How light do you want your bike to be? If you're the type who frequents cross-country races, your answer might be ''As light as possible.'' Unfortunately, that usually comes with geometry that feels like it's trying to end your life the second things get a little wild. No, I'll take a pass on the 17lb featherweight, its 90-degree head angle, and all the scabs that I'd end up with, thank you very much.
Unno, that Spanish brand
who brought us the ultra-chic Dash trail bike (full review on the 7th, finally, by the way), might have the answer in their Aora hardtail frame that weighs just 685-grams in raw form and sports a very un-cross-country-like 67-degree head angle. That sounds fun, doesn't it?
Sure, it's 790-grams once you put on the axle and derailleur hanger that I guess you need, but whatever. That's still a very, very low number, one that Unno says makes the Aora "
the lightest production XC hardtail on the market today.'' For the record, Scott's Scale frame, which is often many riders' go-to starting point for their fly-weight, weighs a hardly acceptable 59-grams heavier. What a porker!
Unno Aora• Intended use: cross-country racing
• Wheel size: 29''
• Head angle: 67-degrees
• Rider weight limit: 198lb
• Weight: 790-grams
• Availability: Jan 2019
• Frame MSRP: 4,000€
•
www.unno.com Most of the ingredients needed to make an Aora frame.
The Aora's low weight is partly a result of how the frame is manufactured at their Barcelona HQ, with the folks at Unno creating the entire frame in a single mold rather than building it in halves and then gluing the pieces together.
The company has also touted using some pretty high-end carbon, too, which further helps to lower the weight - and raise the price.
Unno builds the Aora in their own factory in Spain, and they even machined their old molds.
While the 790-gram number is certainly worth pointing out, it's what Unno has done with another number that's more interesting to me: The Aora's head angle is just 67-degrees, making it one of the most relaxed pure race bikes out there. Yes, that sounds downright pointy compared to what's used on the front of bikes intended to spend more time off the ground or in a bike park, but in the Aora's world, that's slack AF. Some perspective for you: The Scale sports a 69.5 front end, Cannondale went with 69-degrees for their F-Si Hi-Mod frame that weighs a claimed 900-grams, and the Specialized S-Works Epic has a 69.8-degree head angle and weighs a claimed 890-grams.
Relatively speaking, the Aora appears to be both really freaking light and relatively slack. That could be a good combo.
Other details include a proper 31.6mm seat post size rather than the hokey 27.2mm diameter that some companies go with to save 1.2-nanograms. That means you can run a full-length dropper so you can actually enjoy how the bike handles, too.
You're not going to have any excuses when it comes to weight if you build one of these up nicely.
You know there has to be a catch or two, though, right? One of the big sticking points for a potential Aora buyer has to be its sizing - it's only available in a M/L-ish size with a 441mm reach that's intended to work with a short stem. Oh, and you can't weigh more than 198lb. And the frame's 4,000€ price tag.
I don't doubt that the Aora is pretty neat, but all those quibbles mean that most of us won't ever see one of these bikes in the carbon. So does this thing even matter? It certainly does if World Cup cross-country bikes end up two degrees slacker and running shorty stems a few years from now.
Do you think cross-country geometry is going to end up going down the same longer, slacker trail as all-mountain and enduro bikes have, or is the Lycra set destined to be sketchy forever?
www.pinkbike.com/news/stanton-switchback-review-2015.html
(Ed Haythorntwaite is a UK bike builder, has been tech editor at Dirt Magazine UK and currently works for Robotbike.co. He knows stuff.)
Either way my bike feels a lot more lively when I can drop the seat on the downs vs when I can not. If I was an orthodontic professional I'd buy this unno.
My comment was a very generic response to the question of why hardtail manufacturers keep their seattube diameters small. Not concerning carbon frames in particular. In fact, I think there is a lot to the lay-up of the material that probably inluences the ride quality. So yeah, Unno could probably get the desired ride quality even with a larger diameter seat tube. Why they didn't? I've had a good chat with Cesar Rojo here in the comment section one day so maybe he'll drop by again and clear things up .
JD-YSP36 would be your best option.
Stealth, 123€,110mm drop only.
Skittish is the word.
But hey, reality is, people are trading their life for money...gotta spend the money on something I guess...and as long as they're spending, might aswell make stuff to sell'em.
I think I just figured out the answer to life! Nice.
PS: Slick looking bike, would pedal
Live more, Slave less.
truck bed paint is heavy
You need to deal with your issue with Leo and Pole bicycles.
I do have a Pole but because I chose to buy one and then found out from riding it that it worked really well. I don't follow trends or drink the bike cool aid. I was riding short stems (less than 30mm) and wide rims (+35mm) before it was trendy.
Well well...
Interestingly, the geometry is exactly the same (to within 1mm on dimensions and 0.1 degrees on angles!) as the custom frame I built myself this year. Now if I could just find 4 grand down the back of the sofa... and they were available
Cheers
XC in 2019: Maybe slack HTAs are a good idea.
XC in 2020: ?
@stinkbikelies. no yeti doesnt make a hardtail, purely as theres so little demand
Doesn't fill me with confidence about the manufacturing quality of a frame that weighs less than most road frames....
I had my fingers burned too many times by companies selling the same old chinese crap as everyone else, but with a fancy logo and price tag to disguise its bargain basement history, to be anything other than a totally cynical bastard at this point.
A product that high end needs to be perfect. Imperfections at any level will drive away customers in hordes....
Frame itself looks nice
A good rider miiiiiiiight eke out a faster segment here or there on something steeper, but an error-free XC race (compared to a dab or 3) will totally offset any advantage a twitchy bike has over the course of a 2 hour race.
Then again, full suspension is also faster in those situations-the added weight is totally offset by the improved traction and control (and reduced effective rolling resistance).
So......what's the point of this bike? That it's possible? It was obsolete as the fastest XC whip out there before it was even a gleam in the Unno guy's eyes. I suppose it could be a cool gravel bike with some drop bars.......
Together in?
I have foreseen it.
Also, regarding what I’m smoking, I’m from BC, you don’t want to just dive into the shit we have up here rookie.
I also would really like to know what name brands you are dealing with, pretty much any brand has a no question asked policy around these days...
You might think the generic frame is soo much cheaper because European and American companies like to rip of their customers however the truth it is its because they skip all the above, use the cheapest materials available and take every other shortcut they can find.
And No, the Chinese factories do not do that by themselves. They roll differently...
I work for almost 20 years as a developer for different companies in this industry and I can ensure you that barley any of these Chinese generic products fulfill western quality or safety standards.
Even the factories that produce for Western companies often do not use the same quality on their own house brand or unbranded products.
I have seen anything from died black glass fiber being sold as carbon to toxic resins and other chemicals being used because they are cheaper.
A lot of times these factories have multiped production lines, one that goes by the standards required by international customers. Environmental, Workplace safety and so on, as they get audited. And than another facility around the corner where they do all their dirty work for cheap.
A US company cant just import anything and sell it here. Products have to be tested for chemicals for example and that isn't cheap. Every product needs to be tested for its safety or the first person that crashes will sue them out of business.
On the other hand a Chinese e-bay, Alibaba or Amazon component has to do nothing as they are just sending over a single item...
Sure, not all of them are outright dangerous but the point is you never know.
You might not believe me which is also OK but I would personally never take the chances.
QBP/Heller is a US company. Product they sell is not the same as generic China frames you can get for 300 bucks anywhere on eBay Alibaba or amazon.
Like any US Company they have to do their due diligence. They have people working with the factories, people like myself, that make sure what you get is not total crap and fulfils every standard to be imported to the US or the European Union.
Yes their frames/bikes are priced lower than other brands stuff but that's because their overhead is still lower. Its nowhere near the Generic China frame discussed here.
Stuff like this:
www.amazon.com/27-5er-Mountain-Bicycle-Compatible-14212mm/dp/B07JZZHPT9/ref=asc_df_B07JZZHPT9/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=312125954623&hvpos=1o1&hvnetw=g&hvrand=16211929717628444941&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9032090&hvtargid=pla-574552903892&psc=1&tag=&ref=&adgrpid=63589537658&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvadid=312125954623&hvpos=1o1&hvnetw=g&hvrand=16211929717628444941&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9032090&hvtargid=pla-574552903892
The reason their prices are better is they do not do Marketing and have race teams with sponsored athletes. And most of all they don't do extensive development work neither are they are they trying to innovate. Another way to offer cheaper product but still do marketing and development is to cut out the Shops. You know the guys that you expect to fix it for you if broke it...
Anyway, For an established Brand that's different. Take Specialized for example. For starters there is a team of engineers, about 10 of them who only work on mountain bikes and mountain bike specific components. There is an even bigger team for road including folks taht runs a wind tunnel some of them aerospace engineers that happen to be cycling enthusiasts and chose to work in this industry because its their passion even though the make less money than the would in aerospace.
Then there a group of people who build test mules for technology and geometry updates. They test every prototype that comes in from Asia and test them in the laboratory on machines they developed just to figure out if the product is any good. they test the first couple of frames out of every production run just to make sure they are on spec. They have a whole group of employees worldwide working on Compliance, meaning making sure everything is up to standards (anything from safety to environmental to Production Quality) They work with and at factories around the globe. There is outside labs that test every material that comes in contact with a human for chemicals known to be harmful to humans. You have to do that if you want to import and resell in the US and that isn't cheap.
Back in the day when I worked with them there was a good dozen or more graphic and industrial designers working at the big evil S and than you have product mangers, demand planning, sales, marketing, logistics, team managers and riders... all in all a couple of hundred of people working to ensure the customer get good stuff.
Yes its not aero industries, but why do you think so may people want specialized (or any other brand for that matter?
Because the brands build a reputation, they invest into marketing and development in the US or in Europe. All these people need to be payed and that's what you pay for with a brand frame.
You are right its not a magical process, its a process that requires hard work by skilled and educated employees and entrepreneurs who want to earn a good living like everyone else and that's what you pay for... I am not ignorant, I am one of them...
the 1250 Dollar Qbp or the 250 Dollar amazon version?
I simply tried to explain where the difference in price between China Generic (amazon/Alibaba/ebay), Imported and distributed (QBP/Heller) and US developed frames made in far east (Spesch, Trek, Yeti, YT and almost any other company) comes from but if that's too much talk for you that's a bummer.