bwaarp

The TR wont be over 33lb. My 2010 mega weighed in at 32lb with coil lyriks and cost 2500 to build. The frame was about 1lb heavier than the tr.

To highlight my point further for the people on here who should know better 8465.21 Canadian Dollars or 7644.00 US Dollars for an Alumiunium Kona! :D http://www.biketart.com/350086/products/kona-process-111dl-2014-red-complete-bike.aspx

That CTM has awful, awful geometry. Anyway, here's the equivilent Kona. http://www.biketart.com/350090/products/kona-process-153-dl-2014-green-complete-bike.aspx It costs 3999 in the UK, a whopping 600-800 quid more for what effectively amounts to a similar spec bike of similar weight. But you get an X0 rear mech for all that extra cash. Awesomes, way to go Konaaaa!!!! The Americans/Canucks on here should quit whining, we have to put up with your ridiculously overpriced bikes over here.

I hope you idiots realise that the price for the Pro model in the UK is exactly the same as the originals were back in 2010/2011. The frames have gone up in price, the full builds havn't. In the UK the bikes are still pretty good value, cheaper than the aluminium Konas whilst the equivilent specced Norco Carbon Range is 1600 quid more or about 3200 canadian dollars. That model comes with a lower spec Pike as well. Although I do wish Nukeproof had kept the Mega AM as a 152mm travel frame, the old one was a bit more versatile... when compared to the increased rotating mass (27.5) and 160mm of travel. The TR model is a bit to short in terms of travel and it would have been nice if it has the same head angle etc.

It reminds me of an Ancillotti just a lot uglier and worse. If you want a moto style shock setup go with an Ancillotti