I can see what your shooting for, I understand the reasons and I can see how your system would work for sure. The biggest problems I see is frame stiffness, weight and matching the 2 linkage systems leverage ratios up to avoid a nasty spike in the travel. But those are all problems that could be minimized with LOTS of fooling and knowledge.
But I’m not expert of any kind, merely a student in mech eng and precision machining.
ok, so i was talking to the guys from 2stage bikes, and they told me that they are some magor issues with designing such a frame. also, someone pointed out the thread to them. o what the heck, heres the message they sent me:
[Quoten]Hey Erik,
Someone brought to my attention the thread you mention.
Good on the guy for thinking outside the square, unfortunately there are some major issues with what he is trying to achieve, and how he is going about it, but still good on him, I am sure he will learn a lot from the exercise.
The weight I quoted you is 08 spec, 2009 frame designs should be much lighter again.
It may surprise you to learn that two of our air shocks weigh less than the one coil shock!
ok, so i was talking to the guys from 2stage bikes, and they told me that they are some magor issues with designing such a frame. also, someone pointed out the thread to them. o what the heck, heres the message they sent me:
[Quoten]Hey Erik,
Someone brought to my attention the thread you mention.
Good on the guy for thinking outside the square, unfortunately there are some major issues with what he is trying to achieve, and how he is going about it, but still good on him, I am sure he will learn a lot from the exercise.
The weight I quoted you is 08 spec, 2009 frame designs should be much lighter again.
It may surprise you to learn that two of our air shocks weigh less than the one coil shock!
Regards,
Rhys [/Quoten]
yes but one air shock weighs less then two air shock!
ok, so i was talking to the guys from 2stage bikes, and they told me that they are some magor issues with designing such a frame. also, someone pointed out the thread to them. o what the heck, heres the message they sent me:
[Quoten]Hey Erik,
Someone brought to my attention the thread you mention.
Good on the guy for thinking outside the square, unfortunately there are some major issues with what he is trying to achieve, and how he is going about it, but still good on him, I am sure he will learn a lot from the exercise.
The weight I quoted you is 08 spec, 2009 frame designs should be much lighter again.
It may surprise you to learn that two of our air shocks weigh less than the one coil shock!
Regards,
Rhys [/Quoten]
yes but one air shock weighs less then two air shock!
ok, that makes a lot more sense, now i can analyze it...
edit:
alright, its sorta floating.the thing is though, if the wheel if pulled back, it will pull on the shock
IMO this design has potential... talk about flex though in the swing arm. The angles and positions of the links may need to be changed too.
i just realized something, i dont know if anyone else sees it, but if the shock is compressed enough, it could push the wheel up instead of down when it expands again...