Knolly's Fugitive has been around in its current form since 2018, so it was time for an update. The new version of their trail-focused 29er gets 138mm of rear travel and is designed around a 150mm fork, but can happily accept 140mm or 160mm up front. Knolly also plans to offer the Fugitive with 131mm of rear travel using a shorter-stroke shock when these become available.
As you might expect, the geometry has been updated too. The head angle has been slackened by 0.5 degrees, the seat tube angle has increased a full degree and the effective top tube length and reach have been lengthened proportionally for each frame size.
Knolly Fugitive 138 DetailsIntended use: Trail riding
Rear wheel travel: 138mm (131mm option expected)
Fork travel: 150mm
Wheel size: 29"
Material: 6066 series aluminum
Sizes: S, M, L, XL
Price: $5,310 to $6,210 USD
More info: knollybikes.com The key numbers are now on the progressive side for a bike with this much travel. A flip-chip offers two geometry settings, which Knolly refer to as "slack" and "neutral" (why can't bike companies bring themselves to call it a "high" or "steep" setting?). In the slack setting, the head angle is 65-degrees and the effective seat angle is 76-degrees. In the "neutral" setting, both measurements increase by 0.75-degrees. The reach is generous too - a size large has a reach of 491mm. The chainstays remain short at 430.5-432mm, which contributes to relatively short wheelbase measurements.
Knolly retains their Fourby4 suspension design, which is essentially a Horst-link four bar arrangement, but with an extra two links that are there purely to drive the shock. That makes it a six-bar design, the main advantage of which is the ability to tune the leverage curve independently of the other suspension considerations. Another Knolly trademark is the straight and highly offset seat tube, which Knolly say has the ability to swallow very long (200mm-travel plus) dropper posts. Knolly also claim that because the slack
actual seat angle means the saddle ends up further forward once dropped, it stays more out the way when descending.
The Fugitive's frame is made of 6066 series hydroformed aluminum alloy tubing (there's no carbon version). It's available now with two build kits. The DP kit uses a RockShox Lyrik and SRAM GX drivetrain, Code R brakes and 175mm Reverb seatpost. It costs from $5310 USD. Meanwhile the EC kit gets a Fox Factory 36 fork with Shimano XT drivetrain and brakes, and costs from $6210 USD.
I will keep this bike until there is a major development. Until then, this version is perfect (except more BB height).
Needless to say this is a joke and that I have nothing against you guys
157...It's old standard 150 with drop outs. People seem to have a REALLY hard time wrapping their heads around this. Knolly also managed to increase the heal clearance by only 1mm with their hydrotubing...
Not interested in that !
Of all the two letter combinations that’s what you ended up with, come on Knolly.
But I love this bike. Wonder how it is on flowy trails
There's probably economical incentives to share headtubes between sizes too.
@unrooted You are a large man!
I dislike the look of having 12 headset spacers to get the bars at the right height, generally.
@unrooted:
Call the burns unit... We've got a sick one here.
Amazing bike. You can smash it around pretty damn hard for a 135mm bike.
Unreal climbing traction in the tech.
Yes, it’s heavy. But I am a bike breaker and I will always sacrifice weight for longevity/toughness.
I've only owned one older Endorphin frame, it was great for trail riding. The engineering nerd in me and having been very involved in the patent creation where I work got me looking into this one as I was really interested in what they were shooting for when the infringement claim surfaced.
Reading patents isn't exactly great bathroom reading material haha, but if you get a chance you should read through their awarded patent. It really is interesting the lengths they went to to show show the benefits of their "novel" idea. Much, much more to it than "better frame construction" or "general tube placement". Not a knock at you, that's just what I read over and over in the comments. I'd say a good 97% of the members haven't actually opened their patent.
But lets face it, I'm a lawyer and the engineering side of things probably goes over my head. Although I have in fact looked into their patent and couldn't figure out which aspect of the design was supposed to be a novelty that represents the state of the art as a stand out example of innovation in bike frame design.
Stock Dawn Patrol comes in at 32.5lbs / 14.88kg
I wonder how this was obtained from a design point of view, frame or just redesigned linkage?
And the 3mm gained in travel are lost in BB height.
I don't think I will upgrade just yet, sounds kind of a 'Bubka' move on the part of Knolly...
1/ Uninterested Rep (will give slack as it was 2020 pandemic crazy)
2/ Too much unnecessary boutique elements (titanium parts)
3/ Related to #2, price
You comment makes no sense. People turn to brands like Knolly because of details like this. That applies to every industry around the world. If you want cookie-cutter bland, go buy cookie-cutter bland, smile when you ride and life goes on.
Tell me more about this, DP package
Thanks Trek and SRAM!!
Sorry Knolly, i know you read the comments, but you're getting left behind in the industry. make meaningful changes.