Trek released images on their official
Instagram page of what looks like an upcoming lightweight e-MTB. The caption on their IG story reads "a new kind of e-mountain bike", and the post caption is "Dawn of a new era. 7.12.22".
After looking at the pixelated silhouette image until my eyes hurt (I really need some of that image-enhancement software they use in
Mission Impossible), all I can say is that the downtube looks a lot slimmer than Trek's
Rail e-MTB, which uses a full-size 750 Wh battery, and the motor housing looks smaller too. The suspension travel looks like it's in the same sort of ballpark, though (150-160 mm).
That suggests Trek are following Specialized, Orbea, Lapierre and others in creating a
relatively lightweight ebike with a smaller battery and less assistance for those looking for a ride experience that's more similar to a regular bike.
Does that constitute "a new kind of e-mountain bike"? Perhaps there's more to it than lightness? It looks like we'll find out on Tuesday the 12th.
Yes, some of Pinkbike's editors have more knowledge about this unreleased bike than I do. If you'd like more information on how we deal with embargoed information, check out Episode 51 of the Pinkbike Podcast.
Personally I love both and pick the e over shuttle days and for self-pedal bike parks ( trail center) days etc. Also. Riding with my little one sitting on his MacRide seat has been something that has enriched our time together immensely. While you can go with a regular bike for that ( and I have and still do sometimes) your range is greatly reduced when you add an extra 20-40 lbs to the bike.
It's all about the right tool for the job if you're fortunate enough to be able to have both.
Why don't e-bikes just stop trying to be xc bikes so hard and embrace that they are heavier than DH bikes anyways? I'm talking dual crown forks, 200mm+ of glorious coil-sprung rear suspension, and 700Wh+ batteries. Lean into the strengths and stop playing to the unavoidable weaknesses of strapping a motor to your bike.
Oh right, now I remember, maybe it's because different people like different things. Some people like a lighter bike with less assist. Other people like even lighter bikes with no assist.
If I were in the market for an e-bike (I'm not), then the lighter-weight less assist would get the nod from me. I have a job and other responsibilities, so 3-4 hours is all I have time for anyway. I like pedaling, but if having a bit of assist gets me 4 laps instead of 3, then great.
And you know what? If I really want a longer day it looks like many manufacturers sell a battery that I can leave in the car until I need it, and then throw it on the bike for another lap or two when the main battery has run out. I know, I know. You're riding to the trailhead, and then doing epic 80 mile rides barefoot uphill both ways, so a bottle battery doesn't help you. Then a lightweight e-bike probably isn't for you.
It is only two first names on a shared account? Ryan and Rew Rogers?
@igxqrrl: @d-man: But you're missing the point. What I described is practically unattainable in the market right now, even though it's the only thing I'd ever want an e-bike for. I don't see why everyone here is so opposed to having the motor help you get a full-travel DH bike up the mountain for all-day blasting. Shit, I would kiss lift tickets goodbye.
It would only take like 1lb to throw a Boxxer on instead of an Enduro fork, and another 2-3lbs to add a reasonable size battery. Doesn't seem like a lot when the bike is already a minimum of 40lbs.
There is a place for small motor e bikes. Less weight means more efficient and less battery use to keep the overall riding time the same as a big battery.
Rarely use Turbo mode in my Rail, I'd swap a few battery pounds for less power.
Norco has the 3 battery size options which to me is where manufacturers need to go.
Yes
You might not own a car, but you will still use it occasionally, rely on road transport for pretty much everything (say groceries from the supermarket are delivered by trucks). If you worried about e-bikes, you should be losing your mind thinking about the future of transport - all electric and with batteries 10 times the size of e-bike batteries. And everyone will own one, not like an e-bike. What I am trying to say, if you worry about battery pollution, e-bikes should not be your focus.
However hopefully in the nearest future graphene batteries will finally get developed/produced, so current polluting batteries will be a thing of the past in 10 years or so.
Sorry, I didn't explain myself well - I was snarkily agreeing that the downvoted poster should shut up about it. I think the downvoted poster was suggesting it is unfair that they can't promote views intolerant to marginalised groups, and the only way for society to protect the marginalised is to not tolerate those intolerant views. Hence the 'paradox'
im all for e-bikes, but e-bike and eat-bikes (comment above made me laugh) arent mixing well.
Hadn't heard about a new Levo SL - any info on that one?
Oh wait a lot of the kids out there riding regular MTB's have zero trail etiquette as well. Just need to focus on education of this new group.
I also don't think there is an immediate obligation for a rider to let faster riders coming up behind get by. Common courtesy would dictate not hogging the trail if you're holding someone up but I'm not going to pull off a tight single track in the middle of a big uphill grunt if someone is behind me. I'll find a convenient spot and make room when it's suitable. I've also pedaled behind slower riders for a good stretch without complaining.
"The downhill rider is always going to be faster than the uphill rider yet downhill riders need to yield to uphill traffic most places and that makes sense because getting started again after stopping mid-climb can be tough compared to stopping and getting going again on the down."
This is referring to established off-road etiquette in the case of OPPOSING TRAFFIC and yielding to the uphill rider. This is not directly relevant to the situation of CONFLUENT TRAFFIC of differing speeds, but is meant to establish that the consideration is the ease with which a yielding rider can restart on loose terrain, and not-so-much-the highway etiquette of "slower-traffic yields for faster traffic".
"By the same logic the e-bike rider (who can slow their pace or stop and start without issue) should be accommodating to riders who may have a hard time regaining their momentum if they had to stop to let them pass."
This is now talking about CONFLUENT TRAFFIC on loose terrain, and applying the same consideration about ease of restarting.
I'm parsing this out because it was pretty easy to misinterpret intent given the less-than-precise terminology used. I had started out responding to a misinterpretation... but then realized mid-way what he was actually saying.
I bet most of the mountain bikers don't help with the trails either.
It’s embarrassing how many people in my neck of the woods drive Raptors to their accounting jobs. I’d bet the only off-road terrain a majority of them see is accidentally driving up on a curb in the Starbucks drive-thru.
Or if I could miniaturize my family somehow maybe we could get a rav4 prime… or maybe Taycan???
Looks good too. Very interested in the performance of the TQ Motor. Great times if you're into Light-E-Bikes.
If you were on a normal bike I would tell you to do a couple rides in a harder gear than normal and see what happens.
Yep, over 200 lb rider here on 52lb bike that pushes my Rail about as hard (torque) wise as regular bike. Lots of rotational with heavier rims, DH casing tires with CushCore and higher gears (10 spd, 11-36 w/34 ring). If go all ECO on climbs can squeeze out 4k tops. All riding either hardpack trail or road climbs to mixed trail surface DH’s. 625wh battery is weak and seems to get weaker over time. Always makes me a little nervous when drop a bar the first mile or two into ride. Buddy who ways more, as heavy bike gets at least 35% more range on his Spesh Levo and rides similar to me on same terrain. Seems to be much more efficient use of juice in my opinion. I hope to be in a more efficient ebike myself one day. Have no use for Turbo or more torque assist, so likely smaller, more efficient motor the way to go like a Kennevo SL. Be interesting to see what comes out in next 1-2 years with lighter weight more efficient ebikes
www.pinkbike.com/photo/22876717
I've never rode eMTB on a single track, but I do not think I would be enjoying 25 - 26kg bike under me. Something lighter like this Trek, or other light weight MTB is probably different story. But I bet this thing is going to start from 7k
Seeecret gas cap!!
Thats it!!
its a gas powered e bike
Hopefully it’s a two stroker
braap braap
♂️ goddamn lazy dumb engineers
The truth is its only 2022 and the future looks clearly electric. With battery tech improving in what feels like monthly increments, I believe 60%+ of all bikes sold in 2025 will be ebikes.
I guessing 70-90nm light weight motors and crazy light 1000+ watt batteries in a nice tight 170mm/160mm 35lb package will be the norm in the next 2-3 years.
One day the world will look back on acoustic bike like this... i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/07/22/article-2017721-0D1DEF0400000578-126_634x375.jpg
And I sure Fred did a lot of growling at the 'motor' powered cars as they flew by too
Oh and I have three mountain bikes, but claim away. My point is that light-long range emtbs are the future, kinda of like 27.5 were, I mean 29ers. Had to listen to all the whining Freds back then too Talk to any shop here, sales are up and people are interested. I'm just saying as the tech, especially battery tech matures sales and demand will continue to rise. Just ask Transition why they joined the 'dark' side lol
See ya at the top!