I went though this with disc brakes on road bikes. Not as big an issue. I’ve decided I’ll be keeping my rim braked bike forever.
Join Pinkbike Login