He has put totoms on the front and a DHX5 on the rear, as well as one sprocket rather than 2, followed by a bash guard, and of course some downhill pedals.
He considers it a "mini downhill bike". Does good down the downhill trials and still isn't too heavy if he feels like riding XC/AM.
Ah cool, so a DH rig, that you can still self shuttle in?
Yeah pretty much.
Still won't be as fast as a pure DH/FR bike obviously, but will hold up on a downhill track none the less.
A good sort of bike for people who prefer AM/XC and still want to ride the odd Downhill track.
The guy I see around made a good choice with totoms on the front because they are hugely adjustable and have some sort of travel lock thing when riding uphill. So yes, a great choice for self shuttle.
Im not saying that a 9" rig isnt both a climbing and descent capable machine, just Mini DH is sounding like its kind of "heritage" if you will, is designed to have a very capable ascending component to its design.
Im not saying that a 9" rig isnt both a climbing and descent capable machine, just Mini DH is sounding like its kind of "heritage" if you will, is designed to have a very capable ascending component to its design.
I think you guys have hit it already, but my idea is a bike that is less in travel. (160-180 ish) and then slightly steeper HT (mine is 66.5) and then light enough to pedal up the hill well enough but built well enough to handle well coming back down, not some super gnarly xc bike that you would be scared to leave the ground on..
I ride a mongoose Khyber super and It is a super fun bike.. Climbs well but takes a beating on the way down just like a dh bike would.. there isnt anything I wouldnt do on my Am bike that I wouldnt on my full on Dh bike.. some stuff slower but I would do it all..
I think you guys have hit it already, but my idea is a bike that is less in travel. (160-180 ish) and then slightly steeper HT (mine is 66.5) and then light enough to pedal up the hill well enough but built well enough to handle well coming back down, not some super gnarly xc bike that you would be scared to leave the ground on..
I ride a mongoose Khyber super and It is a super fun bike.. Climbs well but takes a beating on the way down just like a dh bike would.. there isnt anything I wouldnt do on my Am bike that I wouldnt on my full on Dh bike.. some stuff slower but I would do it all..
So the main difference between the two here:
the Mini DH is more versatile, shorter travel, has a steeper HT for a tighter turning radius
and the DH bike is more heavy duty, specific to its own type of riding, with a longer wheelbase and slightly more raked out geometry, allowing for faster riding?
I think you guys have hit it already, but my idea is a bike that is less in travel. (160-180 ish) and then slightly steeper HT (mine is 66.5) and then light enough to pedal up the hill well enough but built well enough to handle well coming back down, not some super gnarly xc bike that you would be scared to leave the ground on..
I ride a mongoose Khyber super and It is a super fun bike.. Climbs well but takes a beating on the way down just like a dh bike would.. there isnt anything I wouldnt do on my Am bike that I wouldnt on my full on Dh bike.. some stuff slower but I would do it all..
So the main difference between the two here:
the Mini DH is more versatile, shorter travel, has a steeper HT for a tighter turning radius
and the DH bike is more heavy duty, specific to its own type of riding, with a longer wheelbase and slightly more raked out geometry, allowing for faster riding?