Remember the wild-looking, 190mm-travel
Voima e-bike that debuted last summer? Pole is now ready to release the Vikkelä, a mountain bike version featuring the same dual-link suspension system and polarizing appearance, but without the motor and battery. Just like some of their other bikes, the aluminum frame is CNC machined in two halves from a chunk of 7075-T6 billet aluminum and bonded together, and the entire thing is manufactured at their factory in Finland.
Despite having as much travel as some downhill bikes, Leo Kokkonen, the company's founder and CEO, says that it's agile and pedals well enough to be a "hard-hitting" trail bike for some riders. In fact, Vikkelä is a Finnish word meaning nimble or agile.
Vikkelä Details• Intended use: Enduro
• Travel: 190mm
• Frame material: CNC aluminum
• Sensei dual-link suspension
• Head angle: 63.5°
• Seat angle: 80°
• Internal routing
• Weight: TBA
• MSRP: €3218 (frame w/ Cane Creek Kitsuma Air or RockShox SuperDeluxe Ultimate), complete bikes from €4508
• More info:
www.polebicycles.com Vikkelä Frame Details If you're thinking that the Voima and Vikkelä look similar, it's because Pole set out to create two different bikes from one platform. The former is made to accept a 725Wh battery and motor, while the bike pictured here gets a smaller downtube, a slimmer area around the bottom bracket, and is sleeker overall than the e-bike. Pole isn't talking frame weights yet and they generally don't set out to make light bikes, but they are claiming that it'll be lighter than the older Stamina.
Cable routing is internal, with fairly large openings at each end that are covered by rubber grommets for the lines to pass through. To keep them from rattling inside the downtube, Pole inserts a large section of foam tubing that runs its entire length, but it's actually used to hold the lines against the inside face of the frame rather than the lines being run inside of the foam. While it seems a bit basic for such an exotic-looking machine, Kokkonen says that it's simpler and lighter than a tube-in-tube approach.
Pole did make a prototype Vikkelä with downtube storage but decided against putting it on the production bike. That said, Pole being Pole, you can fit two bottles inside the front triangle and another on the underside of the downtube. There's also a keyed chain guide interface around the threaded bottom bracket that lets you spec Pole's own super light guide or an ISCG-05 adapter to fit something else.
Another thing to mention is that you can choose from two different pivot axles (pictured below) that Pole says have a massive effect on swingarm rigidity. The left and right sides of the swingarm are two separate pieces rather than one, and the bike is offered with standard axles or, if you're racing or are a relatively heavy rider, you can get it with 'Race Axles' that add 70-grams and 30-percent more rigidity. Why not sell the frame with the stiffer axles as standard? "We have learned that stiffer is only better for some. Most riders are better off with a more compliant frame. A Stiff frame is something that does not give in and is not easy to bend. A very stiff frame would mean a bike that is very accurate in turning at high speeds and is not so forgiving of the mistakes we make. We have learned that a nimbler rear triangle is easier to corner at low speed. Overall the bike is more tolerant of errors and more comfortable."
Suspension The Vikkelä uses a co-rotating, dual-link layout to deliver its 190mm of travel, and it looks drastically different from pretty much anything else out there aside from the Voima. In fact, Pole says that both bikes get the exact same swingarm and same kinematics, despite only one of them having a motor. And while Pole released the Voima last year, the Vikkelä was actually born before the e-bike: ''We started the process by creating a normal version to test the suspension,'' Kokkonen said. ''We wanted to develop the new linkage system on a normal bike to avoid the added weight compensating for the suspension design.''
Pole calls the dual-link design Sensei suspension, and says that it supplies an anti-squat number that, "hovers slightly over 100% at sag, no matter what gear you are in." It's also said to begin with a high leverage ratio for more active suspension but offers more than 30% progression through its travel, a relatively big number. All that comes together, according to Pole, to make the 190mm-travel Vikkelä pedal so well that it could be a "hard-hitting" trail bike for some riders. "Our urge to explore new ways and challenge the status quo has led us to an insight that some of the textbook kinematics are not perfect. Roughly there are two ways of determining anti-squat values in the kinematics textbooks. We know that neither of these theories works 100% on bicycles. We have developed our way of building our kinematics."
n
"We have learned that long-travel bikes can pedal as good as short-travel bikes. I believe that Voima and Vikkelä are even more efficient than many shorter-travel bikes because we need to be very accurate on the kinematic."
Can a 190mm-travel aluminum monster make a good trail bike? The answer obviously depends on where you are and what you're doing, but we'll be getting a Vikkelä soon to find out more. Leo has surprised us in the past...
Geometry With the same travel and kinematics as the e-bike, and both being based on the same basic frame layout, it's not a surprise to see that the Voima and Vikkelä also share the same geometry. That means four sizes and a longest reach option of 535mm on the 'K4' which translates to an extra-large. The K3, or medium, gets a 480mm reach, while the smallest starts at 450mm. All the bikes get a 63.5-degree head angle, steep 80-degree seat angle, and 455mm chainstays.
As on the Voima, this bike also has zero bottom bracket drop, with Kokkonen saying that it means that it, "doesn't want to stand up when you hit the corners," and really helps the bike's agility despite having so much suspension travel.
Want to know more about Leo Kokkonen and what Pole is doing? Below, I chat with him about production challenges, carbon and aluminum, geometry, and a whole bunch more.
THE PINKBIKE PODCAST // EPISODE 143 - POLE'S LEO KOKKONEN ON RECYCLING, INTERNET COMMENTS, & E-BIKE BATTERIES
Sept 8th, 2022
No carbon, no welds, but definitely some glue, batteries, and controversy.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douche
Just saying.
But in principal, I agree, it’s kinda like Portland which must be implied by a which side of the Mississippi (or Rockies?) you live on.
What were we talking about again?
Sam Hill is IMO one of the greatest dh riders of all time. But yeah if he started a wc dh race these days, on any bike you care to give him, he probably isnt going to podium. Sadly.
I say well done, Leo!
Otherwise, this bike seems like a bit of a home run - and very progressive in terms of suspension quantity, kinematics and geometry. And the price is bordering on reasonable!
And yeah he is not EWS Top 30 fast all the time (but is occasionally) but fast enough to consistently win or podium in Masters at a brutal five day stage race.
So yes he can pedal around Madeira and win race stages for five days in a row on a 190 mm travel bike. And there are some lung busting leg melting long climbs in Madeira.
The photos show a Flight Attendant suspension system fitted which certainly helps on a long travel bike (significant energy savings on transfers and climbs) - if it makes a consistent 5% difference on my Norco Sight (170 front/ 155 rear) then it probably does the same or slightly more on a 190 mm travel bike.
Being Pole is won't be the lightest but it will handle well and be extremely capable.
Short story is that he knows how to race and handle a bike and he is a total OCT perfectionist.
It will be a good bike and hopefully they are through their development, growth and communication problems that have not shown them in the best light in the past couple of years.
That said, this bike really checks a lot of boxes in my eyes: gobs of suspension that is seemingly useful as a daily-driver if you like enduro-ish trails, end-of-the-road geometry numbers, cool manufacturing process, reasonable price and weight.....
...but that seatstay is hideous. Just machine a better, swoopier shape. There is nothing about the design that would prohibit you from doing this; fairly simple piece.
As for chainstays... I'm incredibly happy with the super sorry chainstays on my Polygon Siskiu T8 and I ride a size large 29er. And it seems quite a few brands with excellent designers disagree on that topic.
And I'm going to seriously consider a Pole for my next bike in a few years. I love the fresh thinking, the wild looks and you know how good an accent color will look with that gold? Booyah!
high stack and lower rise make the Steering and front feel alot more confident. - hence the arguements
Look at riders on trials bikes, they need way, way more precision and they use crazy high rise bars.
I just wonder if anyone can really feel that difference especially if we're 35mm. And I realize I'm arguing on the internet so I'll stop there. ;-)
I can feel a considerable difference between my 15mm rise bars and the 35mm bars, both bontrager etc. both 35mm clamp.
If you cant feel a differnce between bar heights, especially big jumps in rise.. then maybe the details arnt for you.
It ain’t pretty, in fact it’s the ugliest e bike I’ve ever laid eyes on
I’ve got a 150 stumpy evo and a 170 enduro and if anything the enduro pedals a little better.
Suspension is designed to absorb energy, some of that energy would otherwise be converted into forward motion. Pedaling, pumping, landing, compressing in the face of a jump are all examples.
Better question is how much energy is actually lost and does it outweigh the benefits like increased grip and better absorption and tracking of rough terrain. I'm gonna guess it's rider dependant.
You should try taking them both to the pump track and dirt jumps and see if you can notice more difference in energy loss than Pedaling
I mean it looks like the axle path might be a little bit rearward initially, but is it really that rearward?
Seems the rear axle doesn't travel that much backwards. I like the suspension layout!
Here are some opposing points of views. Extra travel rarely weighs (significantly more), but still enables rowdier lines and gives a larger margin for error. At the same time, if the extra travel does not pose lower pedaling efficiency what's there not to like? More is more as they say.
Of course, there's a limit to how much travel one needs and can make use of, but it's not topped off at 190mm, at least for not particularly aggressive riders. Steve at Vorsprung Suspension has made a nice video about this particular subject.
www.pinkbike.com/u/VorsprungSuspension/blog/ramblings-how-much-travel-do-you-really-want-the-tuesday-tune-27.html
Oh those crazy motherf*ckers at Pole!
Does their website show something different than this article?
"Does he look, like a douche?!"
As a collector of old MTB’s I’m curious to know how well that glue job is going to hold up in ten plus years?
They should put some tack welds on the seem for security.
As for "tack welds" that would never work, once a welder has been near it, the entire frame will require heat treatment, which will destroy the adhesive.
On the flip side, you don't want to weld 7075 series aluminum, generally speaking there are a few 7000 series aluminum grades that are weldable but most aren't. If they wanted a welded frame they probably would've gone with 6000 series like 6061 or one of the 7000 grades that is weldable like Canfield use.