Words: Samuel McMainA love for riding and our relationship to the places where we do it is somewhat of a rolling dichotomy (pun intended). Mountain biking, as a consumer-centric industry, has very real impacts on the environment; we love our gear, our upgrades, our tech, and not to be forgotten, our travel (pun also intended). Bikes these days are somehow considered outdated if they’re more than a few years old, and that’s not to mention consumables, gear upgrades and romanticized road trips. Needless to say, our sport affects our environment, the most obvious sources being industrial and consumer waste.
But it’s not all bad, and we’re not here to tell you
not to go buy a new bike,
not to lube your chain or not to get out for a two-wheel vacation this summer. But, there are ways to do it while attempting to limit its environmental impacts. I'm highlighting a few brands for their efforts around impact reduction here—but it’s by no means an exhaustive list. Rather, think of it as a stepping-off point.
PNW Components | Refurbished Dropper PostsPNW Components makes excellent dropper posts (among quite a few other mountain bike goodies), that you can also buy refurbished. Getting the correct dropper post for your bike can be tricky as sizing isn’t as straightforward as ‘choose the drop you want.’ When a dropper gets returned, PNW refurbishes it and resells it for a hefty discount under its “PNW Cycled” sub-brand. There’s usually pretty limited stock, but you never know if you’re going find just the post you need. PNW also refurbishes its Loam Lever, which seems to usually be in stock and costs $20 less than buying it new.
PNW has also moved to make all customer purchases carbon neutral through Cooler, and puts a portion of the profits toward clean energy. You can read more about that here.
Visit PNW Cycled
here.
Used GearThere's a reason that Reduce and Reuse are the first two of the three Rs we all learned in elementary school. It's great that some brands are trying to minimize their impacts, but the most environmentally friendly bike gear is the stuff you already have—or that you can buy used. We love the latest and greatest, but it takes more resources and produces more waste to build a new bike than to maintain a used one.
Allow us to promote our own
BuySell classified pages here, where there are nearly 100K listings for bikes and parts right now. The model year cycle of new bikes keeps churning, but that doesn't mean you need to take part in it directly.
Alternatively, if you want more support and less risk, a certified pre-owned service like The Pro's Closet is worth a look. They buy and resell used bikes, with each bike getting inspected, cleaned, and tuned before going back out the door.
Visit The Pro’s Closet
here, and Pinkbike's BuySell
here.
Patagonia | All Things Sustainable SoftgoodsThe brand has long been a leader for an environmentally conscious business model, incorporating their ethos into every part of the company. Over the last few years, Patagonia has developed a line of mountain-bike-specific clothing and softgoods, complete with hard shells, hip packs, shorts, jerseys and even bib-liners.
To explain everything that Patagonia does to justify its environmentally conscious branding would take more than the 200-ish words allotted to each section of this listicle. So instead, we’ll hit you with some numbers that Patagonia publishes on its
website: 100 percent of its electricity needs in the U.S. were met by renewable sources, 64 percent of fabrics used this season were made with recycled fabrics and 56,000 garments were repaired. That last one is pretty neat. Patagonia will repair your gear, saving you from tossing what you have and buying a whole new piece. There’s also a section of their online store for used gear, Worn Wear—according to recent
research, buying second-hand does have a positive impact on sustainability and the environment.
Visit Patagonia
here.
Guerrilla Gravity | Revved CarbonNo doubt most of you have heard about the new-fangled carbon bikes being produced by Guerrilla Gravity (GG). The brand once synonymous with brawler-worthy alloy shred sleds made waves a few years back with its introduction of Revved carbon, a new kind of carbon fiber (to the bike industry) that isn’t made by traditional methods, or using traditional materials. There’s a lot to unpack about Revved, but here are some main takeaways. First, it’s claimed to be stronger (in some ways) than ‘regular’ carbon fiber, so in theory, you’re less likely to damage your frame and need to replace it. But more importantly, Revved is cost-effective to recycle, as is the excess material left over during the frame’s manufacturing process.
GG touts quite a few other ecological benefits, including reduced air pollution (minimal sanding required for finish work) and a shortened supply chain (frames are made and raw materials sourced in the U.S.). Across its lineup of bikes, GG reuses the same front triangles across the line, swapping shocks, links and rear triangles to differentiate between models. This reduces upfront manufacturing costs while also allowing customers to swap bikes, or effectively have two bikes, with less effort and waste than buying a whole new or second bike.
Visit Guerilla Gravity and Revved carbon
here.
Bjorn | Recycled GripsIt might seem like a small fry when compared to some of the big-ticket items in this list, but Bjorn’s pair of ODI-collab grips are made from 100-percent recycled rubber. We’re not even talking percentages, really, the grips have no virgin rubber in them. Even better is where that rubber comes from—the waste from ODI’s grip factory. The post-industrial TPE rubber waste from ODI is collected and re-molded into Bjorn’s grips.
Bjorn’s grips are made in the U.S., at ODI’s headquarters, as a bonus for the North American folks here, and Bjorn goes the extra mile of purchasing carbon offsets for unavoidable waste or emissions produced in the process of making the grips.
Visit Bjorn
here.
Chris King | Hubs and HardgoodsWe’ve all heard the buzz, that swarm of angry bees coming down the trail. But the hub isn’t really what’s important about Chris King, rather it’s how that hub was made and what that process proved.
In manufacturing and milling, there needs to be a coolant for the machine bits. Usually, it’s water, not oil, due to water’s higher specific heat and better cooling ability. But there’s a big environmental concern with using water in machining. Water gets foul with bacteria and eventually becomes hazardous waste. Oil, on the other hand, has a lesser capacity for heat but can be reused and recycled—if you can get it separated from the alloy chips that are also a waste product of milling and machining. Chris King not only has managed to efficiently make that separation, but they also managed to make it profitable and more sustainable. They crush the oil-covered chips in what’s essentially an industrial trash compactor, forcing out remaining oil for collection. At the same time, the now crushed-chip block of metal is superior to loose chips in that more of it is retained during smelting for recycling, which means Chris King can sell it for a higher price. The reclaimed oil can be filtered and reused in the machines over and over. The whole process is a win/win, not a zero sum game that most associate with ‘green practices’ in industrial applications.
It took Chris King decades to land on this method, but it is a method that not only makes its business more profitable but also helps the environment. It’s an example of a positive melding of smart business and environmentalism in a forum where the two are usually mutually exclusive. Chris King proved that’s not always the case, and last year the company was recognized for their efforts with a B-corp certification. You can read more about what that means
here.
To see their product range visit Chis King
here.
Recyclable Carbon WheelsWhile Guerrilla Gravity holds status for making recyclable carbon frames, several companies are now offering carbon rims that are more easily recycled, including Revel, Evil, and Chris King. All three of those companies are getting their rims from CSS Composites, based in Ogden, Utah.
The 'FusionFiber' rims use thermoplastics instead of a traditional resin in curing the carbon strands together. To be clear, that explanation is grossly oversimplified, used to highlight the major differences in the processes when compared to traditional carbon layup. The manufacturing requires less labor and time, and they’re reportedly more durable and compliant than if they were made from regular carbon fiber. Each company uses their own rim molds to achieve their desired attributes, but the basic manufacturing process is the same.
More importantly, though, when the rim does reach the end of its life, it won’t break down into tiny little eco-harmful pieces. Rather, the “thermoplastics” can be reheated and the rim broken down into a material that can be forged into a new carbon fiber creation. It won't be a wheel, but it won’t be modern art in a landfill either. Technically, it's downcycling, which is a form of recycling.
Want to see more? Visit
Revel Bikes,
Evil, or
Chris King.
Pembree | Recyclable PedalsA small U.K.-based company that only makes two products, both pedals, Pembree sets itself apart as an example in putting as much emphasis on their environmental impact as they do their products. Pembree warranties their pedals for five years (two years on bearings) and, after that, offers store credit for your beat-to-sh*t pedals when they eventually do reach the end of their lives. Pembree wants the pedals back for recycling purposes, since they have the ability to recycle parts of the pedals, like seals, that normally would just get tossed in the bin. What other company offers that sort of service?
Pembree is 100-percent carbon-balanced, through
TEMWA, as well as 100-percent run on renewable energy sources. It has also taken steps to render all shipping carbon-neutral and packaging 100-percent made from recycled materials—also plastic-free. The downside? Supporting all that will cost you around $200 pair.
Head over
here to check Pembree out.
Redwood Material | Battery RecyclingRedwood Materials is a Nevada-based company that specializes in the disposal and recycling of lithium-based batteries—think e-bike batteries. It has worked with some pretty big names in the past, like Tesla, Amazon and Nissan, in developing methods for recycling lithium batteries, which we know is a growing concern for the cycling industry’s e-bike sector. What happens to an e-bike battery when it doesn’t hold a charge anymore? Usually, it’s sent overseas for smelting, not specifically recycling. Redwood seeks to process used batteries with recycling first and foremost—see the difference? One major brand that sees the benefits of recycling is Specialized, which is looking to process all its reclaimed batteries from e-bike customers through Redwood. Looking into the future of our sport, which will include e-bikes, having such a prominent company commit to a U.S.-based recycling program is promising.
Want to learn more about Redwood Materials? Maybe you have a dead battery that needs disposal? Check them out
here.
269 Comments
Just buy less.
The average American eats 220# of meat annually, up 10% from 2018.
Perhaps, we need to look more closely at all forms of consumption?
We don't all bike, but we all eat food ...
Humans are exceeding the carrying capacity of the planet. We can act like we're going to think our way out of this problem by inventing fancy things, but realistically we all know those efforts will only slightly delay the inevitable. We can all jerk ourselves off and pat ourselves on the back because we bought a Patagonia jacket and "did our part," but the only realistic solution to global environmental issues is to reduce the number of people on the planet.
And I'm not saying this as some sort of "holier than thou" lecture. I have two kids. I drive a gas car. I have a bunch of bikes. I am very clearly part of the problem. I'm just stating the realistic truth.
In many parts of the world people still live less consumptively and closer to the nature and if we all moved back toward that the earth could meet all our needs.
Is that possible anytime in the near future (almost certainly not) if at all (I don't know), but it is still worth noting.
Part of the issue is that we’re living so much longer. If it weren’t for modern medicine, people would still be dying of “natural causes” at age 35 and the population would be well under control.
www.eia.gov/energyexplained/energy-and-the-environment/where-greenhouse-gases-come-from.php
www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-energy-data-explorer
www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions
Not only would simpler living eliminate human harm to the planet but would also help with our spiraling out of control societies. When humans elevate themselves above nature and no longer respect its design and laws, we feel God like and start to remake the rules the way we think they should be. Eventually nature will win.
I'm pretty sure people here are advocating for less humans. If a billion people decided to not have kids, that would probably be OK.
And as for a billion people just deciding not to have kids… I think that has ramifications you don’t realize. Who do you think takes care of the older generations when they become too old to produce? You’re going start to seeing some of the consequences in a few years as these boomers start to age. There are way more of them than there are of us. It’s going to get tight, and that’s just a fraction of the population debt you’re suggesting.
And anyway, after all that, my point is simply that there is no reason — no incentive for human beings at all — in “saving the earth unless it’s to ensure the survival of our species. Otherwise, why bother?
I try to wear my components out before upgrades. I’m a sucker for frames every 3-4 years though.
And all the time resources are dwindling and regions where life is becoming untenable are on the increase, leading to higher population densities in some areas, then there's the affluent countries where the displaced understandably migrate towards. Most of the people currently living in these countries don't seem too happy about that, so more conflict, but the migration will continue regardless. Until life in those areas also becomes untenable.
No one needs to die in curbing population growth. If we carry on the way we're going people will die in their millions.
Parts of site 1 could be developed without the co-operation of the subject property. The land
it means a fertility rate of 2.1 or above children per fertile woman. So basically two people are having 2 kids , and the extra .1 accounts for childhood deaths. The UK for example has a fertility rate of 1.7 which means that it has a naturally shrinking population. The reason that the populations growing is in small part due to people living longer but mainly due to immigration. As others have pointed out a shrinking population is good for the environment due to less consumption. Here is a map of countries that have above and below replacement fertility. i.redd.it/weyt3ssn4yp81.png
So I agree with most of what you’ve said but I’m just looking for you to recognise that the “problem” of above replacement fertility isn’t really something that we in the west need to solve by having less kids its something for the areas marked red on the map to change. Unfortunately, investment in those areas marked red is where much of our economic growth comes from and where your pension is probably invested.
jalilaessaidi.com/cowmanure
So I agree with most of what you’ve said but I’m just looking for you to recognise that the “problem” of above replacement fertility isn’t really something that we in the west need to solve by having less kids its something for the areas marked red on the map to change. Unfortunately, investment in those areas marked red is where much of our economic growth comes from and where your pension is probably invested.
Also, for what it's worth, I don't have a pension as such.
Refuse
Reduce
Reuse
Regift
Repair
Recycle
Recover
Best is always to hang on to the tail end of technological progress. For stuff that has been around for a while you'll always see more spares and more second hand stuff available.
5th R: repeat
6th R: repeat
“It’s ok for me to buy a new bike, car, phone, etc., because the worst thing for the planet is having kids, and I don’t have kids.”
I just don’t get you types who equate children and the human race to bacteria. Seems like a clear cut case of brainwashing and frankly kind of twisted.
Or remove oneself from the picture : )
It can be planned and ugly, or planned and good, or unplanned and ugly. Pick one
Then 10'000 years later there will be 8 billion humans on the planet.
There's no point in being offended by how someone describes the human race as a whole. People only exist and have feelings as individuals.
However, what really bothers me is that fixing climate change always involves taking my tax money putting it in a country outside of oversight and regulation and then taxing me more to pay for it.
youtu.be/4mvyVUgy99A
Maybe next time
Yeah, this.
Still riding my 2017 Last Coal, and I'll probably ride it until I can't get parts for it.
Tried some newer bikes, can't say any of them felt any better, so why get a new one?
Consume less, re-use your old shit, screw trends.
This is a fase claim.
Why do you go on the internet and spread lies?
Livestock is about 2-3% of all human greenhouse gas emissions, which is roughly 5% of the total emissions.
95% of CO2 is natural, 5% from human activities and 2-3% of that from livestock.
Fun fact, the narrow focus on CO2 and not plastics, is political and economical, not about the environment.
We are much closer to killing all higher life through plastics and poisoning of all water than global warming.
You are not immune to propaganda.
Your claim that "We are much closer to killing all higher life through plastics and poisoning of all water than global warming." is also incorrect, unless you can provide any reliable source for that claim?
Patagonia is $$$ but I've got thermals that are, literally, 40 years old that I inherited from my dad, and I still use them for ski touring.
But.....if you don't know what you're looking for (and don't have a trustworthy friend who does and can help you) you're better off just buying a new bike.
"
The material is economical to recycle.
None of our waste is put into the ocean (duh, we live in Colorado).
The material is safe for handling during the layup process.
90% less sanding and finishing work is needed, minimizing air particulates.
Powder coating does not emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) like wet paint.
Working conditions are A-OK (after-work beers, anyone?)
Short supply chain dramatically reduces the carbon footprint—even the raw material is made in the US!
"
and that the material is "economical to recycle" but nowhere does it ever say that it actually * is * recycled. And just that it doesn't end up in the ocean. So..... landfill then?
Either it's recycled or it isn't. If a company doesn't say so then the omission is the answer to my question I guess
“ End of product life recycling of Revved Carbon is similar to reusing manufacturing drop, has fewer steps involved than traditional thermoset carbon, and the resulting material has long fiber lengths, increasing the mechanical properties for its next use. Because of the long functional life of the bikes themselves, our current focus is in productionizing the reuse of manufacturing “drop” in our US production environment, and we remain committed to continuously developing this area of our technology.”
This is direct from GG’s founder/chief engineer in an interview with Bikerumor. Tells you exactly how they are recycling their waste.
I'll stand by my calling out of greenwashing. Someone show me a product or set of products that are actually being made from recycled bike frames or wheels, and the facility or process that accomplishes it and I'll shut up.
But totally agreed, thermoplastic carbon fibre (and definately not epoxy based composites) just go to landfill.
The nerd alert podcast from Cycling Tips is worth a listen on this subject (28th Apr '22)
That literally says, they have been, they are, and they will continue improving on, using their manufacturing drop (aka waste) so that they can have no manufacturing waste. So yes, it does say they are doing it.
"Everything coming from CSS - Be it from Revel, Evil, King, Atomik, or anyone else using FusionFiber, is recyclable. And getting that rim back for recycling is part of the warranty process as I understand it.
I sat down in person with a team from CSS last month. I can tell you they very much want broken rims back so they can use the materials for other products. It's good for the environment, but also it's cheaper for them to use these materials instead of buying virgin materials at full cost again, so it's a win win from the perspective of a socially and environmentally responsible business. No chances about it, they are for sure being recycled/down-cycled."
This was a road trip, so the guys were not armed up with a slew of parts made from recycled broken rims, but they did put a set of really nice tire levers in my hands that were made from broken rims. Bottom line - the rims are not ending up as landfill - they are being recycled.
My guess is that they are not getting frames back yet so they haven’t bothered scaling up at this end of the system.
It's worth paying Patagucci prices when it's essentially a lifetime warranty for that piece of clothing. (Though, plenty of other outdoor gear without poorer warranty support has certainly eclipsed Patagonia's pricing now).
That said, I just sent something in this weekend, and their current repair estimate is 16(!) weeks. By the time I get the winter coat I just sent in back, we're gonna be thinking about planting the garden.
In the past, their repairs have taken 4-6 weeks. Hopefully this is just a temporary blip, and they're back to reasonable turnaround times soon.
If you've got a local Patagonia store that might be worth a try.
I will say, they managed the whole process far better than virtually any other company I've tried to get repairs from, even for high dollar items. The jacket was pretty old, definitely beyond whatever manufacturer defect warranty would apply.
But i agree that most things should be made so they're repairable by a reasonably competent owner with basic tools, and spares are available to make this possible. Dualit toaster as an example - fixed mine recently for the cost of a new element at 15 quid. Not only a good as new toaster at little cost, but no landfill, and a warm fuzzy feeling inside
eu.patagonia.com/on/demandware.static/Sites-patagonia-eu-Site/Library-Sites-PatagoniaShared/en_US/PDF-US/Made_in_China_EN.pdf
www.patagonia.com/factories-farms-mills And here's their map of where factories, mills, and farms are.
Also, their stuff fits like a TV box, but different stuff.
I DO like how their stuff fits, though. Miles better than Patagonia (at least for me).
Carbon is not going away. We should be supporting companies that are investing in ways to reduce carbon fiber manufacturings impact.
I think you might be confusing metal with plastic, very little plastic actually winds up being recycled for a variety of reasons. Much of it is very difficult to break down into components that can be reused. Most metals simply require being melted down to be reused.
Tho kudos for throwing the PB buy/sell section high up on the list, I guess.
Next tackle ethical sourcing and brands that don't use cultural appropriation.
Play hooky and go ride bikes all day
Just tell your boss, your trying to do your part, by working on saving the planet that day, and he should too!
If a company can some up with a solid bearing seal solution for mtb manufacturers / designers that would be a massive enviro saving…
“Stop riding e bikes.”
This is awesome!
Join Pinkbike Login