Atlas Fr are stronger, lighter, cheaper, and more durable. its simply a bad question! lol But good luck in finding the Atlas in Colours....those were SUPER LTD
Saint 2009 cranks! They have the same weight, but saint are stronger and stiffer that Atlas FR cranks. Atlas FR are there in different colours, but saint is good looking too in 2009 with gold parts!
Saint 2009 cranks! They have the same weight, but saint are stronger and stiffer that Atlas FR cranks. Atlas FR are there in different colours, but saint is good looking too in 2009 with gold parts!
3421248
actually the raceface Atlas FR cranks weigh: 1010g (170mm with 36T ring, Bash Guard & BB) while the Saint weighs 1090g including BB (170mm)
Saint 2009 cranks! They have the same weight, but saint are stronger and stiffer that Atlas FR cranks. Atlas FR are there in different colours, but saint is good looking too in 2009 with gold parts!
3421248
actually the raceface Atlas FR cranks weigh: 1010g (170mm with 36T ring, Bash Guard & BB) while the Saint weighs 1090g including BB (170mm)
Shimanos BB shells are better and they have the better crank arm connection. race face didn't want to pay any royalties to shimano for the design so they came up with a totally problematic design and they know it but continue with it. plus the new saint is light and strong.. all +'s no -'s . race face still has negative's. so other than color why would anyone choose them? Maybe their Canadian and they want to support their countrymen......that would be the only arguement I could see.
We didn't ask you to show us why you're in idiot... The FR Atlast, are lighter than the new saints. Also, about the problems with RF's warranty, i'd like proof of that... I'm pretty its all bullshit.