Powered by Outside

Santa cruz V10 or Intense M6?

PB Forum :: Downhill
Santa cruz V10 or Intense M6?
Author Message
flag Muttley
Posted: Jan 20, 2009 at 12:18 Quote
weight'll go up by 1lb when i slap on Dual ply highrollers, and the 719's are fine, ive got friends wgho've raced full seasons without needing a replacement.
flag mr-wilson
Posted: Jan 20, 2009 at 12:24 Quote
Session 88 Dh frame inc Nuke Proof: 4027.27
09 40RC2: 3216
Elixir CR's: 511
Sram X.0 mech/Shifter: 334
Wellgo MG-1 pedals: 377
2009 Saint cranks: 842
SDg Bel air Sl Saddle: 185
I Beam Micro Post: 220
Bontrager Big Earl Stem: 230
Nuke proof Warhead bars:290
Bontrager Big Earl tyres: 2070
Hope Pro 2 front: 177
Hope Pro 2 rear: 299
XM 719 x 2: 920
DT Revolution spokes: 286
Total: 13984.27 grams
or 30.8703532 pounds

I'm sure someone will correct anything that looks way over or under. A stock Session 88 is 9.58 pounds (L)...so lose a half pound for the frame, 150 grams or so for the spring. Otherwise, missing,

Rotors
Tubes
Real Tire size (just took one)
Real post weights (taken from the site)
Stem size (lightest one from site)
Chain
Chain ring
Cassette
flag Muttley
Posted: Jan 20, 2009 at 12:26 Quote
Oh yeah sory, Cassetes a Ti Dura Ace one, rotors are G3's, posts hacked down to about 1/2 length.
flag pbuser102331
Posted: Jan 20, 2009 at 12:45 Quote
ride66 wrote:
marquis wrote:
719 is a major skinny rim i wouldnt even use them for all mountain.

719 is heavier than the 823... Ok 823 use special nipples but ..Should be close!

weight aside the rim is only 19mm inner width,should only be good for tyres upto 2.3 if that at a push.
flag stryke
Posted: Jan 20, 2009 at 12:46 Quote
mr-wilson wrote:
Session 88 Dh frame inc Nuke Proof: 4027.27
09 40RC2: 3216
Elixir CR's: 511
Sram X.0 mech/Shifter: 334
Wellgo MG-1 pedals: 377
2009 Saint cranks: 842
SDg Bel air Sl Saddle: 185
I Beam Micro Post: 220
Bontrager Big Earl Stem: 230
Nuke proof Warhead bars:290
Bontrager Big Earl tyres: 2070
Hope Pro 2 front: 177
Hope Pro 2 rear: 299
XM 719 x 2: 920
DT Revolution spokes: 286
Total: 13984.27 grams
or 30.8703532 pounds

I'm sure someone will correct anything that looks way over or under. A stock Session 88 is 9.58 pounds (L)...so lose a half pound for the frame, 150 grams or so for the spring. Otherwise, missing,

Rotors
Tubes
Real Tire size (just took one)
Real post weights (taken from the site)
Stem size (lightest one from site)
Chain
Chain ring
Cassette

claimed weights dont count
flag pbuser102331
Posted: Jan 20, 2009 at 12:48 Quote
stryke wrote:
mr-wilson wrote:
Session 88 Dh frame inc Nuke Proof: 4027.27
09 40RC2: 3216
Elixir CR's: 511
Sram X.0 mech/Shifter: 334
Wellgo MG-1 pedals: 377
2009 Saint cranks: 842
SDg Bel air Sl Saddle: 185
I Beam Micro Post: 220
Bontrager Big Earl Stem: 230
Nuke proof Warhead bars:290
Bontrager Big Earl tyres: 2070
Hope Pro 2 front: 177
Hope Pro 2 rear: 299
XM 719 x 2: 920
DT Revolution spokes: 286
Total: 13984.27 grams
or 30.8703532 pounds

I'm sure someone will correct anything that looks way over or under. A stock Session 88 is 9.58 pounds (L)...so lose a half pound for the frame, 150 grams or so for the spring. Otherwise, missing,

Rotors
Tubes
Real Tire size (just took one)
Real post weights (taken from the site)
Stem size (lightest one from site)
Chain
Chain ring
Cassette

claimed weights dont count

does this include the claimed weight of the session in the first place of 38 pounds,the fr version weighs 39.5,granted it runs saint brakes and gears but the totem is 2 pounds lighter than the fox 40,so at a guess the session claimed weight is wrong to begin with.
flag Muttley
Posted: Jan 20, 2009 at 12:59 Quote
Fr runs a full MRp Bash, which is alot heavier.
flag pbuser102331
Posted: Jan 20, 2009 at 13:03 Quote
Muttley wrote:
Fr runs a full MRp Bash, which is alot heavier.

you are the most deluded person i have met,a bash at top weighs 170 ish grammes,2 pounds equates to 1000 grammes even with the heavier parts on the fr version the fox 40 weighs 1000 grammes more than the totem,your maths dont match up at all.
flag nonope
Posted: Jan 20, 2009 at 13:17 Quote
marquis wrote:
Muttley wrote:
Fr runs a full MRp Bash, which is alot heavier.

you are the most deluded person i have met,a bash at top weighs 170 ish grammes,2 pounds equates to 1000 grammes even with the heavier parts on the fr version the fox 40 weighs 1000 grammes more than the totem,your maths dont match up at all.

2.20459 lbs. go phone converter for the last 4 digits. rofl!
flag mr-wilson
Posted: Jan 20, 2009 at 13:28 Quote
stryke wrote:
claimed weights dont count

More or less trying to paint an overall picture of the bike. Tried to use sicklines and weightweenies for what I could. The 9.5 pound frame stems from ridemonkey where two owners have both weighed their frames. The rest I agree, I freely admitted to what I didn't know or have, but you need something more than limited parts.
flag Muttley
Posted: Jan 20, 2009 at 13:34 Quote
well, the scales in the post, it might be here this week not sure, so ill get a picture. im expecting around 34-35lb's though.
flag
Posted: Jan 20, 2009 at 13:46 Quote
Muttley wrote:
well, the scales in the post, it might be here this week not sure, so ill get a picture. im expecting around 34-35lb's though.

dont get your hopes up
flag Muttley
Posted: Jan 20, 2009 at 13:51 Quote
lol....seeing as its one of the lightest frames on the market, with a VERY light build, i fairly sure i can get my hopes up?

also, dont get your hopes up that your deviants going to protect your face in a crash.
flag
Posted: Jan 20, 2009 at 13:54 Quote
Muttley wrote:
lol....seeing as its one of the lightest frames on the market, with a VERY light build, i fairly sure i can get my hopes up?

also, dont get your hopes up that your deviants going to protect your face in a crash.

lol, it will, as long as i happen to crash at 12 miles an hour on a flat road
and by that logic
your bike sucks due to its weight

 


Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.018112
Mobile Version of Website