When i tried them i was over the back at first and the back felt lazy and unresponsive (just a bit). Riding with my weight more in the middle and letting the rear wheel follow the front made things better and more controlled IMO, although it took more time to adopt to this style of riding.
This is what the bikes designer Jason Chamberlain said in the NSMB interview:
nsmb: Obviously Sam is looking to go as fast as possible but can you tell me what sort of handling characteristics he was out to acheive?
JC: He wanted a bike that best fits his style. He rides a little more over the bars and steers the corners from the front. Short chainstays compliment that weight balance very well. Cornering is critical in racing, so the low BB and short chainstays make the bike turn like it’s on rails. And the pedaling independence keeps the wheel in contact with the ground when sprinting. It’s the perfect recipe for going fast and maintaining control.
The Shocker is obviously not a good jump bike, it wants to stick to the ground! It's not going to feel to nice in the air but sticks to the ground like glue
Most downhill machines are designed with 8-10" of travel and most glue to the ground. However it is a common myth that the Shocker does not jump well, on the contrary it jumps very well and floats very nicely with a great neutral balance point where nose dive or high nose is not experienced.
Trek has fixed all the problems for next years version of the frame.
I have owned a shocker for two seasons and it has been a great bike, its a little on the heavy side but still an amazing bike, it jumps well corners like its on rails and gets through the rough stuff with ease. If your looking at getting a bike that will last days in the bike park and still be able to go "huck" some gnar drops while at the same time ripping up a dh course then get a shocker!
For next year my choice is between a new shocker or a new 951, im leaning towards the 951 as I want to try something new and try to build up a very light dh bike. Any of these bikes will be amazing so pick one that fits your budget and go with it and rip it apart.
And just a reminder how good you are all depends on you so if by getting one of these high end dh rigs you think your going to get faster than on your demo then think again.
Trek has fixed all the problems for next years version of the frame.
I have owned a shocker for two seasons and it has been a great bike, its a little on the heavy side but still an amazing bike, it jumps well corners like its on rails and gets through the rough stuff with ease. If your looking at getting a bike that will last days in the bike park and still be able to go "huck" some gnar drops while at the same time ripping up a dh course then get a shocker!
For next year my choice is between a new shocker or a new 951, im leaning towards the 951 as I want to try something new and try to build up a very light dh bike. Any of these bikes will be amazing so pick one that fits your budget and go with it and rip it apart.
And just a reminder how good you are all depends on you so if by getting one of these high end dh rigs you think your going to get faster than on your demo then think again.
90% RIDER 10% BIKE
Not really, I've taken my XC bike down a DH trail and it took me like 5 minutes longer...
for pro's the bike makes even more of a difference hahahah
Give Minaar a Demo 8, ask him to ride a trail.
Give him then a 951.
I bet time difference is less than 5 seconds. Why? Because he is a GOOD rider, he knows how to ride a different bike from almost the very first time. He is gonna ride them both to the limit.
Is the same in motorsports, and in almost every single sport. The better the rider, the less difference the machine makes (but the most importance). Give me a 100hp car and after that the same car with 200 hp. I will probably go much much faster with the second version. Why? Probably because in the stright line I will run quicker. But if you give those cars to a pro racer, time difference wont be so huge, since speed wont be determined so much by power but for physics.
At least thats my theory, and what I've seen in some friends/riders who ride pro and have riden with different bikes the same trails, and the difference wasnt huge.