all the parts on the remedy 9 are for XC with the long stem and jacked up seat and totally different crank set with no bash guard and different rear shock pretty well made for XC so dont tell me that its a AM bike you little 11 year old noob
damn nickkkk, trek remedy is a bloody all mountain bike!!! What are you, some extreme hardcore shredder, so everything that is not dirt bike or lower than 180mm travel is a XC bike? Do U actualy know what Cross Country is?. PPL go for a ride on a 10m wide fire road and they call it XC. U can even do some freeride with Remedy if U are skilled enough. It's actualy a pretty capable park bike too. According to UR classification Semenuk does not ride a Slope style bike cuz he has a XC rear mech, XC shifter, XC brakes, a XC chain, XC casette, XC seat post and above all an XC damper. Apparently he uses DH specific tyres!
Actually it's not completely different than the Remedy. It's kinda like the SX Supercross frame versus the SX Trail frame. The overall idea is the same, but certain things are different. In this case, Brandon's Remedy lacks the Full Floater suspension design, instead utilizing a simple 4-bar single pivot system. It also has a shorter eye-to-eye and stroke length than the shock on the Remedy, providing less travel.
All right, well you're retarded. The Trek full suspension lineup works like this: for XC racing they have the Top Fuel, for XC/am they have the Fuel EX, for am/fr they have the Remedy, and for fr/dh they have the Session.
Either you're severely misinformed about bikes in general, or you have your "travel for intended use" numbers mixed up. XC bikes do not have 150mm of travel.
good, because you're annoying little turd..... so under your line of thinking if I ride my Rocky Flatline on the local xc trails, it's an XC bike? brilliant.
Just because someone rides XC on a bike doesn't make it an XC bike. I can take a 200mm travel bike down to the local trails and ride XC on it, but it's still a DH bike.
As an aside, you're an idiot and a bigot.
Well that's fine that they're "made more xc," but it doesn't make them XC bikes. If anything they're AM bikes. You can put a RockShox SID on a Intense 951 DH bike, but it's still a DH bike.
nickkk shut up, your a complete tard and you don't know anything. your making a complete fool out of yourself. if you have no clue about bikes, don't pretend you do. this is the farthest thing from a XC bike.
If this site is too big for 11 year olds, why are you commenting on it, nickkkk? Also you do realize that you screen name looks like "Nick KKK," right?
If you're 16 maybe you should act like it. I know quite a few 16-year-olds who are mature and educated enough to at least use proper grammar and spelling and to think their rebuttals through before they post them.
You're right in that it's not English class. However, in order for me to take you seriously, you'd have to spell words correctly. As it is, you may as well put "LOL ROFLCOPTER" in between every word you type.
"Ok ROFL I LOL will LOLZ take ROFLCOPTER it LOLLERSKATES that ROFL im ROFL right LOL and LOL your [sic] LOL wrong ROFL by LOL not LOL explaining LOL my LOL thinking ROFL incorect [sic]" That's what I read. Nice try.
If you want to get technical, you misspelled "incorrect" and misused "your," plus you didn't capitalize "I," "I'm," or the first letter in your sentence. If you want to get even MORE technical, your sentence structure was awful.