Richie Rude's 2017 Steed Richie (and the rest of the Yeti team) are running the Yeti's SB5 model here in Rotorua. The team is said to feel the slightly quicker handling bike – over their bigger, burlier SB6 – works better for them on the trails of Rotorua. Richie's bike here is fitted with a 170mm Fox 36 up front, essentially scaling the bike down from his bigger SB6 (127mm rear, 170mm front compared to his 152mm rear, 180mm front SB6). The bikes have been fitted with full XT cassettes, Renthal Bar/Stem, Ergon's new GD1 Factory grips, OneUp chainring and a bunch of custom touches including orange highlights on the frame, turquoise Fox decals on the fork, and an orange OneUp chainguide. Richie had a Maxxis Shorty on the front and an Aggressor out back but rumour has it he will run the Shorty front and rear come Sunday, with the weather forecast calling for a good amount of rain.
Jack Moir's on a Prototype Intense? Aussie pinner, Jack Moir, is rolling around on what appears to be a prototype Intense 29er. Possibly a longer travel update for their line? It's good to see more of the DH'ers having a dig at this enduro thing here in Rotorua too.
Rocky Mountain New, and Newer?.
Replaced with the best seatpost out there.
still works like a charm
@andnyleswillriot the beauty of the hydraulic system is that it eliminates dealing with a cable and all that involves IMO it's a better system, but it's just my opinion i guess
Now can we talk about that Michelin tire?!?!?!?!?!?!
Seriously, Michelin needs to get back into the DH/FR tire game. I'd go Wild Rock'R2 but unsure how they perform in the wet?
That close up picture of the water bottle made it seem like it was an unmarked frame and somebody just got lucky and spotted it. But obviously with a big Rocky Mountain logo on a Teal main frame and orange 36 fork and orange coil nobody was missing that new Rocky Mountain riding around...???
Might even be a 29er wheel on that? 11:56? Or maybe that guy's just short...
It's definitely a 27.5 bike. 160mm front/150mm rear. Dealers have had spec sheets and line drawings for several months, but these are the first photos I've seen. I think Vaea Verbeeck was riding one as well as Jesse Melamed. Not sure about the rest of the Rocky team.
[bike here is fitted with a 170mm Fox 36 up front, essentially scaling the bike down from his bigger SB6 (127mm rear, 170mm front ]
[compared to his 152mm rear, 180mm front SB6] SB6 he normally rides,
ya read dont skim dude! Know that's hard for millenials...
I would not be surprised if he's got more than the stock 127mm travel, and is running a longer stroke shock to achieve it. SB5 comes stock with a 200x50 shock so will accommodate a 200x57, giving ~150mm travel.
Also, that Bontrager pack looks pretty good!
Also going on presumptions, i run a Specialized water bottle, but that doesnt make my bike a Specialized.
The same for bar width, tried 780mm (790 with grips), wasn't that bad for handling and really good for stability but with the long and low front end I couldn't do a proper and efficient bunny without killing my back. Cut it to 760mm, it's incredible how only 20mm change the game. My bike is now stable and found his playfulness back. Hell if Wyn Masters has his bars cut to 760mm why should I go wider. At least I tried and have seen the benefits and the drawbacks. I have seen so many pics in here lately of good national riders having 10mm or more of bars left each side of their hands. That's not a deadly sin we can handle that if you're hands are at the good place for you but they're pics, you have proofs. These are 20mm that could save you from being a tree hugger one day. It becomes more of a problem if you ride them too large and it's detrimental to your riding. So to sum it up, personal preference and tryouts over trend.
I do agree though that we should all just ride whatever the f ever, it's cool to look at the pros and what they're using etc but for most of us; try as wide a variety as possible and don't let anyone tell you what you should be doing.
Same goes for technique to some degree, there are ways and means that are accepted as a good way to corner (for example) and rightly so but if you look at the pros some of the best and some of the most exciting riders don't always necessarily do it by the book.
Have you seen Bryceland trying Greg's bike in one of santa cruz video a the beginning of last season? He couldn't even wheelie and looked like a total goon.
I do love technique and bike checks and I noticed that they all tried to go longer and larger but a lot are slowly going back and narrower like between 760 and 780mm. Gee went far concerning reach when he was on GT and admitted it was counter productive at a pount.
@ThomDawson
I do get what you mean cause I'm coming from a Cannondale Jekyll with 425mm of reach and 740mm bars and going longer at 6'1" (460mm of reach) was a huge step for the better. I litteraly used to have my head above the front wheel and had no room for mistakes. It was a dirt sampling fest to often for my taste .
All I'm saying is don't go wider and longer because you or your friend have seen Peaty go super wide and extremely long. It won't necessarely work for you. Try friends bike and see what's comfortable and the more efficient for you.
To me every brands should just do the Commencal way, adjustable reach with cups and size should be made as the M with the longest cup should be close to an L with short cups, but I get it's difficult with forks tube standards and all. And for DH bikes, adjustable stem would be a plus, that's what's mounted on the Glory and tha'ts really cool (40mm to 50mm). The feel is really different from between the shorter and longer position. Steering is different and weight distribution also. Yes, I'm quite finicky, lol!
In all seriousness I always thought having your tube stuck to the frame was asking for trouble, either by what's been thrown up at it or what ends up transfer in to the tyre once used. Is a back pack really that hard to wear?
Not to mention it's ORANGE
I notice(d) it looks an awful lot like an open-face MX variant(full ear coverage).