How lunatic lefties want “INSURRECTION” but can’t seem to charge anyone with it.

PB Forum :: Social / Political Issues
How lunatic lefties want “INSURRECTION” but can’t seem to charge anyone with it.
Author Message
flag adm750
Posted: Apr 23, 2022 at 4:48 Quote
krumpdancer101 wrote:
MGT Trial where she is schooling leftest prosecutors and the judge is even laughing!!

Prosecutor: Miss Green 1776 Is a political term that you use correct?

MGT: Sorry you’re not from the great state of Georgia but as you can see on the wall our seal has 1776 in it and so yes I am proud of the year.

Prosecutor: But you use the term politically correct.

MGT: I’m a member of Congress, the number you just stated is on our great seal of Georgia and so what would your definition of politically be?

Prosecutor: Ughhh… So I’d like to move onto another subject

LMAO HAHAHAHA

yeah, I caught a bit of that yesterday. My father is attending that trial. Can't wait to hear what he has to say about it. The prosecutor just keeps trying to bait from what I've seen. "I'm going to offer up conjecture... Would that help you agree ???"

"what do you mean by 'BLM'......?" lol

typical lefty tactic.... Rolleyes
flag Matt115lamb
Posted: Apr 23, 2022 at 5:30 Quote
PACNW-MTB wrote:
Matt115lamb wrote:
Go one then ….,,what Q’s ? I’m not looking back so you’ll have to ask again !

I'll play the bigger man and appease you.

First, here is what actually started it all.

Matt115lamb wrote:
PACNW-MTB wrote:


Your beloved Pakman says, "Explicit pictures of children is not child porn." WTF???

That's all the farther I needed to watch. I think I just threw up a little.
He’s right as porn is it’s consenting adults . It fits that you have concentrated on this , MTG has done her job !

Do you still stand behind your defense of Pakman making wurd salad of child porn?

Next question is regarding your testicle tanning video:

PACNW-MTB wrote:
Matt115lamb wrote:
Nothing on the content then Rolleyes

If there was, "content" in that clip, please explain it to me.

GO....

My question still stands, explain the "content" you were referring to.

Next one:

PACNW-MTB wrote:
Matt115lamb wrote:
I’d call it a man who thinks he’s above everyone else , forgets names and expects the conversation to mean the same if you just change them around ! Classy

Please explain, in detail, how it doesn't?

And, finally, answer the following:

PACNW-MTB wrote:
What was your initial point of posting the Pakman video clip?

What is YOUR opinion of the KBJ nomination?

What say you about my response to your question?

Do you think KBJ was the most qualified candidate?

If Biden had said he was only going to nominate a white male to that position, do you think he would’ve eaten shit and be called a racist?
Would YOU have a problem with him picking a Supreme Court Judge from a pool of only white males?

There, I've properly coddled you and handed them to you on a silver platter. Let's see if you can make an honest effort to answer them.
1- I do stand by his comment because if he thinks the term child porn diminishes the sexual abuse of children being filmed, he can choose to use whatever words he likes ( free speech ) !

2 - Nut tanning had absolutely nothing to do with the conversation, it was a joke post !

3 - You don’t have to be a genius to work out if you’re having a very toxic conversation which last over a week and one party has got his names mixed up it can change the whole dynamics ! Then to say “just change the names around” isn’t good enough !

4a - The point of the post was supposed to be about politicians saying things that can be dangerous if aren’t true ie the dems are the party of pedos ! In this particular case some nutjob could take that false comment and go on the rampage , it happens !

4b - I’ve no opinion on her nomination !

4c - I haven’t looked at her CV but from what I’ve read she’s very qualified . I don’t know the individual cases she judged over or the American/state laws ( you must have looked at them ) ! If she turns out to be a the pedo sympathiser that some have stated then I’ll happily eat my words !

4d - I wouldn’t have a problem with Biden picking from a pool of white judges if there were only white judges with the qualifications for the job ! Probably not a good thing to say the next judge will be black though , that was a mistake !

The whole pedo attacks have gotten way out of order and the point of the video has been lost , there could’ve been a number of examples of politicians saying stupid things it just happened to be that video Pac-Man posted while we were talking about good and bad politicians !
flag ScaryGuiTarS
Posted: Apr 23, 2022 at 7:33 Quote
G-wiz lambchop, do you and DCA have the same crack dealer?

~JSV
flag PACNW-MTB
O+
Posted: Apr 23, 2022 at 8:11 Quote
PACNW-MTB wrote:
Matt115lamb wrote:
Go one then ….,,what Q’s ? I’m not looking back so you’ll have to ask again !

I'll play the bigger man and appease you.

First, here is what actually started it all.

Matt115lamb wrote:
PACNW-MTB wrote:


Your beloved Pakman says, "Explicit pictures of children is not child porn." WTF???

That's all the farther I needed to watch. I think I just threw up a little.
He’s right as porn is it’s consenting adults . It fits that you have concentrated on this , MTG has done her job !

Do you still stand behind your defense of Pakman making wurd salad of child porn?

Next question is regarding your testicle tanning video:

PACNW-MTB wrote:
Matt115lamb wrote:
Nothing on the content then Rolleyes

If there was, "content" in that clip, please explain it to me.

GO....

My question still stands, explain the "content" you were referring to.

Next one:

PACNW-MTB wrote:
Matt115lamb wrote:
I’d call it a man who thinks he’s above everyone else , forgets names and expects the conversation to mean the same if you just change them around ! Classy

Please explain, in detail, how it doesn't?

And, finally, answer the following:

PACNW-MTB wrote:
What was your initial point of posting the Pakman video clip?

What is YOUR opinion of the KBJ nomination?

What say you about my response to your question?

Do you think KBJ was the most qualified candidate?

If Biden had said he was only going to nominate a white male to that position, do you think he would’ve eaten shit and be called a racist?
Would YOU have a problem with him picking a Supreme Court Judge from a pool of only white males?

There, I've properly coddled you and handed them to you on a silver platter. Let's see if you can make an honest effort to answer them.

Matt115lamb wrote:
1- I do stand by his comment because if he thinks the term child porn diminishes the sexual abuse of children being filmed, he can choose to use whatever words he likes ( free speech ) !

Do you even read what you write? So you will stand behind whatever anyone says because they have the right to free speech? Weird. New question; Explain how, "Child Porn" diminishes the sexual abuse of children? (I know You THINK that is his opinion, but one must critically look at and vet others' opinions if you are going to stand behind them, no?). I understand free speech, but I do not think you do. Free speech means I can say whatever I want (for the most part, there are very few limited exceptions), not that I can make up new meanings for words and expect others to understand and/or comply with MY meanings. Sorry, it just doesn't work that way.

It was clear to me (and EVERYONE ELSE here who watched that clip), that your beloved soyboy was clearly deflecting and diminishing KBJ's track record with his wurd salad. Ironically, it is what you posted the nut tanning video about, only you were mocking the right for spin, I guess you think this is unique to Fox News. Sad.

You admitted to not knowing who KBJ is, but almost the WHOLE context of that video was about her and her track record with pedo's. THAT is where this conversation went south! YOU posted a video and didn't understand the context (I admit to exacerbating your confusion by transposing initials), I sure hope you are big enough to consider that and take ownership.

Matt115lamb wrote:
2 - Nut tanning had absolutely nothing to do with the conversation, it was a joke post !

You are either a very awkward communicator, or a liar. I think we all initially took it as a funny post, but when there were a couple of smart-ass comments made, you followed it up with a serious question of, "What about the content?" WITH a SERIOUS emoji! The only funny part of that video WAS the nut tanning banter, but you say that has nothing to do with the conversation? I have above-average comprehension of written words, yet myself (and EVERYONE ELSE) who watched that clip, gathered you were mocking Tucker Carlson for promoting nut tanning. AGAIN, you must consider YOUR role in this mess! If you just want to do drive-by, "gotcha" posts of morons who like to hear themselves talk, go right ahead, just don't expect that they will stimulate any kind of rational, academic or stimulating conversations. Those of us here that lean conservative have already stated that the MSM (both right AND left) are spinning narratives and NONE of us here are Fox Fanboi's as you keep claiming, so you can stop adding to the rhetoric by posting drive-by clips of morons.

Matt115lamb wrote:
3 - You don’t have to be a genius to work out if you’re having a very toxic conversation which last over a week and one party has got his names mixed up it can change the whole dynamics ! Then to say “just change the names around” isn’t good enough !

STOP right there! I asked for a detailed explanation, not for you to repeat logical fallacies. I'll type S L O W L Y for you; "You don’t have to be a genius to work out if you’re having a very toxic conversation which last over a week and one party has got his names mixed up it can change the whole dynamics" is a logical fallacy and DOES NOT explain your statement in any way, shape or form.

TRY AGAIN!

Matt115lamb wrote:
4a - The point of the post was supposed to be about politicians saying things that can be dangerous if aren’t true ie the dems are the party of pedos ! In this particular case some nutjob could take that false comment and go on the rampage , it happens !

NO. That is what your beloved soyboy WANTS everybody to think, but there is ZERO credibility to ANYTHING he says in the first minute of that video, it is ALL SPIN and baseless claims. As I stated before, you must vet what you hear, ESPECIALLY from those you worship. The people that Pakman is talking about DON'T EXIST (in any kind of relevant numbers). Just because you are indoctrinated, does NOT make what you believe, or what your handlers say, true. WORDS are NOT dangerous (despite you thinking so). MTG did NOT invite or incite any kind of violence to be perpetrated on anyone. It's just not there. PERIOD. FACT. END OF STORY.

Are you saying that MTG would be responsible if some, "Nutjob" (YOUR words) were to go on the rampage? Seriously" Do you even read what you write?

Matt115lamb wrote:
4b - I’ve no opinion on her nomination !

Okay.

Matt115lamb wrote:
4c - I haven’t looked at her CV but from what I’ve read she’s very qualified . I don’t know the individual cases she judged over or the American/state laws ( you must have looked at them ) ! If she turns out to be a the pedo sympathiser that some have stated then I’ll happily eat my words !

Again, the whole context of the clip you posted was centered around KBJ. If you don't know who she is, you MUST take some responsibility for the thread derailment. We ASSUMED you had a clue and understood the context of the video YOU posted. You don't have to go too far to bone up on her past, do the adult thing and go educate yourself before you start in with your incessant whining.

Matt115lamb wrote:
4d - I wouldn’t have a problem with Biden picking from a pool of white judges if there were only white judges with the qualifications for the job ! Probably not a good thing to say the next judge will be black though , that was a mistake !

You call that, "A mistake"? Way to passively answer the question that you KNOW only has one answer and clearly exposes the bias and hypocrisy on the left! You are either extremely naive, or unwilling to throw your masters' under the bus. You are such a f*cking hypocrite! You will only call out the extreme right for their spin, yet you are willing to do it yourself? For Biden to have an incredibly diverse group of available candidates to choose from and to say, "My appointee will be chosen from a pool of available black females." is just simply RACIST AND DISCRIMINATORY, yet he was hailed from the (self-righteous) left for doing so. If you can't remove yourself from your personal bias long enough to see how horrible that is, than you deserve all of the libtard comments that get tossed your way.

Matt115lamb wrote:
The whole pedo attacks have gotten way out of order and the point of the video has been lost , there could’ve been a number of examples of politicians saying stupid things it just happened to be that video Pac-Man posted while we were talking about good and bad politicians !

The pedo attacks are because of your inability to acquiesce to reality, due to your cognitive dissonance. Nobody here will try and force their beliefs on you, but if you simply won't acquiesce to reality, and call people out for their obvious bias, then you will likely continue to receive the comments. You have now tripled-down on your ignorance and stance and failed to acknowledge Pakman's bias, spin and deflection, leaving the forum to assume that you are behind them and their track record of being soft and sympathetic to pedo's. Pretty simple, really.
flag ScaryGuiTarS
Posted: Apr 23, 2022 at 8:46 Quote
PACNW-MTB wrote:
"...the MSM (both right AND left) are spinning narratives and NONE of us here are Fox Fanboi's as you keep claiming, so you can stop adding to the rhetoric by posting drive-by clips of morons.'''

Here's a huge problem with that mentality, you've nailed it in that quote. As soon as [they] find someone with a similar opinion on an issue that HAPPENED to also be aired on that network, [they] automatically attribute the person to EVERYTHING else sympathetic to the news media organization.

None of [them] are looking at how [their] language on issues is strongly sympathetic to the virtually criminal behaviors of the MSM organizations that champion [their] issues, all the time, and in strong support of organizations that cause a lot of harm to others.

Their "excuse" then is "I'm not in support of this or that or riots or harm to children etc" But they repeatedly support those that have their hands dirty in all of these things. So it's ammunition for them, even when they're way off, but try to use the same tactic for pointing out dangerous liaisons they have with their politicians and news media and the backpedaling starts the circle talk.

Sorry if I butted in and was wordy. It just gets to me sometimes, the overwhelming redundant hypocrisy that's so fuq'n obvious. I hope these folks know they're NOT pulling the wool over our eyes. We're NOT as easy to con as their brainwashed demographic.

~JSV
flag PACNW-MTB
O+
Posted: Apr 23, 2022 at 9:05 Quote
PACNW-MTB wrote:
Matt115lamb wrote:
Nope , but they’ve both moved probably to counter each other . Hopefully folks will see this as not a good thing and be draw back to the centre happy place !
Might be half drunk and talking shit mind Wink

So you don't have any basis on which to lay your claim? How do you expect to have an adult discussion with no basis?

I mean, WTF does, "But they've both moved probably to counter each other" even mean? It means NOTHING, just wurdz.

Can you provide real-life examples, or are you just spouting....stuff????????

Astro

Since you skipped over this one, what say you?
flag PACNW-MTB
O+
Posted: Apr 23, 2022 at 9:18 Quote
PACNW-MTB wrote:
Matt115lamb wrote:
Nope , but they’ve both moved probably to counter each other . Hopefully folks will see this as not a good thing and be draw back to the centre happy place !
Might be half drunk and talking shit mind Wink

So you don't have any basis on which to lay your claim? How do you expect to have an adult discussion with no basis?

I mean, WTF does, "But they've both moved probably to counter each other" even mean? It means NOTHING, just wurdz.

Can you provide real-life examples, or are you just spouting....stuff????????

Astro

While you are at it Matt, go ahead and answer this one, too. For some reason, you just ignore it when folks ask you to clarify your statements.
flag Matt115lamb
Posted: Apr 23, 2022 at 9:19 Quote
Look here pac …… if someone doesn’t like using a effing word/term/phrase they’re perfectly within they’re rights NOT to use it . Nobody is expecting others the change the words ! It ain’t that hard to comprehend is it !
The WHOLE CONTENT of the video was NOT about the judge it was about the comments politicians use can be dangerous !
I’ve never said the left don’t spin stuff ! You guys post your right stuff with a sprinkling of spin and I post the left stuff with ……………n !

Seems like you’re in for the next judge appointment with these questions Wink ( friendly wink emoji )
flag Matt115lamb
Posted: Apr 23, 2022 at 9:36 Quote
PACNW-MTB wrote:
PACNW-MTB wrote:
Matt115lamb wrote:
Nope , but they’ve both moved probably to counter each other . Hopefully folks will see this as not a good thing and be draw back to the centre happy place !
Might be half drunk and talking shit mind Wink

So you don't have any basis on which to lay your claim? How do you expect to have an adult discussion with no basis?

I mean, WTF does, "But they've both moved probably to counter each other" even mean? It means NOTHING, just wurdz.

Can you provide real-life examples, or are you just spouting....stuff????????

Astro

Since you skipped over this one, what say you?
I did say at the end I might be talking shit !
flag PACNW-MTB
O+
Posted: Apr 23, 2022 at 9:41 Quote
Matt115lamb wrote:
Look here pac …… if someone doesn’t like using a effing word/term/phrase they’re perfectly within they’re rights NOT to use it . Nobody is expecting others the change the words ! It ain’t that hard to comprehend is it !
The WHOLE CONTENT of the video was NOT about the judge it was about the comments politicians use can be dangerous !
I’ve never said the left don’t spin stuff ! You guys post your right stuff with a sprinkling of spin and I post the left stuff with ……………n !

Seems like you’re in for the next judge appointment with these questions Wink ( friendly wink emoji )

WHOA! it would seem you are dug in pretty deep on this one. I already said folks were free to use whatever they want, but they aren't allowed to pretend that they get to decide what the words actually mean (remember the flat-earthers analogy?) Don't use shit like, "Ain't that hard to comprehend", because I've tirelessly explained how the vast majority of people communicate.

UMMMM....once again NO, the video was NOT about "dangerous words", because THERE WERE NO DANGEROUS WORDS IN THAT VIDEO!!!!!!!

YOU are the one that doesn't get it! THE WHOLE VIDEO WAS CLOAKED AS, "DANGEROUS WORDS" IN ORDER TO DEFLECT AND DIMINISH FROM THE PEDO'S AND KBJ.

And if you would answer the other questions I asked regarding this, it may clarify further.
flag PACNW-MTB
O+
Posted: Apr 23, 2022 at 9:49 Quote

This one is the best of all time! lol lol
flag krumpdancer101
O+
Posted: Apr 23, 2022 at 10:03 Quote
Cassady Campbell is Hysterical.
flag Matt115lamb
Posted: Apr 23, 2022 at 10:24 Quote
He never claimed to change the meaning of any words , all he said was he doesn’t like to use them !
So MTG saying the democrats are the party of pedos isn’t dangerous ? Come on !
flag krumpdancer101
O+
Posted: Apr 23, 2022 at 10:33 Quote
Matt115lamb wrote:
He never claimed to change the meaning of any words , all he said was he doesn’t like to use them !
So MTG saying the democrats are the party of pedos isn’t dangerous ? Come on !

Maxine waters: Not as dangerous as telling someone, “when you see them in the street to get all up in their face and tell them they’re not allowed here.”

BLM: Or how about, “pigs in a blanket fry them like bacon “

Kamala Harris: Or possibly,”no justice no peace”

AOC: “The republican party now is not the party of your parents. It is the party of white supremacy”

Joe Biden: “If they win y’all gonna be back in chains!!”

 


Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.010246
Mobile Version of Website