What Movie is this for? oh and i don't know if it would work but you could make a loop to quarter, air the quarter and hit the loop again, it would be really hard but viewers would definetley be wowed by that.
Its for Pistin-n-broke's next movie CKD2 a segement is video of the day and it would be a wow thing but the loop scares me....
make a fat bowl into the ground im talking about getting an excavartor and diggin like 20 feet in the ground and make a jump or drop into it so you drop in and go all the way to the bottom and then launch out of the other side onto a nice landing or something or maybe another bowl so its like you dissappear for a few seconds then you reappear, and gap into another bowl thing. it would be cool to cover the bowls with sheets of plywood then with dirt but have lights in them so you can see were youre going but in the vid it will be like a mole that can jump out of the ground.
it would be cool to cover the bowls with sheets of plywood then with dirt but have lights in them so you can see were youre going but in the vid it will be like a mole that can jump out of the ground.
what about building like a wall ride but u would ride straight at it and onto it then it would flipover onto another bridge or something
That would look cool, but the physics of it don't work so well. Essentially that's just an ultra-steep teeter, but you can't get your center of mass past the balance point. You would somehow have to have an enormous amount of rotational inertia upon hitting the wallride (think front flip attempt), but this would push you off the wall.
So, a near-vertical wallride would only work if the wall had essentially zero mass and zero force restoring it to the original postion AND the rider entered the stunt with considerable forward rotation.
what about building like a wall ride but u would ride straight at it and onto it then it would flipover onto another bridge or something
That would look cool, but the physics of it don't work so well. Essentially that's just an ultra-steep teeter, but you can't get your center of mass past the balance point. You would somehow have to have an enormous amount of rotational inertia upon hitting the wallride (think front flip attempt), but this would push you off the wall.
So, a near-vertical wallride would only work if the wall had essentially zero mass and zero force restoring it to the original postion AND the rider entered the stunt with considerable forward rotation.
what about building like a wall ride but u would ride straight at it and onto it then it would flipover onto another bridge or something
That would look cool, but the physics of it don't work so well. Essentially that's just an ultra-steep teeter, but you can't get your center of mass past the balance point. You would somehow have to have an enormous amount of rotational inertia upon hitting the wallride (think front flip attempt), but this would push you off the wall.
So, a near-vertical wallride would only work if the wall had essentially zero mass and zero force restoring it to the original postion AND the rider entered the stunt with considerable forward rotation.
who says it has to have the fulcrum in the middle? i'm building off this sweet idea from a snowboard mag a few years back (get a bunch of wooden pallettes and set them up like dominos and then ride on top of them as they all fall down....) if you set the wall with the hinge at the bottom then if you hit it, the board or "wall" would tip over just fine. however it would just be like knocking over a garbage can at this point and would probably lose the "cool" factor... just my two cents...