Ibis' 120mm-travel Ripley 29er platform has been around for four years now, and in that time it has earned a rep as a sporty feeling, fun loving trail bike that's a good match for a rider who appreciates efficiency and near-telekinetic handling abilities. In that time, Ibis also offered a second version, the Ripley LS, with a longer reach and slacker steering compared to its OG predecessor, and now a new version of the Ripley LS is set to replace both models.
New Ripley LS Details
• Intended use: trail
• Rear wheel travel: 120mm
• Intended fork travel: 120–140mm
• Clearance for up to 2.6'' tires
• New, stiffer upper eccentric
• 2x and 1x compatible
• Frame weight: 5.9lb w/ Fox Float DPS EVOL
• MSRP: $2,999 USD (frame w/ Fox Float DPS EVOL)
If
you've read any of my words on Ibis' short-travel trail bike, you probably already know that I'm a fan of its on-point steering and firecracker personality, two traits that make the Ripley stand out in a sea of bikes that are all about being long, slack, and possibly too forgiving. Thankfully, Ibis isn't mucking with any of that stuff, but rather going after two areas where the design can be improved: tire clearance and rigidity.
Short-travel and wide, 29'' rubber is a recipe for fun, and the third-generation Ripley receives a new swingarm that allows for 29'' x 2.6'' Schwalbe rubber and Maxxis' 2.5 WT tires to fit. Having run wide tires and Ibis' own 941 wheels on the previous two versions of the Ripley, I'm well aware that there wasn't much space between the rear tire and the frame, and a bit of sticky mud could easily gum up the works. The increased clearance should put an end to that, while also letting riders add some forgiveness to the bike by going with the high-volume tires. Prefer a fast rolling, hummingbird of a bike? Then go with a set of 2.35'' (or slimmer) tires. Looking for more smash-and-dash? A set of big Schwalbes or Maxxis WT tires should do the trick.
| Since we originally designed the Ripley, 29er wheel and tire technology have continually and dramatically improved. We upped the clearance with the launch of the Ripley LS. Now that tire manufacturers are coming on strong with 2.6" offerings, we decided it was time for another update, making the Ripley LS even more versatile.—Scot Nicol, Ibis |
The updated bike also receives a new upper eccentric (and clevis) with a wider stance to improve lateral rigidity—the Ripley has never been the stiffest bike out there—and there are two new 'Vitamin P' and 'Ti-Ho Silver' color options.
The new Ripley, which will continue to be called the LS, will replace the current OG and LS models, and it will also feature the same geometry as the current LS. MSRP for a frame and Fox Float DPS EVOL shock is $2,999 USD.
MENTIONS:
@ibiscycles
I rode a large Mojo with an 80mm stem. It climbed great but was unnerving on the descents. Almost bought an XL HD3, but opted for a large Nomad, and am not looking back. It doesn't climb as well, it's not as playful, but the steeps are way more fun when you don't feel like the bike is fighting against you.
@ everyone: Reach cannot be considered without stack. A change in stack height has about a 40% impact on effective reach. To compare one reach to another, you must choose a standard stack and do some math to normalize the reach to this stack.
I don't want to seem pedantic, but these often overlooked variables can make over a sizes' worth of difference to the geometry.
Having said that I don't believe stack height changes can produce a 40% change in reach. If the head tube angle is 60 degrees and I add a 1 inch spacer, that reduces reach by half an inch. If my original reach was 18 inches, then my new reach of 17.5 is over 97% of my old reach of 18.
Most of the various alterations one makes in adjusting geometry like this tend to produce very low changes in the original values, hence why they actually make for pretty good measurements.
It wouldn't make much sense to say an arbitrary change in stack automatically produces a 40% change in reach!
DOH!!!
Same with steep head angles. Everyone has to have a slack angle these days but if you're picking through slow speed roots, rocks, and chunder the steeper angle is nice and manoeuvrable. Easy to pick up the front end with a steeper HT angle, too, making jumps, wheelies, and manuals all the easier.
I've got both kinds of bikes and I'm not so sure the newer geometry is actually better.
My mate has a Nomad and it is incredible, but it is less of an all round bike than the Hd3. If I lived in Whistler it would be a no brainer, but for the stuff round here I think it is perfect. Horses for courses and all that.
Minor adjustments are attempts to fix annoyances, and many minor adjustments eventually reveal root causes, which are then addressed head-on for real progress. Just look at what 5 years of "marginal improvements" to suspension has done--let alone suspension kinematics and geometry. Let the engineers make marginal improvements and ride their bikes every day, upgrade your bike every 2-3 years to take advantage of now meaningful progress, and quit b*tching.
I've tried a few and it doesn't suit my riding style, At 50 I'm not going to adapt to weigh the front end style that LS requires. I've been riding with the weight further back since my Schwinn BMX with Tuff wheels.
I'm so glad I snagged an OG Ripley V2 when CC accidentally listed them for $1850 for a few hours.
With the current trend I won't be buying a new bike anytime soon. Hated what SC did to the Tallboy as well.
Yes we all like going fast but the longer and slacker we go the less suited the bike is to trails that aren't nuts fast or technical. Aren't we allowed to choose a bike based on what trails we ride and what handling traits we want any more?
It's going to be XC race machine or a L&S bike.
Makes no sense.
And they're shit Plus tires.. 2.8" Minions destroy any 29" tire.
Just because you like plus doesn't mean anything. Many people think they suck, which they do -FACT.
How something that gives grip that no suspension system can come close to can hardly be said to suck.
I went through all this shit years ago with 29" with the clueless kids on here saying they're only good for XC and all that crap. I see guys who have never ridden a Plus bike go into the shop and immediately discount them even though they haven't even ridden one. I'm not saying they're the be all and end all but they're pretty bloody funny to ride and in the right conditions, like loose and blown out, nuts fast.
I know it's hard for some people to understand what they dearly love is thought of as shit by others. It may increase traction, but that has never been an issue for me. It does give a very vague feeling though and that I can't stand.
Demoed the LS version, didnt like it as much.
Sorry but this doesn't look innovating. Tire clearance was def an issue on the original Ripley but they should have fixed it in V2.
Looks like you can't even run it with 27.5+ tires (correct me if im wrong)
Was hoping for this 3rd gen Ripley to have 130-135mm rear travel, 16.9" Chainstays... 120mm with 17.5" chainstays just isn't competitive in 2017. Bummer.